Value-based construction management in a housing project: Stakeholder perceptions and project performance in Sudungdewo residence, Indonesia
Abstract
This study examines the implementation of value-based construction management principles in the Sudungdewo Residence housing project developed by PT. Kreasi Mandiri Pratama in Wonosobo Regency, Central Java. The research aims to identify how value-based management values are applied in project governance and to evaluate stakeholder perceptions regarding their contribution to project performance. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed using a questionnaire distributed to 20 respondents directly involved in the project, including contractors, consultants, field supervisors, and workers. The assessed principles include justice, transparency, balance, and cooperation, while project performance indicators cover quality, time efficiency, cost efficiency, and sustainability. The results show that respondents generally perceived the application of value-based management principles as positive, reflected in dominant agreement levels across most indicators. High levels of approval were particularly evident in coordination among stakeholders, open communication practices, collaborative problem-solving, balanced consideration of quality–time–cost, and adherence to project standards. However, several items related to cost control, resource efficiency, and long-term community benefits recorded relatively higher neutral responses, indicating that these impacts may not yet be evenly felt or require further strengthening and monitoring. Overall, the study concludes that value-based construction management has been implemented consistently and supports ethical, accountable, and socially responsible project execution, while highlighting the need for improvement in financial efficiency practices and measurable long-term social outcomes.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hermawan Hermawan, Rohmatul Aliya, Nurma Khusna Khanifa, Elina Mohd Husini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Moghayedi A, Mahachi J, Lediga R, et al. Revolutionizing affordable housing in Africa: A comprehensive technical and sustainability study of 3D-printing technology. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024; 105: 105329. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105329
[2]Sanfilippo R, Esfandiari M, Foria F, et al. ITA–AITES tunnelling information modelling—A BIM approach for a sustainable life cycle management. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2025; 165: 106711. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2025.106711
[3]Torres K, Bonilla M, Castañeda K, et al. Enhancing construction project management competencies with AI-driven assistants: A dual perspective from academia and industry. Results in Engineering. 2025; 28: 108195. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108195
[4]Casino F. Unveiling the multifaceted concept of cognitive security: Trends, perspectives, and future challenges. Technology in Society. 2025; 83: 102956. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102956
[5]Poudel N, Shaw R. Exploring household resilience indicators in the context of urban-rural linked water systems and post-disaster scenarios in Kathmandu valley. Ecological Modelling. 2025; 510: 111320. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111320
[6]Hasselsteen L, Lindhard SM, Kanafani K. Resource management at modern construction sites: Bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and industry practice and needs. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024; 366: 121835. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121835
[7]de Almeida Vittori Ferreira M, Morgado CDRV, Estellita Lins MP. Organizations and stakeholders’ roles and influence on implementing sustainability requirements in construction projects. Heliyon. 2024; 10(1): e23762. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23762
[8]Shirwa AM, Hassan AM, Hassan AQ, et al. A cooperative governance framework for sustainable digital transformation in construction: The role of digital enablement and digital strategy. Results in Engineering. 2025; 25: 104139. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104139
[9]Åhlén M, Törnroth S, Wikberg-Nilsson Å. The Design Sensibility Approach: A Case Study in Making, Sensing, and Sense-Making of Speculative Household Energy Designs. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. 2025; 11(2): 160–181. doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2025.04.001
[10]Bashir H, Musa R, Al Zarooni HA, et al. Social sustainability in action: An explorative study of practices in construction project management. Project Leadership and Society. 2024; 5: 100148. doi: 10.1016/j.plas.2024.100148
[11]Hughes L, Mavi RK, Aghajani M, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on project management (PM): Multi-expert perspectives on advancing knowledge and driving innovation toward PM2030. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2025; 10(5): 100772. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2025.100772
[12]Shriharsha, Pai JB, Hungund SS. Enhancing decision-making in construction projects—The mediating role of adaptability and response strategy in supply chain and coordination dynamics. Results in Engineering. 2025; 27: 106193. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106193
[13]Wei W, Prasetyo YT, Benito OP, et al. Influencing turnover intention among building information modeling (BIM) Workers in China: A structural equation modeling approach. Acta Psychologica. 2025; 257: 105121. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105121
[14]Wang L, Zeng Y, Xu Y, et al. The effect of blockchain on construction supply chain resilience: A mediated moderation model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2025; 16(2): 103253. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2024.103253
[15]Ahmadzai MB, Ye K. A mixed-method investigation of the root causes of construction project delays in Afghanistan. Heliyon. 2025; 11(2): e41923. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41923
[16]Chikuni A, Kumambala PG, Chasukwa M, et al. Are steering committees the governance fix in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) infrastructure projects? Scientific African. 2026; 31: e03152. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03152
[17]Krystallis I, Kalra J, Locatelli G. Orchestrating governance reconfiguration of inter-organizational project networks to address coordination failures. International Journal of Production Economics. 2025; 285: 109637. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109637
[18]Al-aloosy KFQ, Mirvalad S, Shabakhty N. Evaluating the impact of internet communication quality in human resource management on the productivity of construction projects. Heliyon. 2024; 10(7): e28500. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28500
[19]Kammer-Kerwick M, Muralidharan A, Oommen A, et al. Next practice: A trust-and-cooperation “Neighborhood” model for multi-project delivery. Project Leadership and Society. 2025; 6: 100204. doi: 10.1016/j.plas.2025.100204
[20]Aamir H, Alaloul WS, Khan AM, et al. Advanced work packaging in construction management through systematic review and socio-technical framework for digital integration. Computer Science Review. 2026; 60: 100856. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100856
[21]Roy N, Manaf LA, Ramli AHM. Socio-cultural drivers of waste management practices: A KAP-based systematic review with lessons from Dhaka and diverse urban contexts. Waste Management Bulletin. 2025; 3(4): 100251. doi: 10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100251
[22]Yang X, Ji J, Liu Y. Stakeholder-associated impact factors in the promotion of electric construction machinery for plateau tunnels: A social network analysis. Sustainable Futures. 2025; 10: 101224. doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101224
[23]Osman SMH, Yin TS, Alnoor A, et al. Uncovering the impact of supply chain management practices on supply chain performance: A hybrid PLS-SEM and ANN approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2025; 11(4): 100684. doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100684
[24]Ibn Batouta K, Aouhassi S, Mansouri K. Barriers, drivers, and practices of industrial energy efficiency: An empirical study in Morocco’s largest industrial hub. Energy Reports. 2025; 14: 693–710. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.06.029
[25]Kookalani S, Green S, Luo P, et al. Mapping digital twin applications in infrastructure and the built environment across research types, methods, sectors, phases, and scales. Automation in Construction. 2026; 182: 106778. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2026.106778
[26]Virgolino JLF, Holden NM. Towards a harmonized framework of social life cycle assessment for bio-based value chains: A systematic review and stakeholder mapping. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy. 2026; 13: 100202. doi: 10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100202






