Socio-economic and risk-perceptual determinants of wood-based modular housing adoption in Nigeria
Abstract
This study investigated socio-economic and risk-perceptual determinants of wood-based modular housing acceptance, drawing on three theoretical dimensions: economic cost-benefit perception, socio-cultural attachment to masonry construction, and perceived risk of fire and pest infestation. A sequential mixed-methods design was employed, combining structured questionnaire surveys (n = 291) drawn from a population of 1,200 middle-income prospective homeowners across five major cities with semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 25). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) established measurement validity: all standardized factor loadings exceeded 0.70, average variance extracted (AVE) values exceeded 0.50, and composite reliability (CR) values exceeded 0.80. SEM model fit indices (χ2/df = 2.14; CFI = 0.947; TLI = 0.936; RMSEA = 0.063; SRMR = 0.052) all met recommended thresholds. Multiple regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used for hypothesis testing. Findings confirmed all three hypotheses: perceived cost-effectiveness positively predicted adoption intention (β = 0.387, p < 0.001); socio-cultural attachment to masonry negatively predicted adoption intention (β = −0.291, p < 0.001); and elevated risk perception significantly reduced adoption intention (β = −0.243, p < 0.001). The combined model explained 32.6% of the variance in adoption intention (R2 = 0.326). Risk perceptions were shown to reflect public information asymmetry regarding the documented performance of modern fire-retardant and preservative-treated engineered timber. Grounded in Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour, the study proposes the Socio-Economic Acceptance of Residential Prefabrication (SEARP) Framework and provides policy and industry recommendations for advancing wood-based modular housing in South East Nigeria.
Copyright (c) 2026 Victor Arinzechukwu Okanya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Nwachukwu L, Obi L, Akotia J. Addressing housing affordability in Nigeria through incremental housing: an evaluation of the Millard Fuller Foundation (MFF) model. Cogent Social Sciences. 2025; 11(1): 2588049. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2025.2588049
[2]Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa. 2024 Housing Finance in Africa Yearbook. CAHF; 2024. Available online: https://housingfinanceafrica.org/documents/2024-housing-finance-in-africa-yearbook/
[3]Ogundipe KE, Owolabi JD, Ogunbayo BF, et al. Exploring inhibiting factors to affordable housing provision in Lagos metropolitan city, Nigeria. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2024; 10: 1408776. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1408776
[4]Vincent DA, Anaele EO, Okanya AV. Assessment of sensor technology for safety management of construction sites risks in Ondo and Ekiti states, Nigeria. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology. 2026; 17(1): 6–18. doi: 10.33736/jcest.6308.2026
[5]Okeke FO, Sam-amobi CG, Okeke FI. Role of local town planning authorities in building collapse in Nigeria: evidence from Enugu metropolis. Heliyon. 2020; 6(7): e04361. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04361
[6]Okanya VA, Asogwa JO, Chukwu DU, et al. Comparative impact of solid wood versus engineered wood products on practical skills development in woodwork technology education. International Wood Products Journal. 2026; 17(2): 92–110. doi: 10.1177/20426445261435813
[7]Liang S, Gu H, Bergman R, et al. Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of a Mass Timber Building and Concrete Alternative. Wood and Fiber Science. 2020; 52(2): 217–229. doi: 10.22382/wfs-2020-019
[8]Laguarda Mallo MF, Espinoza O. Awareness, perceptions and willingness to adopt Cross-Laminated Timber by the architecture community in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015; 94: 198–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.090
[9]Saad S, Rasheed K, Ammad S, et al. Offsite modular construction adoption in developing countries: Partial least square approach for sustainable future. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2025; 16(1): 103228.
[10]Center for American Progress. Increasing Affordable Housing Stock through Modular Building. Center for American Progress; 2024. Available online: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/increasing-affordable-housing-stock-through-modular-building/
[11]Nsude GC. The Traditional Architecture of the Igbo of Nigeria [PhD thesis]. Thames Polytechnic; 1987. Available online: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/8750/
[12]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Wood in housing in developing countries. In: Unasylva. FAO; 1971. pp. 101–103. Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/C3848E/c3848e09.htm
[13]Menzemer LW, Vad Karsten MM, Gwynne S, et al. Public perception of fire safety and risk of timber buildings. Wood Material Science & Engineering. 2025; 20(4): 755–768. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2025.2459350
[14]Lähtinen K, Häyrinen L, Roos A, et al. Consumer housing values and prejudices against living in wooden homes in the Nordic region. Silva Fennica. 2021; 55(2). doi: 10.14214/sf.10503
[15]Ab Latib H, Cheong LW, Halis R, et al. The prospects of wooden building construction in Malaysia: Current state of affairs. BioResources. 2019; 14(4): 9840–9852.
[16]Judge M, Warren-Myers G, Paladino A. Using the theory of planned behaviour to predict intentions to purchase sustainable housing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 215: 259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.029
[17]Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. Free Press; 2003.
[18]Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50(2): 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[19]Moore E. Addressing housing deficit in Nigeria: Issues, challenges and prospects. Economic and Financial Review. 2019; 57(4): 201–222. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/avacbnefr/v_3a57_3ay_3a2019_3ai_3a4_3aa_3a15_3ap.htm
[20]Ale TA. Shared homeownership and the pursuit of affordable housing: insights from low-to-medium income earners in Akure, Nigeria. Discover Civil Engineering. 2025; 2(1): 60. doi: 10.1007/s44290-025-00218-8
[21]Kamali M, Hewage K. Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 62: 1171–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.031
[22]Badawy M, Ibrahim A, Hamdy K. Estimating overall barrier to modular construction adoption in residential projects: a fuzzy-SEM approach. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences. 2025; 37(5): 23. doi: 10.1007/s44444-025-00029-3
[23]Hassan FS, Grobbelaar S. Assessing timber construction in South Africa: Perceived quality, barriers and solutions. In: Proceedings of the 18th Built Environment Conference, Construction 5.0: Towards A Collaborative and People-Centered Industry; 15–16 July 2024; Gqeberha, South Africa. pp. 264–278.
[24]Asogwa JO, Okanya AV, Edozie CO, et al. Assessment of technical expertise of building technology graduates of technical colleges in Enugu State Nigeria. Webology. 2022; 19(6): 872–882.
[25]Ndukwu S. A deeper look into the Igbo mansion tradition. Available online: https://stevenndukwu.net/a-deeper-look-into-igbos-building-and-abandoning-mansion/ (accessed on 25 February 2026).
[26]Okeke FO, Ozigbo CA, Mba EJ, et al. Beyond the drafting table: women's journey in architecture as a STEM career. Architecture. 2025; 5(2): 33.
[27]Kremer PD, Symmons MA. The relationship between timber use in construction and property purchasing decisions in Australia: The mediating effects of environmental attitudes. Sustainable Futures. 2025; 10: 101128.
[28]Victor OA, Onyekachi AJ, Ahuoiza VD. Enhancing graduate employability through the introduction of artificial intelligence in building technology education in Nigerian universities. Vocational and Technical Education Journal. 2025; 5(1): 183–197. Available online: https://votej.com.ng/index.php/votej/article/view/39
[29]Evans DH, Kanipe S, Kistner J, et al. A Fire Safety, Environmental, and Economic Assessment of Modifying Building Codes for Tall Mass Timber Buildings. Mass Timber Code Coalition; 2018. Available online: https://www.thinkwood.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/TALL-MASS-TIMBER-REPORT-2.pdf
[30]Kakkar G, Quesada H, Smith R. Assessment of U.S. manufactured system-built wooden homes as an affordable housing alternative for low-income households in developing countries. BioProducts Business. 2019; 4(4): 51–66.
[31]Zhong Z, Gou Z. Adopting cross-laminated timber in architectural design to reduce embodied carbon emission in China based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Building Research & Information. 2023; 51(7): 834–852. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2023.2212087
[32]Koebel CT. Innovation in homebuilding and the future of housing. Journal of the American Planning Association. 2008; 74(1): 45–58.
[33]Sanderford AR, Keefe MJ, Koebel CT, et al. Factors influencing U.S. homebuilders' adoption of green homebuilding products. The Journal of Sustainable Real Estate. 2015; 7(1): 60–82.
[34]Wang J, Li C, Wu J, et al. Research on the Adoption Behavior Mechanism of BIM from the Perspective of Owners: An Integrated Model of TPB and TAM. Buildings. 2023; 13(7): 1745. doi: 10.3390/buildings13071745
[35]Taherdoost H. A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018; 22: 960–967. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
[36]Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications; 2018.
[37]Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 1977.
[38]Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. Cengage Learning; 2019.
[39]Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18(1): 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
[40]Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003; 88(5): 879–903.
[41]Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[42]Munir Q, Hyvärinen M, Kärki T. Sustainable Utilization and Fire Protection of Wood‐Based Composites in Buildings: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sustainable Development. 2026; sd.70773. doi: 10.1002/sd.70773
[43]Oliveira GL, De Oliveira FL, Brazolin S. Wood preservation for preventing biodeterioration of Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) panels assembled in tropical locations. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2018; 11: 242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.032
[44]Okanya VA, Omeje HO, Asogwa JO, et al. Impact of Learning Approaches on Career Interest and Task Persistence of Woodwork Technology Students in Nigerian Universities. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. 2024. doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i10.7905






