Drone-based pothole detection and sustainable repairs
Abstract
Potholes are one of the major challenges affecting road safety, vehicle performance, and infrastructure maintenance worldwide. Conventional pothole detection and repair methods are often time-consuming, labour-intensive, and inefficient in large road networks. Recent advances in drone technology and geospatial data processing provide new opportunities for rapid and accurate road condition assessment. However, limited research integrates drone-based detection with sustainable repair material evaluation. This study proposes a drone-based pothole detection framework combined with a sustainability-oriented repair analysis. A UAV survey was conducted using the DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise to capture high-resolution images of road surfaces. The collected imagery was processed using photogrammetry software such as Agisoft Metashape and QGIS to generate orthomosaic images, digital elevation models (DEM), and pothole measurements. The calculated pothole area and volume values obtained through software were compared with manual measurements, showing a high accuracy range of approximately 97–99%. In addition, a comparative cost analysis of conventional repair materials and sustainable alternatives, including coconut shell charcoal, rice husk ash, HDPE plastic, and demolished aggregates, was performed. The results indicate that sustainable materials can reduce repair costs by up to 13.43%, while drone-based surveys significantly reduce inspection time and improve monitoring efficiency. The proposed integrated approach demonstrates the potential of combining UAV-based infrastructure monitoring with environmentally sustainable repair strategies. This framework can support smarter road maintenance planning and contribute to sustainable infrastructure management.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sameer Jain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Almuhanna RRA, Ewadh HA, Alasadi SJM. Using PAVER 6.5.7 and GIS program for pavement maintenance management for selected roads in Kerbala city. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2018; 8: 323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.01.005
[2]Fendi KG, Adam SM, Kokkas N, et al. An Approach to Produce a GIS Database for Road Surface Monitoring. APCBEE Procedia. 2014; 9: 235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.042
[3]Barbieri DM, Lou B. Instrumentation and testing for road condition monitoring—A state-of-the-art review. NDT & E International. 2024; 146: 103161. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103161
[4]Kuttah D, Waldemarson A. Next generation gravel road profiling—The potential of advanced UAV drone in comparison with road surface tester and rotary laser levels. Transportation Engineering. 2024; 17: 100260. doi: 10.1016/j.treng.2024.100260
[5]Maeda H, Sekimoto Y, Seto T, et al. Road Damage Detection and Classification Using Deep Neural Networks with Smartphone Images. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2018; 33(12): 1127–1141. doi: 10.1111/mice.12387
[6]Broo DG, Schooling J. Towards Data-centric Decision Making for Smart Infrastructure: Data and Its Challenges. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2020; 53(3): 90–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.11.014
[7]Consilvio A, Hernández JS, Chen W, et al. Towards a digital twin-based intelligent decision support for road maintenance. Transportation Research Procedia. 2023; 69: 791–798. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.237
[8]Liu L, Zeng N, Liu Y, et al. Multi-domain data integration and management for enhancing service-oriented digital twin for infrastructure operation and maintenance. Developments in the Built Environment. 2024; 18: 100475. doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100475
[9]Liu C, Zhang P, Xu X. Literature review of digital twin technologies for civil infrastructure. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience. 2023; 2(3): 100050. doi: 10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100050
[10]Michael J, Blankenbach J, Derksen J, et al. Integrating models of civil structures in digital twins: State-of-the-Art and challenges. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience. 2024; 3(3): 100100. doi: 10.1016/j.iintel.2024.100100
[11]Tchana Y, Ducellier G, Remy S. Designing a unique Digital Twin for linear infrastructures lifecycle management. Procedia CIRP. 2019; 84: 545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.176
[12]D’Amico F, Bertolini L, Napolitano A, et al. A possible implementation of non-destructive data surveys in the definition of BIM models for the analysis of road assets. Transportation Research Procedia. 2023; 69: 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.161
[13]Dong Q, Huang B, Jia X. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Asphalt Pavement Pothole Patching Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2014; 2431(1): 49–56. doi: 10.3141/2431-07
[14]Chen X, Wang H, Venkiteela G. Asphalt Pavement Pothole Repair Using the Pre-Heating Method: An Integrated Experiment and Modeling Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2023; 2677(11): 1–12. doi: 10.1177/03611981231164066
[15]Macorig D, Ristori C, Fiore P, et al. Road maintenance: Which future? Transportation Research Procedia. 2023; 69: 687–694. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.224
[16]Mehdi MA, Cherradi T, Bouyahyaoui A, et al. Predictive approach for post-covid 19 evolution study of the pavement surface deterioration based on visual inspection results. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023; 72: 3838–3844. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.518
[17]Patel DK, Thakur TK, Thakur A, et al. Quantifying Land Degradation in Upper Catchment of Narmada River in Central India: Evaluation Study Utilizing Landsat Imagery. Water. 2024; 16(17): 2440. doi: 10.3390/w16172440
[18]Aquilué Junyent I, Martí Casanovas M, Roukouni A, et al. Planning shared mobility hubs in European cities: A methodological framework using MCDA and GIS applied to Barcelona. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024; 106: 105377. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105377
[19]Nejad FM, Sorkhabi H, Karimi MM. Experimental Investigation of Rest Time Effect on Permanent Deformation of Asphalt Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2016; 28(5): 06015016. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001498
[20]Zhang L, Yang F, Daniel Zhang Y, et al. Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); 25–28 September 2016; Phoenix, AZ, USA. pp. 3708–3712. doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533052
[21]Cha Y, Choi W, Büyüköztürk O. Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2017; 32(5): 361–378. doi: 10.1111/mice.12263
[22]Mohan A, Poobal S. Crack detection using image processing: A critical review and analysis. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2018; 57(2): 787–798. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.01.020
[23]Eisenbach M, Stricker R, Seichter D, et al. How to get pavement distress detection ready for deep learning? A systematic approach. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN); 14–19 May 2017; Anchorage, AK, USA. pp. 2039–2047. doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966101
[24]Nex F, Remondino F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Applied Geomatics. 2014; 6(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x
[25]Siebert S, Teizer J. Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system. Automation in Construction. 2014; 41: 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.01.004
[26]Turner D, Lucieer A, Watson C. An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds. Remote Sensing. 2012; 4(5): 1392–1410. doi: 10.3390/rs4051392
[27]Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, et al. ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology. 2012; 179: 300–314. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021
[28]Ameur AB, Valentin J, Baldo N. A Review on the Use of Plastic Waste as a Modifier of Asphalt Mixtures for Road Constructions. CivilEng. 2025; 6(2): 17. doi: 10.3390/civileng6020017
[29]Salem ME, El-Badawy SM, Xiao F, et al. Influence of field aging on viscoelastoplastic performance of rubberized asphalt mixtures incorporating reclaimed asphalt pavement in arid urban climate. Construction and Building Materials. 2024; 449: 138390. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138390
[30]Gonçalves TD, Pel L, Rodrigues JD. Influence of paints on drying and salt distribution processes in porous building materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2009; 23(5): 1751–1759. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.006
[31]Razouki SS, Ibrahim AN. Improving the resilient modulus of a gypsum sand roadbed soil by increased compaction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 2019; 20(4): 432–438. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1309190






