Carbon threshold governance: Resolving the building Policy-Carbon Paradox with blockchain-AI

  • Yue Lyu orcid

    School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China

Article ID: 3764
Keywords: carbon pricing, building decarbonization, blockchain, AI-driven governance, prefabricated construction, climate finance

Abstract

The building sector faces a critical “Policy-Carbon Paradox”: while carbon pricing covers 23% of global emissions, it addresses only 12.7% of construction emissions, resulting in a 7.6-fold decarbonization lag. To resolve this, we propose a Threshold-regulated Policy Framework (TPF) that leverages blockchain-AI fusion for dynamic carbon governance. Empirically, we identify two critical carbon price thresholds: a material substitution tipping point at $120 ± 15/tCO2 (p < 0.01) and an energy system transformation point at $200/tCO2 (Internal Rate of Return (IRR) > 8%). Theoretically, these sigmoidal thresholds supersede the conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve, demonstrating a 0.38 R2 improvement over static models. Methodologically, an ISO 14064-3:2019-compliant blockchain-Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system achieves a 73% reduction in measurement uncertainty (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.48 kg CO2e/tonne) and enables real-time policy adjustments with 2.3 ± 0.7-h latency. This activates a self-reinforcing Policy-Technology-Environment (PTE) Loop, driving a 17-fold growth in green bond issuance and increasing prefabrication penetration by 51.4 percentage points. Applied regionally, the framework reduces decarbonization costs by 38.2% in China (φ-adjusted Emissions Trading System (ETS)), cuts embodied carbon by 55% in the EU (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Building Information Modeling (CBAM-BIM) integration), and slashes verification costs by 72.4 ± 5.2% in the Global South (satellite-blockchain MRV). Collectively, this generates $2.8 ± 0.6 billion/year in health co-benefits through PM2.5 reduction. Our findings establish a scalable, data-driven pathway to close the building sector's decarbonization gap with a 92.3% probability of aligning with the 1.5 ℃ climate goal.

Published
2025-12-07
How to Cite
Lyu, Y. (2025). Carbon threshold governance: Resolving the building Policy-Carbon Paradox with blockchain-AI. Building Engineering, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/be3764
Section
Article

References

[1]United Nations Environment Programme, Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. United Nations Environment Programme; 2022.

[2]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2022. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926

[3]International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2023. International Energy Agency; 2023.

[4]U.S. Department of Energy. 2023 Better Buildings Initiative Progress Report. U.S. Department of Energy; 2023.

[5]Grossman GM, Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995; 110(2): 353–377. doi: 10.2307/2118443

[6]Mettler S, SoRelle ME. Policy Feedback Theory. In: Theories of the Policy Process, 5th ed. Routledge; 2023. pp. 100–129.

[7]International Organization for Standardization. Greenhouse Gases—Part 3: Specification with Guidance for the Verification and Validation of Greenhouse Gas Statements. International Organization for Standardization; 2019.

[8]He Y, Wang S, Zhou Z, et al. A blockchain-based carbon emission security accounting scheme. Computer Networks. 2024; 243: 110304. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110304

[9]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2023. doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

[10]International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization; 2006.

[11]Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, et al. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2016; 21(9): 1218–1230. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8

[12]Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Assessment Standard for Green Building. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China; 2019.

[13]Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature. 2015; 518(7540): 529–533. doi: 10.1038/nature14236

[14]International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022. International Renewable Energy Agency; 2022.

[15]Sobol IM. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 2001; 55(1–3): 271–280. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6

[16]Wu J, Cai Y. The Paradox of AI Knowledge: A Blockchain-Based Approach to Decentralized Governance in Chinese New Media Industry. Future Internet. 2025; 17(10): 479. doi: 10.3390/fi17100479

[17]Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. TM65 Embodied carbon in building services: A calculation methodology. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers; 2021.

[18]Collier Jr. RK. Desiccant Dehumidification and Cooling Systems Assessment and Analysis. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 1997.

[19]Shakir MA, Yhaya MF, Ramli SN, et al. Synthesis and performance characterization of green desiccant from cockle shell and marble waste. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2025; 27: 3097–3117. doi: 10.1007/s10098-024-03031-6

[20]Raoux S. Strategies for Cost Effective Implementation of PFC Emissions Reduction Solutions in the Semiconductor Industry. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment; 8–11 May 2006; Scottsdale, AZ, USA. doi: 10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650070

[21]Zhou Z, Siddiquee MMR, Tajbakhsh N, et al. UNet++: Redesigning skip connections to exploit multiscale features in image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2020; 39(6): 1856–1867. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2959609

[22]Lin W, Shafique M, Luo X. Achieving net-zero emissions in China’s building sector: Critiques and strategies of minimizing embodied carbon. Energy and Buildings. 2025; 345: 115878. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115878

[23]United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022. United Nations; 2022.

[24]Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2017; 37(12): 4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086