The evolving priorities in residential design: Health, sustainability, and age-friendly living spaces

  • Yue Lyu orcid

    1 School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China; 53048830@qq.com

    2 Centre of Rock Mechanics and Geological Disaster, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China

Article ID: 3228
Keywords: sustainability, age-friendly, green building materials, spatial environmental quality, nursing homes

Abstract

In response to the growing global demand for age-friendly housing and the pressing need for healthier indoor environments for aging populations, this study empirically investigates and compares the efficacy of sustainable versus conventional building materials in elderly care facilities. Conducted over a six-month period in a subtropical region of China, the research employed a controlled, side-by-side experimental design in twelve residential rooms. We systematically quantified the impact of material choices on indoor environmental quality by monitoring key parameters: concentrations of PM2.5 and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), thermal and humidity regulation, and floor slip resistance. Results demonstrated that rooms utilizing advanced, low-emission materials (e.g., formaldehyde-free boards, bamboo composites, diatom mud) achieved a significant 30% reduction in PM2.5 and a 25% decline in VOC levels compared to rooms with conventional materials (e.g., medium-density fiberboard, solvent-based paints). Furthermore, these sustainable materials enhanced thermal stability, maintaining indoor humidity within an optimal 40–60% range, and improved wet-condition slip resistance by 200%, substantially mitigating fall risks. The findings translate into actionable, evidence-based design guidelines, emphasizing material specifications like low-VOC coatings and humidity-regulating wall systems. This work bridges material science, environmental engineering, and geriatric design, offering concrete strategies and policy implications for creating safer, healthier, and more sustainable living spaces for the elderly.

Published
2025-07-10
How to Cite
Lyu, Y. (2025). The evolving priorities in residential design: Health, sustainability, and age-friendly living spaces. Building Engineering, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59400/be3228
Section
Article

References

[1]Steemers K, Manchanda S. Energy efficient design and occupant well-being: Case studies in the UK and India. Building & Environment. 2010; 45(2): 270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.025

[2]Heiberger L, Maurer C, Amtage F, et al. Impact of a weekly dance class on the functional mobility and on the quality of life of individuals with Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2011; 3: 14. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2011.00014

[3]Fisk WJ. Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annual Review of Energy & the Environment. 2000; 25: 537–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.537

[4]Zhang Y, Zhai Y. Research on spatial digital feedback of smart community for elderly living alone based on SOR model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; 22–27 June 2025; Gothenburg, Sweden. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-92707-2_15

[5]Hamraie A. Universal design and the problem of “post-disability” ideology. Design and Culture. 2016; 8(3): 285–309. doi: 10.1080/17547075.2016.1218714

[6]Soureshjani OK, Massumi A, Nouri G. Martian buildings: Feasible cement/concrete for onsite sustainable construction from the structural point of view. Acta Astronautica. 2025; 226: 494–520. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.10.056

[7]Chang PJ, Ho LC, Suppakittpaisarn P. Investigating the interplay between senior-friendly park features, perceived greenness, restorativeness, and well-being in older adults. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2024; 94: 128273. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128273

[8]Cowling III WR, Nicoll LHM. Through a window: Finding meaning in unitary appreciative knowing. Advances in Nursing Science. 2025; 48(3): 302–309. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000568

[9]Jones RV, Fuertes A, Bilverstone PA. A repeated cross-sectional study of a biophilic building's effects on workers' perception of indoor environmental quality, health, well-being and productivity. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025; 111: 113476. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113476

[10]Allen JG, Piers MN, Usha S, et al. Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: A controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2015; 124(6): 805–812. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1510037

[11]Oswald F, Wahl HW, Schilling O, et al. Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. The Gerontologist. 2007; 47(1): 96–107. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.1.96

[12]Saleem S, Alchalabi O. An in-depth analysis of factors impacting housing satisfaction: A systematic review and post-occupancy evaluation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning. 2025; 20(1): 119–131. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.200113

[13]Miller AKA. Smart-home technologies to assist older people to live well at home. Journal of Aging Science. 2013; 1(1): 1–9. doi: 10.4172/jasc.1000101

[14]Nakamura-Phillips J. Aging and the environment: Theoretical approaches. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1984; 38: 270–271. doi: 10.5014/AJOT.38.4.270B

[15]Suryasa IW, Rodríguez-Gámez M, Koldoris T. Post-pandemic health and its sustainability. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; 6(1): 5949. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

[16]Boulos PF. Smart water network modeling for sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Water Resources Management. 2017; 31(10): 3177–3188. doi: 10.1007/s11269-017-1699-1

[17]Berardi U. Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Intelligent Buildings International. 2013; 5(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2012.756388

[18]Plessis TAD, Badenhorst F. Improvement of PVC floor tiles by gamma radiation. Radiation Physics & Chemistry. 1988; 31(4–6): 747–751. doi: 10.1016/1359-0197(88)90253-6

[19]Hernández-Olivares F, Barluenga G, Bollati M, et al. Static and dynamic behaviour of recycled tyre rubber-filled concrete. Cement & Concrete Research. 2002; 32(10): 1587–1596. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00833-5

[20]Weick BL, Bhushan B. The tribological and dynamic behavior of alternative magnetic tape substrates. Wear. 1995; 190(1): 28–43. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06726-4

[21]Maltby A, Ruxton P. Use of fatty acid amides as combined slip and anti-block additives. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 1999; 7(8): 537–543. doi: 10.1177/0967391119990708537

[22]Yuan J, Huang Y, Dai C, et al. Luminous environment design for the senior residence based on healthy lighting. Building Energy Efficiency. 2017; 5(1): 1–10.

[23]Mendes LS, Sígolo LM, Toledo RFD. Healthy housing, sustainable city and interlocution between science and society. Periódico Eletrônico Fórum Ambiental da Alta Paulista. 2021; 17(2): 297–310. doi: 10.17271/1980082717220212972

[24]Forseth T, Larsson S, Jensen AJ, et al. Thermal growth performance of juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta: No support for thermal adaptation hypotheses. Journal of Fish Biology. 2009; 74(10): 133–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02119.x

[25]Kumar A, Biebuyck HA, Whitesides GM. Patterning self-assembled monolayers: Applications in materials science. Langmuir. 1994; 10(5): 1498–1511. doi: 10.1021/la00017a030

[26]Roch T, Weihnacht V, Scheibe HJ, et al. Direct laser interference patterning of tetrahedral amorphous carbon films for tribological applications. Diamond & Related Materials. 2013; 33: 20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2012.12.002