A comparative MATLAB/Simulink framework for drive-cycle-based traction motor sizing in battery electric four-wheelers

  • Shweta S. Suryavanshi orcid

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune 411044, Maharashtra, India

  • Sagar Wankhede orcid

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune 411044, Maharashtra, India

  • Pravin M. Ghanegaonkar

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India

  • Devakant Baviskar

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Terna Engineering College, Navi Mumbai 400706, Maharashtra, India

  • Surekha Khetree

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Engineering, Navi Mumbai 400614, Maharashtra, India

  • Choon Kit Chan

    Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

  • Sohankumar G. Prajapati

    Department of Electrical Engineering, Government Engineering College, Patan 384265, Gujarat, India

  • Vijay Chaudhary

    Industries Commissionerate, Gandhinagar 382010, Gujarat, India

  • Subhav Singh

    Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida 201324, Uttar Pradesh, India; Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India

  • Deekshant Varshney

    Centre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India; Centre for Promotion of Research, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248002, Uttarakhand, India

Article ID: 4688
Keywords: electric vehicle; traction motor; motor power sizing; drive cycle; vehicle dynamics; MATLAB/Simulink; process innovation

Abstract

As more battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are being introduced, the need for accurate traction motor sizing to achieve optimal performance, energy efficiency, driving range and cost has become more important. The conventional analytical sizing methods are based on worst-case conditions and often result in over- or under-sizing a motor, with the resulting negative impact on system efficiency and economic viability. In this study, a MATLAB/Simulink model is developed which compares directly between analytical sizing and drive cycle-based simulation of a battery electric four-wheeler for a Maruti Zen passenger car. The equations of the vehicle dynamics with the four forces: rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, acceleration, and gradient force approximate the tractive force, wheel torque, and motor power. The vehicle is tested in three standardised drive cycles (New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET) and the Artemis Urban Drive Cycle (UDC)), and the results are compared to the analytical method. The analytical approach predicts a 23.23–67.99 kW power band for the road gradient range (0°–18°) analysed, while drive-cycle simulation suggests 15.29 kW (NEDC), 14.52 kW (HWFET) and 22.10 kW (UDC)—a 67.5–78.6% decrease from the analytical upper bound. The results show that drive-cycle-based sizing can provide a more accurate, application-specific assessment of traction-motor sizing and help to minimize the risk of over-sizing and increase efficiency. In addition to re-working known vehicle-dynamics equations, this work is novel in that the power gap between the two routes of analytical and drive-cycle sizing is benchmarked for a vehicle and set of parameters, and a low-cost, practical screening tool for selecting a traction motor appropriate for the operating environment and duty profile is provided to manufacturers and researchers.

Published
2026-09-24
How to Cite
Shweta S. Suryavanshi, Sagar Wankhede, Ghanegaonkar, P. M., Baviskar, D., Surekha Khetree, Choon Kit Chan, Sohankumar G. Prajapati, Vijay Chaudhary, Subhav Singh, & Deekshant Varshney. (2026). A comparative MATLAB/Simulink framework for drive-cycle-based traction motor sizing in battery electric four-wheelers. Energy Storage and Conversion, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/esc4688

References

[1]Aich W, Hajlaoui K, Alizadeh A, et al. Novel hybrid ANN with birds of prey-based algorithm and multi-objective flow direction optimization (MOFDO) for intelligent design of liquid cooling channels in electric vehicle battery thermal management. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2026; 225, 110789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2026.110789

[2]Rajamoorthy R, Arunachalam G, Kasinathan P, et al. A novel intelligent transport system charging scheduling for electric vehicles using Grey Wolf Optimizer and Sail Fish Optimization algorithms. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2022; 44(2), 3555–3575. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2022.2067268

[3]Sharmila B, Srinivasan K, Devasena D, et al. Modelling and performance analysis of electric vehicle. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2022; 43(1), 5034–5040. doi: 10.1080/01430750.2021.1932587

[4]Szumska EM. Regenerative braking systems in electric vehicles: A comprehensive review of design, control strategies, and efficiency challenges. Energies. 2025; 18(10): 2422. doi: 10.3390/en18102422

[5]Shahakar DA, Shahakar YD. Review of traction motors for electric vehicle application. EPJ Web of Conferences. 2025; 341: 01019.

[6]Mavlonov J, Ruzimov S, Tonoli A, et al. Sensitivity analysis of electric energy consumption in battery electric vehicles with different electric motors. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2023; 14(2): 36.

[7]Atamnia K, Lebaroud A, Makhlouf M. Traction motor selection based on the performance analysis of pure electric vehicle under different driving scenarios. Carpathian Journal of Electrical Engineering. 2020; 14(1): 51–72.

[8]Praslicka B, Ma C, Taran N. A computationally efficient high-fidelity multi-physics design optimization of traction motors for drive cycle loss minimization. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2023; 59(2): 1351–1360.

[9]Roshandel E, Mahmoudi A, Soong WL, et al. Optimal design of induction motors over driving cycles for electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2023; 72(12): 15548–15562.

[10]Madichetty S, Mishra S, Basu M. New trends in electric motors and selection for electric vehicle propulsion systems. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation. 2021; 11(3): 186–199. doi: 10.1049/els2.12018

[11]Mahmouditabar F, Baker NJ. Design optimization of induction motors with different stator slot rotor bar combinations considering drive cycle. Energies. 2024; 17(1): 154.

[12]Sweeting WJ, Hutchinson AR, Savage SD. Factors affecting electric vehicle energy consumption. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 2011; 4(3): 192–201. doi: 10.1080/19397038.2011.592956

[13]Chau T, Li W. Overview of electric machines for electric and hybrid vehicles. International Journal of Vehicle Design. 2014; 64(1): 46–71. doi: 10.1504/IJVD.2014.057775

[14]Gordić M, Stamenković D, Popović V, et al. Electric vehicle conversion: Optimization of parameters in the design process. Technical Gazette. 2017; 24(4): 1213–1219.

[15]He L, Jing H, Zhang Y, et al. Performance research of integrated thermal management system for battery electric vehicles with motor waste heat recovery. Journal of Energy Storage. 2024; 84: 110893.

[16]Wang Z, Ching TW, Huang S, et al. Challenges faced by electric vehicle motors and their solutions. IEEE Access. 2020; 9: 5228–5249. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045716

[17]Janpoom K, Suttakul P, Achariyaviriya W, et al. Investigating the influential factors in real-world energy consumption of battery electric vehicles. Energy Reports. 2023; 9(s12): 316–320.

[18]Suryavanshi S, Ghanegaonkar PM, Jadhav GK, et al. Comparative performance assessment of sizing of electric motor through analytical approach for electric vehicle application. ARAI Journal of Mobility Technology. 2023; 3(4): 842–855. doi: 10.37285/ajmt.3.4.7

[19]Bajrami A, Palpacelli MC. A proposal for a simplified systematic procedure for the selection of electric motors for land vehicles with an emphasis on fuel economy. Machines. 2023; 11(4): 420.

[20]Ehsani M, Gao Y, Longo S, et al. Modern Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Fuel Cell Vehicles, 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2018.

[21]Gillespie TD. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. SAE International; 1992.

[22]Suryavanshi SS, Ghanegaonkar PM. Repercussion of effect of different drive cycles on evaluation of electrical consumption for electric four-wheeler. Energy Storage. 2023; 5(7): e468.

[23]Wankhede S, Thorat P, Shisode S, et al. Energy consumption estimation for electric two-wheeler using different drive cycles. Energy Storage. 2022; 4(6): e361.

[24]Mamo T, Gebresenbet G, Gopal R, et al. Assessment of an electric vehicle drive cycle in relation to minimised energy consumption with driving behaviour: The case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and its suburbs. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2023; 14(11): 302.

[25]Kinoti E, Mosetlhe TC, Yusuff AA. Multi-criteria analysis of electric vehicle motor technologies: A review. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2024; 15(12): 541.

[26]Askerdal M, Fredriksson J, Laine L. Development of simplified air drag models including crosswinds for commercial heavy vehicle combinations. Vehicle System Dynamics. 2023; 62(5): 1085–1102.

[27]Cheng R, Zhang W, Yang J, et al. Analysis of the effects of different driving cycles on the driving range and energy consumption of BEVs. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2025; 16(3): 124.