Comparative analysis of half-cut monofacial monocrystalline solar panel and traditional full-cell monofacial monocrystalline solar panel

  • Akpovi Oyubu Oyubu orcid

    Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Delta State University, Abraka 330106, Nigeria

  • Ufuoma Kazeem Okpeki orcid

    Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Delta State University, Abraka 330106, Nigeri

  • Anthony Onoharigho Okpare orcid

    Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Delta State University, Abraka 330106, Nigeria

  • Ikechukwu Emmanuel Onuigbo

    Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Delta State University, Abraka 330106, Nigeria

  • Favour Emmanuel Egwuenu

    Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Delta State University, Abraka 330106, Nigeria

  • Akpoghene Destiny Dibie

    Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Delta State University, Abraka 330106, Nigeria

Article ID: 4609
Keywords: half-cut; full-cell; monofacial; monocrystalline; solar

Abstract

Despite the theoretical benefits of the half-cut cells over the traditional full-cell monocrystalline panel, there is limited comparative analysis showing its power output by comparing voltage, current, efficiency and other parameters between both panels under varying sunlight conditions; thus this research aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of both panel technologies in terms of voltage, current, and power output at different times of the day, while also considering environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and solar irradiance. An experimental research design was adopted using two 400 W solar panels with measurements taken simultaneously at 2.5 h intervals between 10:00 am and 3:00 pm for a period of three months under two scenarios—without shading and with shading. The findings revealed that while the traditional panels consistently produced higher voltage values, the half-cut panels generated significantly higher current outputs resulting in greater overall power generation. Statistical analysis including percentage variance, and standard deviation reveal that the energy yield of the half cut is slightly higher than that of the full cut; but the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) carried out to deepen the result of the statistical analysis depict that there is no significant difference in the power generation of both technologies under the ‘without shading’ scenario. However, from the ANOVA, a significant difference under the ‘with shading’ scenario with the half-cut panels having a higher power generation thus confirming the superior energy yield and performance stability of the half-cut panels under all environmental conditions including shading when compared to their traditional full-cell counterpart.

Published
2026-09-01
How to Cite
Oyubu, A. O., Okpeki, U. K., Okpare, A. O., Onuigbo, I. E., Egwuenu, F. E., & Dibie, A. D. (2026). Comparative analysis of half-cut monofacial monocrystalline solar panel and traditional full-cell monofacial monocrystalline solar panel. Energy Storage and Conversion, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/esc4609

References

[1]Enasel E, Dumitrascu G. Assessment of Polycrystalline, Monocrystalline, and Amorphous Solar Panels Under Dynamic Environmental Conditions: Performance Insights for Renewable Energy Applications. Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Iași Machine Constructions Section. 2025; 70(1): 27–46.

[2]Ayadi O, Shadid R, Bani-Abdullah A, et al. Experimental comparison between Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline, and Thin-film solar systems under sunny climatic conditions. Energy Reports. 2022; 8: 218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.121

[3]Abdullahi AA, Bala A, Magaji T, et al. Performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic panel mounted on sloped Corrugated metal sheet roof in Kano state Northwest Nigeria FUDMA. Journal of Sciences (FJS). 2023; 7(3): 257–262. doi: 10.33003/fjs-2023-0703-1783

[4]Takyi G, Adunyah A, Agyei-Agyemang A. Performance evaluation of monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon solar photovoltaic modules under low and high irradiance conditions in Kumasi, Ghana. Nigerian Journal of Technology. 2021; 40(3): 414–426. doi: 10.4314/njt.v40i3.8

[5]Moussa FA, Halidou I, Meilinger S, et al. Seasonal Performance Analysis of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Photovoltaic Solar Panels Under Dust Deposition in Niamey, Niger. Energy Science & Engineering. 2026; 14: 1822–1835. doi: 10.1002/ese3.70447

[6]Ray M, Kabir MF, Raihan M, et al. Performance evaluation of monocrystalline and polycrystalline-based solar cell. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering. 2023; 14(4): 949–960. doi: 10.1007/s40095-023-00558-0

[7]Omorogiuwa OS, Akwenuke EB, Aliu JA, et al. Investigating the Performance of Solar System Using Simulation in Nigeria. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research. 2024; 6(4): 97–11.

[8]Ukoima KN. Design and performance analysis of a solar photovoltaic system for a rural community in Rivers State, Nigeria. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15: 33783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00664-5

[9]Dallaev R, Pisarenko T, Papež N, et al. Overview of the Current State of Flexible Solar Panels and Photovoltaic Materials. Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(17): 5839. doi: 10.3390/ma16175839

[10]Pratama B, Hiendro A, Marpaung J, et al. Effect of shading on Half-cut Solar Panels Power output. Telecommunications, Computers, and Electricals Engineering Journal. 2023; 1(2): 73–83. doi: 10.26418/telectrical.v1i2.69957

[11]Schneider J, Hanifi H, Dassler D, et al. Half-cell solar modules: The new standard in PV production? Photovoltaics International. 2019; 42.

[12]Adila NLJ, Ismaila MA, Jalisaa AB, et al. Comparative Analysis of Soft Shading Effects on the Performance of Full Cell, Half-Cut, and Shingle Photovoltaic Modules. Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment. 2026; 13(1): 76–84.

[13]Shukir SS. Half-cut solar panels to reduce the effect of high temperature and shadow on the productivity of solar panels. Journal of Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources. 2021; 7(3): 25–31.

[14]Oyubu AO, Okpare AO, Eyenubo JO, et al. Investigation of Efficiency Degradation of Solar Powered Street Lights in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria in Sub Saharan Africa. SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. 2024; 11(12): 137–143.

[15]Agaja SA, Ajibade BF, Nwaezeapu AO, et al. Study on the Performance of Selected Solar Photovoltaic Systems installed by Government Intervention Agencies in Delta State, Nigeria. 2020; 8(5): 30–36. doi: 10.37082/IJIRMPS.2020.v08i05.006

[16]Okpeki UK, Oyubu AO, Efenedo GI, et al. Design and Implementation of a 2.5kVA Solar Power System. SSRG International Journal of Recent Engineering Science. 2023; 10(4): 48–57.

[17]Al-Najideen MI, Alrwashdeh SS. Design of a solar photovoltaic system to cover the electricity demand for the faculty of Engineering- Mu'tah University in Jordan. Resource-Efficient Technologies. 2017; 3(4): 440–445. doi: 10.1016/j.reffit.2017.04.005

[18]Jo JH, Ilves K, Barth T, et al. Implementation of a large-scale solar photovoltaic system at a higher education institution in Illinois, USA. AIMS Energy. 2017; 5(2): 54–62. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.1.54

[19]Uzorka A, Kibirige D, Mustafa M, et al. Design and implementation of a photovoltaic system for health facilities in rural areas of Uganda. Discover Applied Sciences. 2025; 7(3): 197. doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-06640-y

[20]Ndubuizu CL, Ngbede EO, Ibekwe FC. Design and Installation of Solar Photovoltaic System for Power Generation in School of Science Education Office. South Eastern Journal of Research and Sustainable Development. 2022; 10(1): 17–27.

[21]Jatoi AR, Samo SR, Jakhrani AQ. Performance evaluation of various photovoltaic module technologies at Nawabshah Pakistan. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development. 2021; 10(1): 97–103. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2021.32352

[22]Yuldoshov B, Saitov E, Khaliyarov J, et al. Effect of Temperature on Electrical Parameters of Photovoltaic Module. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT (ICAIIT); 2023; 11(1): 291–295. doi: 10.25673/101957

[23]Sajjad U, Ali HM. Insights into effect of thermal distribution on overall efficiency and effective life span of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules. Results in Engineering. 2026; 29: 108540. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108540

[24]Alaas ZM. The Effects of Temperature on Photovoltaic and Different Mitigation Techniques: A Review. IEEE Access. 2024; 2: 180309–180327. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3504009

[25]Sani M, Sule A. Effect of Temperature on the Performance of Photovoltaic Module. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 2020; 5: 670–676. doi: 10.38124/IJISRT20SEP533