AI-assisted nanolayer-engineered solid-state electrolyte interfaces for lithium dendrite suppression in high-energy lithium metal batteries

  • Tanveer Ahmad Wani orcid

    Department of Physics, Noida International University, Greater Noida 203201, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Ramesh Saini orcid

    Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India

  • Shobhit Goyal orcid

    Quantum University Research Center, Quantum University, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India

  • Manni Sruthi orcid

    Centre for Multidisciplinary Research, Anurag University, Hyderabad 500088, Telangana, India

  • Chetansinh R. Vaghela orcid

    Faculty of Science, Gokul Global University, Siddhpur 384151, Gujarat, India

  • Yinxin Tang orcid

    Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Samkhok 12160, Pathum Thani, Thailand

  • Kaustubh Milind Utpat orcid

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vishwakarma University, Pune 411048, Maharashtra, India

Article ID: 4568
Keywords: lithium metal batteries; solid-state electrolytes; nanolayer engineering; dendrite suppression; artificial intelligence; interfacial stability; high-energy-density batteries

Abstract

Commercialization of lithium metal batteries with high energy density is limited largely due to uncontrolled lithium dendrite growth, poor interfacial resistance of solid-state electrolytes, and inadequate cycle stability of solid-state electrolytes. A new architecture that leverages artificial intelligence to design engineered nanolayer interfaces for solid-state electrolytes enables controlled lithium-ion transport and prevents dendrite propagation in next-generation batteries. To achieve this, the proposed framework combines multiphysics interfacial modeling with an artificial intelligence optimization module to simultaneously determine the optimal thickness and interfacial parameters for nanolayers to optimize ionic conductivity while minimizing electrochemical degradation. Simulation results show that the engineered interface provides a significantly better electrochemical performance than any existing solid-state electrolyte configuration. The simulation results show that the optimized nanolayer-engineered interface gave an ionic conductivity of 1.21 × 10−3 S cm−1, which was an enhancement of 34.8% compared to the conventional interface. This framework helped reduce interfacial resistance to 46 Ω cm2 from 82 Ω cm2, which was an improvement of 43.9%, and increased the critical current density to 2.1 mA cm−2 from 1.3 mA cm−2. Additionally, the optimized interface retained 93.4% of its capacity after 500 cycles of charge-discharge, which is an improvement of 93.4% from the conventional interface’s 79.6%. Collectively, these results indicate that the combination of nanolayer engineering and artificial intelligence optimization enables uniform deposition of lithium ions, enhances interfacial stability, and reduces the degree of dendrite-induced degradation. The proposed framework enables large-scale development of safer, long-lasting solid-state lithium-ion batteries and facilitates high-energy-density storage for electric vehicles and large renewable energy systems.

Published
2026-11-06
How to Cite
Tanveer Ahmad Wani, Ramesh Saini, Shobhit Goyal, Manni Sruthi, Chetansinh R. Vaghela, Yinxin Tang, & Kaustubh Milind Utpat. (2026). AI-assisted nanolayer-engineered solid-state electrolyte interfaces for lithium dendrite suppression in high-energy lithium metal batteries. Energy Storage and Conversion, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/esc4568

References

[1].Taghavi M, Lee CJ. Development of a novel hydrogen liquefaction structure based on liquefied natural gas regasification operations and solid oxide fuel cell: Exergy and economic analyses. Fuel. 2025; 384: 133826.

[2].Taghavi M, Colpan CO, Dincer I. Development of an integrated production and liquefaction system of hydrogen and green natural gas: energy, exergy, economic and sensitivity assessments. Energy. 2026; 360: 141476.

[3].Janek J, Zeier WG. A solid future for battery development. Nature Energy. 2016; 1(9): 16141.

[4].Mwangi S. Solid-State Battery Integration Strategies for Next-Generation Renewable Energy Storage Networks. National Journal of Renewable Energy Systems and Innovation. 2026; 2(4): 38–50.

[5].Lin D, Liu Y, Cui Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nature Nanotechnology. 2017; 12(3): 194–206.

[6].Lemeon M, Noria F. Advanced Battery Management and Control Algorithms for Sustainable Lithium-Ion and Solid-State Energy Storage Systems. Transactions on Energy Storage Systems and Innovation. 2025; 1(3): 19–25.

[7].Shen J, Cui C, Zhao J, et al. Advancing NASICON solid-state electrolytes for lithium metal batteries: Interfacial challenges, engineering strategies, and future directions. Energy Storage Materials. 2025; 81: 104471.

[8].Manthiram A, Yu X, Wang S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nature Reviews Materials. 2017; 2(4): 16103.

[9].Han F, Westover AS, Yue J, et al. High electronic conductivity is the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes. Nature Energy. 2019; 4(3): 187–196.

[10].Hashim IM. Mechanical Analysis of Stress and Deformation in Lithium Battery Electrodes During Charge–Discharge Cycles. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2026; 1(35): 598–609.

[11].Porz L, Swamy T, Sheldon BW, et al. Mechanism of lithium metal penetration through inorganic solid electrolytes. Advanced Energy Materials. 2017; 7(20): 1701003.

[12].Zhang Z, Shao Y, Lotsch B, et al. New horizons for inorganic solid-state ion conductors. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018; 11(8): 1945–1976.

[13].Yang X, Wang Y, Guo Y, et al. Interfacial engineering of suppressing Li dendrite growth in all-solid-state Li-metal batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2024; 12(25): 14848–14865.

[14].Cheng XB, Zhao CZ, Yao YX, et al. Recent advances in energy chemistry between solid-state electrolyte and safe lithium-metal anodes. Chem. 2019; 5(1): 74–96.

[15].Xu R, Cheng XB, Yan C, et al. Artificial interphases for highly stable lithium metal anode. Matter. 2019; 1(2): 317–344.

[16].Zhao Q, Stalin S, Zhao CZ, et al. Designing solid-state electrolytes for safe, energy-dense batteries. Nature Reviews Materials. 2020; 5(3): 229–252.

[17].Krauskopf T, Richter FH, Zeier WG, et al. Physicochemical concepts of the lithium metal anode in solid-state batteries. Chemical Reviews. 2020; 120(15): 7745–7794.

[18].Yang C, Fu K, Zhang Y, et al. Protected lithium‐metal anodes in batteries: From liquid to solid. Advanced Materials. 2017; 29(36): 1701169.

[19].Sun C, Ruan Y, Zha W, et al. Recent advances in anodic interface engineering for solid-state lithium-metal batteries. Materials Horizons. 2020; 7(7): 1667–1696.

[20].Chen C, Zuo Y, Ye W, et al. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials. Advanced Energy Materials. 2020; 10(8): 1903242

[21].Li W, Li M, Ren H, et al. Nitride solid-state electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Energy & Environmental Science. 2025; 18(10): 4521–4554.

[22].Esmizadeh S, Cabras L, Serpelloni M, et al. A review on modeling of nucleation and growth of Li dendrites in solid electrolytes. Journal of Energy Storage. 2024; 97: 112897.

[23].Wang H, Yan X, Zhang R, et al. Application-driven design of non-aqueous electrolyte solutions through quantification of interfacial reactions in lithium metal batteries. Nature Nanotechnology. 2025; 20(8): 1034–1042.

[24].Chen XR, Zhao BC, Yan C, et al. Review on Li deposition in working batteries: From nucleation to early growth. Advanced Materials. 2021; 33(8): 2004128.

[25].Ng MF, Zhao J, Yan Q, et al. Predicting the state of charge and health of batteries using data-driven machine learning. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2020; 2(3): 161–170.