Performance comparison of solar fed MPC and AI controller for fast battery charging in electric vehicles

  • Apoorva Srivastava orcid

    Department of Electrical Engineering, Babu Banarasi Das Institute of Technology and Management, Lucknow 226028, India

  • Mohammad Saif Raza orcid

    Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Babu Banarasi Das Institute of Technology and Management, Lucknow 226028, India

  • Faiz Haider orcid

    Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Maharishi University of Information Technology, Lucknow 226013, India

  • Prasant Shukla orcid

    Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow 226031, India

Article ID: 4291
Keywords: solar PV-fed EV charging; model predictive control; deep reinforcement learning; fast battery charging; energy management; hardware-in-the-loop validation

Abstract

The rapid growth of electric vehicles (EVs) has increased the demand for charging infrastructure that is not only fast and efficient but also environmentally sustainable. Solar-powered EV charging stations, which integrate photovoltaic (PV) systems, offer a promising solution by reducing dependence on the electrical grid and lowering carbon emissions. However, the intermittent nature of solar energy creates significant challenges for maintaining stable and efficient fast-charging operations. This study evaluates the performance of different control strategies for a solar-powered EV fast-charging system. A comparative analysis was conducted between Model Predictive Control (MPC), Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based controllers. The system consisted of a 100 kWp PV array, a 400 V DC bus, a bidirectional DC–DC converter operating at 20 kHz, and a 60 kWh EV battery charged at 1C–2C rates. The MPC controller was designed with a prediction horizon of 10, a control horizon of 3, and a sampling time of 100 μs using quadratic cost optimization, while the DRL controller employed a Deep Q-Network framework. Simulation results demonstrated that the DRL-based controller achieved superior performance under varying irradiance conditions. Compared with MPC, it increased solar energy utilization by 8%, improved charging efficiency by 12.8%, and reduced battery degradation by approximately 15% over 1000 charge–discharge cycles. In addition, DRL exhibited faster transient response, achieving system stabilization within 0.21 s during sudden irradiance changes, compared with 0.35 s for MPC. The findings indicate that advanced adaptive control strategies can enhance energy utilization, charging performance, and battery longevity in solar-powered EV charging applications.

Published
2026-06-04
How to Cite
Srivastava, A., Raza, M. S., Haider, F., & Shukla, P. (2026). Performance comparison of solar fed MPC and AI controller for fast battery charging in electric vehicles. Energy Storage and Conversion, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/esc4291
Section
Article

References

[1]Hakam Y, Gaga A, Tabaa M, et al. Enhancing Electric Vehicle Charger Performance with Synchronous Boost and Model Predictive Control for Vehicle-to-Grid Integration. Energies. 2024; 17(7): 1787. doi: 10.3390/en17071787

[2]Luetz JM, Nichols E, Du Plessis K, et al. Spirituality and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Word Frequency Analysis and an Agenda for Research in Pacific Island Countries. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3): 2201. doi: 10.3390/su15032201

[3]Minchala-Ávila C, Arévalo P, Ochoa-Correa D. A Systematic Review of Model Predictive Control for Robust and Efficient Energy Management in Electric Vehicle Integration and V2G Applications. Modelling. 2025; 6(1): 20. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/6/1/20

[4]Srivastava A, Yadav V, Yadav V et al. Performance comparison of PI and AI-based controllers for solar PV-fed fast electric vehicle battery charging systems. Energy Storage and Conversion. 2026; doi: 10.59400/esc4074

[5]Wen T, He J, Jiang L, et al. A simple and flexible bootstrap-based framework to quantify epistemic uncertainty of ground motion models by light gradient boosting machine. Applied Soft Computing. 2024; 152: 111195. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111195

[6]Lin H, Cai C, Chen J, et al. Modulation and Control Independent Dead-Zone Compensation for H-Bridge Converters: A Simplified Digital Logic Scheme. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2024; 71(11): 15239–15244. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2024.3370975

[7]Hassan AM, Ababneh J, Attar H, et al. Reinforcement learning algorithm for improving speed response of a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor based model predictive control. PLOS ONE. 2025; 20(1): e0316326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316326

[8]Huang Z, Gong J, Xiao X, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin Technologies for Power Converter Control in Transportation Applications: A Review. IET Power Electronics. 2025; 18(1): e70013. doi: 10.1049/pel2.70013

[9]Carvajal CP, Andaluz VH, Roberti F, et al. Path-following control for aerial manipulators robots with priority on energy saving. Control Engineering Practice. 2023; 131: 105401. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105401

[10]Aljundi K, Figueiredo A, Vieira A, et al. Geothermal energy system application: From basic standard performance to sustainability reflection. Renewable Energy. 2024; 220: 119612. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119612

[11]An Z, Zhao Y, Du X, et al. Experimental research on thermal-electrical behavior and mechanism during external short circuit for LiFePO4 Li-ion battery. Applied Energy. 2023; 332: 120519. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120519

[12]Zhang Y, Yang Q, An D, et al. Multistep Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Energy Schedule Strategy of Charging Stations in Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2023; 53(7): 4292–4305. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2022.3165074

[13]Fortuna C, Yetgin H, Mohorčič M. Smart Infrastructures: Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Lifecycle Automation. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 2023; 17(2): 37–47. doi: 10.1109/MIE.2022.3165673

[14]Golestan S, Golmohamadi H, Sinha R, et al. Real-Time Simulation and Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing Based on OPAL-RT ePHASORSIM: A Review of Recent Advances and a Simple Validation in EV Charging Management Systems. Energies. 2024; 17(19): 4893. doi: 10.3390/en17194893

[15]Zahraoui Y, Korõtko T, Rosin A, et al. Market Mechanisms and Trading in Microgrid Local Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review. Energies. 2023; 16(5): 2145. doi: 10.3390/en16052145

[16]Dehkordi NM, Nekoukar V. Adaptive distributed stochastic deep reinforcement learning control for voltage and frequency restoration in islanded AC microgrids with communication noise and delay. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 27315. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13010-6

[17]Nabih A, Li Q. Design of 98.8% Efficient 400-to-48-V LLC Converter With Optimized Matrix Transformer and Matrix Inductor. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2023; 38(6): 7207–7225. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3244869

[18]Gao B, Zhu Y, Li Y. Optimal Operation Strategy Analysis with Scenario Generation Method Based on Principal Component Analysis, Density Canopy, and K-medoids for Integrated Energy Systems. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. 2024; 12(1): 89–100. doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2022.000681

[19]Su T, Zhao J, Yao Y, et al. Safe Reinforcement Learning-Based Transient Stability Control for Islanded Microgrids With Topology Reconfiguration. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2025; 16(4): 3432–3444. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2025.3569696

[20]Dong J, Guo X, Zhang C, et al. Multi-level monitoring method based on slow independent component analysis-tensor decomposition for industrial batch processes. Measurement. 2025; 241: 115610. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115610

[21]Zheng H, Du Q, Mo S, et al. Improved marine predator MPPT algorithm for photovoltaic systems in partial shading conditions. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 21092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06408-9

[22]Li G, Wu J, Li S, et al. Multitentacle Federated Learning Over Software-Defined Industrial Internet of Things Against Adaptive Poisoning Attacks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2023; 19(2): 1260–1269. doi: 10.1109/TII.2022.3173996

[23]Demeke W, Ryu B, Ryu S. Machine learning-based optimization of segmented thermoelectric power generators using temperature-dependent performance properties. Applied Energy. 2024; 355: 122216. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122216

[24]Nagadurga T, Raju VD, Barnawi AB, et al. Global MPPT optimization for partially shaded photovoltaic systems. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 10831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89694-7

[25]Mollik Babu R, Alam MS, Islam A, et al. Toward Sustainable and Clean Energy Futures: A Techno-Economic Review of Solar PV Systems, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access. 2025; 13: 169720–169757. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3614771

[26]Mishra A, Sahoo UK, Maiti S. Robust Structured Sparsity-Based Fused Lasso Estimator With Sensor Position Uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs. 2024; 71(4): 2449–2453. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2023.3330151

[27]Santarelli C, Helbig C, Li A, et al. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Electrical and Thermal Characterization of Battery Packs—Case Study for an Electric Race Car. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2023; 14(4): 102. doi: 10.3390/wevj14040102

[28]Wu M, Ma D, Xiong K, et al. Optimizing load frequency control in isolated island city microgrids: a deep graph reinforcement learning approach with data enhancement across extensive scenarios. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2025; 12: 1384995. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1384995

[29]Zhang L, Ye H, Ding F, et al. Increasing PV Hosting Capacity With an Adjustable Hybrid Power Flow Model. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2023; 14(1): 409–422. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2022.3215287