Comparative evaluation of solar photovoltaic cell technologies across Türkiye’s climatic regions: A PVsyst simulation-based analysis

  • Muhammed Fatih Saltuk orcid

    Development and Investment Bank of Türkiye, Istanbul 34768, Turkey

Article ID: 3850
Keywords: PV cell technology, renewable energy, PV cell performance, PVsyst, performance optimization

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies have become a part of the global energy transition, primarily driven by sustained reductions in capital costs. This rapid deployment has intensified the need for robust, technology-specific performance assessments under diverse climatic conditions. This study presents a comparative evaluation of three crystalline silicon PV cell technologies, which are Passivated Emitter and Rear Contact (PERC), Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon), and Silicon Heterojunction (SHJ/HJT), across Türkiye’s climatically heterogeneous regions using PVsyst simulation software. A rigorously controlled modelling framework was employed, in which all system-level parameters, including irradiance data, thermal behaviour, array configuration, and loss assumptions, were held constant across simulations, thereby isolating the impact of cell architecture on energy yield. The results demonstrate clear performance differentiation among the examined technologies. SHJ modules exhibit superior energy output under high temperature conditions due to favourable temperature coefficients, whereas TOPCon modules show enhanced robustness under harsh operating environments and improved resistance to lifetime degradation. PERC technology, despite its maturity, remains competitive in regions characterised by moderate climatic stress. These findings indicate that PV technology selection should extend beyond nominal efficiency metrics to incorporate thermal sensitivity, degradation behaviour, and low irradiance performance. Consequently, informed PV investment and deployment strategies must align cell technological attributes with specific environmental conditions. While controlled PVsyst simulations provide a consistent comparative baseline, their practical relevance depends on careful contextualisation to real-world operating environments.

Published
2025-12-03
How to Cite
Saltuk, M. F. (2025). Comparative evaluation of solar photovoltaic cell technologies across Türkiye’s climatic regions: A PVsyst simulation-based analysis. Energy Storage and Conversion, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/esc3850
Section
Article

References

[1]International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024. International Renewable Energy Agency; 2025.

[2]International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2024. International Energy Agency; 2024.

[3]Zhang Y, Kim M, Wang L, et al. Design considerations for multi-terawatt scale manufacturing of existing and future photovoltaic technologies: challenges and opportunities related to silver, indium and bismuth consumption. Energy and Environmental Science. 2021; 14: 5587–5610. doi: 10.1039/D1EE01814K

[4]VDMA. International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics (ITRPV), 16th ed. VDMA; 2025.

[5]Kivambe M, Abdallah A, Figgis B, et al. Comprehensive assessment of performance and reliability of PERC, TOPCon and SHJ modules in desert climates. Solar Energy. 2025; 295: 113555. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2025.113555

[6]Zhou Z, Kang Q, Sun Z, et al. Optimization strategies and efficiency prediction for silicon solar cells with hybrid route of PERC and SHJ passivation contact. Advanced Science. 2025; 12(15): 2411965. doi: 10.1002/advs.202411965

[7]Shen W, Zhao Y, Liu F. Highlights of mainstream solar cell efficiencies in 2024. Frontiers in Energy. 2025; 19: 8–17. doi: 10.1007/s11708-025-0985-5

[8]Anderson KS, Hansen CW, Theristis M. A noniterative method of estimating parameter values for the PVsyst version 6 single-diode model from IEC 61853-1 matrix measurements. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2025; 15(3): 492–499. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2025.3554338

[9]Chang YC, Zhang Y, Wang L, et al. Silver-lean metallization and hybrid contacts via plating on screen-printed metal for silicon solar cells manufacturing. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and applications. 2025; 33(1): 158–169. doi: 10.1002/pip.3799

[10]Liu M, Cao X, Wang L, et al. Characterizing photovoltaic module power degradation through impedance spectroscopy: Transitioning to outdoor applications. Renewable Energy. 2025; 252: 123438. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123438

[11]Xu W, Zhou P, Xiu Q. Optimizing the manufacturing process to increase fill factor and elevate efficiency of N-type crystalline silicon TOPCon solar cells. AIP Advances. 2025; 15(6), 065009. doi: 10.1063/5.0270347

[12]Liu Y, Peters IM, Ding K, et al. Silver reduction through direct wire bonding for Silicon Heterojunction solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 282: 113412. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113412

[13]Li Z, Yu K, Zhu Q, et al. UVID of TOPCon Solar Cells: Effect of the Front Passivation Al2O3 layer thickness and recovery by different processes. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 289: 113691. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113691

[14]Liang B, Chen X, Wang X, et al. Progress in crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2025; 13(4): 2441–2477. doi: 10.1039/D4TA06224H

[15]Leung TL, Willson GK, Fimbres-Weihs G, et al. A new perspective for evaluating circularity of photovoltaic module recycling and technology developments. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2025; 6: 102547. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102547

[16]Yuan D, Cui J, Ding J, et al. Efficiency loss analysis and simulation of 23.2% efficiency PERC cell. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 2025; 57: 216. doi: 10.1007/s11082-025-08136-w

[17]Gao K, Xu D, Wang J, et al. Efficient silicon solar cells with aluminum-doped zinc oxide-based passivating contact. Advanced Functional Materials. 2025; 35: 2415039. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202415039

[18]Li F, Tatapudi SR, Shaw SL, et al. Photovoltaic module leach testing: Database development and statistical analysis. Journal of Environmental Management. 2025; 377: 124666. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124666

[19]Öz AK, Neven-du Mont S, Nikitina V, et al. Pushing the boundaries: Challenges that arise in manufacturing and designing photovoltaic modules for new application areas. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 291: 113735. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113735

[20]Chen N, Liu Y, Shao Y, et al. Review of the latest industrial progress in screen printing. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 290: 113734. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113734

[21]Karade VC, He M, Song Z, et al. Opportunities and challenges for emerging inorganic chalcogenide–silicon tandem solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2025; 18: 6899–6933. doi: 10.1039/D4EE04526B

[22]Khokhar MQ, Yousuf H, Alamgeer, et al. Progressive development of n-poly-Si contacts and stencil refinement for high-efficiency p-TOPCon solar cells. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s40684-025-00755-8

[23]Zhang L, Gao Q, Guo J, et al. High work function large-area carbon black films as conductive, passivated, and hole-selective heterocontact layer for highly efficient solar cells. Solar Energy. 2025; 296: 113590. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2025.113590

[24]Wang X, Sen C, Wu X, et al. Alleviating contaminant-induced degradation of TOPCon solar cells with copper plating. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 282: 113444. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113444

[25]Pirot-Berson L, Couderc R, Bodeux R, et al. Study and mitigation of moisture-induced degradation in SHJ modules by modifying cell structure. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 285: 113557. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113557

[26]Nasser H, Altıner G, Çambay Kuban F, et al. Industrial PERC solar cells with fully passivated rear contact enabled by local hole-selective MoOx/Ag. ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2025; 8(12): 7912–7918. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.4c03001

[27]Jang YH, Lee Y, Seo HS, et al. Sacrificial layer concept interface engineering for robust, lossless monolithic integration of perovskite/Si tandem solar cells yielding high fill factor of 0.813. Nano Convergence. 2025; 12: 24. doi: 10.1186/s40580-025-00492-3

[28]Jäger K, Aeberhard U, Llado EA, et al. Optics for terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Review and Perspectives. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 2025; 17: 185–294. doi: 10.1364/AOP.530556

[29]Brecl K, Bokalič M, Faes A, Topič M. An accurate bifacial PV module energy performance model using a direct-diffuse power rating model. Applied Energy. 2025; 382: 125310. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125310

[30]ChenLi Y, Sun Z, Yan D, et al. Degradation mechanism of TOPCon solar cells in an ambient acid environment. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2025; 17(7): 10776–10783. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c21774

[31]Du H, Zhang X, Liu W, et al. High-performance boron emitters for tunnel oxide passivating contact solar cells enabled by multi-layer PECVD-deposited boron source structures. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2025; 515: 163487. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.163487

[32]Su Q, Lin H, Wang G, et al. Contactless characterization of polarity boundary recombination on silicon heterojunction back contact solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 291: 113738. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113738

[33]Banerjee S, Das MK, Ahmed T, et al. Design and analysis of passivated n-Si solar cell employing SiC window layer. Silicon. 2025; 17: 1079–1089. doi: 10.1007/s12633-025-03252-4

[34]Cao K, Yang Z, Wang M, et al. Physical mechanisms and design strategies for high-efficiency back contact tunnel oxide passivating contact solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 289: 113656. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113656

[35]Kirchartz T, Yan G, Yuan Y, et al. The state of the art in photovoltaic materials and device research. Nature Reviews Materials. 2025; 10(5): 335–354. doi: 10.1038/s41578-025-00784-4

[36]Huang H, Du D, Li L, et al. Revealing the effect of phosphorus diffusion gettering on industrial silicon heterojunction solar cell. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 282: 113392. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113392

[37]Xu J, Zhang W, Li Y, et al. The impact of silicon surface pretreatment on interface structure and passivation quality of AlOx films deposited by atomic layer deposition. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2025; 289: 113658. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113658

[38]Hudişteanu VS, Cherecheș NC, Țurcanu FE, et al. Impact of temperature on the efficiency of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic panels: A comprehensive experimental analysis for sustainable energy solutions. Sustainability. 2024; 16(23): 10566. doi: 10.3390/su162310566

[39]Karafil A, Ozbay H, Kesler M. Temperature and solar radiation effects on photovoltaic panel power. Journal of New Results in Science. 2016; 12: 48–58.

[40]Wang S, Peng J, Wang M, et al. Evaluation of the energy conversion performance of different photovoltaic materials with measured solar spectral irradiance. Renewable Energy. 2023; 219(Part 1): 119431. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119431

[41]Bevanda I, Marić P, Kristić A, et al. Assessing the impact of solar spectral variability on the performance of photovoltaic technologies across European climates. Energies. 2025; 18(14): 3868. doi: 10.3390/en18143868

[42]Sen C, Wu X, Wang H, et al. Accelerated damp-heat testing at the cell-level of bifacial silicon HJT, PERC and TOPCon solar cells using sodium chloride. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2023; 262: 112554. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112554

[43]Wang Q, Guo K, Gu S, et al. Electrical performance, loss analysis, and efficiency potential of industrial-type PERC, TOPCon, and SHJ solar cells: A comparative study. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. 2024; 32: 889–903. doi: 10.1002/pip.3839