Thermodynamic modeling of the Power-to-Gas technology with methane and hydrogen as a chemical storage

  • Peter Ivanov orcid

    Joint Institute for High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125412 Moscow, Russia

  • Andrey Zhuk orcid

    Joint Institute for High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125412 Moscow, Russia

Article ID: 3366
Keywords: thermodynamic modeling, TQ-diagrams, Power-to-Gas, solid oxide fuel cells, internal conversion of methane

Abstract

A novel toolset is developed for the thermodynamic modeling of the direct and reverse energy conversion processes in the scope of Power-to-Gas technology, which means the use of gases as chemical storage of electricity. The direct process is well commercialized, electrolysis of water, or of vapor in the high temperature version. The reverse process, up to recently, has been considered unreasonable due to the high demand for electrolysis hydrogen for other processes. An appearance of highly efficient convertors of chemical energy of gases into electricity, like solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), claims to reconsider the Power-to-Gas technology as a whole, firstly from a thermodynamic point of view. It is done in this paper using a one-way conversion approach in terms of thermodynamic cycle and thermodynamic potentials. To deal with the heat flow through the energy conversion plants, the pinch analysis was used by means of composed TQ-diagrams for heat sources and heat sinks. The toolset was tested on two options of the technology with methane and hydrogen as chemical storage. Methane option, compared with hydrogen, seems to be thermodynamically more efficient, because there are two cases of thermally integrating the exothermal and endothermal processes: high temperature electrolysis (SOEC technology) with methanation, and the internal reforming of methane in SOFC.

Published
2025-07-10
How to Cite
Ivanov, P., & Zhuk, A. (2025). Thermodynamic modeling of the Power-to-Gas technology with methane and hydrogen as a chemical storage. Energy Storage and Conversion, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59400/esc3366
Section
Article

References

[1]Görtz J, Aouad M, Wieprecht S, et al. Assessment of pumped hydropower energy storage potential along rivers and shorelines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 165: 112027.

[2]Rabi AM, Radulovic J, James M et al. Comprehensive review of compressed air energy storage (CAES) technologies. Thermo. 2023; 3(1): 104–126. doi: 10.3390/thermo3010008

[3]Olabi A, Wilberforce T, Ramadan M, et al. Compressed air energy storage systems: Components and operating parameters—A review. Journal Energy Storage. 2020; 34: 102000.

[4]Bazdar E, Sameti M, Nasiri F, et al. Compressed air energy storage in integrated energy systems: A review. Renew. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 167: 112701.

[5]Buttler A, Spliethoff H. Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 82(3): 2440–2454. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003

[6]Ghorbani B, Salehi G, Ebrahimi A, et al. Energy, exergy and pinch analyses of a novel energy storage structure using post-combustion CO2 separation unit, dual pressure Linde-Hampson liquefaction system, two-stage organic rankine cycle and geothermal energy. Energy. 2021; 233: 121051.

[7]Ebrahimi A, Ghorbani B, Taghavi M. Novel integrated structure consisting of CO2 capture cycle, heat pump unit, Kalina power, and ejector refrigeration systems for liquid CO2 storage using renewable energies. Energy Science & Engineering. 2022; 10(8):3167–3188.

[8]Taghavi M, Salarian H, Ghorbani B. Economic evaluation of a hybrid hydrogen liquefaction system utilizing liquid air cold recovery and renewable energies. Renewable Energy Research and Applications. 2023; 4(1):125–143.

[9]Taghavi M, Salarian H, Ghorbani B. Thermodynamic and exergy evaluation of a novel integrated hydrogen liquefaction structure using liquid air cold energy recovery, solid oxide fuel cell and fotovoltaic panels. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 320: 128821 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128821

[10]Lehner M, Tichler R, Steinmüller H, et al. The power-to-gas concept. In: Lehner M, Tichler R, Steinmüller H, et al. (editors). Power-to-Gas: Technology and Business Models. Springer Briefs in Energy; 2014. pp. 7–17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03995-4_2

[11]Mueller M, Klinsmann M, Sauter U, et al. High temperature solid oxide electrolysis—technology and modeling. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 2024; 96 (1–2): 143–166; DOI: 10.1002/cite.202300137

[12]Wendel CH, Gao Z, Barnett SA, et al. Modeling and experimental performance of an intermediate temperature reversible solid oxide cell for high-efficiency, distributed-scale electrical energy storage. Journal of Power Sources. 2015; 283: 329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.113

[13]Wang W, Wang S, Ma X, et al. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011; 40: 3703–3727.

[14]Gao J, Wang Y, Ping Y, et al. A thermodynamic analysis of methanation reactions of carbon oxides for the production of synthetic natural gas. RSC Advances. 2012; 2: 2358–2368.

[15]C. Molinet-Chinaglia C, Shafiq S, Serp P. Low Temperature Sabatier CO2 Methanation. CheCatChem. 2024; 16(24). doi: 10.1002/cctc.202401213

[16]Lin Y, Zhang W, Machida H, et al. CFD simulation of the Sabatier process in a shell-and-tube reactor under local thermal non-equilibrium conditions: Parameter sensitivity and reaction mechanism analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022; 47(34): 15254–15269

[17]HELMETH. HELMETH Project. Available online: http://www.helmeth.eu/ (accessed on 31 March 2025).

[18]HELMETH. Methanation process. Available online: http://www.helmeth.eu/index.php/technologies/methanation-process (accessed on 31 March 2025).

[19]HELMETH. Final Report Summary—HELMETH (Integrated High-Temperature Electrolysis and Methanation for Effective Power to Gas Conversion). Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/621210/reporting (accessed on 31 March 2025).

[20]HELMETH. Attachments (publishable figures) to final publishable report. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/621/621210/final1-2017-03-01-helmeth-publishable-figures.pdf (accessed on 31 March 2025).

[21]Leucht KW. How NASA will use robots to create rocket fuel on mars: the year is 2038. IEEE Spectrum. 2018; 55(11): 34–39. doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8513782

[22]Zhuk AZ, Ivanov PP. Thermodynamic cycle of a solid oxide fuel cell with internal methane conversion under the one-way conversion approach. High Temperature. 2024; 62: 801–807. doi: 10.1134/S0018151X25700464

[23]Zhuk AZ, Ivanov PP. Characteristics of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell for the Thermodynamic Modeling of Power Plants. High Temperature. 2023; 61: 714–719.

[24]Belov GV, Iorish VS, Yungman VS. Simulation of equilibrium states of thermodynamic systems using IVTANTHERMO for windows. High Temperature. 2000; 38(2): 191–196.

[25]Curzon FL, Ahlborn B. Efficiency of a carnot engine at maximum power output. American Journal of Physics. 1975; 43: 22–24. doi: 10.1119/1.10023