Turkey’s present hydraulic energy and hydropower potential
Abstract
Energy is a prime agency for economic liberty and sustainability. It can be supplied from fossil or renewable sources. Hydropower is a renewable energy source that generates electricity without emitting greenhouse gases. So, it possesses significant potential for replacing fossil fuel power plants and providing energy by reducing carbon-based energy sources. In that sense, Turkey has several promising initiatives, such as the Southeastern Project (GAP), which generates 27 billion kWh of hydroelectric energy. On the other hand, Turkey has significant installed capacity. The Atatürk Dam is the sixth largest volume dam in the world, and the average electricity energy production is 8.5 billion kWh/year. Based on the geographic distribution of these sources, a significant portion of the water potential is located in the southeast (28%) and the Black Sea region (8%). Considering these advantages of hydropower, this article shows the hydraulic energy potential in our country. Energy necessities and the balance between supply and demand and their effects are also comprehensively discussed. Finally, the presented study emphasized that Turkey has high hydraulic potential due to its varied topology and numerous rivers. That source also displays economically feasible, environmentally available, and unique domestic characteristics.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Niu S, Jia Y, Wang W, et al. Electricity consumption and human development level: A comparative analysis based on panel data for 50 countries. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2013; 53: 338–347.
[2]Osipov VI, Galitskaya IV, Zaikanov VG. Landfill Technology of Waste Management. Water Resources. 2022; 49(2): 525–535.
[3]Baird J. Global warming, a global energy resource. Thermal Science and Engineering. 2024; 7(2).
[4]Dolgushev TV. Influence of Climate Changes in the Barents Sea Level Mode on Port Hydraulic Engineering. Power Technology and Engineering. 2023; 57(1).
[5]Kaygusuz K. Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012; 16(2): 1116–112.
[6]Babadjanova M, Bobojonov I, Bekchanov M, et al. Can domestic wheat farming meet the climate change-induced challenges of national food security in Uzbekistan? International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2024; 40(3): 448–462.
[7]Yuksel I. As a renewable energy hydropower for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010; 14(9): 3213–321.
[8]Moya D, Aldás C, Kaparaju P. Geothermal energy: Power plant technology and direct heat applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 94: 889–90.
[9]Gökgöz F, Yücel O. Merit-order of dispatchable and variable renewable energy sources in Turkey’s day-ahead electricity market. Utilities Policy. 2024; 88: 101758.
[10]Acaroğlu H. An Assessment of Electricity Markets in Turkey: Price Mechanisms, Regulations, and Methods. In: Sustainability: Cases and Studies in Using Operations Research and Management Science Methods. Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 199–216.
[11]Melikoğlu M. Hydropower in Turkey: Analysis in the view of Vision 2023. Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews. 2013; 25: 503–510.
[12]Benli H. Potential of renewable energy in electrical energy production and sustainable energy development of Turkey: Performance and policies. Renewable Energy. 2013; 50: 33–46.
[13]Oğulata RT. Sectoral energy consumption in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2001; 6(5): 471–480.
[14]Demirbaş A, Akdeniz F, Güllü D, et al. Energy policies and sustainable energy options of Turkey up to 2010. Energy Education Science & Technology. 2001; 7: 19–36.
[15]Erat S, Telli A, Ozkendir OM, et al. Turkey’s energy transition from fossil-based to renewable up to 2030: Milestones, challenges and opportunities. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2021; 23: 401–412.
[16]Hydroelectric Power Plants in Turkey. Available online: https://www.enerjiatlasi.com/hidroelektrik/ (accessed on 2 December 2024).
[17]World Energy Council, Turkish National Committee, Türkiye’s Energy Sector Report. Available online: http://www.dunyaenerji.org.tr (accessed on 2 December 2024).
[18]Koç C. A study on the development of hydropower potential in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014; 39, 498–508.
[19]Toklu E. Overview of potential and utilization of renewable energy sources in Turkey. Renewable Energy. 2013; 50: 456–463.
[20]Demirbaş A, Bakış R. Turkey’s water resources and hydropower potential. Energy Exploration & Exploitation. 2005; 23(1): 19–29.
[21]Kaygusuz K. Hydropower and Biomass as Renewable Energy Sources in Turkey. Energy Sources. 2001; 23: 775–799.
[22]Pioro I, Duffey R. Nuclear power as a basis for future electricity generation. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science. 2015; 1(1).
[23]Onat N, Bayar H. The sustainability indicators of power production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010; 14(9): 3108–3115.
[24]Uddin R, Shaikh AI, Khan HR, et al. Renewable energy perspectives of Pakistan and Turkey: Current analysis and policy recommendations. Sustainability. 2021; 13(6): 3349.
[25]Hepbaslı A, Ozdamar A, Ozalp N. Present Status and Potential of Renewable Energy Sources in Turkey. Energy Sources. 2001; 23: 631–648.
[26]Aydoğan B, Görmüş T, Ayat B, et al. Analysis of potential changes in the Black Sea wave power for the 21st century. Renewable Energy. 2021; 169: 512–526.
[27]Yuksek O, Komurcu MI, Yuksel I, et al. The role of hydropower in meeting Turkey’s electric energy demand. Energy policy. 2006; 34(17): 3093–3103.
[28]General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works annual reports. Available online: https://www.dsi.gov.tr/ (accessed on 2 April 2024).
[29]Paish O. Small hydro power technology and current status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2002; 6(6): 537–556.
[30]Kaygusuz K. Hydro power and the world’s energy future. Energy Sources. 2004; 26: 215–224.
[31]Demirbaş A. Sustainable development of hydropower energy in Turkey. Energy Sources. 2002; 24: 2–40.
[32]Dursun B, Gokcol C. The role of hydroelectric power and contribution of small hydropower plants for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable Energy. 2011; 36(4): 1227–1235.
[33]Serencam U. Capacity Factor Analysis in Small Scale Hydropower Plants and a Practice Specific to Giresun. GÜFBED/GUSTIJ. 2019; 9(4): 691–698.
[34]GAP Regional Development Administration. Available online: http://www.gap.gov.tr/ (accessed on 2 April 2024).
[35]Kaygusuz K. Contribution of the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) to irrigation and hydroelectric power production in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 2010; 5(2): 199–209.
[36]Kankal M, Bayram A, Uzlu E, et al. Assessment of hydropower and multi-dam power projects in Turkey. Renewable Energy. 2014; 68: 118–133.
[37]Balat M. Current hydro power potential in Turkey and sustainability of hydro power for Turkey’s energy demand. Energy Exploration & Explotation. 2005; 23(1): 1–18.
[38]Yücer AA. An assessment of the water, irrigation, and food security by a fishbone analysis in Turkey. Open Access Library Journal. 2020; 7(11): 1.
[39]Wasti A, Ray P, Wi S, et al. Climate change and the hydropower sector: A global review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2022; 13(2): e757.
[40]Adhikari S, Sopin J, Techato KA, et al. A Systematic Review on investment risks in hydropower to developing sustainable renewable energy systems. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2023; 13(2): 222–230.
[41]Mayeda AM, Boyd AD. Factors influencing public perceptions of hydropower projects: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020; 121: 109713.
[42]Al Mubarak F, Rezaee R, Wood DA. Economic, societal, and environmental impacts of available energy sources: A review. Eng. 2024; 5(3): 1232–1265.
[43]Gemechu E, Kumar A. A review of how life cycle assessment has been used to assess the environmental impacts of hydropower energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 167: 112684.
[44]Zahedi R, Ahmadi A, Gitifar S. Reduction of the environmental impacts of the hydropower plant by microalgae cultivation and biodiesel production. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022; 304: 114247.
[45]Arbour AJ, Bhatt P, Simsek H, et al. Life cycle assessment on environmental feasibility of microalgae-based wastewater treatment for shrimp recirculating aquaculture systems. Bioresource Technology. 2024; 399: 130578.
[46]Aung TS, Fischer TB, Azmi AS. Are large-scale dams environmentally detrimental? Life-cycle environmental consequences of mega-hydropower plants in Myanmar. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2020; 25: 1749–1766.
[47]Solarin SA, Bello MO, Bekun MV. Sustainable electricity generation: the possibility of substituting fossil fuels for hydropower and solar energy in Italy. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 2021; 28(5): 429–439.
[48]Sayed ET, Wilberforce T, Elsaid K, et al. A critical review on environmental impacts of renewable energy systems and mitigation strategies: Wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal, Science of the total environment. 2021; 766: 144505.
[49]Yüksel I. Hydropower for sustainable water and energy development Renewable andsustainable energy reviews. 2010; 14(1): 462–469.


