The character model of a scientist: Structure and role

Jian Zhou; Jian’er Yu; Rebecca Susan Dewey; Yuanyuan Zhou

doi:10.59400/apr4148

The character model of a scientist: Structure and role

Jian Zhou
Continuing Medical Education Center, Shanwei Second People’s Hospital, Shanwei 516600, China
Jian’er Yu
Continuing Medical Education Center, Shanwei Second People’s Hospital, Shanwei 516600, China
Rebecca Susan Dewey
Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Yuanyuan Zhou
Department of Statistics, Shanwei Second People’s Hospital, Shanwei 516600, China

Article ID: 4148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/apr4148

Keywords: scientists’ character, character model of scientists, role, scientific education, science study

Abstract

People have been studying the characteristics of scientists for more than 100 years. Some related studies have drawn on concepts and methods from fields such as psychology, cognitive science, ethics, and behavioral science, proposing certain incomplete perspectives. However, systematic research in this area remains insufficient to date. Based on a literature review and theoretical analysis, this study integrates research findings from modern psychology, cognitive science, ethics and moral science, and behavioral science to propose a systematic theoretical framework for the character of a scientist. The study introduces a novel definition of these traits, elucidates their constituent elements, and establishes a theoretical model for describing the characteristics of scientists. This paper also discusses the close connections between the scientist model and the Big Five Personality Model, Rational Cognitive Style Theory, Schwartz Value Theory, and Habit Behavior Theory, as well as the relationships among the various dimensions of the model. The proposal and dissemination of the scientist character theory will facilitate the objective selection of future scientists and researchers, as well as the acquisition and enhancement of their scientific research skills, ultimately advancing the progress of scientific research. Simultaneously, it may exert positive potential impacts on science communication, public understanding of science, and the development of scientific culture and science education.

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Zhou, J., Yu, J., Dewey, R. S., & Zhou, Y. (2026). The character model of a scientist: Structure and role. Applied Psychology Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.59400/apr4148

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[2]Andrews, R. W. (1973). A Comparison of Students and Scientists' Understanding of the Characteristics of Scientists [Master’s thesis]. Memorial University of Newfoundland.

[3]Anita, R. (1992). Images of science a study of school and scientists: Teachers’ views. i. Characteristics of Scientists. Science Education, 76(4), 415–436.

[4]Anne, S. (2008). Albert Einstein. Pasadena, CA: Saddleback Educational Publishing.

[5]Blomstervik, I. H., & Olsen, S. O. (2026). The relationship between personal values and preference for novelty: Conceptual issues and the novelty–familiarity continuum. Current Issues in Tourism, 29(3), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2428767

[6]Bucchi, M., Loner, E., & Fattorini, E. (2019). Give science and peace achance: Speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences,1901–2018. PLoS One, 14(10), e0223505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223505

[7]Cai, D. C. (2003). Scientific spirit and humanistic spirit are inseparable. Democracy and Science, 15(2), 12–14. (in Chinese)

[8]Chen, Z., Song, G. D. (2020). A qualitative analysis of personality traits of natural scientists in China. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–20.

[9]Chiang, K. S. (1943). The Way and Spirit of Science. Nature, 152(8), 180–182.

[10]David, P. (2007). The 1000 Wisest Things Ever Said by Nobel Prize Laureates. New York, NY: Walker & Company.

[11]Farsad, L., & Modarresi, G. (2022). EFL Learners’ construction of L2 ego and its relationship with emotional intelligence. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 124–139.

[12]Fatima, S. K., Tholappan, A., Anandan, K., et al. (2025). Correlative study of cognitive style on problem-solving ability among secondary school students. Bharati International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 3(6), 167–184.

[13]Feist, G. J. (1993). A structure model of science eminence. Psychological science, 4(6), 366–371.

[14]Gardner, B., Amanda, L., Rebar, A., et al. (2024). What is habit and how can it be used to change real‐world behaviour? Narrowing the theory‐reality gap. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 18(6), e12975. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12975

[15]Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., et al. (editors). (2020). The Handbook of Behavior Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[16]Han, D. P. (2021). I say the spirit of science. Science and society, 40(3), 6–10. (in Chinese)

[17]Harrison, G. G., & Donald, G. W. (1960). Stylistic variations among professional research scientists. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 49(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1960.9916387

[18]Heath, R. W. (1964). Curriculum, Cognition, and Educational Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24(2), 239–253.

[19]Ji, S. L. (1991). The antinomy of science and democracy in modern China. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 5(2), 109–130. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698599108573384

[20]John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In: Pervin, L. A. (edior), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Guilford Press. pp. 66–100

[21]John, W. L., Nancy, F., Hemali, P., et al. (2012). An investigation of the personality traits of scientists versus nonscientists and their relationship with career satisfaction. R&D Management, 42(1), 47–59.

[22]Khine, M. S. (2012). Advances in Nature of Science Research: Concepts and Methodologies. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.

[23]Lee, Y. H., (2013). A Proposal of Inclusive Framework of the Nature of Science (NOS) Based on the 4 Themes of Scientific Literacy for K-12 School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(5), 553–568.

[24]Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988). The Spirit of Science: Presidential Address to the American Society for Clinical Investigation, Washington, DC, 30 April 1988. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 82(8), 375–378.

[25]Lewis, C., & William, G. (1882). The Lief of James Clerk Maxwell. London: Macmillan and CO.

[26]Louwen, C., Reidlinger, D., & Milne, N. (2023). Profiling health professionals’ personality traits, behaviour styles and emotional intelligence: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 23, 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04003-y

[27]Martínez-Romera, D. D. (2018). Sternberg-Wagner thinking styles: A research tool in social science didactics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.422

[28]McLaern, D. S. (1980). The spirit of science: A threat to medicine. Medical Education, 14(3), 225–226.

[29]Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Srorer, N. W. (editor). The Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[30]Miller, D. C. (1936). The spirit and service of science. Science, 84(2179), 297–304.

[31]Nehru, J. (2004). The Discovery of India. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

[32]Pavlov and the spirit of science. (1936). News and views. Nature, 137, 572. https://doi.org/10.1038/137572a0

[33]Peng, H., & Tang, Z. S. (2021). Scientific spirit under the background of core literacy: Essential characteristics, internal logic and times value. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Educational Science), 33(5), 105–110. (in Chinese)

[34]Petkova, K., & Boyadjieva, P. (1994). The image of the scientist and its functions. Public Understanding of Science, 3(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/3/2/005

[35]Qin, Y. H. (2006). On Scientific Spirit—And an Analysis of the Deficiency and Cultivation of the Scientific Spirit in My Country [PhD thesis]. Fudan University. (in Chinese)

[36]Riding, R. J. (1997).On the nature of cognitive Style. Educational Psychology, 17(1–2), 29–49.

[37]Sadler-Smith, E. (2004). Cognitive style and the management of small and medium-sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 25(2), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604036914

[38]Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal Values Across Cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517–546. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100

[39]Samuel, J. U. (2012). Impacts of personality traits on career choice of information scientists in Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 4(4), 57–70.

[40]Sato, W. (2016). Scientists’ personality, values, and well-being. Springer Plus, 5, 613. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2225-2

[41]Saxena, A. (2014). Understanding Scientific Temperament and Assessing its Social Relevance. Journal of Scientific Temper, 2(1–2), 121–140.

[42]Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116

[43]Sezgin, E. (2021). A Comparative Investigation on the Characteristics of Scientists in Social Studies Teaching. Ulakbilge. 67, 1371–1391.

[44]Shaila, D. (2019). Please Think: Practical Lessons in Developing a Scientific Temper. Vipra, J. (translator). Chennai: Westland Publications Private Limited.

[45]Sheldrake, R. (2012). The Science Delusion Freeing the Spirit of Enquiry. Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.

[46]Sier, V. Q., Schmitz, R. F., Putter, H., et al. (2022). The big five: Studying the surgical personality. Surgery, 172(5), 1358–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.003

[47]Snow, C. P. (1998). The Two Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[48]Snowden, J. H. (1917). The Scientific Spirit in Theological Study and Teaching. The Biblical World, 49(5), 275–280.

[49]Su, D. (2013). On the integration of scientific spirit and humanistic spirit. Journal of Academic Exchange, 29(1), 59–63. (in Chinese)

[50]Visser, J. (2000). The Scientific Mind in Context. Windermere, FL: Learning Development Institute.

[51]Wang, B. (2005). Revelation of Scientific Spirit. Shanghai: Shanghai Science Popularization Press. (in Chinese)

[52]Zheng, M. H., Ren, S. R., Ren, L., et al. (2021). Scientific spirit and its measurement in the citizen's scientific quality. Studies on Science Popularization, 16(2), 24–31. (in Chinese)

[53]Zhou, J., Lin, Y. Q., Dewey, R. S., et al. (2023). The distribution of Kolb's learning style in college students from different family backgrounds. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, 13(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.51847/zUO6U56w16

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Giuseppe Lanza

Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Italy

eISSN

3029-276X

Publication Frequency

Semi-annual

Indexing

Polish Scientific Bibliography

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

Featured Articles

A comprehensive review (1963–2024) of environmental psychology: Trends, themes, and future directions

Multidisciplinary environmental psychology studies the dynamic link between humans and their natural and manmade settings. This thorough study synthesises 443 works from 1963 to 2024 on topics such as physical surroundings’ effects on behaviour, environmental stressors, pro-environmental behaviour, and applying psychological theories to environmental interactions. This literature is synthesised to identify patterns, themes, and future directions. Growing environmental concerns and the need for sustainable development have changed the profession. Green areas have been demonstrated to boost mental health and reduce stress. Nature helps mental exhaustion recuperation. Hospitals and workplaces’ design and structure affect health and productivity. Walkable, green urban development improves citizens’ well-being and promotes sustainable living. Environmental stresses including noise, pollution, and overpopulation harm mental and physical health. Children exposed to noise pollution are more likely to develop cardiovascular illness and cognitive deficits. Anxiety and despair caused by climate change are also becoming more apparent. Pro-environmental behaviour is emphasised, with notions like planned behaviour and community-based social marketing working. Behaviour interventions using social norms and feedback have decreased energy and waste. Personal values-driven intrinsic motivation promotes long-term behavioural change better than extrinsic incentive. Environmental psychology uses surveys, experiments, and mixed-methods research. Virtual and augmented reality provide for environmental simulations and psychological studies. Good health and well-being, excellent education, sustainable cities, responsible consumerism, climate action, and living on land are among the field’s major contributions to the UNSDGs. Environmental psychology will help establish sustainable and healthy settings that correspond with the UNSDGs as environmental issues grow.

The impact of the menstrual cycle on emotions and behavior—A review of current research

The menstrual cycle has attracted the interest of many researchers for many years. It is analyzed from many angles, including its impact on mental health. Hormonal changes over the course of the cycle have a very strong impact on the emotions, needs, or pain experienced. Estrogen, secreted shortly before ovulation, influences increased confidence and feelings of attractiveness, which can lead to new relationships. In contrast, progesterone, secreted during the luteal phase, promotes the strengthening of stable relationships, and a large proportion of women may experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS) during this time. This publication discusses studies from recent years that have assessed the variability of women’s needs and emerging symptoms during different phases of the cycle. It also summarizes any strategies and practical tips needed to work with women considering their cyclical variability.

Testing social impact and self-attention predictions with live audiences and co-actors

This experiment examined the influences of number of co-actors and audience size on manual dexterity task performance and subjective reactions such as perceived effort and arousal. Predictions derived from social impact theory and the self-attention perspective’s other-total ratio indicated that both number of co-actors and audience size should influence responses. Undergraduate students (N = 128) responded as 1, 2, 4, or 8 group members who were observed in counterbalanced fashion by 1, 2, 4, or 8 audience members for four performance trials. The predictions of increased task performance with larger audience sizes and decreased performance as number of co-actors increased were not supported. Participants’ rated arousal was somewhat consistent with the predictions from the self-attention perspective and social impact theory. Self-reported effort was consistent with the predicted patterns, but not always significantly so. The influence of number of others is moderated by the objective-subjective nature of responses of real co-actors performing in front of live audiences.

Manifesting the academic psychological contract

The level of research undertaken on the academic psychological contract, and its influence on academics’ behaviour is limited. This paper seeks to consider the academic psychological contract, by reviewing its manifestation within the role and the influence on their undertaking of the role. Particularly important is academics’ interpretation of the role and what they consider important. Within this, the paper considers in-role and extra-role activities and what may be the grey areas in which time is spent. The research adopts the combined usage of phenomenology with interpretivist processes to investigate the insights of eighteen academics at nine UK University Business Schools. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data to consider the constructs’ manifestation. Key aspects of behaviour were identified as discretionary effort autonomy and managerialism, with links to academic citizenship.