Manifesting the academic psychological contract
Abstract
The level of research undertaken on the academic psychological contract, and its influence on academic’s behaviour is limited. This paper seeks to consider the academic psychological contract, by reviewing its manifestation within the role of and the influence on their undertaking of the role. Particularly important is academics’ interpretation of the role and what they consider important. Within this, the paper considers in-role and extra-role activities and what may be the grey areas in which time is spent. The research adopts the combined usage of phenomenology with interpretivist processes to investigate the insights of eighteen academics at nine UK University Business Schools. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect to consider the constructs’ manifestation. Key aspects of behaviour were identified as discretionary effort and autonomy and managerialism with links to academic citizenship.
References
Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL. Interviews. Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges. Published online 2012: 239-257. doi: 10.4135/9781526435620.n14
Avramenko A. Inspiration at work: is it an oxymoron? Baltic Journal of Management. 2013, 9(1): 113-130. doi: 10.1108/bjm-07-2013-0110
Bathmaker S. “So, what’s the deal?” the state of the psychological contract in a ‘new’ university. Journal of Vocational Education & Training. 1999, 51(2): 265-282. doi: 10.1080/13636829900200084
Bryson C. What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal. 2004, 35(1): 38-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2004.00299.x
Coyne I, Gavin F. Employee relations and motivation. In: Lewis R, Zibarras L (editors). Work and Occupational Psychology: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage; 2013.
Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Sage; 2014
Deem R, Brehony KJ. Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education. 2005, 31(2): 217-235. doi: 10.1080/03054980500117827
Deem R. Changing Research Perspectives on the Management of Higher Education: Can Research Permeate the Activities of Manager‐Academics? Higher Education Quarterly. 2006, 60(3): 203-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2006.00322.x
DelCampo RG. Understanding the psychological contract: a direction for the future. Management Research News. 2007, 30(6): 432-440. doi: 10.1108/01409170710751926
Gammie RG. Psychological Contracts in a Business School Context [PhD thesis]. University of Stirling; 2006; Unpublished work.
Gillespie NA, Walsh M, Winefield AH, et al. Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & Stress. 2001, 15(1): 53-72. doi: 10.1080/02678370117944
Guercini S. New qualitative research methodologies in management. Simone Guercini P, ed. Management Decision. 2014, 52(4): 662-674. doi: 10.1108/md-11-2013-0592
Guest DE. Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1998, 19(S1): 649-664. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(1998)19: 1+<649: : aid-job970>3.0.co, 2-t
Herriot P, Manning WEG, Kidd JM. The Content of the Psychological Contract. British Journal of Management. 1997, 8(2): 151-162. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.0047
Herriot P, Pemberton C. Facilitating new deals. Human Resource Management Journal. 1997, 7(1): 45-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1997.tb00273.x
Jha S, Pingle S. Organizational impact of psychological contract: An empirical study. Review of Management. 2015; 5 (1/2): 31–39.
Johns G. Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2009, 31(4): 519-542. doi: 10.1002/job.630
Johnston A. The impact of the psychological contract on academics’ discretionary effort. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice. University Forum for Human Resource Development; 7–9 June 2017; Lisbon, Portugal.
Kasekende F, Munene JC, Ntayi JM, et al. The interaction effect of social exchanges on the relationship between organizational climate and psychological contract. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2015, 36(7): 833-848. doi: 10.1108/lodj-01-2014-0007
Kasekende F. Psychological contract, engagement and employee discretionary behaviours. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2017, 66(7): 896-913. doi: 10.1108/ijppm-07-2016-0136
Kelley-Patterson D, George C. Securing graduate commitment: an exploration of the comparative expectations of placement students, graduate recruits and human resource managers within the hospitality, leisure and tourism industries. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2001, 20(4): 311-323. doi: 10.1016/s0278-4319(01)00019-6
Krivokapic-Skoko B, O’Neill G. University academics’ psychological contracts in Australia: A mixed methods research approach. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008; 6(1): 61–72.
Macfarlane B. Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2007, 29(3): 261-273. doi: 10.1080/13600800701457863
Marks A. Developing a multiple foci conceptualization of the psychological contract. Employee Relations. 2001, 23(5): 454-469. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000005897
Miles RE, Snow CC. Designing strategic human resources systems. Organizational Dynamics. 1984, 13(1): 36-52. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(84)90030-5
Nutakki LP, Reddy MS, Balan S. Psychological contract in the Indian higher education sector. IUP Journal of Soft Skills. 2015; 9(1): 35–44.
O’Neill G, Krivokapic-Skoko B, Dowell D. Unpacking informal contractual relationships: psychological contracts established by Australian business academics. Irish Journal of Management. 2010; 29(2): 5–33.
Ramdhony A, Francis H. In search of the critical in the concept of engagement: Implications for HRD professionals. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice Across Europe; 4–6 June 2014; Edinburgh, Scotland.
Rousseau D, Schalk R. Psychological Contracts in Employment: Cross-National Perspectives. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2000. doi: 10.4135/9781452231273
Rousseau DM, Hansen SD, Tomprou M. A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2018, 39(9): 1081-1098. doi: 10.1002/job.2284
Rousseau DM, Parks JM. The contracts of individuals and organisations. Research in Organisational Behavior. 1993; 15: 1–43.
Rousseau DM. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1990, 11(5): 389-400. doi: 10.1002/job.4030110506
Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed. Prentice Hall; 2009.
Sewpersad R, Ruggunan S, Adam JK, et al. The Impact of the Psychological Contract on Academics. SAGE Open. 2019, 9(2): 215824401984012. doi: 10.1177/2158244019840122
Shen J. University academics’ psychological contracts and their fulfilment. Journal of Management Development. 2010, 29(6): 575-591. doi: 10.1108/02621711011046549
Stone-Romero EF, Alvarez K, Thompson LF. The construct validity of conceptual and operational definitions of contextual performance and related constructs. Human Resource Management Review. 2009, 19(2): 104-116. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.003
Tallman RJ. Are psychological contracts idiosyncratic. Review of Business Research. 2008; 8(6): 211–218.
Tookey M. The Impact of The Psychological Contract on Job Performance and Satisfaction[PhD thesis]. University of East Anglia; 2013; Unpublished work.
Vardi I. The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life. Higher Education. 2008, 57(4): 499-508. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9159-8
Wellin M. Managing the Psychological Contract. Gower; 2007.
Copyright (c) 2024 Alan Johnston
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that the authors are given credit. With this license, authors hold the copyright.
