Evaluating the profitability of forest biomass power generation: A mathematical modeling approach

  • Bahar Panbechi School of Energy Engineering and Sustainable Resources, College of Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran 1439957131, Iran
  • Ali Roghani Araghi School of Energy Engineering and Sustainable Resources, College of Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran 1439957131, Iran
Article ID: 2181
Keywords: forest biomass; transportation; profitability; CO2 limitation; renewable energy

Abstract

This article presents a detailed assessment of the economic feasibility of establishing a forest biomass power plant using a mathematical programming model that incorporates various operational and economic factors. Results indicate that this power plant is currently unprofitable, highlighting the financial challenges renewable energy projects face. Multiple factors, such as transportation costs, CO2 penalties, and local employment impacts, significantly affect the net revenue generated from electricity derived from wood products. The need for strategic interventions to improve revenue generation and enhance the profitability of forest biomass power plants is evident. In this article, in addition to examining the challenges, suggestions will be provided to improve the economic status of biomass power plants, which can assist stakeholders in their future decision-making.

References

[1]An J, Mikhaylov A, Jung SU. The Strategy of South Korea in the Global Oil Market. Energies. 2020; 13(10): 2491. doi: 10.3390/en13102491

[2]Fetting C. The European green deal. ESDN Report; 2020.

[3]Szpilko D, Ejdys J. European Green Deal-research directions. a systematic literature review. Ekonomia i Środowisko; 2022.

[4]Titus BD, Brown K, Helmisaari HS, et al. Sustainable forest biomass: a review of current residue harvesting guidelines. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2021; 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s13705-021-00281-w

[5]Martinez-Valencia L, Camenzind D, Wigmosta M, et al. Biomass supply chain equipment for renewable fuels production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021; 148: 106054. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106054

[6]Acuna M, Sessions J, Zamora R, et al. Methods to Manage and Optimize Forest Biomass Supply Chains: a Review. Current Forestry Reports. 2019; 5(3): 124-141. doi: 10.1007/s40725-019-00093-4

[7]Sikkema R, Junginger M, Van Dam J, et al. Legal Harvesting, Sustainable Sourcing and Cascaded Use of Wood for Bioenergy: Their Coverage through Existing Certification Frameworks for Sustainable Forest Management. Forests. 2014; 5(9): 2163-2211. doi: 10.3390/f5092163

[8]Andersen RS, Towers W, Smith P. Assessing the potential for biomass energy to contribute to Scotland’s renewable energy needs. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2005; 29(2): 73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.04.004

[9]Parvez AM, Lewis JD, Afzal MT. Potential of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for bioenergy production in Canada: Status, challenges and outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021; 141: 110784. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110784

[10]da Silva BP, Saccol F, Caetano NR, et al. Technical and Economic Viability for the Briquettes Manufacture. Defect and Diffusion Forum. 2017; 380: 218-226. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.380.218

[11]Feliciano D, Slee B, Smith P. The potential uptake of domestic woodfuel heating systems and its contribution to tackling climate change: A case study from the North East Scotland. Renewable Energy. 2014; 72: 344-353. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.039

[12]Demirbaş A. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy conversion and Management; 2001.

[13]McKay H. Environmental, economic, social and political drivers for increasing use of woodfuel as a renewable resource in Britain. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2006; 30(4): 308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.07.008

[14]Scottish Government. Renewable Energy: Progress Report 2020. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2020.

[15]Korhaliller S. The UK’s biomass energy development path. IIED, London, UK; 2010.

[16]Caetano NR, da Silva BP, Ruoso AC, et al. Rocha LA, Lorenzini G. Energy Recovery Based on Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Heat Regeneration Processes Applied in a Firewood Boiler. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics. 2023; 32(3): 482-501. doi: 10.1134/s1810232823030062

[17]Bulut S, Aytaş İ. Modeling potential distribution and above-ground biomass of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in the Inner Anatolian Region, Türkiye. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2023; 195(12). doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-12101-z

[18]Scottish Government. Scotland’s Forestry Strategy 2019-2029. Edinburgh: Forestry and Land Scotland. Available online: https://www.forestry.gov.scot/publications/373-scotland-s-forestry-strategy-2019-2029 (accessed on 5 May 2024).

[19]Scottish Natural Heritage. Scottish Natural Heritage Factsheet. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-natural-heritage-factsheet/ (accessed on 5 May 2024).

[20]Ahtikoski A, Heikkilä J, Alenius V, et al. Economic viability of utilizing biomass energy from young stands—The case of Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2008; 32(11): 988-996. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.022

[21]Elkington J. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review. 1994; 36(2): 90-100. doi: 10.2307/41165746

[22]Makepa DC, Chihobo CH, Ruziwa WR, et al. A systematic review of the techno-economic assessment and biomass supply chain uncertainties of biofuels production from fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Fuel Communications. 2023; 14: 100086. doi: 10.1016/j.jfueco.2023.100086

[23]Atashbar NZ, Labadie N, Prins C. Modeling and optimization of biomass supply chains: A review and a critical look. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016; 49(12): 604-615. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.742

[24]Scottish Government. Scottish Energy Strategy: The Future of Energy in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Available online: https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-energy-strategy-future-energy-scotland/ (accessed on 5 May 2024).

[25]Hogan JL. Why does community ownership foster greater acceptance of renewable projects? Investigating energy justice explanations. Local Environment. 2024; 29(9): 1221-1243. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2360716

[26]Stepanova D, Yousif NBA, Karlibaeva R, et al. Current analysis of cryptocurrency mining industry. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2024; 8(7): 4803. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4803

[27]Kleinert T, Labbé M, Ljubić I, et al. A Survey on Mixed-Integer Programming Techniques in Bilevel Optimization. EURO Journal on Computational Optimization. 2021; 9: 100007. doi: 10.1016/j.ejco.2021.100007

[28]Warren J. Average Cost of Electricity Per kWh in the UK. Available online: https://energyguide.org.uk/average-cost-electricity-kwh-uk/ (accessed on 25 May 2024).

[29]Lowry Z. How Much Wood Is in a Logging Truck’s Load? 2022; Available online: https://thetimberlandinvestor.com/how-much-wood-is-in-a-logging-trucks-load/ (accessed on 25 May 2024).

[30]Bhattacharya SC, Albina DO, and Abdul Salam P. Emission factors of wood and charcoal-fired cookstoves. Biomass and Bioenergy; 2002.

[31]Wood Fuel Demand and Usage in Scotland - 2021 report; Available online: https://www.forestry.gov.scot/publications/1486-wood-fuel-demand-and-usage-in-scotland-2021-report; (accessed on 4 May 2024).

[32]Roberts G. Scottish Forestry funds electric timber truck trial in Scotland. Available online: https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/truck-news/2023/05/02/scottish-forestry-funds-electric-timber-truck-trial-in-scotland; (accessed on 3 May 2023).

[33]Thakur A, Canter CE, Kumar A. Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass. Applied Energy. 2014; 128: 246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.085

[34]Shabani N, Sowlati T. A mixed integer non-linear programming model for tactical value chain optimization of a wood biomass power plant. Applied Energy. 2013; 104: 353-361. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.013

Published
2025-02-17
How to Cite
Panbechi, B., & Araghi, A. R. (2025). Evaluating the profitability of forest biomass power generation: A mathematical modeling approach. Energy Storage and Conversion, 3(1), 2181. https://doi.org/10.59400/esc2181
Section
Article