Thermal imaging-based fault detection and energy efficiency analysis in a 1.6 MW photovoltaic system in Bağyurdu OIZ, Türkiye
Abstract
The present study assesses the influence of thermal imaging defect detection on the energy efficiency of a 1.6 MW solar power facility in the Bağyurdu Organized Industrial Zone (OIZ) in İzmir, Turkey. Thermal imaging has demonstrated efficacy in detecting serious problems in photovoltaic (PV) panels, including hot spots, inoperative modules, faulty connections, and shadowing, which substantially impact system performance. A comprehensive investigation revealed that around 15% of the photovoltaic panels displayed defects, resulting in a 16% decrease in system performance and an estimated yearly energy loss of 0.35 GWh. The study emphasizes the benefits of thermal imaging compared to conventional fault detection techniques, including its capacity for swift and non-invasive identification of localized overheating, which may lead to fires, and its ability to discern fluctuations in energy output due to shading or malfunctioning modules. The results underscore the necessity for routine thermal evaluations and maintenance to guarantee photovoltaic systems’ operational efficacy and dependability. This study enhances the sparse data on large-scale photovoltaic systems in Türkiye and illustrates the effectiveness of thermal imaging as an economical and accurate diagnostic instrument. Future studies should amalgamate thermal imaging with sophisticated diagnostic techniques, like electroluminescence testing and machine learning, to augment fault detection precision and optimize photovoltaic system efficacy.
References
[1]Bradbury K, Pravettoni M, Betts TR. Photovoltaic module performance in real-world conditions: Long-term field monitoring and machine learning analysis. Prog Photovolt Res Appl. 2016; 24(1): 19–34. doi: 10.1002/pip.2702
[2]Andò B, Baglio S, Marletta V, Pitrone N. A low-cost infrared thermography system for real-time fault detection in photovoltaic plants. IEEE Sens J. 2015; 15(12): 7265–7272. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2015.2477520
[3]Murillo-Soto D, Meza A. Advanced methodologies for the diagnosis of photovoltaic systems: A review. J Sol Energy Eng. 2021; 143(2): 1–15. doi: 10.1115/1.4049319
[4]Ge W, Zhang Y, Sun H. A comparative study on PV panel performance under different maintenance strategies: Implications from thermal imaging analysis. Int J Sol Energy. 2022; 85: 152–162. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.12.034
[5]Cubukcu M, Akanalci A. Real-time inspection and determination methods of faults on photovoltaic power systems by thermal imaging in Türkiye. Renew Energy. 2020; 147: 1231–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.013
[6]Song X, Qian Y, Ma L. Detection and analysis of shadow effect in PV systems using thermal imaging. J Clean Prod. 2018; 182: 625–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.048
[7]Tan W, Sun J, Liu Q. Mitigating the impact of shading on photovoltaic performance using thermal imaging analysis. Renew Energy Res Appl. 2023; 10: 30–42.
[8]Da Costa RS, Smith MD, Oliveria C. The role of thermal imaging in enhancing the performance and reliability of photovoltaic systems in Türkiye. J Renew Energy Stud. 2021; 32: 45–61.
[9]Zhang Y, Liu Z, Huang S. Optimizing photovoltaic performance: The role of thermal imaging in fault detection and maintenance. Renew Energy Syst. 2024; 88: 203–214. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.06.013
[10]Jiang P, Luo P, Yang Z. Detection of hot spots in photovoltaic systems using infrared thermography and its efficiency analysis. Energy Convers Manag. 2015; 105: 868–878. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.022
[11]Li D, Tao X, Wang Y. The impact of dust and shading on photovoltaic output and the use of thermography for detection. Energy Reports. 2017; 3: 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2017.03.005
[12]Aslam, A.; Ahmed, N.; Qureshi, S.A.; Assadi, M.; Ahmed, N. Advances in Solar PV Systems: A Comprehensive Review of PV Performance, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Techniques. Energies 2022, 15, 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207595
[13]Muñoz J, Alonso-García MC, Vela N. Early failure detection of PV modules by thermographic techniques. Sol Energy. 2011; 85(9): 2119–2127. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.06.016
[14]Silvestre S, Costa R, Correia S. Monitoring and fault diagnosis of photovoltaic systems using thermal imaging. Energy Procedia. 2014; 57: 2466–2475. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.277
[15]Anwar S, Soudian A, Hijazi B. Use of infrared thermography for PV panel faults detection. Sol Energy. 2016; 132: 324–332. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.010
[16]Ahadi A, Ziar H, Rahimi R. Evaluation of dust effect on photovoltaic panels’ performance in different climates. Renew Energy. 2017; 113: 420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.098
[17]Mandanici E, Tavasci L, Corsini F, Gandolfi S. A multi-image super-resolution algorithm applied to thermal imagery. Appl Geomat. 2019; 11(2): 215–228. doi: 10.1007/s12518-019-00253-y
[18]Alamouri A, Hassan M, Gerke M. Development of a methodology for real-time retrieving and viewing of spatial data in emergency scenarios. Appl Geomat. 2021; 13(4): 747–761. doi: 10.1007/s12518-021-00389-w
Copyright (c) 2025 Cihan Yalçın
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.