Bibliometric analysis of internet of things (IoT) in the construction industry using Scopus database: Trends, characteristics, and future directions

Sameer  Jain

doi:10.59400/be.v2i2.1503

Bibliometric analysis of internet of things (IoT) in the construction industry using Scopus database: Trends, characteristics, and future directions

Sameer Jain NICMAR University, Pune 411045, India

Ariticle ID: 1503

97 Views, 54 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/be.v2i2.1503

Keywords: future directions; construction industry; Scopus database; sensors; wireless networks

Abstract

This research examines the Internet of Things (IoT), a fast-developing technology that has transformed several industries, through bibliometric analysis of the building and construction sector. The current state of research, its features, and possible future paths are evaluated using the Scopus database. A thorough search of the literature conducted with Scopus produced a total of 2070 publications published between 2004 and 2022. Over the past five years, the number of IoT articles in the construction industry has significantly increased, according to the research. The study found that the top five countries for publications on this issue were China, Hong Kong, India, Portugal, and Sweden. The data suggests that a number of topics, such as energy management, construction automation, and smart buildings, have attracted a lot of attention. Additionally, the survey found that wireless networks and sensors were the IoT technology most frequently employed in the construction sector. The paper also makes recommendations for potential research directions, including the employment of cutting-edge technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence, as well as the application of IoT in the building sector. The study’s results shed light on market trends, unmet needs in the field, and prospective directions for Internet of Things applications in the construction sector.

References

[1] Alshawi M, Aziz Z, Sutrisna M. Internet of things (IoT) in construction: A review of current status and future directions. Automation in Construction. 2018; 86: 224–241.

[2] Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G. The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks. 2010; 54(15): 2787–2805. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

[3] Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, et al. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2013; 29(7): 1645-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

[4] Hammad A, Varghese K, Saeed M. The internet of things (IoT) applications in the construction industry. IEEE. 2018.

[5] Hu L, He X, Wang X, Wang Z. An internet of things-based temperature and humidity control system for concrete curing. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2020.

[6] Li B, Ma Q, Zhang L, Lin Q. Internet of things (IoT) system for concrete strain and stress monitoring during the curing process. Sensors. 2019; 19(13): 2969.

[7] Wang J, Xu X, Wang X. Internet of things and building information modeling-based intelligent construction management system for prefabricated construction. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 229: 1043–1055.

[8] Yang S, Liu Y, Liu M, Wang Z. Sensing Technologies for Monitoring Construction Noise and Vibration: A Review. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2018; 32(5): 04018025.

[9] Chen X, Lu W, Wu Q, Jiang X. Integration of Internet of Things and Building Information Modeling in construction industry: A review. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2020; 34(3): 04020002.

[10] Wang D, Niu Y, Zhang T, Ma Y. A survey of the application of the Internet of Things in construction engineering. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(22): 4704.

[11] Mokhtarian P, Abdollahzadeh G, Iranmanesh M. BIM and IoT: Integration challenges and opportunities. Automation in Construction. 2021; 122: 103463.

[12] Cao M, Yu W, Wang X, et al. Research on the application of the Internet of Things in construction project management. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 37(3): 3485–3493.

[13] Tao Y, Luo H, Chen X. Security challenges for Internet of Things in the construction industry: A review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2019; 145(1): 04018105.

[14] Zhang X, Wang Y, Zeng Q, Deng X. IoT in construction: A review and a path forward. Automation in Construction. 2019; 100: 135–148.

[15] Haas CT, Goncalves G, Gu N. Building information modeling and internet of things integration: A review. Automation in Construction. 2018; 93: 1-15.

[16] Lu Y, Liao Y, Bai Y. An interoperable Internet of Things platform for construction management. Automation in Construction. 2020; 110: 103031.

[17] Serrano D, Torres L, Gómez A, García Á. An overview of wireless sensor networks and the Internet of Things for monitoring and management of buildings. Sensors. 2017; 17(6): 1301.

[18] Hasan MH, Demian P, Ghosh R. A review of sensor placement optimization techniques in construction engineering and management. Automation in Construction. 2019; 107: 102932

[19] Xu X, Wu Q, Lin J, et al. Internet of Things in construction: A review of applications, data privacy, and security issues. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2020; 34(6): 04020042.

[20] Wang X, Zhang J, Gao J. Barriers and strategies of implementing the Internet of Things in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2020; 146(2): 04019104.

[21] Almarashdeh I, Bao Y, et al. Cybersecurity risks and protection for the Internet of Things in construction: A review. Automation in Construction. 2021; 127: 103750.

[22] Borgia E. The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications. 2014; 54: 1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008

[23] Cao X, Lin J, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Building information modeling meets Internet of Things: A review. Automation in Construction. 2020; 110: 103014.

[24] De Moura Oliveira PB., Ferraz A. Mapping the scientific literature on the Internet of Things: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 212: 1287–1306.

[25] Garfield E. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Wiley; 1979.

[26] Glänzel W, Moed HF. Journal impact measures. In: Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (editors). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer; 2019. pp. 473–507.

[27] Katiyar A, Kumar P. A Review of Internet of Things (IoT) in Construction Industry: Building a Better Future. International Journal of Advanced Science Computing and Engineering. 2021; 3(2): 65-72. doi: 10.62527/ijasce.3.2.53

[28] Karimi M, Zavadskas EK. Bibliometric analysis of construction innovation research: a scientometric review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 261: 121097.

[29] Li Q, Chen Z, Liu L, et al. Smart Helmet-Based Real-Time Construction Worker Safety Monitoring System. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2021; 35(2): 04020024.

[30] Noronha T, Goh YM. The IoT and its impact on the future of the construction industry. Procedia Engineering. 2019; 196: 1213–1220.

[31] Small H. Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1973; 24(4): 265–269. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406

[32] Scopus. Advanced search. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/search/form/advanced (accessed on 4 March 2023).

[33] Zhang Y, Feng C, Li Z. Mapping the intellectual structure of climate change adaptation research: A co-citation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 229: 1285–1295.

[34] Zupic I, Novak I, Kveder D. O. Digital transformation research: A bibliometric review and bibliometric map analysis. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21): 8914.

Published

2024-09-07

How to Cite

Jain, S. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of internet of things (IoT) in the construction industry using Scopus database: Trends, characteristics, and future directions. Building Engineering, 2(2), 1503. https://doi.org/10.59400/be.v2i2.1503

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Scholz Miklas
University of Johannesburg, South Africa

eISSN

3029-2670

Publication Frequency

Semi-annual

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2024

Vol 2, No 2 (2024)

Vol 2, No 1 (2024)

2023

Vol 1, No 1 (2023)

Featured Articles

Comprehensive seismic loss model of Tehran, Iran in the case of Mosha fault seismic scenario using stochastic finite-fault method

This paper presents the results of a study caried out to assess probable seismic loss, in term of damage to the residential buildings and the number of fatalities, in the case of Mosha Fault seismic scenario in Tehran, Iran. Accordingly, seismic risk components (including seismic hazard, exposure model and fragility curves) are evaluated. The stochastic finite-fault method with dynamic corner frequency is applied for quantifying ground motion values. The results shows that PGA on the soil surface could range between 0.1 g to 0.45 g. Then, a reliable model of building exposure by analyzing census data from Tehran is compiled. This model included 19 different classes of buildings and is used to evaluate the potential damage to buildings from seismic scenario. The results indicate that the median of damage ratio from 100,000 iterations for the whole of the city is about 6% ± 1.54%. The study found that the central and eastern parts of Tehran are the most vulnerable areas, with an estimated 15,952 residents at risk of losing their lives in this scenario. This is equivalent to 0.2 percent of total population of Tehran. The finding from this study can be used by local authorities to provide appropriate emergency-response and preparedness plans in the case of Mosha Fault seismic scenario.

Digital transformation of quality management in the construction industry during the execution phase by integration of building information modeling (BIM) and cloud computing

The quality of construction projects significantly impacts social and economic development. However, low quality and project failure often result from factors such as lack of quality procedures, poor communication, task coordination, and inefficient progress monitoring. This research aims to improve the efficiency of the construction phase by creating quality control checklists for processes and enhancing quality management through a collaborative digital environment integrating building information modeling (BIM) and cloud computing. Expert constructive interviews were first conducted to define a construction process quality control procedure to be linked to the 3DBIM model and then transition to a collaborative cloud environment (Autodesk Construction Cloud). An actual instance in Latakia City (Syria) demonstrated that the proposed methodology improves the efficiency and effectiveness of quality management during the implementation phase. It does so by offering a robust database, enhancing on-site quality information extraction from BIM models using smartphones, documenting defects and entering inspection data directly into a shared digital environment, and making it easier to track corrective actions and feedback. This facilitates constant and organized access to current data, reducing errors and rework, saving money and time, and enhancing decision-making speed and effectiveness. The search recommends the necessity of strict laws to adhere to quality procedures and the importance of providing infrastructure for digital transformation in quality management.

Net zero energy analysis and energy conversion of sustainable residential building in Muscat, Oman

The building sector is the predominant consumer of primary energy globally. The building sector accounts for around 40% of global energy production.Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) are highly suggested by energy experts as an effective option to alleviate the strain on primary energy sources caused by the building sector. The disparity between energy performance predictions provided during the design phase and the actual energy performance of residential buildings is mostly attributed to a limited comprehension of the components that influence energy consumption and the constraints of whole building simulation software. The objective of this research was to perform a comparison analysis of the expected and actual energy consumption of a prototype net-zero energy house built at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences in Muscat. The Hourly Analysis Programme (HAP V4.2) was utilised to forecast the energy consumption of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) at HCT, taking into account the availability of an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV) and the absence of an ERV. The newly built house underwent a one-month testing phase to fulfil many duties according to competition regulations. One of the main goals was to generate on-site energy through photovoltaic panels, producing an amount proportional to the energy consumed by the house. Upon comparing the actual energy consumption data with the simulated result, it was noticed that the actual energy demand of the house was around 20% lower than the prediction made by the simulation tool.

Architecting sustainability performances and enablers for grid-interactive efficient buildings

Today, grid-interactive efficient buildings are gaining popularity due to their potential sustainability performances through their ability to learn, adapt, and evolve at different scales to improve the quality of life of their users while optimizing resource usage and service availability. This is realized through various practices such as management and control measures enabled by smart grid technologies, interoperability, and human-cyber-physical security. However, despite their great potential, the research of those technologies still faces various challenges. These include a lack of communication and control infrastructure to address interpretability, security, cost barriers, and difficulties balancing occupant needs with grid benefits. Initially, system modelling and simulation are promising approaches to address those challenges ahead of time. It involves the consideration of complex systems made up of components from various research domains. This paper addresses the above practices, highlighting the value of integrating technology and intelligence in the planning and operation of buildings, both new and old. It provides a way to educate architects and engineers about this emerging field and demonstrates how these practices can help in creating efficient, resilient, and secure buildings that contribute to occupant comfort and decarbonization.