Density effect on erosion mechanisms in silica-phenolic solid rocket motors insulations
Abstract
The design of lightweight Internal Thermal Protection Systems (ITPS) for solid rocket motors is constrained by the non-linear degradation of erosion resistance at low densities. The primary motivation for this work is the discrepancy often observed between standard design models and flight data, specifically in regions of complex flow such as the aft-dome and submerged nozzle inlets. This study establishes a physics-based constitutive law to predict the transition from thermochemical ablation to mechanical spallation in silica-phenolic composites. Unlike semi-empirical correlations, we derive an Augmented Density-Erosion Model from first principles by coupling the energy conservation equation with Gibson-Ashby cellular solids mechanics. We analytically demonstrate that the mechanical erosion rate scales with density according to a power law (r˙∝ ρ−β) , where the exponent β ≈ 1.5 corresponds to the fracture toughness scaling of open-cell porous foams. This theoretical framework resolves the "spallation gap", the under-prediction of recession by standard heat-of-ablation models (Q∗) in low-density felts (ρ < 600 kg·m−3). The model is validated against historical firing data, demonstrating that the erosion mechanism shifts from energy-limited to strength-limited regimes as density decreases. Furthermore, we address the practical application of these findings by quantifying "danger zones" in density space for graded insulation architectures. This work provides propulsion designers with a rigorous methodology for determining safety margins in mass-critical motor stages, ensuring structural integrity is not compromised by the pursuit of weight reduction.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jacob Nagler

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Kim Y, Cho J. Surface erosion analysis for thermal insulation materials of graphite and carbon–carbon composite. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(16): 3323. doi: 10.3390/app9163323
[2]Thakre P, Yang V. Chemical erosion of carbon-carbon/graphite nozzles in solid-propellant rocket motors. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2008; 24(4): 822–833. doi: 10.2514/1.34946
[3]Martin HT, Cortopassi AC, Kuo KK. Assessment of the performance of ablative insulators under realistic solid rocket motor operating conditions. International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion. 2017; 16(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2017021828
[4]Xiao J, Das O, Mensah RA, et al. Ablation behavior studies of charring materials with different thickness and heat flux intensity. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2021; 23: 100814. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2020.100814
[5]Xu YH, Hu X, Yang YX, et al. Dynamic simulation of insulation material ablation process in solid propellant rocket motor. Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2015; 28(5). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000452
[6]McWhorter B, Ewing M, Albrechtsen K, et al. Real-time measurements of aft dome insulation erosion on space shuttle reusable solid rocket motor. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit; 11–14 July 2004; Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-3896
[7]Nandihalli N, Gorsse S, Kleinke H. Effects of additions of carbon nanotubes on the thermoelectric properties of Ni0.05Mo3Sb5.4Te1.6. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2015; 226: 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.02.016
[8]Nandihalli N, Mori T, Kleinke H. Effect of addition of SiC and Al2O3 refractories on Kapitza resistance of antimonide-telluride. AIP Advances. 2018; 8: 095009. doi: 10.1063/1.5034520
[9]Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
[10]Swann RT, Brewer WD, Clark RK. Effect of Composition, Density, and Environment on the Ablative Performance of Phenolic Nylon. NASA TN D-3908. National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 1967.
[11]Natali M, Kenny JM, Torre L. Science and technology of polymeric ablative materials for thermal protection systems and propulsion devices: A review. Progress in Materials Science. 2016; 84: 192–275. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.003
[12]Koo JH, Pilato LA, Wissler GE. Polymer nanostructured materials for propulsion systems. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 2007; 44(6): 1250–1262. doi: 10.2514/1.26295
[13]Koo JH, Natali M, Tate J, et al. Polymer nanocomposites as ablative materials—A comprehensive review. International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion. 2013; 12(2): 119–162. doi: 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2013005383
[14]Turchi A, Bianchi D, Thakre P, et al. Radiation and roughness effects on nozzle thermochemical erosion in solid rocket motors. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2014; 30(2): 314–324. doi: 10.2514/1.B34997
[15]Tompkins S, Kabana W. Effects of Material Composition on the Ablation Performance of Low Density Elastomeric Ablators. NASA TM-X-71932. National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 1973.
[16]Zuber C, Reimer T, Esser B, et al. Development of a low-density phenolic-impregnated fibrous ablator. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Flight vehicles, Aerothermodynamics and Re-entry Missions and Engineering (FAR); 30 September–3 October 2019; Monopoli, Italy.
[17]Bianchi D, Nasuti F, Onofri M, et al. Thermochemical erosion analysis for chraphite/carbon-carbon rocket nozzles. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2011; 27(1): 197–205. doi: 10.2514/1.47754
[18]Chinnaraj RK, Kim YC, Choi SM. Thermal behavior of carbon-phenolic/silica phenolic dual-layer ablator specimens through arc-jet tests. Materials. 2023; 16(17): 5929. doi: 10.3390/ma16175929
[19]Elwan I, Jabra R, Arafeh MH. Preparation and ablation performance of lightweight phenolic composite material under oxyacetylene torch environment. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management. 2018; 10: e3118. doi: 10.5028/jatm.v10.935
[20]Vaka PR, Rathi N, Ramakrishna PA. Experimental investigation of erosion rate of insulation materials using hybrid rockets. FirePhysChem. 2021; 1(4): 222–230. doi: 10.1016/j.fpc.2021.11.011
[21]Uyanna O, Najafi H. Thermal protection systems for space vehicles: A review on technology development, current challenges and future prospects. Acta Astronautica. 2020; 176: 341–356.
[22]Mazzaracchio A. One-dimensional thermal analysis model for charring ablative materials. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management. 2018; 10: e0418. doi: 10.5028/jatm.v10.965
[23]Şimşek B, Uslu S. One-dimensional aerodynamic heating and ablation prediction. Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2019; 32(4): 04019048. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001042
[24]Lachaud J, Cozmuta I, Mansour NN. Multiscale approach to ablation modeling of phenolic impregnated carbon ablators. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 2010; 47(6): 910–921. doi: 10.2514/1.42681
[25]Chen YK, Milos FS. Ablation and thermal response program for spacecraft heatshield analysis. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 1999; 36(3): 475–483. doi: 10.2514/2.3469
[26]Chen G, Xu Y, Zha X, et al. Simulation study of solid rocket motor C/C throat liner ablation based on two regions. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering. 2024; 12(4): 1–19. doi: 10.4236/jpee.2024.124001
[27]Gowariker VR. Mechanical and chemical contributions to the erosion rates of graphite throats in rocket motor nozzles. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 1966; 3(10): 1490–1494. doi: 10.2514/3.28682
[28]Alanyalioğlu ÇO, Özyörük Y. Conjugate analysis of silica-phenolic charring ablation coupled with interior ballistics. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2021; 37(4): 528–543. doi: 10.2514/1.B37839
[29]Wang L, Li J, Wang Y, et al. Harmonizing lightweight and ablation resistance: Design and performance of multilayer composite insulation materials for solid rocket motors. Polymer Composites. 2025; 46(4): 3427–3438. doi: 10.1002/pc.29183
[30]Li Y, Mao C, Wu F, et al. Thermal insulation performance of high-silica/phenolic composites: experimental and numerical study. Composite Structures. 2025; 377: 119855. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119855
[31]Nandihalli N. Microwave-driven synthesis and modification of nanocarbons and hybrids in liquid and solid phases. Journal of Energy Storage. 2025; 111: 115315. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.115315
[32]Sun L, Bao F, Zhang N, et al. Thermo-structural response caused by structure gap and gap design for solid rocket motor nozzles. Energies. 2016; 9(6): 430. doi: 10.3390/en9060430
[33]Concio P, Migliorino MT, Nasuti F. Numerical approach for the estimation of throat heat flux in liquid rocket engines. Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio. 2021; 100: 33–38. doi: 10.1007/s42496-020-00060-4
[34]Wang L, Tian W, Chen L, et al. Investigation of carbon–carbon nozzle throat erosion in a solid rocket motor under acceleration conditions. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences. 2021; 22: 42–51. doi: 10.1007/s42405-020-00277-4
[35]Tian H, He L, Yu R, et al. Transient investigation of nozzle erosion in a long-time working hybrid rocket motor. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2021; 118: 106978. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106978
[36]Nagler J. On thermoelastic impact modelling of frozen composite target during pre–heated projectile penetration starts of motion. PROOF. 2024; 4: 26–68. doi: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.4
[37]Nagler J. Development of a stealth-enabled supersonic interceptor missile: design, propulsion, and guidance. Mechanical Engineering Advances. 2025; 3(3): 3077. doi: 10.59400/mea3077



