Physico-mechanical characterization of compressed earth blocks reinforced with waste fibers from calamus rotang: Case of the elastic soil of western region of Cameroon
Abstract
In order to enhance the value of local materials and contribute to reducing construction costs in Cameroon, rattan waste is used to reinforce compressed earth blocks (CEB). This main work’s objective is the study of the effect of rattan waste on the physical and mechanical properties of CEB. For this, a soil sample taken in the western region of Cameroon, more precisely in Bangangté, was analyzed, the analysis includes the granulometric analysis, the Atterberg limits, and the Proctor test. Then the CEB samples with different rattan waste contents, that is 0%, 2%, 4% and 6%, were developed for a compaction stress of 7.5 MPa. These different samples were characterized through mechanical and physical tests carried out in the laboratory. It appears that the blocks reinforced with 2% of rattan waste have better mechanical characteristics, respectively 0.70 MPa in three-point bending and 3.04 MPa in compression. On the other hand, the presence of rattan wastes has a positive effect on the mechanical behavior of the composite, by increasing its ductility compared to the fragile behavior of the control block, which is observed during crushing. Thus the mechanical properties of CEB improve with the incorporation of rattan waste, which is optimal for a content of 2%. But they increase the material's porosity, and then its sensitivity to water unlike the control CEB.
References
[1]Aduwo EB, Ejale EA, Ibem EO. Contemporary Shelter in the Built Environment: A Comparative Review of Social Housing Schemes in Selected European and African Nations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 1054(1): 012027. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1054/1/012027
[2]Hotouom LMT. Identification, analysis, evaluation and possible solutions of the problem of housing in Cameroon: Case study of Douala and Yaounde. University of Stellenbosch Business School; 2015. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4203.4644
[3]Banakinao S, Drovou S, Lolo K, et al. Shear Resistance of Siltous Sands Improved with Bridelia Tannins. Geomaterials. 2024; 14(01): 1-11. doi: 10.4236/gm.2024.141001
[4]Boutarfa M, Belouettar R, Makradi A. Comparative Study of Cement Mortar Reinforced with Vegetable Fibers Alfa, Date Palm and Diss: Mechanical Properties and Shrinkage. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science. 2018.
[5]Guillaud H, Doat P, Rollet P, et al. Technologie de construction et architecture de terre. In: Proposition de directions prioritaires de recherche pour la République de Corée: Rapport final (Volume 1/2): Analyze de l'état de l'art au niveau international et national et Proposition de directions prioritaires de recherche. Université Nationale de Mokpo; 2008.
[6]Doat P, Hays A, Houben H, et al. Building with soil. Paris, Editions Parenthèses, collection An Architecture, Paris, France, 1979.
[7]Houben H, Gillard H. Treatise on earth construction, 3rd ed. Marseille: Editions Parenthèses, Marseille, France; 2006.
[8]Taallah B. Study of the physico-mechanical behavior of compressed soil blocks with fibers. Materialstoday Proceedings; 2022.
[9]Alves De Azeredo G. Development of mechanical test procedures on soil mortars: Application to the study of their rheology [PhD thesis]. National Institute of Applied Sciences, Lyon, Germany; 2005.
[10]Kouakou CH. Valorization of clays from Côte d'Ivoire: study of the cold stabilization of Dabou clay with a hydraulic binder (Portland cement) [PhD thesis]. University of Cocody, Abidjan; 2005.
[11]Kouadio KC. Development and characterization of cement-stabilized clay blocks (Cimarg): Influence of the addition of degreaser on the physical and mechanical characteristics of the blocks [PhD thesis]. University of Cocody, Abidjan; 2010.
[12]Ouattara S. Research of lightweight bricks: design and characterization of raw bricks based on clay and sawdust, stabilized with portland cement [PhD thesis]. University of Abidjan; 2013.
[13]Swamy RHS, Ahuja BM, Krishamoorthy YS. Behavior of concrete reinforced with jute, coir, bamboo fibers. The international journal of cement composite and light weight concrete. 1984; 5: 13. doi: 10.1016/0262-5075(83)90044-1
[14]Ntom Nkotto LI, Dounbissi Kamgang G, Tiewa J, et al. Characterization of blocks produced by addition of coconut fibers and cement laterite-based building materials. Afrique Science; 2020.
[15]Danso H, Martinson DB, Ali M, et al. Physical, mechanical and durability properties of soil building blocks reinforced with natural fibres. Construction and Building Materials. 2015; 101: 797-809. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.069
[16]André A, Ahoudou NN, Benjamin B, et al. Effects of oil palm mesocarp fibers on the physical and mechanical properties of expansive soils. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024; 22(1): 794-811. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.1.1095
[17]Google earth. Availbale online: https //www…in line (accessed on 22 April 2024).
[18]Nfornkah BN, Enongene K, Kaam R, et al. Spatial distribution of rattan and indigenous perspectives vis-à-vis the growth rate of economically important rattan species in Cameroon: Sustainability and policy implications. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 2022; 4: 100151. doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100151
[19]NF (French Standard) EN ISO 17892-1. Geotechnical reconnaissance and testing—Laboratory tests on soils—Part 1: Determination of water content. OBP; 2014.
[20]NF EN ISO 17892-4. Geotechnical reconnaissance and testing—Laboratory tests on soils—Part 4: Determination of particle size distribution. OBP; 2018.
[21]NF EN ISO 17892-12. Geotechnical reconnaissance and testing—Part 12: Determination of liquidity and plasticity limits. OBP; 2018.
[22]CN 102-114. Terminology and Classification of CEB. OBP; 2006.
[23]AFNOR. NFP94-093. Soils: Recognition and testing—Determination of the compaction references of a material—Normal Protor test. Modified Protor test; 1999.
[24]Michel J. Study on the stabilization and compression of soil for their use in construction, Annals of the Technical Institute of Building and Public Works. Materials Series; 1999.
[25]ASTM C 20. Standard Test Methods for Apparent Porosity, Water Absorption, Apparent Specific Gravity, and Bulk Density of Burned Refractory Brick and Shapes by Boiling Water. International; 2000.
[26]NFP94-051. Atterberg limits. Normes nationales et documents normatifs nationaux; 1993.
[27]NC 102-114. Terminology and Classification of CEB. Normes nationales et documents normatifs nationaux; 2006.
[28]Djohore CA, Djomo SA, et al. Effect of the addition of potash-treated coconut fibers on the mechanical properties of clay-cement-based construction materials, Edition. European Scientific Journal. 2018.
[29]Ouedraogo KAJ. Stabilization of sustainable and ecological building materials based on raw earth by organic and/or mineral binders with low environmental impacts [PhD thesis]. Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier University (UT3 Paul Sabatier); 2019.
[30]Sédan D. Study of physicochemical interactions at hemp fiber/cement interfaces. Influence on the mechanical properties of the composite [PhD thesis]. University of Limoges, Germany; 2007.
[31]LE Trode M. Characterization of physicochemical interactions in a composite material based on phyllosilicates, lime and cellulose fibers [PhD thesis]. University of Limoges, Germany; 2009.
[32]Abessolo D, Biwole AB, Fokwa D. Effects of the length and content of bamboo fibers on the physic mechanical and hygroscopic properties of compressed soil blocks used in construction Abstract. Afrique Sci; 2020.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fabien Kenmogne, Emmanuel Foadieng, Olivier Lekeufack Tiokeng, Roger Eno, Martial Nde Ngnihamye, Alphonse Tchoukouabe, Sorel Holsen Wafo Wafo, Moussa Sali, Emmanuel Yamb Bell, Sévérin Nguiya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.