Mathematical modeling of the process of hydrotreating diesel fuel from organosulfur impurities

  • Naum A. Samoilov Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, 450062 Ufa, Russia
Article ID: 2837
Keywords: diesel fuel; hydrodesulfurization process; mathematical modeling; diesel feedstock; reaction rate constant; industrial reactor block

Abstract

Hydrotreating of diesel fuel is a major catalytic process for motor fuel production. This process aims to reduce the organosulfur content in the fuel to 10 parts per million (ppm) in order to meet environmental standards. However, this deep purification of diesel fuel requires the use of an expensive catalyst at hydrotreating plants, which have giant reactors with a capacity of 200–600 cubic meters. Such a volume of reactors is associated with the use of methods of classical kinetics of chemical reactions, when all the raw materials of the process are in the reactor until the required conversion depth is reached, while hydrotreating has its own specific features. All known mathematical models for diesel fuel hydrotreating take into account different nuances of the process, but they all have one common disadvantage: they use approximate, often crude, ideas about the composition of multicomponent raw materials, such as diesel oil fractions, which contain several dozen different organosulfur compounds with varying activity in hydrogenation reactions. Most often, these raw materials are represented in a mathematical model as a combination of two to six pseudo-components, or lumps, that combine sulfo-organic impurities from one or more homologous groups. Such a theoretical framework allows us to model the current state of hydrotreating technology, but it does not advance it. We propose a new approach to mathematical modeling of diesel fuel hydrotreatment, which better takes into account the actual features of the process. The structure of the mathematical model considers the composition of the raw material as a set of 10–20 narrow fractions. In each fraction, the set of hydrogenated organosulfur impurities is treated as a single pseudo-component. Another feature of the model is the use of different rate constants for different organosulfur impurities in the raw material, represented as a continuous kinetic characteristic that changes over time. This allows us to integrate the system of differential equations in the model and adapt the rate constant to the concentration of the hydrogenated organosulfur impurity at any given time during the process. The developed model has also made it possible to propose a new technology, hydrotreatment: separating the feedstock into two or three wide fractions, combining the corresponding narrow fractions, and then subjecting them to separate hydrogenation processes. This differential hydrotreatment technique will allow for a reduction of the catalyst load in the hydrotreatment unit by almost 50% while maintaining its efficiency or for doubling the efficiency while maintaining the same catalyst load with traditional technology.

Published
2025-05-28
How to Cite
Samoilov, N. A. (2025). Mathematical modeling of the process of hydrotreating diesel fuel from organosulfur impurities. Journal of AppliedMath, 3(3), 2837. https://doi.org/10.59400/jam2837
Section
Article

References

[1]Song C. An Overview of New Approaches to Deep Desulfurization for Ultra-clean Gasoline, Diesel Fuel and Jet Fuel. Catalysis Today. 2003; 86(2): 211–263. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00412-7

[2]Ahmed ZM, Gasmelseed GA. Modelling and Control of a Diesel Hydrotreating Process. International Journal of Science and Research. 2017; 6(10): 1940–1944. doi: 10.21275/ART20177709

[3]Palmer E, Polcar S, Wong A. Clean Diesel Hydrotreating. Design Considerations for Clean Diesel Hydrotreating. Petroleum Technology Quarterly. 2009; 14(1): 91–103.

[4]Samoilov NA. Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Diesel-fuel Hydrotreatin. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering. 2021; 55(1): 99–109. doi: 10.1134/S0040579520060202

[5]Babich IV, Moulijn JV. Science and Technology of Novel Processes for Deep Desulfurization of Oil Refinery Streams: A Review. Fuel. 2003; 82(6): 607–631. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00324-1

[6]Gasimova ZА, Mukhtarova GS, Bashiriva TK, et al. Hydrotreatment of diesel fuels involving distillation fractions. Processes of Petrochemistry and Oil Refining. 2024; 25(2): 376–388. doi: 10.62972/1726-4685.2024.2.376

[7]Gheni S, Awad SA, Ahmed SMR, et al. Nanoparticle Catalyzed Hydrodesulfurization of Diesel Fuel in a Trickle Bed Reactor: Experimental and Optimization Study. Royal Society of Chemistry Advances. 2020; 10(56): 33911–33927. doi: 10.1039/D0RA05748G

[8]Verstraete JJ, Le Lannic K, Guibard I. Modeling Fixed-bed Residue Hydrotreating Processes. Chemical Engineering Science. 2007; 62: 5402–5408. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.020

[9]Weng H, Wang J. Kinetic Study of Liquid-phase Hydrodesulfurization of FCC Diesel in Tubular Reactors. China Petroleum Processing and Petrochemical Technology. 2015; 17(2): 1–8.

[10]Solmanov PS, Maximov NM, Eremina YV, et al. Hydrotreating of Mixtures of Diesel Fractions with Gasoline and Light Coking Gas Oil. Petroleum Chemistry. 2013; 53(3): 177–185. doi: 10.1134/S0965544113030109

[11]Nakano K, Ali SA, Kimet HJ, et. al. Deep Desulfurization of Gas Oil Over NiMoS Catalysis Supported on Alumina Coated USY-zeolite. Fuel Processing Technology. 2013; 116: 44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.04.012

[12]Shokri S, Marvast MA, Tajerian M. Production of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel: Simulation and Software development. Petroleum & Coal. 2007; 49(2): 48–59.

[13]Leal E, Torres-Mancera P, Alonso F, et al. Optimization Methodology of Dual-Bed Catalyst Stacking Systems to Produce Ultralow-Sulfur Diesel. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2024; 63(42): 17857–17867.

[14]Chen X, Orton KC, Mukarakate C, et al. Diesel production via standalone and cohydrotreating of catalytic fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Advances. 2024; 3: 1121–1131. doi: 10.1039/rsc_crossmark_policy

[15]Tataurshikov A, Ivanchina E, Kruvtcjva N, et al. Mathematical Modeling of Diesel Fuel Hydrotreating. In: Proceedings of the 27-th IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science; April 6–10 2015; Tomsk, Russia.

[16]Ghosh P, Andrewsand AT, Quann RQ, et.al. Detailed Kinetic Model for the Hydrodesulfurization of FCC Naphtha. Energy Fuels. 2009; 23(12): 5743–5759. doi: 10.1021/ef900632v

[17]Al-Zeghayer YS, Jibri BY. Kinetics of Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene on Sulfide Commercial Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3Catalyst. The Journal of Engineering Research. 2006; 3(1): 38–42.

[18]Li X, Zhou F, Wang A, et.al. Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene over MCM-41-Supported Pd and Pt Catalysts. Energy & Fuels. 2012; 26(8): 4671–4679. doi: 10.1021/ef300690s

[19]Ren J, Wang A, Li X, et.al. Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene Catalyzed by Ni-Mo Sulfides Supported on a Mixture of MCM-41 and HY Zeolite. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2008; 344(1–2): 175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.04.017

[20]Ahmed KW, Ali SA, Ahmed S, et al. Simultaneous Hydrodesulfurization of Benzothiophene and Dibenzothiophene Over CoMo/Al2O3 Catalysts with Different [Co/(Co + Mo)] Ratios. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis. 2011; 103(1): 113–123. doi: 10.1007/s11144-011-0288-1

[21]Tang S, Li S, Yue C, et al. Lumping Kinetics of Hydrodesulfurization and Hydrodenitrogenation of the Middle Distillate from Chinese Shale oil. Oil Shale. 2013; 30(4): 517–535. doi: 10.3176/oil.2013.4.05

[22]Bannatham P, Teeraboonchaikul S, Patirupanon T, et al. Kinetic Evaluation of the Hydrodesulfurization Process Using a Lumpy Model in a Thin-layer Reactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016; 55(17): 4878–4886. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0038

[23]Jiang H, Shao Z, Chen W, et al. Study on Diesel Hydrotreating Kinetics and the Synergistic Effect of CoMo and NiMo Catalysts. Energy and Fuels. 2024; 38(7): 6314–6324.

[24]Tataurshchicov AA, Krivtcova NI. Non-stationary Mathematical Model of Industrial Diesel Fuel Hydrotreating Process. Petroleum & Coal. 2018; 60(1): 104–112.

[25]Samoilov NA, Zhilina VA. On the Formation of Psevdo-components in the Raw Organosulfur Materials of the Diesel Fuel Hydrotreating Process. Progress in petrochemical science. 2020; 3(5): 389–381. doi: 10.31031/PPS.2020.03.000573

[26]Gheni SA, Awad SA, Ahmed SMR, et al. Nanoparticle catalyzed hydrodesulfurization of diesel fuel in a trickle bed reactor: Experimental and optimization study. RSC Advances. 2020; 10: 3911–3927.

[27]Petrova D, Lyubimenko V, Ivanov E, et al. Energy Basis of Catalytic Hydrodesulfurization of Diesel Fuels. Catalysis. 2023; 12: 1301–1315.

[28]Lebedev BL, Loginov SA, Kogan OL, et al. Investigation of the composition and reactivity of sulfur compounds in the process of hydrodesulfurization in an industrial installation (Russian). Oil refining and petrochemistry. 2001; 11: 62–67.

[29]Samoilov NA. Kinetic Characteristic of the Reaction Rate Constant in Multicomponent Reaction Systems. Petroleum Chemistry. 2021; 61(9): 1040–1051. doi: 10.1134/S0965544121090036

[30]Samoilov NA. Theoretical foundations of differential hydrodesulfurization of diesel fuel. Trend in Chemical Engineering. 2023; 21: 27–43.

[31]Wang Y, Shang D, Yuan X, et al. Modeling and Simulation of Reaction and Fractionation Systems for the Industrial Residue Hydrotreating Process. Processes. 2020; 8(32): 1–19. doi: 10.3390/pr8010032

[32]Samoilov NA, Zhilina VA. Verification of mathematical model of diesel fuel hudrotreating with the representation of organosulfur substances in the form of pseudo-components (Russian). Oil and Gas Business. 2021; 1: 117–145. doi: 10.17122/ogbus-2021-1-117-145

[33]Loginov SA, Kapustin VM, Lebedev BL, et al. Development of New Technology for the Process of Hydrodesulfurization of Diesel Fuels (Russian). Oil Refining and Petrochemistr. 2001; 11: 67–74.

[34]Mnushkin IA, Samoilov NA, Zhilina VA. Method Hydrotreating of Diesel Fuel. Patent RU, no. 2691965. 2019.

[35]Mnushkin IA, Maltsev DI, Samoilov NA. Method Hydrotreating of Diesel Fuel. Patent RU, no. 2798566. 2023.

[36]Wang B, Xiao C, PInd. Pengfei li, et. al. Hydrotreating Performance of FCC Diesel and dibenzothiophene over NiMo Supported Zirconium Modified Al-Tud-1 Catalysts Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018; 57(35): 8p. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01214

[37]Moiseev AV, Maximov NM, Solmanov PS, et al. Investigation of dibenzothiophene, dimethyldisulfide, quinoline and naphthalene reactions under hydrotreating conditions in the presence of Ni6PMonW(12−n)/Al2O3 catalysts. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis. 2022; 135: 927–936. doi: 10.1007/s11144-022-02189-8

[38]Vinogradov Nikolai A, Timoshkina VV, Pimerzin A, et. al. CoPMoV Sulfide Supported on Natural Halloysite Nanotubes in Hydrotreating of Dibenzothiophene and Naphthalene. Petroleum Chemistry. 2023: 63(8): 931–938.

[39]Puello-Polo E, Pájaro Y, Márquez E. Effect of the Gallium and Vanadium on the Dibenzothiophene Hydrodesulfurization and Naphthalene Hydrogenation Activities Using Sulfided NiMo-V2O5/Al2O3-Ga2O3. Catalysts. 2020; 10(8): 894. doi: 10.3390/catal10080894

[40]Mukhacheva PP, Vatutina YV, Nadeina KA, et al. Comparision of the HDS DBT reaction using bulk and supported catalysts. Chimica Techno Acta. 2024; 11(2): 10p. doi: 10.15826/chimtech.2024.11.2.06