Individualization and universal design for learning in competency-based physical education: A proposal for inclusive teaching

Jordi  Brasó-Rius; Aaron  Rillo-Albert; Marta  Pérez-González; Meritxell  Arderiu-Antonell

doi:10.59400/fes2337

Individualization and universal design for learning in competency-based physical education: A proposal for inclusive teaching

Jordi Brasó-Rius University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
Aaron Rillo-Albert National Institute for Physical Education of Catalonia, INEFC Pirineus, 25700 La Seu d’Urgell, Spain
Marta Pérez-González Departament d’Educació i Formació Professional, Generalitat de Catalunya, 08021 Barcelona, Spain
Meritxell Arderiu-Antonell University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain

Article ID: 2337

Keywords: competency-based learning; didactic methodology; inclusive education; physical education; teacher training; universal design for learning

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals have contributed to the evolution of physical education. As an objective, it is proposed to rethink a new individualized model and shift the paradigm of a physical education system poorly adapted to students. Teacher training is key to promoting inclusive, high-quality education. The LIRPSE (Lieberman-Brian Inclusion Rating Scale for Physical Education) framework can be a useful tool.

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

Brasó-Rius, J., Rillo-Albert, A., Pérez-González, M., & Arderiu-Antonell, M. (2025). Individualization and universal design for learning in competency-based physical education: A proposal for inclusive teaching. Forum for Education Studies, 3(3), 2337. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2337

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Huizinga J. The Autumn of the Middle Ages (Spanish). Alianza; 2001.

[2]Huizinga J. Man playing (Spanish). Alianza; 2012.

[3]Delval J. Human development (Spanish). Siglo XXI Editores México; 2014.

[4]Vigotsky L. The development of higher psychological processes (Spanish). Grijalbo; 1979.

[5]Vigotsky L. Thought and Language (Spanish). Planeta; 2013.

[6]Piaget J. Balancing cognitive structures: A central developmental problem (Spanish). Siglo XXI de España Editores S.A.;1998.

[7]Mosston M. The teaching of physical education (Spanish). Paidos; 1978.

[8]Mosston M, Ashworth S. Teaching Physical Education: Reforming Teaching Styles (Spanish). Editorial Hispano Europea; 1993.

[9]Riera JR. Fundamentals of learning sports technique and tactics (Spanish). INDE; 1989.

[10]Riera JR. Skills in sports (Spanish). INDE; 2005.

[11]Pedraz MV. School and Physical Education in the Context of Competence-Based Teaching. Genealogical Reflections from Critical Pedagogy. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte. 2011; 6(18): 161–170.

[12]Pedraz MV. Critique of physical education and education in Spain: (Critical) state of the art (Spanish). Movimento: Revista da Escola de Educação Física. 2013; 19(1): 309–329.

[13]Pedraz MV. Basis for Critical Didactics in Physical Education (Spanish). Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes. 2016; 123: 76-85. doi: 10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.cat.(2016/1).123.09

[14]Pérez-Pueyo Á, Hortigüela-Alcalá D, Fernández-Río J. Pedagogical models in physical education: What, how, why and for what (Spanish). Universidad de León; 2021. pp. 11–24.

[15]Martínez BJSA, Valenzuela AV, Ardoy DN, Barrero JAM. Emerging methodologies in physical education: Theoretical and practical considerations for teachers (Spanish). Wanceulen; 2020.

[16]Lavega P, Planas A, Ruiz P. Cooperative games and inclusion in physical education. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 2014; 14(53): 37–51.

[17]UNESCO. Education for the Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives (Spanish). Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura; 2017.

[18]UNESCO. From Promise to Practice: Access to Information for Sustainable Development (Spanish). Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura; 2021.

[19]Gabbard C. Lifelong Motor Development. Pearson; 2012.

[20]Sibley BA, Etnier JL. The relationship between physical activity and cognition in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2003; 15(3): 243–256.

[21]Etkin J. A Pedagogical Shift from Traditional Approaches. ournal of Graduate Studies in Education. 2024; 16(1), 2024, 1-15.

[22]Juan FR, López AG, Andújar AJC. Sports initiation based on team sports (Spanish). Gymnos; 2001.

[23]Lleixà Arribas MT, Soler Prat S, Serra Payeras P. Gender perspective in the training of physical education teachers. Retos. 2020; 37: 37–42.

[24]Andreu LS. Inclusion of all students in physical education (Catalan). Available online: https://dspace.uib.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11201/161003/Samaniego_Andreu_Llucia.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2024).

[25]McLennan N. Advocating for an inclusive development of quality physical education policies: Policy report (Spanish). Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376153 (accessed on 10 December 2024).

[26]Marín-Suelves D, Ramon-Llin J. (2021). Physical education and inclusion: A bibliometric study (Spanish). Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes. 2021; 143: 17–26.

[27]García Astor H. Inclusive and awareness-based physical education: A space for all (Spanish). Universitat Ramon Llull; 2020.

[28]López-Ibáñez FJ, Martínez AC, Martínez-Segura MJ. Universal Design for Learning and ICT in the Physical Education Area: Design and Validation of an Intervention Proposal (Spanish). Publicaciones. 2023; 53(3): 157–178. doi: 10.30827/publicaciones.v53i3.23867

[29]Lieberman L, Brian A, Grenier M. The Lieberman–Brian Inclusion Rating Scale for Physical Education. European Physical Education Review. 2017; 25(2): 341–354. doi: 10.1177/1356336X17733595

[30]International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Spanish). Available online: https://www.plenainclusion.org/sites/default/files/convencion_onu_lf.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2024).

[31]Jiménez-Monteagudo ML, Hernández-Álvarez JL. Initial teacher training for inclusive physical education: Status, future and competencies. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 2013; 13(51): 471–494.

[32]Muñoz OG. General Law on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Their Social Inclusion: Adaptation for Easy Reading (Spanish). Available online: https://www.siis.net/documentos/ficha/507478.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2024).

[33]Ministerio de España. Normativa sobre discapacidad. España, 2007. https://www.rpdiscapacidad.gob.es/discapacidad-derechos-humanos/normativa-sobre-discapacidad.htm (accessed on 18 January 2025)

[34]European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Key Principles for Special Needs Education. Denmark. Belgium; 2003.

[35]UNESCO. Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. UNESCO; 2009.

[36]Watkins A. Fundamental principles for promoting quality inclusive education. Recommendations for policymakers (Spanish). Agencia Europea para el Desarrollo de la Educación del Alumnado con Necesidades Educativas Especiales; 2009.

[37]Donnelly V. Fundamental principles for promoting the quality of inclusive education: Recommendations for implementation (Spanish). Agencia Europea para el Desarrollo de la Educación del Alumnado con Necesidades Educativas Especiales; 2011.

[38]Meijer, C., Watkins, A. Financing special needs and inclusive education–from Salamanca to the present. International Journal of Inclusive Education.2019, 23(7-8): 705-721.

[39]Donnelly VJ, Watkins A. Fundamental principles. Support for the development and implementation of policies for inclusive education (Spanish). Agencia Europea para las Necesidades Educativas Especiales y la Inclusión Educative; 2021.

[40]Norwich B. From the Warnock Report (1978) to an Education Framework Commission: A novel contemporary approach to educational policy making for pupils with special educational needs/disabilities. Frontiers in Education. 2019; 4: 1–10. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00072

[41]UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO Publishing; 2020.

[42]UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education: Everyone, without exception (Spanish). UNESCO; 2020.

[43]Brasó-Rius J. COVID 19: A new world to build, a new society to discover (Spanish). Temps d’Educació. 2021; 61: 305–307.

[44]Brasó-Rius J, Arderiu-Antonell M. COVID-19, a possibility to improve online education. The case of post-compulsory education and vocational training (Spanish). Temps d’Educació. 2022; 63: 163–177.

[45]OECD. Education Policy Perspectives no. 9. An implementation framework for effective change in schools. OECD; 2020.

[46]Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). State System of Education Indicators 2023 (Spanish). Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional; 2023.

[47]Peinado, M. "El profesorado en formación ante la neurodiversidad: análisis del contexto DUA, compromiso y proyección de futuro." Educar 2025, 61(1): 1-19.

[48]Yenduri G, Kaluri R, Rajput DS, et al. From assistive technologies to metaverse: Technologies in inclusive higher education for students with specific learning difficulties. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11057 (accessed on 15 December 2024).

[49]Letaw L, Garcia R, Morreale P, et al. Educating educators to integrate inclusive design across a 4-year CS degree program. Computer Science. 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2209.02748

[50]Mendoza NT. Cooperative learning and Universal Learning Design as measures to address diversity (Spanish). Anuari de l’Educació. 2022; 288.

[51]Roski M, Witteck M, Nehring A. Universal design for learning: The more, the better? Education Sciences. 2021; 11(4): 164. doi: 10.3390/educsci11040164

[52]Galkienė A, Monkevičienė O. Improving Inclusive Education through Universal Design for Learning. Springer; 2021.

[53]Ismailov M, Chiu TKF. Catering to inclusion and diversity with universal design for learning in asynchronous online learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 819884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819884

[54]Rossi M. Universal design for learning and inclusive teaching: Future perspectives. Elementa. 2022; 1(1-2): 103–113.

[55]Castellanos R. Learning Style Corners Method: REAPSES (Spanish). Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje. 2020; 13: 171–182.

[56]Brasó-Rius J; Torrebadella-Flix, X. The ‘rescue’ game in Catalonia. An educational project at the Escola del Mar by Pere Vergés (Spanish). Temps d’Educació. 2015; 47: 191–212.

[57]Brasó-Rius J; Torrebadella-Flix, X. Investigation-action and the projects methodology in physical education: The organization of Prisoner’s Base tournament. Estudios Pedagógicos. 2016; 42(2): 21–37.

[58]Bloom B. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (Spanish). El Ateneo; 1971.

[59]Harrow AJ. A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd; 1972.

[60]Parlebas P. Games, sports and societies: Lexicon of motor praxeology (Spanish). INDE; 2001.

[61]Bañuelos SF. Bases for teaching physical education and sport (Spanish). Gymnos; 1992.

[62]Famose J. Aprendizaje motor y dificultad de la tarea. aidotribo, 1992.

[63]Piéron M. Para una enseñanza eficaz de las actividades físico-deportivas. INDE, 1999

[64]Blázquez D. Physical Education (Spanish). INDE; 2006.

[65]Delgado MA. Teaching styles in PE (Spanish). ICE de la Universidad de Granada; 1992.

[66]Guillamón AR, López PJC, Cantó EG, et al. Bibliographic review of teaching methods in physical education (Spanish). Acción Motriz. 2021; 27: 46–56.

[67]Camacho AS, Noguera MAD. Physical education and teaching styles (Spanish). INDE; 2002.

[68]Brasó-Rius J. Pere Vergés: School and gamification in the early 20th century (Spanish). Educación Física y Deportes. 2018; 133: 20–37. doi: 10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2018/3).133.02

[69]Sebarroja JC. Pedagogies of the 21st Century (Spanish). Octaedro; 2015.

[70]Achucarro S, Hernández N, Di Domizio D. Physical Education: Theories and practices for inclusion processes (Spanish). Universidad Nacional de la Plata; 2017.

[71]Baños RF, Baena-Extremera A. Innovative digital tools as pedagogical resources in physical education (Spanish). EmásF: Revista Digital de Educación Física. 2018; 52: 79–91.

[72]Ros CR. Current and future challenges of physical activity and sport (Spanish). Wanceulen; 2021.

[73]Kemmis S. Introduction (Spanish). In: Towards a critical science of education (Spanish). Laertes; 1990. p. 7.

[74]Brasó-Rius J, Torrebadella-Flix X. Reflections on (re)formulating critical physical education (Spanish). Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. 2018; 18(71). doi: 10.15366/rimcafd2018.71.003

[75]Garcés M. Apprenticeship school (Spanish). Gutenberg; 2020.

[76]Picado FM. General didactics: An integrative perspective (Spanish). UNED; 2005.

[77]Diputació de Barcelona. Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda (Spanish). Available online: https://www.diba.cat/web/ods/publicacions (accessed on 2 December 2024).

[78]Coll C. Personalization of school learning (Spanish). Ediciones SM; 2017.

[79]Rovira JMP. Pedagogy of common action (Spanish). Graó; 2021.

[80]Bisquerra R, López-Cassá È. Emotional Education. 50 Questions and Answers (Spanish). Ateneo; 2020.

[81]Durán C, Lavega P, Salas C, et al. Emotional physical education in adolescents: Identification of predictive variables of emotional experience (Spanish). Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte. 2015; 10(28): 5–18.

[82]Arderiu-Antonell M, Brasó-Rius J. Teacher training: Competency-based programming based on real-life cases. Proposal for the field of physical education (Spanish). In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research in Education; 4–5 November 2019; Barcelona, Spain. pp. 40–48.

[83]Blázquez D, Lorente E, Sebastiani E. Teaching by competencies in physical education (Spanish). INDE; 2010.

[84]Castañer M, Camerino O. Basic manifestations of motor skills (Spanish). Universidad de Lérida; 2006.

[85]Pozo JI, Monereo C. Strategic learning (Spanish). Santillana; 1999.

[86]Garrido JLG, Gálvez IE. Lifelong learning (Spanish). EUNSA; 2006.

[87]Arderiu-Antonell M, Brasó-Rius J. Organizations and Curricular Transformations. The Socio-Sports Teaching and Animation Training Cycle (Catalonia) (Spanish). Acción Motriz. 2022; 29(1): 53–70.

[88]Brasó-Rius J, Arderiu-Antonell M. Technological tools for monitoring students in dual vocational training (Spanish). Revista Prácticum. 2019; 4(2): 77–94. doi: 10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v4i2.7805

[89]Brasó-Rius J, Arderiu-Antonell M. External internships and vocational training. Family of physical and sports activities. Retos. 2022; 46: 68–75. doi: 10.47197/retos.v46.91590

[90]OECD. Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators (Spanish). Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; 2017.

[91]Bourdieu P, Passeron J. Reproduction: Elements for a theory of the teaching system (Spanish). Popular; 2001.

[92]Devís-Devís J. Sociocritical research in physical education (Spanish). Estudios Pedagógicos. 2012; 38: 125–153. doi: 10.4067/S0718-07052012000400008

[93]Foucault M. Discipline and punish (Spanish). SIGLO XXI; 2005.

[94]Giroux HA. A pedagogy of resistance in the age of casino capitalism (Spanish). Con-Ciencia Social. 2013; 17: 55–71.

[95]Brasó J, Cercós R. Pere Vergés Farrés (1896–1970): En Pedagogue of Leisure-Sport Competitions (Spanish). Educación Física y Deportes. 2019; 137: 11–16. doi: 10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2019/3).137.01

[96]Pastor CA. Universal Design for Learning: A Theoretical and Practical Model for Quality Inclusive Education. Educational Participation (Spanish). 2019; 6(9): 55–66.

[97]CAST. Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. CAST; 2018.

[98]Luri G. School is not an amusement park (Spanish). Ariel; 2020.

[99]Lieberman L, Grenier M, Brian A, Arndt K. Universal design for learning in physical education. Human Kinetics; 2021.

[100]Carr W, Kemmis S. Critical teaching theory (Spanish). Martínez Roca; 1988.

[101]Lagardera Otero F. Motivation in physical education classes (Spanish). Apunts. Educació Física i Esports. 1989; 2(16–17): 105–108.

[102]Betrán JO. About education (Spanish). Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes. 1999; 3(57): 3–4.

[103]Blavt O. Individualization of the Educational Process of Inclusive Physical Education of Students with Disabilities. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology. 2022; 3(2): 65–70. doi: 10.17309/jltm.2022.2.03

[104]Bauer L, Olgeirsson G, Pereira F, et al. Fundamental Principles of Special Needs Education: Recommendations for Policymakers (Spanish). European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education; 2023.

[105]Leiva AC. Individualization of the teaching-learning process (Spanish). Pedagogía Magna. 2021; 11: 8–13.

[106]García P, Alberto M. Individualization in technical preparation: A theoretical analysis (Spanish). Arrancada. 2017; 17(31): 28–37.

[107]Obrusnikova I, Block M, Dillon S. Children’s beliefs toward cooperative playing with peers with disabilities in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2016; 35(2): 123–132.

[108]Santana Cansado P, y Garoz Puerta I. The attitude towards disability and teaching intervention in adapted sports. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 2013; 13(49): 1–17.

[109]Enkvist I. The complex profession of the teacher (Spanish). Fineo; 2016.

[110]Reguant Álvarez M, Torrado-Fonseca M. The Delphi method (Spanish). Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació. 2016; 9(1): 87–102. doi: 10.1344/reire2016.9.1916

[111]Instrument of Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, done at New York on 13 December 2006 (Spanish). Available online: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2008/04/21/pdfs/A20648-20659.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2024).

[112]Díaz Barahona J. Challenges and opportunities of mobile technology in physical education. Retos. 2020; 37: 763–773. doi: 10.47197/retos.v37i37.68851

[113]Díaz del Cueto M. Perception of competence of Physical Education and inclusion teachers (Spanish). Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 2009; 9(35): 322–348.

[114]Nieto BH. Teaching methods in Physical Education (Spanish). Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes. 2009; 14(132).

[115]Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. UNESCO advances the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Spanish). UNESCO; 2017.

[116]Morales Águila A, Álvarez Prieto ME. Principles for the individualization of sports detraining (Spanish). Ciencia y Actividad Física. 2023; 2(1): 80–90.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Indexing

Polish Scientific Bibliography

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.