Next-generation VANET routing: An AI-based time-evolving graph framework

  • Ali Hamlili orcid

    Smart Systems’ Laboratory, Department of Computer Networks, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Informatique et d’Analyse des Systèmes (ENSIAS), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Agdal, Rabat B.P. 713, Morocco

Article ID: 4261
Keywords: vehicular ad hoc networks, proactive routing, random geometric graphs, Markov chains, stochastic geometry, optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR), machine learning, intelligent transportation systems

Abstract

Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) exhibit highly dynamic topologies due to rapid vehicle mobility and frequent fluctuations in wireless connectivity. Consequently, efficient routing remains a significant challenge. Proactive routing protocols rely on periodic route updates. This creates a trade-off between routing accuracy and control overhead. Higher update frequencies improve accuracy and timeliness. However, they also generate substantial control overhead. Conversely, lower update frequencies reduce overhead at the cost of outdated topology information and increased routing errors. Achieving an optimal balance between these competing objectives is particularly difficult in non-stationary network environments, a well-documented challenge in VANETs. This paper introduces a unified framework combining stochastic modeling, graph analysis, and machine-learning optimization. Vehicle positions follow a Poisson process, while link dynamics are modeled with a two-state Markov chain. We derive closed‑form expressions that quantify network connectivity, expected link lifetime, and overall routing stability in dynamic vehicular environments. An artificial intelligence (AI)-driven adaptive controller is integrated into the proposed framework to dynamically adjust routing parameters in response to variations in VANET topology and non-stationary network conditions. Simulation results demonstrate a 35–50% reduction in routing overhead while preserving high packet delivery performance.

Published
2025-12-23
How to Cite
Hamlili, A. (2025). Next-generation VANET routing: An AI-based time-evolving graph framework. Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/cai4261
Section
Article

References

[1]Erdös P, Rényi A. On the Evolution of Random Graphs. Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; 1960. pp. 344–347.

[2]Bollobás B. Random Graphs, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2011.

[3]Penrose M. Random Geometric Graphs. Oxford University Press; 2003.

[4]Hamlili A. Techniques for Analyzing Random Graph Dynamics and Their Applications. In: Zhang Y (editor). New Frontiers in Graph Theory. InTech; 2012. doi: 10.5772/34207

[5]Hamlili A. Intelligibility of Erdös–Rényi random graphs and time varying social network modeling. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Digital Environment (ICSDE’17); 21–23 July 2017; Rabat, Morocco. pp. 201–206. doi: 10.1145/3128128.3128159

[6]Viriyasitavat W, Bai F, Tonguz OK. Dynamics of Network Connectivity in Urban Vehicular Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 2011; 29(3): 515–533.

[7]Gupta P, Kumar PR. Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks. In: McEneaney WM, Yin GG, Zhang Q (editors). Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications. Birkhäuser; 1999. pp. 547–566. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1784-8_33

[8]Cui Q, Hu X, Ni W, et al. Vehicular mobility patterns and their applications to Internet-of-Vehicles: A comprehensive survey. Science China Information Sciences. 2022; 65: 211301. doi: 10.1007/s11432-021-3487-x

[9]Fiore M, Härri J. The networking shape of vehicular mobility. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc’08); 26–30 May 2008; Hong Kong, China. pp. 261–272. doi: 10.1145/1374618.1374654

[10]Zhu H, Li M. Studies on Urban Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks. Springer; 2013.

[11]Naskath J, Paramasivan B. A Study on Modeling Vehicle Mobility with MLC for Enhancing Vehicle-to-Vehicle Connectivity in VANET. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2020; 12: 8255–8264.

[12]Vivitha Varshini RJ, Jahangeer N, Paramasivan B. High Speed Realistic Mobility Model for TN-Multi Lane Highway Environment. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2018; 7(4.5): 151–154.

[13]Stepanyants VG, Romanov AY. A Survey of Integrated Simulation Environments for Connected Automated Vehicles: Requirements, Tools, and Architecture. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine. 2024; 16(2): 6–22.

[14]Stepanyants VG, Romanov AY. Integrating OPAL into CAVISE for Connected Vehicle Simulation with 3D Signal Propagation. IEEE Access. 2025; 13: 134793–134803.

[15]Ateya AA, Tu ND, Muthanna A, et al. QL-AODV: Q-Learning-Enhanced Multi-Path Routing Protocol for 6G-Enabled Autonomous Aerial Vehicle Networks. Future Internet. 2025; 17(10): 473. doi: 10.3390/fi17100473

[16]Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature. 2015; 518: 529–533.

[17]Clausen T, Jacquet P. IETF RFC 3626: Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR). RFC Editor; 2003.

[18]ETSI EN 302 663 V1.3.1. Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); ITS-G5 Access Layer Specification for Intelligent Transport Systems Operating in the 5 GHz Frequency Band. 2020.

[19]Dai Y, Lyu L, Cheng N, et al. A Survey of Graph-Based Resource Management in Wireless Networks—Part II: Learning Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking. 2025; 11(4): 2101–2122.

[20]Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed. MIT Press; 2018.

[21]Gupta A, Fernando X. Federated Reinforcement Learning for Collaborative Intelligence in UAV-Assisted C-V2X Communications. Drones. 2024; 8(7): 321.

[22]Sommer C, Joerer S, Segata M, et al. How shadowing hurts vehicular communications and how dynamic beaconing can help. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. 2014; 14(7): 1411–1421.

[23]Nzouonta J, Rajgure N, Wang G, et al. VANET routing on city roads using real-time vehicular traffic information. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2009; 58(7): 3609–3626.

[24]Gote PM, Kumar P, Verma P, et al. From 5G to 6G: The role of AI, machine learning, and deep learning in wireless systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning; 18–20 February 2025; Bhimdatta, Nepal.

[25]Omheni N, Koubaa H, Zarai F. Artificial Intelligence for 5G and 6G Networks: A Taxonomy-Based Survey of Applications, Trends, and Challenges. Technologies. 2025; 13(12): 559. doi: 10.3390/technologies13120559

[26]Ahmad AM, Majeed SA, Dawood YS. A Survey of 6G Mobile Systems, Enabling Technologies, and Challenges. International Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Telecommunications. 2023; 12(1): 1–21.

[27]Kandu S, Prakash A, Tiwari M, et al. C-V2X and 5G-V2X: Challenges and Improvement Strategies. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Microwave, Antenna and Communication (MAC); 27–29 June 2025; Bhopal, India.