The algorithmic guardians: AI and computer vision for global faunal welfare, conservation, and future policy trajectories in the Indian subcontinent
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Computer Vision (CV) are rapidly transforming animal welfare, conservation, and ecosystem management by enabling scalable, real-time analysis of large multimodal datasets. Traditional monitoring approaches are increasingly inadequate due to the exponential growth of visual and sensor data across farms, urban ecosystems, and wildlife habitats. This paper presents a structured review of AI/CV methodologies—including convolutional neural networks, You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based detection, and pose estimation—for quantitative faunal assessment. A systematic synthesis is provided across key domains such as precision livestock farming, urban animal welfare, wildlife conservation, and marine ecosystem monitoring. The study adopts a structured literature review methodology, outlining database selection, inclusion criteria, and comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art techniques. Key findings indicate that AI-driven systems significantly enhance early disease detection, behavioral analysis, and conservation efficiency, though challenges persist in terms of data scarcity, algorithmic bias, and deployment constraints in low-resource environments. A comparative analysis highlights trade-offs between accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability across different AI architectures. The paper also identifies critical research gaps, including the lack of standardized datasets, limited cross-species generalization, and insufficient integration with policy frameworks. Finally, the study proposes a conceptual framework integrating AI, edge computing, and ethical governance for sustainable faunal management. The findings underscore the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and responsible AI deployment to ensure equitable and scalable benefits across diverse ecological and socio-economic contexts.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ayan Paul

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Patel H, Samad A, Hamza M, et al. Role of artificial intelligence in livestock and poultry farming. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika. 2022; 6(4): 2425–2429. doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11837
[2]Akinsulie OC, Idris I, Aliyu VA, et al. The potential application of artificial intelligence in veterinary clinical practice and biomedical research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024; 11: 1347550. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1347550
[3]Rajagukguk RA, Lee SY, Park JY, et al. Deep learning for visual animal monitoring (detection, tracking, pose estimation, and behavior classification): A comprehensive review. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2025; 12: 101539. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101539
[4]Rajwani M, Kannauje L, Noushad M, et al. Enhancing Animal Rescue Efficiency Using AI for Real-Time Reporting and Assistance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances and Applications in Artificial Intelligence (ICAAAI 2025), Proceedings of the ICAAI 2025 conference committee sincerely invite you to take part in 9th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence (ICAAI 2025); 14–16 November 2025; Manchester, UK. Atlantis Press; 2025. pp. 1241–1253. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-738-0_95
[5]Luo S, Dong C, Dong G, et al. YOLO-DAFS: A composite-enhanced underwater object detection algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(5): 947. doi: 10.3390/jmse13050947
[6]Zhang J, Wang J, Zhao M. A lightweight crop pest detection algorithm based on improved Yolov5s. Agronomy. 2023; 13(7): 1779. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13071779
[7]Wagner JH. Pose-Based Computer Vision Detection of Lameness in Dairy Cattle [Master's Thesis]. Iowa State University; 2025. doi: 10.31274/td-20251215-227
[8]Gerken A, Juan RS, Maille JM, et al. Data and Code From: Smart Vision-Based Monitoring System for AI-Driven Moth Population Estimation Using Camera-Equipped Trap Imaging. USDA Agricultural Data Commons. 2025. doi: 10.15482/USDA.ADC/29452583
[9]Zeng M, Chen S, Liu H, et al. HCFormer: A lightweight pest detection model combining CNN and ViT. Agronomy. 2024; 14(9): 1940. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14091940
[10]Perez M, Toler-Franklin C. CNN-based action recognition and pose estimation for classifying animal behavior from videos: A survey. arXiv preprint. 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.06187
[11]Menezes GL, Mazon G, Ferreira RE, et al. Artificial intelligence for livestock: A narrative review of the applications of computer vision systems and large language models for animal farming. Animal Frontiers. 2024; 14(6): 42–53. doi: 10.1093/af/vfae048
[12]Mansour HAEH. Integration of assisted reproductive technologies and artificial intelligence for optimizing fertility and genetic selection in livestock production. Discover Applied Sciences. 2025; 7(10): 1143. doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-07380-9
[13]Kumar S, Singh SK. Biometric recognition for pet animal. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications. 2014; 7(5): 470. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2014.75044
[14]Caya MV, Arturo ED, Bautista CQ. Dog identification system using nose print biometrics. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM); 28–30 November 2021; Manila, Philippines. pp. 1–6.
[15]Wu L, Shao M, Wei S, et al. Widespread of stray animals: Design a technological solution to help build a rescue system for stray animals. In: Rauterberg M, Fui-Hoon Nah F, Krömker H, et al. (editors). HCI International 2022—Late Breaking Papers: HCI for Today's Community and Economy. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; 26 June–1 July 2022; Online. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2022. 13520, pp. 376–396. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-18158-0_28
[16]Han P. Review of identification technologies for stray animal governance. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Signal Processing and Computer Science (SPCS 2024), 23–25 August 2024, Kaifeng, China. 2025. pp. 11–20. doi: 10.1117/12.3053130
[17]Oladele OK. AI in Wildlife Conservation: Species Monitoring, Poaching Prevention, and Habitat Restoration. ResearchGate; 2025. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390066060_AI_in_Wildlife_Conservation_Species_Monitoring_Poaching_Prevention_and_Habitat_Restoration
[18]Out of the wild: How A.I. is transforming conservation science. Available online: https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-conservation (accessed on 28 June 2025).
[19]Berger-Wolf TY, Rubenstein DI, Stewart CV, et al. Wildbook: Crowdsourcing, computer vision, and data. arXiv preprint. 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1710.08880
[20]Ou L, Lu L, Qian W, Liu B. Application of artificial intelligence in fish information identification: A scientometric perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2025; 12: 1575523. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1575523
[21]Kumar S. The ultimate guide to ethical ML bias audits. Medium—AI Simplified in Plain English. Medium; 2025. Available online: https://medium.com/ai-simplified-in-plain-english/the-ultimate-guide-to-ethical-ml-bias-audits-726a06923432
[22]Jiang W, Tang H, Qin Y, et al. RPFbot: Unsupervised modular robot for precise feeding of rabbits. Information Processing in Agriculture. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2025.10.002
[23]Raghav YY, Chauhan A. Tech for the wild: Leveraging IoT and cloud computing in wildlife conservation. In: Raghav YY, Chauhan A, Pandey P, et al. (editors). AI and Machine Learning Techniques for Wildlife Conservation. IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2025. pp. 49–64. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6935-7.ch003

