The potentially fractal nature of intelligence

  • Andy E. Williams Caribbean Center for Collective Intelligence, St. John’s 16500, Antigua
Article ID: 2258
Keywords: fractal intelligence; Nth order intelligence; decentralized intelligence; AI safety; collective intelligence

Abstract

This article examines the hypothesis that intelligence may exhibit fractal properties. The concept of Nth order intelligence is introduced, emphasizing its implications for problem-solving scalability and contrasting the limitations of centralized systems with the potential of decentralized collective intelligence. The analysis explores the limitations of first-order AI systems in addressing non-linear problem scaling, particularly in the context of AI safety, and critiques the inherent risks of centralization in accelerating control-oriented trajectories. In contrast, decentralized collective intelligence is proposed as a scalable framework capable of optimizing problem-solving across diverse participants. The stakes of these competing trajectories are profound: one path leads to escalating centralization, potentially culminating in irreversible and misaligned control, while the other fosters collaboration through decentralized structures that ensure alignment. This work emphasizes the necessity of prioritizing decentralized, semantic-level approaches to intelligence to address existential challenges and ensure alignment with collective human interests.

Published
2025-06-12
How to Cite
Williams, A. E. (2025). The potentially fractal nature of intelligence. Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 3(2), 2258. https://doi.org/10.59400/cai2258
Section
Review

References

[1]Gardenfors P. Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representation. Mind Matter. 2024; 2(2): 9-27.

[2]Tversky B. Visuospatial reasoning. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 209-40.

[3]Asimov D. The Grand Tour: A Tool for Viewing Multidimensional Data. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput. 1985; 6(1): 128-43. doi:10.1137/0906011.

[4]Gödel K. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I [On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I]. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik. 1931; 38(1): 173-98.

[5]Shannon CE. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3):379-423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

[6]Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press; 1962.

[7]Gray J. Ideas of space-Euclidean, non-Euclidean, and relativistic. Clarendon Press; 1989.

[8]Bohr N. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. John Wiley & Sons; 1958.

[9]Bostrom N. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press; 2014.

[10]Taleb NN. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House; 2007.

[11]Page SE. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press; 2008.

[12]Williams AE. Are wicked problems a lack of general collective intelligence? GCI and wicked problems. AI Soc. 2023; 38(1): 343-8.

[13]Becker J, Brackbill D, Centola D. Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(26): 6700-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615978114.

[14]Urban Institute. Technology and equity in cities [Internet]. Available online: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/101360/technology_and_equity_in_cities_1.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2024).

[15]OECD. Confronting the cost-of-living and housing crisis in cities [Internet]. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/confronting-the-cost-of-living-and-housing-crisis-in-cities_7a6008af-en.html (accessed on 1 December 2024).

[16]World Economic Forum. Which cities are leading the way on sustainability and smart technology? [Internet]. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/03/top-cities-smart-technology-sustainability/ (accessed on 1 December 2024).

[17]Semantic Backpropagation: Extending Symbolic Network Effects to Achieve Non-Linear Scaling in Semantic Systems. In review 2024.

[18]Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press; 1990.

[19]Yudkowsky E. Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk. In: Bostrom N, Ćirković M (editors). Global catastrophic risks. Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 308-45.

[20]Stiglitz JE. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. W.W. Norton & Company; 2012.