Condition-based maintenance threshold determination for gearbox fault progression using vibration envelope features and accelerated life testing
Abstract
Gearbox failures represent a critical problem faced by industrial machines, considering the impacts of such failures on machine reliability, efficiency, and maintenance cost. Despite the well-established use of vibration-based condition monitoring techniques for diagnosing the presence of faults, few attempts have been made in transforming information about fault progression into thresholds that could be used in making condition-based maintenance (CBM) decisions. In this work, a CBM system for analysing gearbox fault progression based on vibration envelope features is presented, alongside accelerated life testing. An experimental approach has been adopted, whereby accelerated life testing was performed to induce gearbox degradation progressively. Then, vibration data were analysed through the envelope technique, out of which six vibration envelope features, namely RMS Envelope, Kurtosis, Crest Factor, Peak Amplitude, Envelope Energy, and Sideband Energy Ratio, were derived and analysed based on their sensitivity through correlation, monotonicity, trendability, and separability tests. Thereafter, a composite health index based on the most sensitive features was formulated, and a multilevel maintenance threshold system consisting of Alert, Warning, and Critical levels was created. The findings show that Envelope Energy, Sideband Energy Ratio, and Kurtosis have the highest sensitivity to degradation and can accurately represent the evolution of gearbox faults. The composite health index shows a strong correlation with the extent of degradation (R2 = 0.962) and successfully discriminates between different health states of the gearbox. The developed framework for determining maintenance thresholds achieves an accuracy of 94.9%, which allows accurate identification of maintenance intervention phases.
Copyright (c) 2026 Asokan Vasudevan, Suleiman Mohammad, Mohammad Ahmmad Hunitie, Gui Jie, Jonathan Lee, Mbiatke Andrew

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Nithin SK, Gowda SKR, Mahale RS, et al. A Review on Gearbox Condition Monitoring and Signal Analysis Techniques: A Review on Gearbox Condition. Scientific Hypotheses. 2024; 1: 36–46. doi: 10.69530/15vwy749
[2]Zamudio-Ramirez I, Saucedo-Dorantes JJ, Antonino-Daviu J, et al. Detection of Uniform Gearbox Wear in Induction Motors Based on the Analysis of Stray Flux Signals Through Statistical Time-Domain Features and Dimensionality Reduction Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2022; 58(4): 4648–4656. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2022.3174049
[3]Alkhadafe H, Al-Habaibeh A, Lotfi A. Condition monitoring of helical gears using automated selection of features and sensors. Measurement. 2016; 93: 164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.011
[4]Gupta V, Mitra R, Koenig F, et al. Predictive maintenance of baggage handling conveyors using IoT. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2023; 177: 109033. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109033
[5]Bala A, Rashid RZJA, Ismail I, et al. Artificial intelligence and edge computing for machine maintenance-review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2024; 57(5): 119. doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10748-9
[6]Jangra D, Antil P, Sidh KN, et al. Gear faults diagnosis: a comprehensive review of experimental and theoretical studies. Structural Health Monitoring. 2025; 14759217251324698. doi: 10.1177/14759217251324698
[7]Gu JX, Albarbar A, Sun X, et al. Monitoring and diagnosing the natural deterioration of multi-stage helical gearboxes based on modulation signal bispectrum analysis of vibrations. International Journal of Hydromechatronics. 2021; 4(4): 309. doi: 10.1504/IJHM.2021.120609
[8]Liu C, Cichon A, Królczyk G, et al. Technology development and commercial applications of industrial fault diagnosis system: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2022; 118(11–12): 3497–3529. doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-08047-6
[9]Tama BA, Vania M, Lee S, et al. Recent advances in the application of deep learning for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using vibration signals. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2023; 56(5): 4667–4709. doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10293-3
[10]Alonso-González M, Díaz VG, Pérez BL, et al. Bearing Fault Diagnosis With Envelope Analysis and Machine Learning Approaches Using CWRU Dataset. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 57796–57805. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3283466
[11]Srilakshmi Nayaka SR, Ganashri S, Bisagni NGBKCR, et al. Integrating Envelope Analysis with Industrial Machine Learning for Bearing Fault Detection. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. 2025; 09(11): 1–9. doi: 10.55041/IJSREM54270
[12]Dong E, Zhang Y, Zhan X, et al. A novel dynamic predictive maintenance framework for gearboxes utilizing nonlinear Wiener process. Measurement Science and Technology. 2024; 35(12): 126210. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ad762e
[13]Xu Z, Bashir M, Zhang W, et al. An intelligent fault diagnosis for machine maintenance using weighted soft-voting rule based multi-attention module with multi-scale information fusion. Information Fusion. 2022; 86–87: 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.06.005
[14]Chen S, Liu Z, He X, et al. Multi-mode fault diagnosis datasets of gearbox under variable working conditions. Data in Brief. 2024; 54: 110453. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110453
[15]Gawde S, Patil S, Kumar S, et al. Multi-fault diagnosis of Industrial Rotating Machines using Data-driven approach : A review of two decades of research. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 123: 106139. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106139
[16]Althubaiti A, Elasha F, Teixeira JA. Fault diagnosis and health management of bearings in rotating equipment based on vibration analysis – a review. Journal of Vibroengineering. 2022; 24(1): 46–74. doi: 10.21595/jve.2021.22100
[17]Chen B, Zhang W, Xi Gu J, et al. Product envelope spectrum optimization-gram: An enhanced envelope analysis for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2023; 193: 110270. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110270
[18]Bachar L, Matania O, Cohen R, et al. Anomaly detection of gear wear: introducing a novel health indicator through experimentation and physical investigation. Structural Health Monitoring. 2026; 25(2): 1409–1423. doi: 10.1177/14759217241307837
[19]Du NT, Dien NP, Nga NTT. Gear fault detection in gearboxes operated in non-stationary conditions based on variable sideband analysis without a tachometer. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering. 2022; 8: 1021222. doi: 10.3389/fmech.2022.1021222
[20]Ghemari Z. Concept and Application of Envelope Spectrum Analysis in the Field of Vibration Signal Processing. International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control. 2025; 15(2): 133–145. doi: 10.2174/0122103279326563240725095526
[21]Rebiai M, Bengharbia B, Maazouz M, et al. FPGA implementation of an improved envelope detection approach for bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science. 2024; 71(1): 3. doi: 10.1186/s44147-023-00343-0
[22]Qulub IS. Implementation of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with FMEA approach to improve productivity of the auto insert machine in electronic component manufacturing. Journal of Applied Research in Technology & Engineering. 2025; 6(2): 11–22. doi: 10.4995/jarte.2025.22952
[23]Zio E. Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2009; 94(2): 125–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.06.002
[24]Elahi M, Afolaranmi SO, Martinez Lastra JL, et al. A comprehensive literature review of the applications of AI techniques through the lifecycle of industrial equipment. Discover Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 3(1): 43. doi: 10.1007/s44163-023-00089-x
[25]Ashasi-Sorkhabi A, Fong S, Prakash G, et al. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, ISSN 2153-2648, 2017 019 1 A Condition Based Maintenance Implementation for an Automated People Mover Gearbox. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management. 2020; 8(3). doi: 10.36001/ijphm.2017.v8i3.2648
[26]Leoni L, De Carlo F, Abaei MM, et al. A hierarchical Bayesian regression framework for enabling online reliability estimation and condition-based maintenance through accelerated testing. Computers in Industry. 2022; 139: 103645. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103645
[27]Chen Z, Xia T, Zhou D, et al. A Health Index Construction Framework for Prognostics Based on Feature Fusion and Constrained Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2021; 70: 1–15. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3104414
[28]Chauhan S, Vashishtha G, Kumar R, et al. An adaptive feature mode decomposition based on a novel health indicator for bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement. 2024; 226: 114191. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114191
[29]Xin X, Yang Z, Liu K, et al. Multi-stage and multi-topology analysis of ship traffic complexity for probabilistic collision detection. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023; 213: 118890. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118890
[30]Mogane LK, Masebe T, Msagati TAM, et al. A comprehensive review of water quality indices for lotic and lentic ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2023; 195(8): 926. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11512-2
[31]Cheikh K, Boudi EM, Rabi R, et al. Evaluating Economic Performance and Robustness of Maintenance Strategies for Degrading Systems. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés. 2024; 57(4): 991–1003. doi: 10.18280/jesa.570407
[32]Giannoulidis A, Gounaris A, Nikolaidis N, et al. Investigating thresholding techniques in a real predictive maintenance scenario. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2022; 24(2): 86–95. doi: 10.1145/3575637.3575651
[33]Kamariotis A, Tatsis K, Chatzi E, et al. A metric for assessing and optimizing data-driven prognostic algorithms for predictive maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2024; 242: 109723. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109723
[34]Lyu D, Liu E, Zhang B, et al. Threshold-Varying Assessment for Prognostics and Health Management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. 2025; 55(1): 685–698. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2024.3489879
[35]Wang D, Tsui KL, Miao Q. Prognostics and Health Management: A Review of Vibration Based Bearing and Gear Health Indicators. IEEE Access. 2018; 6: 665–676. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2774261
[36]Salunkhe S, Konile V, Khude T, et al. A Break through the State of Art: Review on Different Analysis Approaches Used for the Diagnosis of the Produced Vibration in Gear-Box. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science. 2025; 10(4): 46–49. doi: 10.46335/IJIES.2025.10.4.11
[37]Ricci R, Pennacchi P. Diagnostics of gear faults based on EMD and automatic selection of intrinsic mode functions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2011; 25(3): 821–838. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.002
[38]Schmidt S, Zimroz R, Heyns PS. Enhancing gearbox vibration signals under time-varying operating conditions by combining a whitening procedure and a synchronous processing method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2021; 156: 107668. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107668
[39]Xu M, Han Y, Sun X, et al. Vibration characteristics and condition monitoring of internal radial clearance within a ball bearing in a gear-shaft-bearing system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2022; 165: 108280. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108280
[40]Elforjani M, Mba D, Salihu B. Experimental monitoring of eccentric gears with different mechanical conditions. Applied Acoustics. 2022; 197: 108903. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108903
[41]Lupea I, Lupea M, Coroian A. Helical Gearbox Defect Detection with Machine Learning Using Regular Mesh Components and Sidebands. Sensors. 2024; 24(11): 3337. doi: 10.3390/s24113337
[42]Kim M, Song C, Liu K. A Generic Health Index Approach for Multisensor Degradation Modeling and Sensor Selection. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 2019; 16(3): 1426–1437. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2018.2890608
[43]Wang Y, Wang D, Liu J, et al. Composite Health Index Construction for Online Monitoring from a Perspective of Control Chart Performance Optimization. In: Volume 47: Mechanics, Electronics, Automation and Automatic Control. IOS Press; 2024. doi: 10.3233/SAEM240037
[44]Meng D, Yang H, Fazeres-Ferradosa T, et al. Time-varying mesh stiffness modelling of offshore wind gearboxes under multi-fault modes. Maritime Engineering. 2025; 178(4): 170–195. doi: 10.1680/jmaen.25.00031
[45]Meng D, Wang H, Yang S, et al. Fault Analysis of Wind Power Rolling Bearing Based on EMD Feature Extraction. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 2022; 130(1): 543–558. doi: 10.32604/cmes.2022.018123




