Lifecycle cost optimization of vibration mitigation in rotating machinery: Integrating measured transmissibility, finite element modeling, and downtime cost scenarios
Abstract
Rotation devices play a vital role in industrial plants, where vibrations significantly affect efficiency, reliability, and the overall cost of operation. Vibrations cause wear and tear, failures, and high maintenance time, but previous studies have focused on machine efficiency without including financial factors. This paper provides a solution to this problem by developing an integrated approach to optimizing lifetime cost through vibration reduction in rotation devices. A numerical approach was used to quantify and analyse the phenomenon, including experimental measurement, finite element (FE) modelling, and economic analysis. Transmissibility measurement was used to describe vibration dynamics and validate the FE model. The response of the system was correlated to wear and tear, failure rates, and downtime. These factors were then used to formulate a lifetime cost model. The results have shown that there is a strong non-linear connection between the transmissibility factor and the lifecycle cost, where the higher the levels of vibrations, the greater the extent of wear and tear and downtime. The process of optimizing identified the optimum operating point where there is a perfect compromise between the vibration performance and the cost effectiveness. The sensitivity analysis has revealed that the transmissibility is the most significant factor affecting the lifecycle cost.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sulieman Ibrahim Mohammad, Naeema Darwish Khamis Al Maashari, Asokan Vasudevan, Wenya Wu, Mohammad Faleh Ahmmad Hunitie, Anber Abraheem Shlash Mohammad, Torki M. Al-Fawwaz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Thoppil NM, Vasu V, Rao CSP. Health indicator construction and remaining useful life estimation for mechanical systems using vibration signal prognostics. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 2021; 12(5): 1001–1010. doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01190-z
[2]Rao JS. Vibratory Condition Monitoring of Machines. CRC Press; 2000.
[3]Chu T, Nguyen T, Yoo H, et al. A review of vibration analysis and its applications. Heliyon. 2024; 10(5): e26282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26282
[4]Wszołek G, Czop P, Słoniewski J, et al. Vibration monitoring of CNC machinery using MEMS sensors. Journal of Vibroengineering. 2020; 22(3): 735–750. doi: 10.21595/jve.2019.20788
[5]Nasar RA, Alzarooni T, AL-Shudeifat MA. On modeling and damage detection methodologies in rotor systems. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2024; 112(19): 16657–16710. doi: 10.1007/s11071-024-09962-5
[6]Vidal HNA, Torres RIT, Molina ITB, et al. Predictive analysis of industrial safety based on noise, vibrations and machinery reliability. Sound & Vibration. 2026; 60(2). doi: 10.59400/sv3995
[7]Khot SN, Patil PJ. Enhancing the Effective Performance of Critical Equipment’s In Sugar Industry. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 2023; 11(8): 800–812. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2023.55254
[8]Jambulingam N, Jardine AKS. Life cycle costing considerations in reliability centered maintenance: An application to maritime equipment. Reliability Engineering. 1986; 15(4): 307–317. doi: 10.1016/0143-8174(86)90036-3
[9]El-Gazzar DMS, Deabs AA. Optimizing vertical pump reliability: Investigating main shaft challenges through integrated design and testing strategies. Water Science. 2024; 38(1): 448–459. doi: 10.1080/23570008.2024.2384318
[10]Senapaty G, Rao US. Vibration based condition monitoring of rotating machinery. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018; 144: 01021. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201814401021
[11]Baher K, Atiyah QA, Abdulsahib IA. Comparative study of vibration analysis in rotary shafts between Rayleigh’s and Dunkerley’s methods. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal. 2022; 18(2): 29–42. doi: 10.22153/kej.2022.05.001
[12]Ye S, Williams KA. Torsional friction damper optimization. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2006; 294(3): 529–546. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.025
[13]Mechanical Vibrations. Fourth Edition. J. P. Den Hartog. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956. 67s. 6d. Available online: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/aeronautical-journal/article/abs/mechanical-vibrations-fourth-edition-j-p-den-hartog-mcgrawhill-new-york-1956-67s-6d/BF19F602D073D34F8595208182AB6DDA#article (accessed on 13 April 2026).
[14]Martini A, Troncossi M, Vincenzi N. Structural and Elastodynamic Analysis of Rotary Transfer Machines by Finite Element Model. Journal of the Serbian Society for Computational Mechanics. 2017; 11(2): 1–16. doi: 10.24874/jsscm.2017.11.02.01
[15]Chellil A, Gahlouz I, Lecheb S, et al. Dynamic modelling and predictive health monitoring for vibration control and resonance of rotating machinery. Scientific Research and Essays. 2016; 11(19): 202–212. doi: 10.5897/SRE2016.6401
[16]Zhou YL, Wahab MA. Damage detection using vibration data and dynamic transmissibility ensemble with auto-associative neural network. Mechanics. 2017; 23(5): 688–695. doi: 10.5755/j01.mech.23.5.15339
[17]Pagaimo J, Millan P, Costa JN, et al. Transmissibility-based methods for damage identification on a railway bogie frame. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2025; 47(3): 121. doi: 10.1007/s40430-025-05419-x
[18]Jaoudé AA. Advanced Analytical Model for the Prognostic of Industrial Systems Subject to Fatigue [PhD Thesis]. Aix-Marseille Université; 2012. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-00874624
[19]Zwingelstein G. John Moubray’s RCM2TM Reliability-Based Maintenance Method. CairnInfo; 2025. Available online: https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/en/resources/article/ti112/john-moubray-s-rcm2tm-reliability-based-maintenance-method-se1660/v1
[20]Abdul-Nour G, Beaudoin H, Ouellet P, et al. A reliability based maintenance policy; a case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 1998; 35(3–4): 591–594. doi: 10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00166-1
[21]Ståhl JE, Gabrielson P, Andersson C, et al. Dynamic manufacturing costs—Describing the dynamic behavior of downtimes from a cost perspective. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 2012; 5(4): 284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.09.003
[22]Raji AO, Oke SA. Enhancement of Maintenance Downtime Using Poisson Motivated-Taguchi Optimization Method. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences. 2019; 22(4): 294–306. doi: 10.29194/NJES.22040294
[23]Farinha JT, Galar D. Proceedings of Maintenance Performance Measurement and Management (MPMM) Conference 2014. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2014. Available online: https://scispace.com/pdf/proceedings-of-maintenance-performance-measurement-and-3uvkndsj26.pdf
[24]Matania O, Bechhoefer E, Bortman J. Digital Twin of a Gear Root Crack Prognosis. Sensors. 2023; 23(24): 9883. doi: 10.3390/s23249883
[25]Tan X, Hua L, Lu C, et al. A new method for optimizing the parameters of torsional vibration dampers. Journal of Vibroengineering. 2017; 19(6): 4155–4171. doi: 10.21595/jve.2017.18579
[26]Shamseldin A, Abido MA, Alofi A. AI-driven optimization of dynamic vibration absorbers with hydraulic amplifier and mechanical inerter integration. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering. 2024; 10: 1464692. doi: 10.3389/fmech.2024.1464692
[27]Sobczyk K, Trębicki J. Stochastic Analysis of Degrading Vibratory Systems. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 1999; 5(6): 394–398. doi: 10.3846/13921525.1999.10531494
[28]Chang M, Huang X, Coolen FPA, et al. Reliability analysis for systems based on degradation rates and hard failure thresholds changing with degradation levels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2021; 216: 108007. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108007
[29]Wu S, Longhurst P. Optimising age-replacement and extended non-renewing warranty policies in lifecycle costing. International Journal of Production Economics. 2011; 130(2): 262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.007
[30]Yousefi N, Coit DW, Song S, et al. Optimization of on-condition thresholds for a system of degrading components with competing dependent failure processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2019; 192: 106547. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106547
[31]Gopikuttan LL, Veettil SP, Govindan RV. Maintenance Initiation Prediction Incorporating Vibrations and System Availability. Advances in Technology Innovation. 2022; 7(3): 181–194. doi: 10.46604/aiti.2022.8618
[32]Zai BA, Khan M, Khan KA, et al. The role of dynamic response parameters in damage prediction. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2019; 233(13): 4620–4636. doi: 10.1177/0954406219841083
[33]Cheikh K, Boudi EM, Rabi R, et al. Evaluating Economic Performance and Robustness of Maintenance Strategies for Degrading Systems. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés. 2024; 57(4): 991–1003. doi: 10.18280/jesa.570407
[34]Asadi P, Hajirasouliha I. A practical methodology for optimum seismic design of RC frames for minimum damage and life-cycle cost. Engineering Structures. 2020; 202: 109896. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109896
[35]Ayyash ANA, Hejazi F. Development of hybrid performance-based optimization algorithm for structures equipped with vibration damper devices. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2023; 23(2): 123. doi: 10.1007/s43452-023-00665-z
[36]Makinde OA, Mpofu K, Ramatsetse BI, et al. A maintenance system model for optimal reconfigurable vibrating screen management. Journal of Industrial Engineering International. 2018; 14(3): 521–535. doi: 10.1007/s40092-017-0241-7
[37]Lin YH, Li F, Zio E. A comparison between Monte Carlo simulation and finite-volume scheme for reliability assessment of multi-state physics systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2018; 174: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.01.008




