Navigating professional growth: Exploring reflective practices in EFL teacher leadership within Arab higher education contexts

Sayyed Rashid  Ali Shah; Hamid Ali  Khan Eusafzai

doi:10.59400/fes.v2i1.537

Navigating professional growth: Exploring reflective practices in EFL teacher leadership within Arab higher education contexts

Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah Galileo Institute of Learning & Development, Islamabad 44020, Pakistan
Hamid Ali Khan Eusafzai School of Arts and Sciences, University of Central Asia, Bishkek 720001, Kyrgyzstan

Article ID: 537

115 Views

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i1.537

Keywords: EFL teacher leaders; reflective practice; professional learning; leadership skills; higher education

Abstract

Employing an interpretive lens and utilizing a case study methodology, this research investigated insights from a purposively selected cohort of 12 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teacher leaders on the significance of reflective practice in their professional growth within an EFL environment. Through a qualitative approach, data was collected via semi-structured interviews and an open-ended questionnaire. The findings reveal the multifaceted operational and instructional leadership roles undertaken by EFL teacher leaders within the hierarchical structures of the English Language Institute (ELI). These leaders demonstrate a commitment to reflective practices and proactive learning, utilizing collegiality and collaborative reflection to enhance their leadership skills and navigate contextual challenges at the ELI. In the landscape of higher education, EFL teacher leadership emerges from intrinsic motivation to learn and adapt to context-specific roles. This entails reflecting on diverse experiences and applying accumulated knowledge to enhance practical leadership competencies.

References

[1]Collin S, Karsenti T, Komis V. Reflective practice in initial teacher training: critiques and perspectives. Reflective Practice. 2013; 14(1): 104-117. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2012.732935

[2]Clarà M. What Is Reflection? Looking for Clarity in an Ambiguous Notion. Journal of Teacher Education. 2014; 66(3): 261-271. doi: 10.1177/0022487114552028

[3]Feucht FC, Lunn Brownlee J, Schraw G. Moving Beyond Reflection: Reflexivity and Epistemic Cognition in Teaching and Teacher Education. Educational Psychologist. 2017; 52(4): 234-241. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1350180

[4]Schon DA. The Reflective Practicioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books New York; 1983.

[5]Zeichner KM, Liston DP. Reflective Teaching. Routledge; 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203771136

[6]Mann S, Walsh S. Reflective Practice in English Language Teaching. Routledge; 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315733395

[7]Benitt N. Campus meets classroom: Video conferencing and reflective practice in language teacher education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics & TEFL. 2019; 8(2).

[8]Fox RK, Dodman S, Holincheck N. Moving beyond reflection in a hall of mirrors: developing critical reflective capacity in teachers and teacher educators. Reflective Practice. 2019; 20(3): 367-382. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2019.1617124

[9]Cappelletti G, Sajon MP. The reflective processes of principals as an engine of school change. Reflective Practice. 2022; 23(2): 246-257. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2021.2014310

[10]Lambert L. Leadership redefined: an evocative context for teacher leadership. School Leadership & Management. 2003; 23(4): 421-430. doi: 10.1080/1363243032000150953

[11]Ezzi SW, Teal EJ, Izzo GM. The influence of Islamic values on connected generation students in Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies Volume. 2014; 9: 1-19.

[12]York-Barr J, Duke K. What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From Two Decades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research. 2004; 74(3): 255-316. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003255

[13]Shah SRA. The Emergence of Teacher Leadership in TESOL: An Exploratory Study of English Language Teachers as Teacher Leaders in the Saudi EFL Context. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. 2019; 5(1): 136-156. doi: 10.31578/jebs.v5i1.196

[14]Katzenmeyer M, Moller G. Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop as Leaders. Corwin Press; 2009.

[15]Chelliah KK, Arumugam Z. Does Reflective Practice Enhance Clinical Competency in Medical Imaging Undergraduates? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 60: 73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.349

[16]Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT press; 2014.

[17]Dewey J. A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. DC Heath; 1933.

[18]Sullivan LG, Wiessner CA. Learning to be reflective leaders: A case study from the NCCHC Hispanic leadership fellows program. New Directions for Community Colleges. 2010; 2010(149): 41-50. doi: 10.1002/cc.394

[19]Guthrie KL, Jones TB. Teaching and Learning: Using Experiential Learning and Reflection for Leadership Education. New Directions for Student Services. 2012; 2012(140): 53-63. doi: 10.1002/ss.20031

[20]Norsworthy BE. Being and Becoming Reflexive in Teacher Education [PhD thesis]. The University of Waikato; 2008.

[21]Wallace MJ. Training Foreign Language Teachers: A Reflective Approach. Cambridge University Press; 1991.

[22]McAlpine L, Weston C. Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. In: Hativa N, Goodyear P (editors). Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education. Springer; 2002. pp. 59-78. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_4

[23]Moon JA. A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning. Routledge; 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203416150

[24]Guo L. How should reflection be supported in higher education?—A meta-analysis of reflection interventions. Reflective Practice. 2021; 23(1): 118-146. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2021.1995856

[25]Inman M. The Journey to Leadership: A Study of How Leader-Academics in Higher Education Learn to Lead [PhD thesis]. University of Birmingham; 2007.

[26]Grimmett PP, Riecken TJ, Erickson GL, Mackinnon AM. Summary of a review of research on reflection in teacher education. Images of Reflection in Teacher Education. 1988; 9-10.

[27]Fendler L. Teacher Reflection in a Hall of Mirrors: Historical Influences and Political Reverberations. Educational Researcher. 2003; 32(3): 16-25. doi: 10.3102/0013189x032003016

[28]Beauchamp C. Understanding Reflection in Teaching: A Framework for Analysing the Literature [PhD thesis]. Université McGill; 2006.

[29]Lubbe W, Botha CS. The dimensions of reflective practice: a teacher educator’s and nurse educator’s perspective. Reflective Practice. 2020; 21(3): 287-300. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2020.1738369

[30]Furtado L, Anderson D. The Reflective Teacher Leader: An Action Research Model. Journal of School Leadership. 2012; 22(3): 531-568. doi: 10.1177/105268461202200305

[31]Crotty M. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Sage; 1998.

[32]Schwandt TA. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1994; 1: 118-137.

[33]Bryman A. Social Research Methods, 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.

[34]Yin RK. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. SAGE Publications; 2003. pp. 93-96. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e

[35]Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. Routledge; 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315456539

[36]Creswell J, Poth C. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2018.

[37]Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage; 2021.

[38]Norton L, Campbell A (editors). The development of reflective practice in higher education: A theoretical perspective. In: Learning, Teaching and Assessing in Higher Education: Developing Reflective Practice. Sage; 2007. pp. 140-148.

[39]Alexandrou A, Swaffield S, MacBeath J. Scottish teacher leaders: Two accidental journeys enacting leadership for learning. In: Teacher Leadership and Professional Development. Routledge; 2016. pp. 215-230.

[40]Burgoyne J, Stuart R. Teaching and Learning Methods in Management Development. Personnel Review. 1978; 7(1): 53-58. doi: 10.1108/eb055353

[41]Stephenson L. Leadership perspectives and influences: A conversation with five leaders in TESOL. Arab World English Journal. 2012; 19-35.

[42]Hager P, Hodkinson P. Becoming as an appropriate metaphor for understanding professional learning. In: Scanlon L (editor). “Becoming” a Professional: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Professional Learning. Springer; 2011. Volume 16. pp. 33-56. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1378-9_2

Published

2024-03-26

How to Cite

Ali Shah, S. R., & Khan Eusafzai, H. A. (2024). Navigating professional growth: Exploring reflective practices in EFL teacher leadership within Arab higher education contexts. Forum for Education Studies, 2(1), 537. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i1.537

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.