A practical framework for the US universities to attract and support African students to business education

Babu  George

doi:10.59400/fes2735

A practical framework for the US universities to attract and support African students to business education

Babu George Alcorn State University, Lorman, MS 39096, USA

Article ID: 2735

Keywords: African international students; higher education; institutional strategies; cultural inclusion; financial accessibility

Abstract

This paper presents a practical framework designed to guide US universities to attract and retain international students from Africa, particularly in the context of business education. Drawing from consumer choice theories, international student decision-making models, and the socio-cultural contexts of African countries, this study synthesizes existing literature to provide actionable insights for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs). Key focus areas include cultural and social integration, financial accessibility, specialized business curricula, inclusive campus environments, and career opportunities. The framework emphasizes leveraging alumni networks, addressing racial climate concerns, and tailoring institutional strategies to align with African students’ unique needs and aspirations. This paper serves as a valuable resource for universities, policymakers, and other stakeholders committed to fostering a supportive academic environment for this growing student population.

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

George, B. (2025). A practical framework for the US universities to attract and support African students to business education. Forum for Education Studies, 3(3), 2735. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2735

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Institute of International Education. Open Doors 2022 Report on International Exchange. Available online: https://opendoorsdata.org/ (accessed on 9 December 2024).

[2]Dolan M. Supporting International Students of Economics in UK Higher Education. The Economics Network; 2012. doi: 10.53593/n2264a

[3]Gasman M, Baez B, Turner CSV. Understanding Minority-Serving Institutions. State University of New York Press; 2008.

[4]Greer TM, Brown P. Minority status stress and coping processes among African American college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 2011; 4(1): 26–38. doi: 10.1037/a0021267

[5]Cantwell B. Are International Students Cash Cows? Examining the Relationship Between New International Undergraduate Enrollments and Institutional Revenue at Public Colleges and Universities in the US. Journal of International Students. 2015; 5(4): 512–525. doi: 10.32674/jis.v5i4.412

[6]Gasman M, Esters LT. HBCU: The power of Historically Black colleges and universities. JHU Press; 2024.

[7]Clayton AB, McClay LP, Davis RD, Tevis TL. Considering Both HBCU and PWI Options: Exploring the College Choice Process of First-Year Black Students. The Journal of Higher Education. 2023; 94(1): 34–59. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2022.2131966

[8]Chang MJ, Denson N, Sáenz V, Misa K. The Educational Benefits of Sustaining Cross-Racial Interaction among Undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education. 2006; 77(3): 430–455. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2006.11778933

[9]Anderson JD. The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860–1935. University of North Carolina Press; 1988.

[10]Mulvey B. “Decentring” international student mobility: The case of African student migrants in China. Population, Space and Place. 2020; 27(3). doi: 10.1002/psp.2393

[11]Sav GT. Funding Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Progress Toward Equality? Journal of Education Finance. 2010; 35(3): 295–307. doi: 10.1353/jef.0.0017

[12]Sherry M, Thomas P, Chui WH. International students: A vulnerable student population. Higher Education. 2009; 60(1): 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9284-z

[13]Rizvi F, Lingard B, Rinne R. Reimagining globalization and education: An Introduction. In: Reimagining Globalization and Education. Routledge; 2022. pp. 1–10.

[14]Maringe F, Carter S. International students’ motivations for studying in UK HE: Insights into the choice and decision making of African students. International Journal of Educational Management. 2007; 21(5): 459–475.

[15]Hazelkorn E. Reshaping Higher Education. In: Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2015. pp. 203–227.

[16]Binsardi A, Ekwulugo F. International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2003; 21(5): 318–327. doi: 10.1108/02634500310490265

[17]Chen LH. Internationalization or International Marketing? Two Frameworks for Understanding International Students’ Choice of Canadian Universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2008; 18(1): 1–33. doi: 10.1080/08841240802100113

[18]Wilczewski M, Alon I. Language and communication in international students’ adaptation: A bibliometric and content analysis review. Higher Education. 2023; 85(6): 1235–1256.

[19]Constantine MG, Anderson GM, Berkel LA, et al. Examining the Cultural Adjustment Experiences of African International College Students: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2005; 52(1): 57–66. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.57

[20]Yosso T, Smith W, Ceja M, Solórzano D. Critical Race Theory, Racial Microaggressions, and Campus Racial Climate for Latina/o Undergraduates. Harvard Educational Review. 2009; 79(4): 659–691. doi: 10.17763/haer.79.4.m6867014157m707l

[21]Slaten CD, Elison ZM, Lee JY, et al. Belonging on Campus. The Counseling Psychologist. 2016; 44(3): 383–410. doi: 10.1177/0011000016633506

[22]Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics [1989]. Feminist Legal Theory. 2018; 57–80. doi: 10.4324/9780429500480-5

[23]Adefulu A, Farinloye T, Mogaji E. Factors Influencing Postgraduate Students’ University Choice in Nigeria. In: Higher Education Marketing in Africa. Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 187–225.

[24]Quimby D, Agonafer E. Culturally Matched Embedded Counseling: Providing Empowering Services to Historically Marginalized College Students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy. 2023; 37(4): 410–430. doi: 10.1080/87568225.2022.2112002

[25]Rivera LA. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton University Press; 2015.

[26]Robert SA, Yu M. Intersectionality in Transnational Education Policy Research. Review of Research in Education. 2018; 42(1): 93–121. doi: 10.3102/0091732x18759305

[27]UNCF. UNCF Makes the Case for HBCU Funding, Despite House Cuts. Available online: https://uncf.org/news/uncf-makes-the-case-for-hbcu-funding-despite-house-cuts (accessed on 11 January 2025).

[28]US News & World Report. Find the Best Business Schools. Available online: https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-business-schools (accessed on 11 January 2025).

[29]Wade E. The History of HBCUs: Lessons on Innovation from the Past. In: Reimagining Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Survival Beyond 2021. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2021. pp. 5–13.

[30]Andrade MS. International students in English-speaking universities. Journal of Research in International Education. 2006; 5(2): 131–154. doi: 10.1177/1475240906065589

[31]Birindelli P. The Experience of International Students: Biographical Narratives and Identities. Society. 2023; 60(3): 372–387. doi: 10.1007/s12115-023-00809-0

[32]Brown KH. From PWI to HBCU: When the oppressed takes on the characteristics of the oppressor. In: Research Anthology on Racial Equity, Identity, and Privilege. Information Science Reference; 2022. pp. 90–104.

[33]Hoffman C. Historically Black colleges and universities, 1976–1994. Department of Education Office of Educational; 1996.

[34]Irungu J, Kimencu L. Trends in private higher education. In: A Global Perspective on Private Higher Education. Chandos Publishing; 2016. pp. 255–269.

[35]Kirloskar P, Inamdar N. Shifting International Student Mobility Directions and Factors Influencing Students’ Higher Education Destination Choices. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies. 2021; 2(3): 160–178. doi: 10.52547/johepal.2.3.160

[36]Malhotra R, Massoudi M, Jindal R. An alumni-based collaborative model to strengthen academia and industry partnership: The current challenges and strengths. Education and Information Technologies. 2023; 28(2): 2263–2289. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11276-1

[37]Marginson S. Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education. Higher Education. 2006; 52(1): 1–39. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x

[38]Palmer R, Gasman M. “It Takes a Village to Raise a Child”: The Role of Social Capital in Promoting Academic Success for African American Men at a Black College. Journal of College Student Development. 2008; 49(1): 52–70. doi: 10.1353/csd.2008.0002

[39]Perna LW, Orosz K, Jumakulov Z, et al. Understanding the programmatic and contextual forces that influence participation in a government-sponsored international student-mobility program. Higher Education. 2014; 69(2): 173–188. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9767-4

[40]Mazzarol T, Soutar GN. “Push-pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management. 2002; 16(2): 82–90. doi: 10.1108/09513540210418403

[41]Meng LK, Zaidi HJ, Asma A. Celebrating cultural diversity through sports for global peace and understanding. In: Globalisation, Cultural Diversity and Human Rights. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. pp. 11–39.

[42]Mills KJ. Black Students’ Perceptions of Campus Climates and the Effect on Academic Resilience. Journal of Black Psychology. 2021; 47(4–5): 354–383. doi: 10.1177/00957984211001195

[43]Le TD, Dobele AR, Robinson LJ. Information sought by prospective students from social media electronic word-of-mouth during the university choice process. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2019; 41(1): 18–34. doi: 10.1080/1360080x.2018.1538595

[44]Lee JJ, Rice C. Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination. Higher Education. 2007; 53(3): 381–409. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-4508-3

[45]Li X, An C. African students in China: Research, reality, and reflections. In: The Changing World and Africa. Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. pp. 459–512.

[46]George B, Ward YD, Jones E. Digital Inequities and Digital Inclusion in Education: An Agenda for the Post-COVID-19 World. In: Implementing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging Management in Organizational Change Initiatives. IGI Global; 2022. pp. 260-267.

[47]Felten P, Barnett B. Intersectionality in action: A guide for faculty and campus leaders for creating inclusive classrooms and institutions. Routledge; 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003445395

[48]Fries-Britt SL, Turner B. Facing stereotypes: A case study of Black students on a White campus. Journal of College Student Development. 2001; 42(5): 420–429.

[49]Gasman M, Commodore F. Opportunities and Challenges at Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Palgrave Macmillan US; 2014. doi: 10.1057/9781137480415

[50]George Mwangi CA, Changamire N, Mosselson J. An intersectional understanding of African international graduate students’ experiences in U.S. higher education. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 2019; 12(1): 52–64. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000076

[51]Gutema DM, Pant S, Nikou S. Exploring key themes and trends in international student mobility research—A systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2023; 16(3): 843–861. doi: 10.1108/jarhe-05-2023-0195

[52]Gasman M. Black Men in the STEM fields at Historically Black Colleges and Universities. In: Beyond Stock Stories and Folktales: African Americans’ Paths to STEM Fields. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2011. pp. 115–127.

[53]Harper SR, Hurtado S. Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation. New Directions for Student Services. 2007; 2007(120): 7–24. doi: 10.1002/ss.254

[54]Khatun A, George B, Dar SN. Knowledge management practices in the higher education sector with special reference to business schools. Education and Self Development. 2021; 16(2): 47-59.

[55]George B, Wooden O. Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences. 2023; 13(9): 196.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Indexing

Polish Scientific Bibliography

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.