Artificial intelligence in teacher education: Examining critical thinking and creativity through AI usage

Xianfeng  Li

doi:10.59400/fes2727

Artificial intelligence in teacher education: Examining critical thinking and creativity through AI usage

Xianfeng Li Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614004, Sichuan, China

Article ID: 2727

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2727

Keywords: AI usage; teacher education; critical thinking; creativity; cognitive load theory; dual-process theory

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in teacher education has raised important questions about its impact on higher-order cognitive skills, particularly critical thinking and creativity. This study investigates the mediating role of critical thinking in the relationship between AI usage and creativity among pre-service teachers. Grounded in Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and Dual-Process Theory, the research conceptualizes critical thinking as a second-order reflective construct comprising adaptive exploration (AE) and systematic validation (SV). Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 107 pre-service teachers at a teacher training institution in Southwest China. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyze the relationships among AI usage, critical thinking, and creativity. Results indicate that AI usage significantly enhances critical thinking (β = 0.560, p < 0.001), which, in turn, has a strong positive effect on creativity (β = 0.707, p < 0.001). Moreover, critical thinking serves as a partial mediator, amplifying the effect of AI usage on creativity (β = 0.397, p < 0.001, VAF = 65.89%). These findings underscore the necessity of fostering AI-supported critical thinking skills in teacher education. As generative AI technologies become increasingly prevalent in digital learning environments, integrating adaptive exploration and systematic validation into pedagogical strategies is essential for cultivating both critical thinking and creativity. The study contributes to the discourse on digital learning innovations and teacher education by providing empirical evidence on AI’s role in enhancing cognitive development.

Published

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Li, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teacher education: Examining critical thinking and creativity through AI usage. Forum for Education Studies, 3(2), 2727. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2727

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Deshpande AS, Mahajan SR, Kulkarni SB, Puri SA. Impact of AI on Education: A Review. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM). 2024; 2(09): 2929-2934. doi: 10.47392/irjaem.2024.0433

[2]Bushuyev S, Igbal AB, Elams C. The ai revolution in it education. international journal of information and communication technologies. 2024; 5(2(18)): 8-22. doi: 10.54309/ijict.2024.18.2.001

[3]Hamdi M. How AI is Transforming and Shaping the Future of Education. IEEE; 2024.

[4]Dei MО. The impact of AI on the adaptation of educational materials and teaching methods to the needs of each student. LatIA. 2025; 3: 124. doi: 10.62486/latia2025124

[5]Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 1988; 12(2): 257-285. doi: 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

[6]Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2011.

[7]Sweller J, Ayres P, Kalyuga S. Cognitive Load Theory. Springer New York; 2011.

[8]Macedo HS, Santos ITF, Silva ELO. The Power of Attention: Bridging Cognitive Load, Multimedia Learning, and AI. arXiv; 2023.

[9]Evans JStBT, Stanovich KE. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013; 8(3): 223-241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685

[10]Panthalookaran V. A Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for AI-Natives: Reimagining Thinking Skills in the Age of AI. Higher Education for the Future. 2024; 12(1): 51-64. doi: 10.1177/23476311241285100

[11]Yatani K, Sramek Z, Yang C-L. AI as Extraherics: Fostering Higher-order Thinking Skills in Human-AI Interaction. arXiv; 2024.

[12]Tolan S, Pesole A, Martínez-Plumed F, et al. Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2021; 71: 191-236. doi: 10.1613/jair.1.12647

[13]Sugathan M. The impact of AI on design students’ cognitive learning. International Journal of Design Education. 2023; 11(9).

[14]Gonzalez JSL, Hernández LA. AI and education: combination to enhance knowledge. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education. 2025; 4: 37. doi: 10.56294/mw202537

[15]Sallu S, Sianturi NM, Purwoko B, et al. Learning in Higher Education Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) with Case Based Reasoning (CBR). Journal of Namibian Studies : History Politics Culture. 2023; 34. doi: 10.59670/jns.v34i.1191

[16]Young J. The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. 2024; 13(2). doi: 10.24940/ijird/2024/v13/i2/feb24019

[17]Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 6th ed. Sage; 2023.

[18]Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis, 8th ed. Pearson; 2019.

[19]Alharbi W. AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Rahman MM, ed. Education Research International. 2023; 2023: 1-15. doi: 10.1155/2023/4253331

[20]Hao X, Geng F, Wang T, et al. Relations of Creativity to the Interplay Between High-order Cognitive Functions: Behavioral and Neural Evidence. Neuroscience. 2021; 473: 90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.015

[21]Zhuang K, Yang W, Li Y, et al. Connectome-based evidence for creative thinking as an emergent property of ordinary cognitive operations. NeuroImage. 2021; 227: 117632. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117632

[22]Smillie LD, Bennett D, Tan NP, et al. Does openness/intellect predict sensitivity to the reward value of information? Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2021; 21(5): 993-1009. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00900-1

[23]Cabrera D, Cabrera L, Cabrera E. Perspectives Organize Information in Mind and Nature: Empirical Findings of Point-View Perspective (P) in Cognitive and Material Complexity. Systems. 2022; 10(3): 52. doi: 10.3390/systems10030052

[24]Wang Y, Xu ZL, Lou JY, et al. Factors influencing the complex problem-solving skills in reflective learning: results from partial least square structural equation modeling and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. BMC Medical Education. 2023; 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04326-w

[25]Gupta N, Salgaonkar S, Kothari C, et al. Hypothesis Problem Solving Using Natural Language Processing. IEEE; 2023.

[26]Facione PA. The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill. Informal Logic. 2000; 20(1). doi: 10.22329/il.v20i1.2254

[27]Runco MA, Jaeger GJ. The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2012; 24(1): 92-96. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

[28]Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18(1): 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104

[29]Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 7th ed. Pearson; 2019.

[30]Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods. 2008; 40(3): 879-891. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879

[31]American Psychological Association (APA). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th ed. APA; 2020.

[32]Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; 6(1): 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118

[33]Li J, Wang Y, Chen X. The role of artificial intelligence in fostering critical thinking in digital learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development. 2021; 69(4): 781-803.

[34]Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman; 2022.

[35]Brown PC, Roediger HL, McDaniel MA. Make It Stick. Harvard University Press; 2014.

[36]Zhao Y. Artificial Intelligence and Education: End the Grammar of Schooling. ECNU Review of Education. Sage; 2024.

[37]Taufikin MSI, Supa’At N, Nikmah F, et al. The impact of AI on teacher roles and pedagogy in the 21st-century classroom. IEEE; 2024.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Indexing

Polish Scientific Bibliography

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.