Implementation of open science practices to enhance academic resilience in students: Case of Ukraine

Iryna  Simkova; Yuliana  Lavrysh

doi:10.59400/fes2709

Implementation of open science practices to enhance academic resilience in students: Case of Ukraine

Iryna Simkova Department of English Language for Humanities, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
Yuliana Lavrysh Department of English Language for Engineering, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine

Article ID: 2709

Keywords: Open Science; academic resilience; Open Educational Resources; collaborative learning; transparent assessment; inclusivity; resilient pedagogy

Abstract

This paper explores how Open Science (OS) practices can help students build academic resilience, especially in light of the ongoing challenges in Ukraine due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the war. By incorporating OS principles—like Open Educational Resources (OER), collaborative efforts, and transparent assessment—the study illustrates how students cultivate adaptability, problem-solving abilities, and a sense of community. The authors analyze the principles of Open Science and resilient pedagogy strategies using theoretical and empirical methods. The study presents the results from observing the training and interviews with 54 Ukrainian students. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research examines students’ involvement with OS practices in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course. The findings suggest that OS contributes to resilience by lowering knowledge barriers, fostering collaborative learning, and enhancing inclusivity. Nonetheless, the study also points out the importance of balancing openness with privacy considerations. The paper wraps up with practical suggestions for integrating OS into education to foster more equitable and resilient learning environments.

Published

2025-05-08

How to Cite

Simkova, I., & Lavrysh, Y. (2025). Implementation of open science practices to enhance academic resilience in students: Case of Ukraine. Forum for Education Studies, 3(2), 2709. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2709

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Grahe JE, Cuccolo K, Leighton DC, et al. Open Science Promotes Diverse, Just, and Sustainable Research and Educational Outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 2019; 19(1): 5-20. doi: 10.1177/1475725719869164

[2]Buyserie B, Bryson R, Quistberg R. Productive disruptions: Resilient pedagogies that advocate for equity. In: Resilient pedagogy: Practical teaching strategies to overcome distance, disruption, and distraction. Utah State University; 2021. pp. 37-53. doi: 10.26079/a516-fb24

[3]Farnham A, Kurz C, Öztürk MA, et al. Early career researchers want Open Science. Genome Biology. 2017; 18(1). doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1351-7

[4]Christensen G, Wang Z, Paluck EL, et al. Open Science Practices are on the Rise: The State of Social Science (3S) Survey. UC Berkeley: Center for Effective Global Action; 2020.

[5]Banks GC, Field JG, Oswald FL, et al. Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2018; 34(3): 257-270. doi: 10.1007/s10869-018-9547-8

[6]Wehn U, Ajates R, Mandeville C, et al. Opening science to society: how to progress societal engagement into (open) science policies. Royal Society Open Science. 2024; 11(5). doi: 10.1098/rsos.231309

[7]Fleming JI, Wilson SE, Espinas D, et al. Special Education Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Use of Open Practices. Remedial and Special Education. 2024. doi: 10.1177/07419325241237268

[8]Heck T, Peters I, Mazarakis A, et al. Open science practices in higher education: Discussion of survey results from research and teaching staff in Germany. Education for Information. 2020; 36(3): 301-323. doi: 10.3233/efi-190272

[9]Weller M. The Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press; 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/bam

[10]Cronin C. Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2017; 18(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096

[11]Buheji M. Understanding Mechanisms of Resilience Economy- Live Application on a Complex Business Model. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. 2017; 4(14). doi: 10.14738/assrj.414.3484

[12]Barton G, Mckay L, Garvis S, Viviana S. Introduction: Defining and Theorising Key Concepts of Resilience and Well-Being and Arts-Based Research. Available online: 10.1007/978-3-030-26053-8_1. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338368234_Introduction_Defining_and_Theorising_Key_Concepts_of_Resilience_and_Well-Being_and_Arts-Based_Research (accessed on 10 January 2025).

[13]Borucka A, Ostaszewski K. Theory of resilience. Key conceptual constructs and chosen issues (Polish). Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2008; 12(2 Pt 1): 587-597.

[14]Southwick SM, Bonanno GA, Masten AS, et al. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2014; 5(1). doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338

[15]Lambert SR. Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development. 2018; 5(3). doi: 10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290

[16]Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work. Child Development. 2000; 71(3): 543-562. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164

[17]Branda F. Social impact: Trusting open science for future pandemic resilience. Societal Impacts. 2024; 3: 100058. doi: 10.1016/j.socimp.2024.100058

[18]Gong K. Open science: The science paradigm of the new era. Cultures of Science. 2022; 5(1): 3-9. doi: 10.1177/20966083221091867

[19]Mirowski P. The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science. 2018; 48(2): 171-203. doi: 10.1177/0306312718772086

[20]Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IjJ, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data. 2016; 3(1). doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18

[21]DeRosa R, Robinson S. From OER to Open Pedagogy: Harnessing the Power of Open. Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science. 2017: 115-124. doi: 10.5334/bbc.i

[22]Paic A. Open Science—Enabling Discovery in the Digital Age. Going Digital Toolkit Note, No. 13. Available online: https://goingdigital.oecd.org/data/notes/No13_ToolkitNote_OpenScience.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2025).

[23]Wouter B, Judith H, Carien D, et al. (2022). Meaningful public engagement in the context of open science: reflections from early and mid-career academics. Research for All. doi:10.14324/RFA.06.1.23

[24]Lasthiotakis H, Kretz A, Sá C. Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK. Policy Futures in Education. 2015; 13(8): 968-989. doi: 10.1177/1478210315579983

[25]Group O. Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Available online: https://opendefinition.org/ (accessed on 5 January 2025).

[26]Rajala R, Westerlund M, Möller K. Strategic flexibility in open innovation – designing business models for open source software. European Journal of Marketing. 2012; 46(10): 1368-1388. doi: 10.1108/03090561211248071

[27]Manco A. A Landscape of Open Science Policies Research. Sage Open. 2022; 12(4). doi: 10.1177/21582440221140358

[28]UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/about (accessed on 5 January 2025).

[29]Hegarty B. Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology. 2015; 55(4): 3–13.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Indexing

Polish Scientific Bibliography

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.