Impact of online resources on assessment literacy of polytechnic educators

Vanessa  Vinodhen

doi:10.59400/fes2678

Impact of online resources on assessment literacy of polytechnic educators

Vanessa Vinodhen Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore 569830, Singapore

Article ID: 2678

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2678

Keywords: assessment literacy; online resources; polytechnic; educators

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of online assessment resources on the assessment literacy of polytechnic educators in Singapore. Assessment literacy, defined as educators’ knowledge and skills in designing, implementing, and interpreting assessments, is crucial for ensuring fair and valid evaluation of student learning. With the increasing reliance on online resources for professional development, this study investigates the impact of such resources on the assessment literacy of polytechnic educators. Twenty-three educators from diverse disciplines participated in a pre- and post-survey based on adapted questions from the Scale of Teacher Assessment Practices (STAP). The intervention comprised a six-week engagement with curated online resources, articles, and interactive tutorials on formative and summative assessment strategies. Results from paired t-tests indicated significant improvements in educators’ confidence and competence in designing and implementing assessments, as evidenced by increased mean scores across key domains of assessment literacy. The accessibility and relevance of online resources were highlighted in qualitative feedback, emphasizing their potential for bridging professional development gaps. This study underscores the potential of online resources as an accessible and scalable means of enhancing assessment literacy among polytechnic educators. Implications for integrating such resources into institutional professional development programs and considerations for future research are discussed.

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

Vinodhen, V. (2025). Impact of online resources on assessment literacy of polytechnic educators. Forum for Education Studies, 3(3), 2678. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2678

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Popham WJ. Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental?. Theory Into Practice. 2009; 48(1): 4-11. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577536

[2]Johnson P, Lee H. Exploring teachers’ assessment literacy and its impact on student writing achievements. Journal of Educational Assessment. 2021.

[3]Wang H, Sun W, Zhou Y, et al. Teachers’ assessment literacy improves teaching efficacy: A view from conservation of resources theory. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007830

[4]Suyansah AI, Said N, Jawing E. Exploring Digital Assessment Literacy in Malaysian Esl Tertiary Institution Instructors’ Innovative Pedagogy. International Journal of Modern Education. 2023; 5(17): 431-439. doi: 10.35631/ijmoe.517033

[5]Williams G, Chen D, Ahmed K. Assessment literacy for teachers: The impact of professional development. Journal of Teacher Development. 2022.

[6]Jones M, Smith L. Enhancing educators’ assessment literacy through professional development. Educational Review Quarterly; 2022.

[7]Morris NP. The role of learning objects in online education. In: Tatnall A, Umer O (editors). Interactions in digital education: Future challenges and opportunities. Springer; 2021.

[8]National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment (NCIEA). Supporting the improvement of educators’ assessment literacy. Available online: https://www.nciea.org (accessed on 2 January 2025).

[9]Richter S, Idleman L. Online Teaching Efficacy: A Product of Professional Development and Ongoing Support. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2017; 14(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2016-0033

[10]Howell J. Development and analysis of a measurement scale for teacher assessment literacy (PublicationNo. 1539000) [PHD thesis]. East Carolina University; 2018.

[11]Koh KH. Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development: Teaching Education. 2011; 22(3): 255-276. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2011.593164.

[12]Sajjad H, Muhammad MK, Zarina A. A correlational study on teacher educators’ assessment literacy and their students’ academic achievement. PJE. 2023; 35(3). doi: 10.30971/pje.v35i3.918

[13]Sinnayah P, Ambler T, Kelly K, Konjarski L, et al. Reviewing the literature: Collaborative professional learning for academics in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2023; 61(5): 862–876. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2227614

[14]Chen Z, Pavlova M, Ramos C. A systematic approach to adult educators’ professional development in Singapore: challenges and future developments. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2021; 40(5–6): 455–470. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2021.1978006

[15]Dille KB, Røkenes FM. Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2021; 105: 103431. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431

[16]Darling-Hammond L, Hyler M, Gardner M. Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute; 2017. doi: 10.54300/122.311

[17]DeLuca C, Coombs AJ, MacGregor S, Rasooli A. Toward a differential and situated view of assessment literacy: Studying teachers’ responses to classroom assessment scenarios. Frontiers in Education. 2019; 4(94): 1-10. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00094

[18]Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology. The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008.

[19]Alaghbary G. Integrating Technology with Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy: Web 2.0-enabled Learning Designs for Online Learning. Asian EFL Journal. 2021.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Indexing

Polish Scientific Bibliography

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.