The place of emotions in language education from an emotional intelligence perspective

İbrahim Halil  Topal

doi:10.59400/fes1832

The place of emotions in language education from an emotional intelligence perspective

İbrahim Halil Topal Gazi University, 06830 Yenimahalle, Türkiye

Article ID: 1832

96 Views, 51 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes1832

Keywords: emotions; emotional intelligence; language learning; language teaching; psychology

Abstract

The significance of emotions in language education is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial element that impacts both teaching and learning. This article delves into the role of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in enhancing the language learning experience, emphasizing the importance of perceiving, using, understanding, and regulating emotions. Educators, as integral to the learning process, can cultivate more inclusive, supportive, and effective learning environments by integrating emotional awareness and regulation strategies into language teaching. This holistic approach to language education intertwines cognitive and emotional development, emphasizing the practical implications for educators in fostering EI in the language classroom to improve learner engagement and success.

References

[1]Lazarus RS. Emotions and Interpersonal Relationships: Toward a Person‐Centered Conceptualization of Emotions and Coping. Journal of Personality. 2005; 74(1): 9–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x

[2]Bradberry T, Greaves J. The emotional intelligence quick book: Everything you need to know to put your EI to work. Simon and Schuster; 2006.

[3]Stein SJ, Book HE. The EI edge: Emotional intelligence and your success. Jossey-Bass; 2011.

[4]Packard AB. Managing emotions. doi: 10.17760/d20412901

[5]Perera HN, DiGiacomo M. The relationship of trait emotional intelligence with academic performance: A meta-analytic review. Learning and Individual Differences. 2013; 28: 20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.08.002

[6]Crossman J. The role of relationships and emotions in student perceptions of learning and assessment. Higher Education Research & Development. 2007; 26(3): 313–327. doi: 10.1080/07294360701494328

[7]Salovey P, Mayer JD. Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 1990; 9(3): 185–211. doi: 10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg

[8]Goleman D. Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury; 1996.

[9]Mayer JD, Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In: Sluyter DJ (editor). Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications. Basic Books; 1997. pp. 3–34.

[10]Mayer JD, Caruso DR, Salovey P. The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates. Emotion Review. 2016; 8(4): 290–300. doi: 10.1177/1754073916639667

[11]Oz H, Demirezen M, Pourfeiz J. Emotional Intelligence and Attitudes Towards Foreign Language Learning: Pursuit of Relevance and Implications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 186: 416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.118

[12]Skordoulis M, Koukounaras Liagkis M, Sidiropoulos G, et al. Emotional Intelligence and Workplace Conflict Resolution: The Case of Secondary Education Teachers in Greece. International Journal of Research in Education and Science. 2020; 6(4): 521. doi: 10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1224

[13]Mamat NH, Ismail NAH. Integration of emotional intelligence in teaching practice among university teachers in higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 2021; 18(2): 69–102. doi: 10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.3

[14]Khassawneh O, Mohammad T, Ben-Abdallah R, et al. The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Educators’ Performance in Higher Education Sector. Behavioral Sciences. 2022; 12(12): 511. doi: 10.3390/bs12120511

[15]Trad M, Alayoubi MO, Abdul Khalek R, et al. Assessing the influence of emotional intelligence on teachers’ performance in Lebanese private education institutions. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. 2021; 12(3): 556–573. doi: 10.1108/heswbl-12-2020-0268

[16]Eteng-Uket S, Njaka RC. Predictive power of grit and emotional intelligence on research anxiety experience of students. American Journal of Education and Learning. 2023; 8(1): 63–75. doi: 10.55284/ajel.v8i1.875

[17]Lee MY, Kutty FM. Emotional Intelligence and Professional Identity of Student Teachers During Practicum. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2023; 13(4). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i4/16736

[18]Dulay H, Burt M. (1977). Remarks on creativity in language acquisition. In: Burt M, Dulay H, & Finocchiaro M (editors). Viewpoints on English as a second language. Regents; 1977. pp. 95–126.

[19]Fehrenbach NR. An overview of SLA theories with a focus on the affective filter hypothesis [Master’s thesis]. University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA; 2020.

[20]Dewaele JM. Reflections on the emotional and psychological aspects of foreign language learning and use. Anglistik: International journal of English Studies. 2011; 22(1): 23–42.

[21]Dörnyei Z, Muir C. Creating a motivating classroom environment. In: Gao X (editor). Second handbook of English language teaching. Springer; 2019. pp. 719–736.

[22]Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.

[23]Huang X, Lajoie SP. Social emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Why it matters and how can we measure it? Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023; 7(1): 100447. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100447

[24]Mänty K, Järvenoja H, Törmänen T. Socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Combining individual emotional experiences and group-level emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 102: 101589. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589

[25]Sucaromana U. Contribution to Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of Emotional Intelligence. English Language Teaching. 2012; 5(9). doi: 10.5539/elt.v5n9p54

[26]Dwyer J, Hopwood N. The business communication handbook. Cengage AU; 2019.

[27]Antonopoulou H. The Value of Emotional Intelligence: Self-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Motivation, and Empathy as Key Components. Technium Education and Humanities. 2024; 8: 78–92. doi: 10.47577/teh.v8i.9719

[28]Morin A. Self‐Awareness Part 1: Definition, Measures, Effects, Functions, and Antecedents. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2011; 5(10): 807–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00387.x

[29]Eurich T. What self-awareness really is (and how to cultivate it)? Harvard Business Review. Available online: https://hbr.org/2018/01/what-self-awareness-really-is-and-how-to-cultivate-it (accessed on 1 October 2024).

[30]Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. Understanding self-regulation: An Introduction. In: Baumeister RF & Vohs KD (editors). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and its applications. Guilford Press; 2004. pp. 1–12.

[31]Taherkhani R, Moradi R. The relationships among self‐regulation, emotional intelligence, willingness to communicate, and reading comprehension of Persian foreign language learners: Structural equation modeling. Foreign Language Annals. 2022; 55(3): 742–768. doi: 10.1111/flan.12610

[32]Elizondo K, Valenzuela R, Pestana JV, et al. Self‐regulation and procrastination in college students: A tale of motivation, strategy, and perseverance. Psychology in the Schools. 2023; 61(3): 887–902. doi: 10.1002/pits.23088

[33]Oxford RL. 2 Toward a Psychology of Well- Being for Language Learners: The ‘EMPATHICS’ Vision. Positive Psychology in SLA. Published online December 31, 2016: 10–88. doi: 10.21832/9781783095360-003

[34]Taheri H, sadighi F, Bagheri MS, et al. EFL learners’ L2 achievement and its relationship with cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, learning styles, and language learning strategies. Cogent Education. 2019; 6(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186x.2019.1655882

[35]Graham S, Weiner B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In: Berliner DC & Calfee RC (editors). Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan; 1996. pp. 63784.

[36]Thao LT, Thuy PT, Thi NA, et al. Impacts of Emotional Intelligence on Second Language Acquisition: English-Major Students’ Perspectives. Sage Open. 2023; 13(4). doi: 10.1177/21582440231212065

[37]Ioannidou F, Konstantikaki V. Empathy and emotional intelligence: What is it really about?. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2008; 1(3): 118–123.

[38]Mercer S. 3 Seeing the World Through Your Eyes: Empathy in Language Learning and Teaching. Positive Psychology in SLA. Published online December 31, 2016: 91–111. doi: 10.21832/9781783095360-004

[39]Oz H. Emotional Intelligence as A Predictor of L2 Communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 186: 424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.117

[40]Paolini A. Social Emotional Learning: Role of the School Counselor in Promoting College and Career Readiness. Anatolian Journal of Education. 2019; 4(1). doi: 10.29333/aje.2019.411a

[41]Chen C. Empathy in Language Learning and Its Inspiration to the Development of Intercultural Communicative Competence. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2013; 3(12). doi: 10.4304/tpls.3.12.2267-2273

[42]Fan L, Cui F. Mindfulness, self-efficacy, and self-regulation as predictors of psychological well-being in EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024; 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332002

[43]Oxford RL. Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge; 2016.

[44]llen J, Cohen J. Emotional intelligence in classrooms and in schools: What we see in the educational setting. In: Murphy KR (editor). A critique of emotional intelligence. Pennsylvania State University; 2006. pp. 125–139.

[45]Morilla-García C. The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Bilingual Education: A Study on The Improvement of the Oral Language Skill. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 7(1): 27. doi: 10.17583/remie.2017.1840

[46]Shah AP, Galantino ML. (2019). Building emotional intelligence for student success: A pilot study. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2019; 4(6): 1445–1461. doi: 10.1044/2019_PERSP-19-00101

[47]Mercer S, Gkonou C. Teaching with heart and soul. In: Gregersen T & MacIntyre PD (editors). Innovative practices in language teacher education. Springer; 2017. pp. 103–124.

[48]Mitchell S. The effect of social-emotional learning on language proficiency [PhD thesis]. Caldwell University, USA; 2020.

[49]Russell V. Language anxiety and the online learner. Foreign Language Annals. 2020; 53(2): 338–352. doi: 10.1111/flan.12461

[50]Li C, Huang J, Li B. The predictive effects of classroom environment and trait emotional intelligence on Foreign Language Enjoyment and Anxiety. System. 2021; 96: 102393. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2020.102393

[51]Richards JC. Exploring Emotions in Language Teaching. RELC Journal. 2020; 53(1): 225–239. doi: 10.1177/0033688220927531

[52]Shafiee Rad H, Jafarpour A. Effects of Well-being, Grit, Emotion Regulation, and Resilience Interventions on L2 Learners’ Writing Skills. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2022; 39(3): 228–247. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2022.2096517

[53]Oleet JB, Yu C. Examining the Role and Effect of Emotions in Adults’ Online Learning. Utilizing Emotional Experience for Best Learning Design Practices. Published online October 22, 2024: 155–204. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2663-3.ch006

[54]Tengberg M, Olin-Scheller C. Developing Critical Reading of Argumentative Text: Effects of a Comprehension Strategy Intervention. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2016; 7(4): 635. doi: 10.17507/jltr.0704.02

[55]González‐Lloret M. Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals. 2020; 53(2): 260–269. doi: 10.1111/flan.12466

[56]Kos T. Enhancing Young Learners’ Collaboration Through Tasks–What Can Language Pedagogy Learn from Research? Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--TESL-EJ. 2024; 28(2). doi: 10.55593/ej.28110a2

[57]Borge M, Soto JA, Aldemir T, et al. Building Multicultural Competence by Fostering Collaborative Skills. Teaching of Psychology. 2020; 49(1): 85–92. doi: 10.1177/0098628320977421

[58]Paolini AC. Social Emotional Learning: Key to Career Readiness. Anatolian Journal of Education. 2020; 5(1): 125–134. doi: 10.29333/aje.2020.5112a

[59]Fisher D, Frey N, & Almarode J. (2020). Student learning communities: A springboard for academic and social-emotional development. ASCD; 2020.

[60]Philibert CT. Everyday SEL in High School. Published online June 24, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9781003141068

[61]Morgan WJ, Katz J. Mindfulness meditation and foreign language classroom anxiety: Findings from a randomized control trial. Foreign Language Annals. 2021; 54(2): 389–409. doi: 10.1111/flan.12525

[62]Zeilhofer L, Sasao Y. Mindful language learning: The effects of college students’ mindfulness on short-term vocabulary retention. System. 2022; 110: 102909. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2022.102909

[63]Zeilhofer L. Mindfulness in the foreign language classroom: Influence on academic achievement and awareness. Language Teaching Research. 2020; 27(1): 96–114. doi: 10.1177/1362168820934624

[64]Hutchins D, Goldstein Hode M. Exploring faculty and staff development of cultural competence through communicative learning in an online diversity course. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 2021; 14(4): 468–479. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000162

[65]Lash M, Madrid Akpovo S, Cushner K. Developing the intercultural competence of early childhood preservice teachers: preparing teachers for culturally diverse classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education. 2020; 43(1): 105–126. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2020.1832631

Published

2024-12-02

How to Cite

Topal, İbrahim H. (2024). The place of emotions in language education from an emotional intelligence perspective. Forum for Education Studies, 2(4), 1832. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes1832

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.