Intra and inter-individual differences in the visual evaluation of crown preparations in the phantom head

  • Maximilian Nothaft Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstrasse, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria; Dental Practice, Dres Marion & Maximilian Nothaft, 94032 Passau, Germany
  • Laurenz Kotthaus Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstrasse, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria
  • Eva Groth Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstrasse, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria
  • Mihai Rominu Department of Protheses Technology and Dental Materials, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
  • Rüdiger Junker Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstrasse, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria
Article ID: 1609
63 Views, 42 PDF Downloads
Keywords: prep Check; dental education; self-assessment; pre-clinical preparation course

References

[1]Alammari, M.R., Y.M. Alkhiary, and A.A. Nawar, Intra-and inter-examiner variability in evaluating impression procedures at the undergraduate level. Journal of Life Sciences, 2013. 5(1): p. 5-10.

[2]Sharaf, A.A., A.M. AbdelAziz, and O.A. El Meligy, Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures. J Dent Educ, 2007. 71(4): p. 540-4.

[3]Haynes, B.I., S. Bauermeister, and D. Bunce, Age and Intraindividual Variability, in Encyclopedia of Geropsychology, N.A. Pachana, Editor. 2015, Springer Singapore: Singapore. p. 1-9.

[4]Faure, P., et al., Social Determinants of Inter-Individual Variability and Vulnerability: The Role of Dopamine. Front Behav Neurosci, 2022. 16: p. 836343.

[5]Miyazono, S., et al., Use of Digital Technology to Improve Objective and Reliable Assessment in Dental Student Simulation Laboratories. J Dent Educ, 2019. 83(10): p. 1224-1232.

[6]Jenkins, S.M., et al., Evaluating undergraduate preclinical operative skill; use of a glance and grade marking system. J Dent, 1998. 26(8): p. 679-84.

[7]Kahneman, D., O. Sibony, and C.R. Sunstein, Noise : a flaw in human judgment. First edition. ed. 2021, New York: Little, Brown Spark. ix, 454 pages.

[8]Kwon, S.R., et al., Dental anatomy grading: comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique. J Dent Educ, 2014. 78(12): p. 1655-62.

[9]Kateeb, E.T., et al., Utilising an innovative digital software to grade pre-clinical crown preparation exercise. Eur J Dent Educ, 2017. 21(4): p. 220-227.

[10]Baumann, M., Evaluation von Bewertungskriterien für praktische Studentenarbeiten im Vergleich zur Bewertung per Augenschein. 2015, LMU München.

[11]Schiefelbein, R., Untersuchung zur Umsetzung von Richtlinien zur Präparation CAD/CAM-generierter vollkeramischer Frontzahnkronen. 2015, LMU München.

[12]Nothaft, M., et al., The preclinical teaching of the “Chairside Economical Restoration of Esthetic Ceramic” workflow: A questionnaire-based evaluation. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences, 2023. 10(2): p. 72-77.

[13]Landis, J.R. and G.G. Koch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977. 33(1): p. 159-74.

[14]Welk, A., et al., Computer-assisted learning and simulation systems in dentistry--a challenge to society. Int J Comput Dent 2006. 9: p. 253-265.

[15]Salvendy, G., et al., Pilot study on criteria in cavity preparation--facts or artifacts? J Dent Educ, 1973. 37(11): p. 27-31.

[16]Mino, T., et al., Rating criteria to evaluate student performance in digital wax-up training using multi-purpose software. J Adv Prosthodont, 2022. 14(4): p. 203-211.

[17]Strub, J.R., et al., Curriculum Prothetik: Band 1. 2019: Quintessenz Verlag.

[18]Brosch, T., et al., The impact of emotion on perception, attention, memory, and decision-making. Swiss Med Wkly, 2013. 143: p. w13786.

[19]Al Amri, M.D., H.R. Sherfudhin, and S.R. Habib, Effects of Evaluator’s Fatigue and Level of Expertise on the Global and Analytical Evaluation of Preclinical Tooth Preparation. J Prosthodont, 2018. 27(7): p. 636-643.

[20]Fuller, J.L., The effects of training and criterion models on interjudge reliability. J Dent Educ, 1972. 36(4): p. 19-22.

[21]Lilley, J.D., et al., Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry. Br Dent J, 1968. 125(5): p. 194-7.

[22]Goepferd, S.J. and P.E. Kerber, A comparison of two methods for evaluating primary class II cavity preparations. J Dent Educ, 1980. 44(9): p. 537-42.

[23]Schmitt, L., et al., Study on the Interrater Reliability of an OSPE (Objective Structured Practical Examination) - Subject to the Evaluation Mode in the Phantom Course of Operative Dentistry. GMS J Med Educ, 2016. 33(4): p. Doc61.

[24]Habib, S.R. and H. Sherfudhin, Students’ self-assessment: a learning tool and its comparison with the faculty assessments. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2015. 16(1): p. 48-53.

[25]Schepke, U., et al., Digital assessment of a retentive full crown preparation-An evaluation of prepCheck in an undergraduate pre-clinical teaching environment. Eur J Dent Educ, 2020. 24(3): p. 407-424.

[26]Wolgin, M., et al., Comparison of a prepCheck-supported self-assessment concept with conventional faculty supervision in a pre-clinical simulation environment. Eur J Dent Educ, 2018. 22(3): p. e522-e529.

[27]Stoilov, M., et al., Comparison of Digital Self-Assessment Systems and Faculty Feedback for Tooth Preparation in a Preclinical Simulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(24).

[28]Nagy, Z.A., et al., Evaluating the efficiency of the Dental Teacher system as a digital preclinical teaching tool. Eur J Dent Educ, 2018. 22(3): p. e619-e623.

[29]Nothaft, M., et al., Self-Assessment-Of-Dental-Preparations-In-The-Phantom-Head-With-Prepcheck-A-Questionnaire-Based-Evaluation. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabiltation, 2023.

[30]Schlenz, M.A., et al., Undergraduate dental students’ perspective on the implementation of digital dentistry in the preclinical curriculum: a questionnaire survey. BMC Oral Health, 2020. 20(1): p. 78.

Published
2024-11-19
How to Cite
Nothaft, M., Kotthaus, L., Groth, E., Rominu, M., & Junker, R. (2024). Intra and inter-individual differences in the visual evaluation of crown preparations in the phantom head. Forum for Education Studies, 2(4), 1609. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes1609
Section
Article