Education’s primary motive of overall human development in India: Case based perspective of Dayalbagh Educational Institute

Hans  Kaushik

doi:10.59400/fes.v2i4.1517

Education’s primary motive of overall human development in India: Case based perspective of Dayalbagh Educational Institute

Hans Kaushik Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, Uttar Pradesh 282005, India

Article ID: 1517

61 Views, 51 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i4.1517

Keywords: value; education; sustainability; consciousness

Abstract

The Indian higher education system faces significant challenges in integrating value-based education, sustainability, and consciousness, often prioritizing academic achievements over holistic development. This case-based research explores how Dayalbagh Educational Institute (DEI) effectively addresses these challenges by incorporating sustainability, value, and consciousness into its educational framework. DEI was selected for its distinctive approach, which emphasizes moral and social responsibility, fostering not only academic success but also the ethical development of students. The study draws on document analysis and observations to illustrate how DEI’s educational practices serve as a model for other institutions. The research underscores the urgent need for educational reforms in India that go beyond traditional metrics of success, addressing the gaps in moral education and sustainable practices. By fostering critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and social responsibility, DEI demonstrates how an education system can prepare students for future challenges while promoting a deeper consciousness about their role in society. The findings suggest that integrating value-based education with sustainability and consciousness not only enhances students’ holistic development but also contributes to broader goals of national development. DEI’s model offers practical insights and evidence for other educational institutions to adopt similar strategies, ensuring that future generations are better equipped to address societal challenges with a strong ethical foundation. This research thus provides a comprehensive view of the essential elements needed in modern education to create responsible and conscious global citizens.

References

[1]Bhardwaj A. Importance of education in human life: A holistic approach. Int J Sci Conscious. 2016; 2(2): 23-28.

[2]Minnis F. Socrates for six-year-olds. Booklet accompanying the BBC program of the same title. London: BBC; 1991.

[3]Patwal I. Literacy v/s Education. Available online: https://scicomm.in/education/literacy-v-s-education/ (accessed on 26 June 2024).

[4]Sharma S. Towards sustainable education: Integrating environmental and social responsibility into the curriculum. Int Sci J Res. 2023; 5(5): 1-10.

[5]Bonnett M. Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environ Educ Res. 2002; 8(1): 9-20.

[6]Ludvik MJB. The neuroscience of learning and development: Enhancing creativity, compassion, critical thinking, and peace in higher education. Taylor & Francis. 2023.

[7]Kaushik H, Kaushik S. A study on the associations among the factors influencing digital education with reference to Indian higher education. Educ Inf Technol. 2024; 1-25.

[8]Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 75264-75278.

[9]Gupta V. The importance of value-based education & role of teacher. Int J Inf Mov. 2017; 2: 153-156.

[10]Borstorff PC, Lowe SK. Student perceptions and opinions toward e-learning in the college environment. Academic Education Leadership Journal. 2007; 11(2).

[11]World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Oxford University Press; 1987. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf

[12]Hurst B, Wallace RR, Nixon SB. The impact of social interaction on student learning. Read Horizons. 2013.

[13]Butnaru GI, Niță V, Anichiti A, et al. The effectiveness of online education during COVID-19 pandemic—A comparative analysis between the perceptions of academic students and high school students from Romania. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9): 5311.

[14]Kulal A, Nayak A. A study on perception of teachers and students toward online classes in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District. Asian Assoc Open Univ J. 2020.

[15]Annan-Diab F, Molinari C. Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. Int J Manag Educ. 2017; 15(2): 73-83.

[16]Kopnina H. Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. J Environ Educ. 2020; 51(4): 280-91.

[17]Webster’s third new international dictionary. 1966 ed. Vol. 1. Springfield (MA): G & C Merriam Co.; 1966. p. 482.

[18]Sutherland S. The Macmillan Dictionary of Psychology. Macmillan Education UK; 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-24403-4

[19]Hart T. From information to transformation: Education for the evolution of consciousness. Peter Lang Inc., International Academic; 2001.

[20]Mustakova-Possardt E. Journal of Moral Education. 2004; 33(3): 245-269. doi: 10.1080/0305724042000733046

[21]Kaushik H, Rajwanshi R, Bhadauria A. Modeling the challenges of technology adoption in dairy farming. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. Published online June 2, 2023. doi: 10.1108/jstpm-09-2022-0163

[22]Agarwal R, Bhadauria A, Kaushik H, et al. ISM-MICMAC-based study on key enablers in the adoption of solar renewable energy products in India. Technology in Society. 2023; 75: 102375. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102375

[23]Satsangi PS, Horatschek AM, Srivastav A, et al. Consciousness Studies in Sciences and Humanities: Eastern and Western Perspectives. Springer International Publishing; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-13920-8

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Kaushik , H. (2024). Education’s primary motive of overall human development in India: Case based perspective of Dayalbagh Educational Institute. Forum for Education Studies, 2(4), 1517. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i4.1517

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.