Can CLIL give Italian high school students in the private sector a greater opportunity to develop their EFL speaking skills?

Federico  Valente

doi:10.59400/fes.v2i3.1507

Can CLIL give Italian high school students in the private sector a greater opportunity to develop their EFL speaking skills?

Federico Valente Department of Human, Social and Health Sciences, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Campus Folcara, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy

Article ID: 1507

150 Views, 83 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i3.1507

Keywords: CLIL; EFL; SLA; methodology; syllabus; curriculum; grammar translation; exposure

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) can lead Italian high school students to improve their English as a Foreign Language speaking skills. The trigger for this research comes from my EFL teaching experiences at Italian schools, where the syllabi employed tend to neglect the training of speaking skills and focus mainly on grammar translation and English literature instructions. The stimulus for this investigation comes also from articles on the effectiveness of using CLIL for the improvement of FL speaking performance and Lexis extension that I read before writing this article in order to have a broader view of this topic. The literature review describes in detail theoretical issues with regard to the advantages of using CLIL methodology in the classroom over traditional approaches and how this technique helps FL students to facilitate speaking difficulties. It also makes reference to a few key findings from previous research. This study was conducted in Italy, and the data gathering processes consist mainly of qualitative, semi-structured interviews with five participants (three EFL learners and two experienced teachers of English as a foreign language), interview transcripts, and content analysis techniques that I used to examine and interpret the collected data. Findings indicate that not only can content and language integrated learning represent an improvement of the common EFL teaching methods and help learners enhance their speaking abilities, but it can also stimulate their motivation to study English and lower learners’ levels of anxiety, which is commonly associated with their concern about making mistakes or being assessed.

References

[1]Willis J. A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman; 1996.

[2]Coury G, Carlos S. English as a Lingua Franca in the Brazilian Academic World. Karen’s Linguistics Issues; 2001.

[3]Pashaie P, Khalaji H. Does open task outcome affect speaking skills of pre-intermediate high school students? (A study in Malayer, Iran). International Journal of Educational Investigations. 2014; 1(1): 54–65.

[4]Richards JC. Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press; 2015.

[5]Lopriore L, Djigunovic’ JM. Attitudinal Aspects of Early EFL Learning. UPRT; 2009.

[6]Costa F. ICLHE Italy: State of the Art. Multilingualism, CLIL and teaching innovation. Bozen University Press; 2013. pp. 107–121.

[7]Bohlke D. Fluency-oriented Second Language Teaching. In: Celce-Murcia M, Brinton D, Snow MA. (editors). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 4th ed. Heinle; 2013. pp. 121–135.

[8]Mishan F, Timmis I. Materials Development for TESOL. Edinburgh University Press; 2015. doi: 10.1515/9780748691371

[9]Richars JC, Rodgers TS. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2001.

[10]Wedell M. More than just ‘technology’: English language teaching initiatives as complex educational changes. In: Coleman H (editor). Dreams and Realities: Developing COUNTRIES and the English Language. British Council; 2011.

[11]Lange’ G, Cinganotto L. E-CLIL for an innovative instruction. The notebooks of the Research n.18, Loescher. Available online: http://www.laricerca.loescher.it/quaderno_18/#/4/ (accessed on 15 December 2022).

[12]Nunan D. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers; 1999.

[13]Burkart G, Sheppard K. Content ESL across the USA: A training packet. A descriptive study of content-ESL practices. National clearinghouse for English language acquisition. Available online: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/cal/contentesl/ (accessed on 15 December 2022).

[14]Florez MAC. Improving Adult English Language Learners’ Speaking Skills. National Center for ESL Literacy Education; 1999.

[15]Fattah Torky SA. The Effectiveness of a Task-Based Instruction Program in Developing the English Language Speaking Skills of Secondary Stage Students. Ain Shams University Women’s College. Curricula and Methods of Teaching Department; 2006.

[16]Pratiwi ZF, Ayu M. The use of describing picture strategy to improve secondary students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning. 2020; 1(2): 38–43. doi: 10.33365/jeltl.v1i2.603

[17]Rivers WM. Teaching Foreign Language Skills, 2nd ed. Chicago University Press; 1981. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226518855.001.0001

[18]Oprandy R. Listening/speaking in second and foreign language teaching. System. 1994, 22(2): 153-175. doi: 10.1016/0346-251x(94)90054-x

[19]Duguid A. Italian speakers. In: Swan M, Smith B (editors). Learner English: A Teacher’s Guide to Interference and Other Problems. Cambridge University Press; 2001. pp. 73-89. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511667121.007

[20]Bygate M. Speaking. In: Carter R, Nunan D (editors). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press; 2001. pp. 14-20. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511667206.003

[21]Nation P, Newton J. Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. Routledge; 2008. doi: 10.4324/9780203891704

[22]Celce-murcia M, Brinton D, Snow MA. Teaching English as A Second or Foreign Language, 4th ed. Heinle; 2014.

[23]Mackey A. Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1999, 21(4): 557-587. doi: 10.1017/s0272263199004027

[24]Hilferty A. The Relationship between Reading and Speaking Skills. Focus on Basics; 2005.

[25]Farabi M, Hassanvard S, Gorjian B. Using guided oral presentation in teaching English language learners’ speaking skills. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning. 2017; 3(1): 17–24.

[26]Mehisto P, Frigols MJ, Marsh D. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and Multilingual Education. Macmillan; 2008.

[27]Piacentini V, Simões AR. CLIL: A way to develop plurilingual and intercultural competences in schools? In: Anastassiou F, Andreou G (editors). English as a Foreign Language: Perspectives on Teaching, Multilingualism and Interculturalism. Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2020.

[28]Šulistová J. The Content and Language Integrated Learning Approach in Use. Acta Technologica Dubnicae. 2013, 3(2): 47-54. doi: 10.1515/atd-2015-0018

[29]Dalton-Puffer C. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Language Learning & Language Teaching. John Benjamins; 2007. doi: 10.1075/lllt.20

[30]Brumfit CJ, Johnoson K. The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford University Press; 1979.

[31]Hughes SP, Madrid D. The effects of CLIL on content knowledge in monolingual contexts. The Language Learning Journal. 2019, 48(1): 48-59. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2019.1671483

[32]Marsh D. CLIL/EMILE—The European dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. European Commission, DG EAC; 2002.

[33]Piacentini V, Simões AR, Vieira RM. Teachers’ view of language(s) in (CLIL) science education: A case study in Portugal. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2019; 77(5): 636–649. doi: 10.33225/pec/19.77.636

[34]Genesee F, Hamayan E. CLIL in Context. Cambridge University Press; 2016.

[35]Bruton A. CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System. 2013, 41(3): 587-597. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001

[36]Villabona N, Cenoz J. The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 2021, 35(1): 36-50. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703

[37]Civinini C. Digital EL Gazette. Behind the news at Italian schools. Available online: https://www.cebs.at/fileadmin/user_upload/service/CLIL/clil_research_italian_model_230516_ab_01.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2022).

[38]MIUR. National guidelines for high schools. Available online: http://nuovilicei.indire.it/content/index.php?action=lettura&id_m=7782&id_cnt=10497 (accessed on 15 December 2022).

[39]Cinganotto L. CLIL in Italy: a general overview. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning. 2016; 9(2): 374-400. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.6

[40]Valdés-Sánchez L, Espinet M. Coteaching in a science-CLIL classroom: changes in discursive interaction as evidence of an English teacher’s science-CLIL professional identity development. International Journal of Science Education. 2020; 42(14): 2426-2452. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1710873

[41]Dalton-Puffer C. Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2011; 31: 182-204. doi: 10.1017/s0267190511000092

[42]Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning, Cambridge, England. Cambridge University Press; 2010.

[43]Banegas DL. Putting CLIL into practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 2018; 21: 2, 265–268. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2016.1146425

[44]Di Martino E, Di Sabato B. CLIL implementation in Italian schools: can the long ago employed teacher be trained effectively? The Italian protagonists’ voice. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning. 2012; 5(2): 73-105. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2012.5.2.9

[45]Marsh D, Mehisto P, Wolff D, Frigols-martin MJ. European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. European Centre for modern Languages; 2011.

[46]Walker A, White G. Technology Enhanced Language Learning. Oxford University Press; 2014.

[47]Stanley G. Language Learning with Technology: Ideas for Integrating Technology in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press; 2013.

[48]Hedge T. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press; 2000.

[49]Meddings L, Thornbury S. Teaching Unplugged: Dogme in English Language Teaching. Delta; 2009.

[50]Macalister J, Nation ISP. Language Curriculum Design. Routledge; 2009. doi: 10.4324/9780203870730

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Valente, F. (2024). Can CLIL give Italian high school students in the private sector a greater opportunity to develop their EFL speaking skills?. Forum for Education Studies, 2(3), 1507. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i3.1507

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Surapati Pramanik

Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, India

eISSN

3029-2956

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

Featured Articles

Diachronic analysis of Spanish scientific production on teaching methodologies in Primary Education: A scientometric and conceptual perspective (2000–2023)

The evaluation of science is essential to ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific results. Science needs to undergo a review process to ensure the rigorousness of scientific output. This evaluation provides a solid basis for political and economic decisions related to the design and execution of research projects, the establishment of new lines of research, or the identification of areas of specialization. This paper analyses diachronically the Spanish scientific production related to the implementation and development of teaching methodologies in primary education and indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases during the period 2000–2023. This analysis is carried out on the one hand, from a scientometric perspective, based on the analysis of indicators such as diachronic production, the journals with the highest scientific productivity, and the most productive institutions, and, on the other hand, from a conceptual perspective, trying to define its relationship with other areas of education. The general results of this study reveal two clear stages: the first, up to 2010, with little scientific production; and the second, from 2011 onwards, characterised by a general growth. The relationship between this field and others such as initial teacher training, ICT, and didactics is also evident.

The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools

This study explores the intricate relationship between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices in secondary schools in the Mansehra district of Pakistan. Teacher self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to manage and influence classroom environments effectively, has been identified as a critical factor influencing both teaching performance and student outcomes. The research employed a mixed-method approach, gathering data from 62 teachers and 310 students using both online surveys (via Google Forms) and physical questionnaires to ensure a diverse and inclusive participant pool. Data analysis was conducted using two complementary tools: SPSS and Smart PLS. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics and inferential analyses, such as t-tests, chi-square tests, and measures of central tendency, to offer an overview of group differences and relationships between variables. Meanwhile, Smart PLS was employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a technique suited for complex models and smaller sample sizes. This method allowed for the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships between the study variables—teacher self-efficacy, teaching practices, and classroom management. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between teacher self-efficacy and classroom management practices. Additionally, teaching practices were found to mediate this relationship, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy not only directly improve classroom management but also enhance teaching performance, which in turn contributes to better-managed classrooms. These results suggest that interventions aimed at enhancing teacher self-efficacy can have far-reaching effects on educational outcomes. The study highlights the need for focused teacher development programs that foster self-efficacy, thereby improving classroom management, student engagement, and overall academic success.

Artificial Intelligence in education: A comprehensive study

This comprehensive study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in education, exploring its applications, benefits, challenges, and future implications. The purpose of the study is to show how AI in education helps educators identify gaps in student knowledge and provide targeted feedback to improve learning outcomes. As a methodology, the library method and the study and review of various documents have been used in this research. The study examines the diverse range of AI technologies employed in educational settings, including intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, educational chatbots, and virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, the study delves into the numerous benefits that AI brings to education. It highlights how AI-powered analytics and data-driven insights enable educators to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, identify areas for improvement, and tailor instructional strategies accordingly. Additionally, AI-driven tools promote inclusivity by providing personalized support to learners with diverse needs and learning styles. Despite its transformative potential, the study also acknowledges the challenges and ethical considerations associated with integrating AI into education. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide are examined in detail, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI deployment and ethical guidelines. Looking ahead, the study explores the future implications of AI in education and the evolving role of educators in AI-enabled classrooms. It discusses how AI technologies will continue to evolve, offering new opportunities for collaborative learning, skill development, and lifelong education. In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the profound impact of AI on education and the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that prioritize equity, inclusivity, and ethical considerations. By harnessing the potential of AI, education systems can better prepare learners for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Enhancing adult learner success in higher education through decision tree models: A machine learning approach

This article explores the use of machine learning, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART), to address the unique challenges faced by adult learners in higher education. These learners confront socio-cultural, economic, and institutional hurdles, such as stereotypes, financial constraints, and systemic inefficiencies. The study utilizes decision tree models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting graduation outcomes, which helps in formulating tailored educational strategies. The research analyzed a comprehensive dataset spanning the academic years 2013–2014 to 2021–2022, evaluating the predictive accuracy of CART models using precision, recall, and F1 score. Findings indicate that attendance, age, and Pell Grant eligibility are key predictors of academic success, demonstrating the strong capability of the model across various educational metrics. This highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) to improve data-driven decision-making in educational settings. The results affirm the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) models in meeting the educational needs of adult learners and underscore the need for institutions to adapt their strategies to provide more inclusive and supportive environments. This study advocates for a shift towards nuanced, data-driven approaches in higher education, emphasizing the development of strategies that address the distinct challenges of adult learners, aiming to enhance inclusivity and support within the sector.