Qualitative research: Understanding its underlying philosophies
Abstract
In the realm of research, it is emphasized that research must be grounded in a clearly stated research philosophy and set out early in the research process. It is significant because research philosophy enables researchers to promote clarity and decisions about the research design and guide them in identifying a suitable design. Therefore, understanding the underlying philosophies of qualitative research is crucial for researchers, especially those who are just starting their journey in this field. This paper aims to provide beginning researchers with a basis for the development of key philosophical understandings related to qualitative research. A descriptive analysis of the philosophies of ontology and epistemology and the subsets of philosophies under these two umbrella terms is presented as an introduction to the philosophical foundation of qualitative research. The paper serves as a basis for novice researchers to distinctively identify the philosophical underpinnings of qualitative research and as a resource that enables and guides them towards designing and conducting qualitative studies.
References
[1] Crossan F. Research philosophy: towards an understanding. Nurse Researcher. 2003; 11(1): 46–55. doi: 10.7748/nr2003.10.11.1.46.c5914
[2] Mkansi M. Acheampong EA. Research philosophy debates and classifications: students’ dilemma. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2012; 10(2): 32–140.
[3] Kirongo A, Odoyo C. Research philosophy design and methodologies: A systematic review of research paradigms in information technology. Global Scientific Journals. 2020; 8(5).
[4] Mauthner NS. Research philosophies and why they matter. In: How to Keep your Doctorate on Track. Elgar; 2020. pp. 76–86. doi: 10.4337/9781788975636.00018
[5] Madden AD. A review of basic research tools without the confusing philosophy. Higher Education Research & Development. 2021; 41(5): 1633–1647. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2021.1920895
[6] Pae CU. Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review? Psychiatry Investigation. 2015; 12(3): 417. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.3.417
[7] Booth A, Harris J, Croot E, et al. Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER). BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2013; 13(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-118
[8] Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 62(1): 107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
[9] Aspers P, Corte U. What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology. 2019; 42(2): 139–160. doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
[10] Morse JM, Field PA. The purpose of qualitative research. In: Boston MA (editor). Nursing Research. Springer; 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4471-9_1
[11] Henwood K. Qualitative Research. In: Teo T (editor). Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_256
[12] Brown-Saracino J. Unsettling Definitions of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology. 2021; 44(4): 591–597. doi: 10.1007/s11133-021-09498-9
[13] Gläser-Zikuda M, Hagenauer G, Stephan M. The Potential of Qualitative Content Analysis for Empirical Educational Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2020; 21(1). doi: 10.17169/FQS-21.1.3443
[14] Siiman LA, Rannastu-Avalos M, Pöysä-Tarhonen J, et al. Opportunities and Challenges for AI-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: An Example from Collaborative Problem-Solving Discourse Data. In: Proceedings of Innovative Technologies and Learning: 6th International Conference, ICITL 2023; 28–30 August 2023; Porto, Portugal. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_9
[15] Mbanaso UM, Abrahams L, Okafor KC. Research philosophy, design and methodology. In: Research Techniques for Computer Science, Information Systems and Cybersecurity. Nature Switzerland: Springer; 2023. pp. 81–113.
[16] Bashir S. Philosophical and Methodological Aspects of a Mixed-Methods Research: A Review of the Academic Literature. Journal of Independent Studies and Research-Management, Social Sciences and Economics. 2017; 15(1): 31–49. doi: 10.31384/jisrmsse/2017.15.1.3
[17] Sahin MD, Öztürk G. Mixed method research: Theoretical foundations, designs and its use in educational research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. 2019; 6(2): 301–310. doi: 10.33200/ijcer.574002
[18] Baškarada S, Koronios A. A Philosophical Discussion of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research in Social Science. Qualitative Research Journal. 2018; 18(1): 2–21. doi: 10.1108/qrj-d-17-00042
[19] Audi R. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, 3rd ed. Routledge; 2010. doi: 10.4324/9780203846469
[20] Bowden BG. Empiricism, epistemology and modern postmodernism: a critique. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. 2019; 14(4): 481–497. doi: 10.1108/qrom-02-2019-1726
[21] Markie P, Folescu M. Rationalism vs. Empiricism. Stanford University; 2004.
[22] Reed B. A new argument for skepticism. Philosophical Studies. 2008; 142(1): 91–104. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9299-9
[23] Hathcoat JD, Barnes LLB. Explaining the Relationship Among Fundamentalism and Authoritarianism: An Epistemic Connection. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2010; 20(2): 73–84. doi: 10.1080/10508611003607884
[24] Hage J. Three kinds of coherentism. In: Coherence: Insights from philosophy, jurisprudence and artificial intelligence Dordrecht. Netherlands: Springer; 2013. pp. 1–32.
[25] Guyon H, Kop JL, Juhel J, et al. Measurement, ontology, and epistemology: Psychology needs pragmatism-realism. Theory & Psychology. 2018; 28(2): 149–171. doi: 10.1177/0959354318761606
[26] Calvente S, Manzo S. Empiricism, Early Modern. In: Jalobeanu D, Wolfe C (editors). Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Cham: Springer; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_588-1
[27] Hossain FM. A Critical Analysis of Empiricism. Open Journal of Philosophy. 2014; 04(03): 225–230. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43030
[28] Pellegrini PA. We are all rationalists, but it is not Enough: Ways of Explaining the Social Acceptance of a Theory. Foundations of Science. 2023; 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10699-023-09913-0
[29] Taliaferro C. Rationality (Philosophical). In: Runehov ALC, Oviedo L (editors). Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1549
[30] Tate JW. Toleration and its possibilities: Relativism, Skepticism, and Pluralism. In: Sardoč M (editor). The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. Palgrave, Cham: Macmillan; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_2
[31] Jash A. Skepticism (Hinduism). In: Long JD, Sherma RD, Jain P, et al. (editors). Hinduism and tribal religions. Encyclopedia of Indian Religions. Dordrecht: Springer; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-1188-1_460
[32] Feuerstein M. Media Literacy in Support of Critical Thinking. Journal of Educational Media. 1999; 24(1): 43–54. doi: 10.1080/1358165990240104
[33] Høffding S, Martiny K, Roepstorff A. Can we trust the phenomenological interview? Metaphysical, epistemological, and methodological objections. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2021; 21(1): 33–51. doi: 10.1007/s11097-021-09744-z
[34] Fumerton R. Foundationalism and non-noundationalism. In: Peters M (editor). Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Singapore: Springer; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_688-1
[35] Bouchard Y. The Foundationalism–Coherentism Opposition Revisited: The Case for Complementarism. Foundations of Science. 2007; 12(4): 325–336. doi: 10.1007/s10699-007-9110-y
[36] Young JO. Coherentism. In: Runehov ALC, Oviedo L (editors). Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1600
[37] Sanches de Oliveira G. Pragmatism. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Cham, Palgrave: Macmillan; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_241-1
[38] Menand L. The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. Cham, Palgrave: Macmillan; 2002.
[39] Maedche A. Ontology—Definition & Overview. In: Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Boston: Springer; 2002. p. 665. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0925-7_2
[40] Hathcoat JD, Meixner C, Nicholas MC. Ontology and Epistemology. In: Liamputtong P (editor). Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_56-1
[41] Jacquette D. Ontology. London: Routledge; 2014. doi: 10.4324/9781315710655
[42] Craig E. Realism and antirealism. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis; 1998. doi: 10.4324/9780415249126-N049-1
[43] Erismann C. Realism. In: Lagerlund H (editor). Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_432
[44] Staudacher A. Realism (Metaphysical, Internal, Common Sense, Naïve, Scientific). In: Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Windhorst U (editors). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin: Springer; 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_4946
[45] Bhaskar R. Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso; 1993.
[46] Bhaskar R, Hartwig M. Enlightened Common Sense: The philosophy of critical realism. London: Routledge; 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315542942
[47] Vandenberghe F. What’s Critical About Critical Realism?: Essays in reconstructive social theory. London: Routledge; 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203798508
[48] Smith CS. Critical Realism. In: Foundations of Interprofessional Health Education. Cham: Springer; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-33414-6_4
[49] Kipfer BA. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology. New York: Springer; 2021. pp. 178–1178.
[50] Affolter J. Relativism. In: Chatterjee DK (editor). Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_123
[51] Refinetti R. Relativism. In: Leeming DA (editor). Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Boston: Springer; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_568
[52] Craig E. Relativism. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge; 1998. doi: 10.4324/9780415249126-N050-1
[53] Glazer M. Cultural relativism. Texas: McAllen; 2011.
[54] Samuel RD, Eldadi O, Galily Y, et al. Mobility and Migration Experiences of Transnational Coaches within the Israeli Handball Context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021; 101853. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101853
[55] Henson D. Constructivism in Archaeology Education. In: Smith C (editor). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2084
[56] Gogus A. Constructivist Learning. In: Seel NM (editor). Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Boston: Springer; 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_142
[57] Giliberto M. Constructivism, Overview. In: Teo T (editor). Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_350
[58] Phillips MJ. Towards a social constructionist, criticalist, Foucauldian-informed qualitative research approach: Opportunities and challenges. SN Social Sciences. 2023; 3(10): 175. doi: 10.1007/s43545-023-00774-9
[59] Vitale G. Research Methodology. In: Understanding Supply Chain Digitalization Through Actor-Network Theory. SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration. Cham: Springer; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-30988-5_3
[60] Seibold LKC. Methodology. In: Family Businesses’ Growth. Family businesses and SMEs. Springer; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-29396-3_3
[61] Goldkuhl G. Pragmatism vs Interpretivism in Qualitative Information Systems Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 2012; 21: 135–146. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2011.54
[62] Liyanage SIH. Methodology. In: Producing Green Knowledge and Innovation. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Cham: Springer; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-97850-1_10
Copyright (c) 2024 Adelina Asmawi, Md. Saiful Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that the authors are given credit. With this license, authors hold the copyright.
