A new canvas of learning: Enhancing formal analysis skills in AP art history through AI-generated Islamic art
Abstract
This study explores the use of AI art generators to enhance formal analysis skills in AP Art History students, with a focus on Islamic Art and Architecture. Students, often entering the course with high academic achievements, find the unique challenge of articulating detailed visual descriptions of artworks. The study’s approach involves using AI image-generation websites, like wepik.com, where students create AI images resembling Islamic artworks studied in class. This method aims to refine their descriptive skills, focusing on visual evidence rather than relying on identifying details. The choice of Islamic Art, markedly different from other historical periods covered in the curriculum, is intended to boost retention and learning engagement. The results show that students were more successful in describing architectural artworks compared to two-dimensional narrative pieces, with limited site access and the need for iterative description refinement being key challenges. Successful attempts were marked by precise vocabulary usage and detailed descriptions, resulting in AI images closely matching the original artworks. In contrast, less successful attempts revealed deficiencies in comprehensive and detailed descriptions, particularly in narrative artworks. These outcomes highlight the potential and limitations of AI tools in art history education, suggesting that their effectiveness depends largely on the depth and precision of student inputs. The study not only demonstrates the innovative application of AI in education but also underscores the importance of detailed visual analysis, pointing towards future enhancements in AI-assisted educational methodologies.
References
Donahue-Wallace K, La Follette L, Pappas A. Teaching art history with new technologies: Reflections and case studies. Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2009.
Kutis B. Scaffolding the Formal Analysis Assignment in Art History Courses to Promote Learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology. 2020; 9(1). doi: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i1.29162
DOW AW. Composition. Published online November 10, 2023. doi: 10.2307/jj.8441755
Black CV, Barringer T. Decolonizing Art and Empire. The Art Bulletin. 2022; 104(1): 6-20. doi: 10.1080/00043079.2021.1970479
Graham ME, Bailey C. Digital images and art historians – Compare and contrast revisited. Art Libraries Journal. 2006; 31(3): 21-24. doi: 10.1017/s0307472200014565
Alpers, S. Ut Pictura Noesis? Criticism in Literary Studies and Art History. New Directions in Literary History. Published online April 7, 2022: 199-220. doi: 10.4324/9781003247937-12
Hutson J, Olsen T. Digital Humanities and Virtual Reality: A Review of Theories and Best Practices for Art History. International Journal of Technology in Education. 2021; 4(3): 491-500. doi: 10.46328/ijte.150
Hutson J, Olsen T. Virtual Reality and Art History: A Case Study of Digital Humanities and Immersive Learning Environments. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2022; 22(2). doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5036
Zullich M, Macovaz V, Pinna G, et al. An Artificial Intelligence System for Automatic Recognition of Punches in Fourteenth-Century Panel Painting. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 5864-5883. doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3236502
Hutson J, Robertson B. Exploring the Educational Potential of AI Generative Art in 3D Design Fundamentals: A Case Study on Prompt Engineering and Creative Workflows. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: A Arts & Humanities-Psychology. 2023; 23(2).
Gu J, Han Z, Chen S, et al. A systematic survey of prompt engineering on vision-language foundation models. arXiv. 2023; arXiv:2307.12980. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.12980
Walton N. There are no formal elements. Debates in Art and Design Education. Published online December 28, 2020: 72-81. doi: 10.4324/9780429201714-5
Gasper-Hulvat M. Active learning in art history: A review of formal literature. Art History Pedagogy & Practice. 2017; 2(1): 2.
Avci H, Pedersen S, Thomas A. Writing a Formal Analysis of Art in a Game-Based Learning Environment. In: EdMedia and Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2020. pp. 669-671
Elgammal A, Liu B, Kim D, et al. The Shape of Art History in the Eyes of the Machine. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018; 32(1). doi: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11894
Freedman K. Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. Teachers College Press; 2003.
Olin M. Formal Analysis: Art and Anthropology. Ideas of ‘Race’ in the History of the Humanities. 2017; 89-111.
Prown JD. Style as Evidence. Winterthur Portfolio. 1980; 15(3): 197-210. doi: 10.1086/495962
Locher P, Krupinski E, Schaefer A. Art and authenticity: Behavioral and eye-movement analyses. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2015; 9(4): 356-367. doi: 10.1037/aca0000026
Nelson A. Visual Thinking Strategies from the Museum to the Library: Using VTS and Art in Information Literacy Instruction. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America. 2017; 36(2): 281-292. doi: 10.1086/694244
Dolšina M. Educational role of art history as a school subject area in programmes of formal education in Slovenia: the aspect of vzgoja, according to general European guidelines. Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2020; 6(1): 227-241. doi: 10.15503/jecs20151.227.241
Mazzone M, Elgammal A. Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence. Arts. 2019; 8(1): 26. doi: 10.3390/arts8010026
Dehouche N, Dehouche K. What’s in a text-to-image prompt? The potential of stable diffusion in visual arts education. Heliyon. 2023; 9(6): e16757. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16757
Jiang HH, Brown L, Cheng J, et al. AI Art and its Impact on Artists. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. Published online August 8, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3600211.3604681
Copyright (c) 2024 Krista Carpino, James Hutson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that the authors are given credit. With this license, authors hold the copyright.
