Job burnout among healthcare workers—The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Marika Wlazło; Daria Łaskawiec-Żuławińska; Mateusz Grajek; Ilona Korzonek-Szlacheta

doi:10.59400/apr.v3i1.359

Job burnout among healthcare workers—The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Marika Wlazło Department of Prevention of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Public Health, Bytom, Silesia, Medical University of Katowice, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland
Daria Łaskawiec-Żuławińska Department of Prevention of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Public Health, Bytom, Silesia, Medical University of Katowice, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland
Mateusz Grajek Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Bytom, Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland
Ilona Korzonek-Szlacheta Department of Prevention of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Public Health, Bytom, Silesia, Medical University of Katowice, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland

Article ID: 359

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/apr.v3i1.359

Keywords: burnout; COVID-19; healthcare workers

Abstract

The overall impact of pandemics on the healthcare sector has been substantial and multidimensional, presenting numerous challenges that have affected healthcare workers on various fronts. Pandemics, particularly the COVID-19 epidemic, caused destabilization in healthcare systems, creating complex challenges for both medical staff and patients. During the pandemic, healthcare professionals faced exceptionally difficult working conditions, such as increased workload, inadequate medical resources, and the pressure of making challenging moral decisions, for instance, related to the allocation of limited resources during a crisis. These factors increased the risk of occupational burnout—a state that may manifest as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased self-esteem and efficacy. Occupational burnout among healthcare workers is a highly significant phenomenon because it can directly impact the quality of care provided to patients. Higher levels of burnout are associated with an increased risk of medical errors, decreased work engagement, and reduced empathy in patient interactions. Additionally, individuals experiencing burnout may encounter reduced social support, further complicating the issue. Consequently, the negative consequences of occupational burnout can have a long-term impact on healthcare workers themselves, the quality of medical care, and patient-provider relationships. Therefore, managing the risk of burnout among medical staff becomes a crucial challenge not only for the mental health of healthcare workers but also for ensuring high-quality healthcare for society. Providing psychological support, proper human resource management, and promoting a healthy lifestyle among medical personnel are essential to alleviating the psychological burden on workers and ensuring sustained, high-quality healthcare.

References

Alanazy, A. R. M., & Alruwaili, A. (2023). The Global Prevalence and Associated Factors of Burnout among Emergency Department Healthcare Workers and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare, 11(15), 2220. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152220

Alkhamees, A. A., Aljohani, M. S., Kalani, S., et al. (2023). Physician’s Burnout during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054598

Aronsson, G., Theorell, T., Grape, T., et al. (2017). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4153-7

Bakker, A. B., & Costa, P. L. (2014). Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysis. Burnout Research, 1(3), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.003

Buselli, R., Corsi, M., Baldanzi, S., et al. (2020). Professional Quality of Life and Mental Health Outcomes among Health Care Workers Exposed to Sars-Cov-2 (Covid-19). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176180

Chen, R., Sun, C., Chen, J., et al. (2020). A Large‐Scale Survey on Trauma, Burnout, and Posttraumatic Growth among Nurses during the COVID‐19 Pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(1), 102–116. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12796

Chigwedere, O. C., Sadath, A., Kabir, Z., et al. (2021). The Impact of Epidemics and Pandemics on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6695. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136695

Chor, W. P. D., Ng, W. M., Cheng, L., et al. (2021). Burnout amongst emergency healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-center study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 46, 700–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.040

Chou, L.-P., Li, C.-Y., & Hu, S. C. (2014). Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan. BMJ Open, 4(2), e004185. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004185

de Wit, K., Mercuri, M., Wallner, C., et al. (2020). Canadian emergency physician psychological distress and burnout during the first 10 weeks of COVID‐19: A mixed‐methods study. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 1(5), 1030–1038. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12225

Dincer, B., & Inangil, D. (2021). The effect of Emotional Freedom Techniques on nurses’ stress, anxiety, and burnout levels during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial. EXPLORE, 17(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.11.012

Ghahramani, S., Lankarani, K. B., Yousefi, M., et al. (2021). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Burnout Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.758849

Gomez, S., Anderson, B. J., Yu, H., et al. (2020). Benchmarking Critical Care Well-Being: Before and After the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Critical Care Explorations, 2(10), e0233. https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000233

Lluch, C., Galiana, L., Doménech, P., et al. (2022). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Burnout, Compassion Fatigue, and Compassion Satisfaction in Healthcare Personnel: A Systematic Review of the Literature Published during the First Year of the Pandemic. Healthcare, 10(2), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020364

Macaron, M. M., Segun-Omosehin, O. A., Matar, R. H., et al. (2023). A systematic review and meta analysis on burnout in physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hidden healthcare crisis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1071397

Meira-Silva, V. S. T., Freire, A. C. T. N., Zinezzi, D. P., et al. (2022). Burnout syndrome in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Trabalho, 20(01), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2022-849

Pfefferbaum, B., & North, C. S. (2020). Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(6), 510–512. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2008017

Rizzo, A., Yıldırım, M., Öztekin, G. G., et al. (2023). Nurse burnout before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic comparative review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1225431

Romani, M., & Ashkar, K. (2014). Burnout among physicians. Libyan Journal of Medicine, 9(1), 23556. https://doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v9.23556

Rossi, M. F., Gualano, M. R., Magnavita, N., et al. (2023). Coping with burnout and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workers’ mental health: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1139260

Ruiz‐Fernández, M. D., Ramos‐Pichardo, J. D., Ibáñez‐Masero, O., et al. (2020). Compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress in healthcare professionals during the COVID‐19 health crisis in Spain. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(21–22), 4321–4330. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15469

Stehman, C., Testo, Z., Gershaw, R., et al. (2019). Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part I. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20(3), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.4.40970

Stodolska, A., Wójcik, G., Barańska, I., et al. (2023). Prevalence of burnout among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors – a scoping review. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 36(1), 21–58. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02007

Teo, I., Chay, J., Cheung, Y. B., et al. (2021). Healthcare worker stress, anxiety and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore: A 6-month multi-centre prospective study. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258866

Tsan, S. E. H., Kamalanathan, A., Lee, C. K., et al. (2020). A survey on burnout and depression risk among anaesthetists during COVID‐19: the tip of an iceberg? Anaesthesia, 76(S3), 8–10. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15231

Ulfa, M., Azuma, M., & Steiner, A. (2022). Burnout status of healthcare workers in the world during the peak period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952783

West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018). Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. Journal of Internal Medicine, 283(6), 516–529. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12752

Xie, W., Chen, L., Feng, F., et al. (2021). The prevalence of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 120, 103973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103973

Published

2024-01-19

How to Cite

Wlazło, M., Łaskawiec-Żuławińska, D., Grajek, M., & Korzonek-Szlacheta, I. (2024). Job burnout among healthcare workers—The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Psychology Research, 3(1), 359. https://doi.org/10.59400/apr.v3i1.359

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Giuseppe Lanza

Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Italy

eISSN

3029-276X

Publication Frequency

Semi-annual

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

2022

Featured Articles

A comprehensive review (1963–2024) of environmental psychology: Trends, themes, and future directions

Multidisciplinary environmental psychology studies the dynamic link between humans and their natural and manmade settings. This thorough study synthesises 443 works from 1963 to 2024 on topics such as physical surroundings’ effects on behaviour, environmental stressors, pro-environmental behaviour, and applying psychological theories to environmental interactions. This literature is synthesised to identify patterns, themes, and future directions. Growing environmental concerns and the need for sustainable development have changed the profession. Green areas have been demonstrated to boost mental health and reduce stress. Nature helps mental exhaustion recuperation. Hospitals and workplaces’ design and structure affect health and productivity. Walkable, green urban development improves citizens’ well-being and promotes sustainable living. Environmental stresses including noise, pollution, and overpopulation harm mental and physical health. Children exposed to noise pollution are more likely to develop cardiovascular illness and cognitive deficits. Anxiety and despair caused by climate change are also becoming more apparent. Pro-environmental behaviour is emphasised, with notions like planned behaviour and community-based social marketing working. Behaviour interventions using social norms and feedback have decreased energy and waste. Personal values-driven intrinsic motivation promotes long-term behavioural change better than extrinsic incentive. Environmental psychology uses surveys, experiments, and mixed-methods research. Virtual and augmented reality provide for environmental simulations and psychological studies. Good health and well-being, excellent education, sustainable cities, responsible consumerism, climate action, and living on land are among the field’s major contributions to the UNSDGs. Environmental psychology will help establish sustainable and healthy settings that correspond with the UNSDGs as environmental issues grow.

The impact of the menstrual cycle on emotions and behavior—A review of current research

The menstrual cycle has attracted the interest of many researchers for many years. It is analyzed from many angles, including its impact on mental health. Hormonal changes over the course of the cycle have a very strong impact on the emotions, needs, or pain experienced. Estrogen, secreted shortly before ovulation, influences increased confidence and feelings of attractiveness, which can lead to new relationships. In contrast, progesterone, secreted during the luteal phase, promotes the strengthening of stable relationships, and a large proportion of women may experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS) during this time. This publication discusses studies from recent years that have assessed the variability of women’s needs and emerging symptoms during different phases of the cycle. It also summarizes any strategies and practical tips needed to work with women considering their cyclical variability.

Testing social impact and self-attention predictions with live audiences and co-actors

This experiment examined the influences of number of co-actors and audience size on manual dexterity task performance and subjective reactions such as perceived effort and arousal. Predictions derived from social impact theory and the self-attention perspective’s other-total ratio indicated that both number of co-actors and audience size should influence responses. Undergraduate students (N = 128) responded as 1, 2, 4, or 8 group members who were observed in counterbalanced fashion by 1, 2, 4, or 8 audience members for four performance trials. The predictions of increased task performance with larger audience sizes and decreased performance as number of co-actors increased were not supported. Participants’ rated arousal was somewhat consistent with the predictions from the self-attention perspective and social impact theory. Self-reported effort was consistent with the predicted patterns, but not always significantly so. The influence of number of others is moderated by the objective-subjective nature of responses of real co-actors performing in front of live audiences.

Manifesting the academic psychological contract

The level of research undertaken on the academic psychological contract, and its influence on academics’ behaviour is limited. This paper seeks to consider the academic psychological contract, by reviewing its manifestation within the role and the influence on their undertaking of the role. Particularly important is academics’ interpretation of the role and what they consider important. Within this, the paper considers in-role and extra-role activities and what may be the grey areas in which time is spent. The research adopts the combined usage of phenomenology with interpretivist processes to investigate the insights of eighteen academics at nine UK University Business Schools. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data to consider the constructs’ manifestation. Key aspects of behaviour were identified as discretionary effort autonomy and managerialism, with links to academic citizenship.