Self-efficacy and means-efficacy as a strategy for reducing resistance to change—Transition from frontal learning to asynchronous learning

Yonatan  Shertzer

doi:10.59400/apr2231

Self-efficacy and means-efficacy as a strategy for reducing resistance to change—Transition from frontal learning to asynchronous learning

Yonatan Shertzer Department of Human Resources, Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel

Article ID: 2231

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/apr2231

Keywords: means-efficacy; self-efficacy; resistance to change; locus of control

Abstract

Modern organizations often face challenges implementing initiatives due to the rapidly changing business landscape and encountering internal obstacles like resistance and delays. This research examines the application of the internal and external efficacy model and its effect on resistance to change in work organizations by raising self-efficacy and means-efficacy (a person’s belief in the ability of the tools available to him to perform the task). Raising the two types of efficacies creates a Pygmalion effect in which high expectations for successful performance encourage the investment of efforts; therefore, ultimately, they will lead to more successful performances. In addition, since individuals with an external locus of control place a higher emphasis on resources that are external to them, the moderating effect of the degree of locus of control on the relationship between means-efficacy and resistance to change was studied. The study that included 138 participants was conducted in a logistics and international forwarding company in Israel and examined a change in learning method from face-to-face learning to an asynchronous learning module. During the study, the level of self-efficacy and means-efficacy of participants was raised, and the level of resistance to change and the level of locus of control as a personality trait were measured. The study showed a distinct effect of increasing self-efficacy on the degree of resistance to change (t = −1.66, p < 0.05), but no significant effect of increasing means efficacy on resistance to change was found (t = −0.87, p > 0.05). The effect of means-efficacy on the degree of resistance was found to be moderated by locus of control (t = −2.3, p < 0.05), meaning that those who had an external locus of control were more impacted by the increase in means-efficacy. This means that people with an external locus of control are more affected by means-efficacy than by self-efficacy.

References

Agars, M. D. (2010). Perceptions of resources matter: Means efficacy and career hoices. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psycholog; 6–10 August 2010; Atlanta, GA, USA.

Agars, M., and Kottke, J. L. (2021). Development of a theoretical framework and a measure of general organizational means-efficacy. Human Performance, 34(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2020.1821378

Akmalia, R., Nst, W. N., and Siahaan, A. (2023). Influence of Self-Efficacy, Organizational Culture, and Job Satisfaction on The Performance of Madrasah Aliyah Teachers. Nidhomul Haq Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(3), 437–453.

Alisic, A., Wiese, B. S. (2020). Keeping an insecure career under control: The longitudinal interplay of career insecurity, self-management, and self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103431

Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., Jimmieson, N. L., Callan, V. J. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of coping processes during a merger: Implications for job satisfaction and organizational identification. Journal of Management, 32, 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306287542

Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human relations, 46(6), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600601

Ashagi, M. M., Beheshtifar, M. (2015). The relationship between locus of control (internal-external) and self-efficacy beliefs of Yazd University of Medical Sciences. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(8), 2–6.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman Publishing.

Burnes, B. (2015). Understanding resistance to change–building on Coch and French. Journal of change management, 15(2), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.969755

Caliendo, M., Kritikos, A. S., Rodriguez, D., Stier, C. (2023). Self-efficacy and entrepreneurial performance of start-ups. Small Business Economics, 61(3), 1027–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00728-0

Chen, S., Westman, M., Eden, D. (2009). Impact of enhanced resources on anticipatory stress and adjustment to new information technology: A field-experimental test of Conservation of Resources Theory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 219–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015282

Coleman-Oliver, S. L. (2018). A multi-dimensional analysis of leadership competencies and resistance to change [PhD thesis]. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University.

Conner, D. (2012). The dirty little secret behind the 70% failure rate of change projects. Available online: http://www.connerpartners.com (accessed on 2 December 2024).

Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., et al. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119637

Eden, D. (2001). Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific subjective efficacy. In: Erez, M., Kleinbeck, U., Thierry, H. (editors). Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 73–86.

Eden, D., Ganzach, Y., Flumin-Granat, R., Zigman, T. (2010). Augmenting means efficacy to boost performance: Two field experiments. Journal of Management, 36(3), 687–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321553

Fløvik, L., Knardahl, S., Christensen, J. O. (2019). Organizational change and employee mental health. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 45(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3777

George, G., Camarata, M. R. (1996). Managing instructor cyberanxiety: The role of self-efficacy in decreasing resistance to change. Educational Technology, 36(4), 49–54.

Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S. D. (2007). Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees’ commitment to change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 942–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.942

Holmes, B. H., Werbel, J. D. (1992). Finding work following job loss: The role of coping resources. Journal of Employment Counseling, 29, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.1992.tb00148.x

Jones, S. L., Van de Ven, A. H. (2016). The changing nature of change resistance: An examination of the moderating impact of time. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(4), 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316671409

Kumar, P., Saxena, C., Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning-the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learning Environments, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8

Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In: Lefcourt, H. M. (editor). Research with the Locus of Control Construct. Academic Press. pp. 15–63.

Lokman, A., Hassan, F., Ustadi, Y. A., et al. (2022). Investigating motivation for learning via Vroom’s Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1), 504–530. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i1/11749

Martin, A. J., Jones, E. S., Callan, V. J. (2005). The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500141228

Omieno, K. (2022). A Critical Review of Technology Adoption Theories and Models for E-Learning Systems, Kenya. International Journal of Innovation Engineering and Science Research, 6(2), 7-15.

Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, Context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247

Padilla, P., Agars. M. D. (2014). When self and Means-Efficacy affect performance: The tole of locus of control. In: Proceedings of the 122nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association; 7–10 August 2014; Washington, DC, USA.

Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G. (2002). Leadership self‐efficacy and managers’ motivation for leading change. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.137

Peppard, J. (2020). Rethinking the concept of the IS organization. In: Strategic Information Management. Routledge. pp. 309–334.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 609.

Schmierer, N., Jones, M. M., Agars, M. D., Kottke, J. L. (2009). Examining means-efficacy and turnover intentions in workers with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2–4 April 2009; New Orleans, LA, USA.

Schunk, D. H., DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. Advances in motivation science, 8; 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001

Simmons, A. L., Payne, S. C., Pariyothorn, M. M. (2014). The role of meansefficacy when predicting creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873667

Srivastava, S., Agrawal, S. (2020). Resistance to change and turnover intention: A moderated mediation model of burnout and perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1431–1447. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0063

Stirin K., Ganzach Y., Pazy A., Eden D. (2012). The effect of perceived advantage and disadvantage on performance: The role of external efficacy. Applied psychology: An International Review. 61 (1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0063

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiley Publishing.

Wanberg, C. R., and Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.I037//0021-9010.85.1.132

Published

2025-03-12

How to Cite

Shertzer, Y. (2025). Self-efficacy and means-efficacy as a strategy for reducing resistance to change—Transition from frontal learning to asynchronous learning. Applied Psychology Research, 4(1), 2231. https://doi.org/10.59400/apr2231

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Giuseppe Lanza

Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Italy

eISSN

3029-276X

Publication Frequency

Semi-annual

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

2022

Featured Articles

A comprehensive review (1963–2024) of environmental psychology: Trends, themes, and future directions

Multidisciplinary environmental psychology studies the dynamic link between humans and their natural and manmade settings. This thorough study synthesises 443 works from 1963 to 2024 on topics such as physical surroundings’ effects on behaviour, environmental stressors, pro-environmental behaviour, and applying psychological theories to environmental interactions. This literature is synthesised to identify patterns, themes, and future directions. Growing environmental concerns and the need for sustainable development have changed the profession. Green areas have been demonstrated to boost mental health and reduce stress. Nature helps mental exhaustion recuperation. Hospitals and workplaces’ design and structure affect health and productivity. Walkable, green urban development improves citizens’ well-being and promotes sustainable living. Environmental stresses including noise, pollution, and overpopulation harm mental and physical health. Children exposed to noise pollution are more likely to develop cardiovascular illness and cognitive deficits. Anxiety and despair caused by climate change are also becoming more apparent. Pro-environmental behaviour is emphasised, with notions like planned behaviour and community-based social marketing working. Behaviour interventions using social norms and feedback have decreased energy and waste. Personal values-driven intrinsic motivation promotes long-term behavioural change better than extrinsic incentive. Environmental psychology uses surveys, experiments, and mixed-methods research. Virtual and augmented reality provide for environmental simulations and psychological studies. Good health and well-being, excellent education, sustainable cities, responsible consumerism, climate action, and living on land are among the field’s major contributions to the UNSDGs. Environmental psychology will help establish sustainable and healthy settings that correspond with the UNSDGs as environmental issues grow.

The impact of the menstrual cycle on emotions and behavior—A review of current research

The menstrual cycle has attracted the interest of many researchers for many years. It is analyzed from many angles, including its impact on mental health. Hormonal changes over the course of the cycle have a very strong impact on the emotions, needs, or pain experienced. Estrogen, secreted shortly before ovulation, influences increased confidence and feelings of attractiveness, which can lead to new relationships. In contrast, progesterone, secreted during the luteal phase, promotes the strengthening of stable relationships, and a large proportion of women may experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS) during this time. This publication discusses studies from recent years that have assessed the variability of women’s needs and emerging symptoms during different phases of the cycle. It also summarizes any strategies and practical tips needed to work with women considering their cyclical variability.

Testing social impact and self-attention predictions with live audiences and co-actors

This experiment examined the influences of number of co-actors and audience size on manual dexterity task performance and subjective reactions such as perceived effort and arousal. Predictions derived from social impact theory and the self-attention perspective’s other-total ratio indicated that both number of co-actors and audience size should influence responses. Undergraduate students (N = 128) responded as 1, 2, 4, or 8 group members who were observed in counterbalanced fashion by 1, 2, 4, or 8 audience members for four performance trials. The predictions of increased task performance with larger audience sizes and decreased performance as number of co-actors increased were not supported. Participants’ rated arousal was somewhat consistent with the predictions from the self-attention perspective and social impact theory. Self-reported effort was consistent with the predicted patterns, but not always significantly so. The influence of number of others is moderated by the objective-subjective nature of responses of real co-actors performing in front of live audiences.

Manifesting the academic psychological contract

The level of research undertaken on the academic psychological contract, and its influence on academics’ behaviour is limited. This paper seeks to consider the academic psychological contract, by reviewing its manifestation within the role and the influence on their undertaking of the role. Particularly important is academics’ interpretation of the role and what they consider important. Within this, the paper considers in-role and extra-role activities and what may be the grey areas in which time is spent. The research adopts the combined usage of phenomenology with interpretivist processes to investigate the insights of eighteen academics at nine UK University Business Schools. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data to consider the constructs’ manifestation. Key aspects of behaviour were identified as discretionary effort autonomy and managerialism, with links to academic citizenship.