Vibro-dynamic testing of a 6-story building and reliability assessment taking into account deformation nonlinearity
Abstract
The paper presents the results of vibro-dynamic testing of a 6-story residential building constructed in an area with a seismic intensity of 10 points. The novelty of the study lies in the full-scale testing of a six-story monolithic building and the subsequent use of the test results to calculate reliability as the probability of failure-free performance. The results obtained make it possible to predict the behavior of the building under seismic action. Structurally, the investigated building is a spatial cross-wall system. The basement and above-ground floors are made of monolithic reinforced concrete structures. The dynamic loading is generated by an inertial vibration machine. Vibration measurements were carried out using a digital instrumentation and measurement system. It is shown that the building deforms nonlinearly. The stiffness of the “test object–foundation” system decreased by a factor of 2.14 compared with its initial stiffness, while the stiffness of the object’s “structural system” decreased by a factor of 1.37. The dissipative forces of the building were studied. The logarithmic decrement of vibration was constant and equal to 0.46. The coefficient of nonlinearity changed approximately twofold. Based on experimental deformation diagrams, the reliability W (probability of failure-free operation) of the building was calculated. For this purpose, the statistical simulation method (Monte Carlo method) was applied. Reliability and failure values were obtained for three values of internal viscous friction. The accuracy of determining reliability and failure values was assessed by studying the convergence of the process with an increasing number of artificial accelerograms. The results allow the building to be considered seismically resistant at high acceleration values at the foundation.
Copyright (c) 2026 Yerken Aldakhov , Zhassulan Omarov , Kulyanda Turekulova , Vladimir Lapin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Atmaca B, Altunişik AC, Ertürk Atmaca E, et al. What is the reason for collapses on February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: Insights from a dataset of 400 collapsed RC buildings post-earthquake analysis. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025; 107: 112660. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112660
[2]Öztürk M, Arslan MH, Doğan G, et al. School buildings performance in 7.7 Mw and 7.6 Mw catastrophic earthquakes in southeast of Turkey. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023; 79: 107810. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107810
[3]Caldeira B, Muñoz CP, Oliveira RJ, et al. Analysis of the 8 September 2023 Al Haouz (Morocco) earthquake source using seismic and geodetic data. Journal of Seismology. 2026; 30(1): 3. doi: 10.1007/s10950-025-10357-1
[4]Boulanouar A, Tiwari RK, Ahmed Z, et al. Fractal characteristics of earthquake occurrence in Al Hoceima city and its adjoining region, Morocco. Geosystems and Geoenvironment. 2025; 4(3): 100402. doi: 10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100402
[5]Fu J, Chen Y, Nie Q, et al. Source modeling of the 2023 Herat earthquake sequence determined from InSAR observations. Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2025; 16(5): 624–634. doi: 10.1016/j.geog.2025.01.003
[6]Hou H, Ji L, Zhu L, et al. InSAR deformation observation and seismogenic tectonic analysis of the 2025 Mw 6.0 Afghanistan earthquake. Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2026; in press. doi: 10.1016/j.geog.2026.04.008
[7]Shapiro GA, Simon YA, Ashkinadze GN, et al. Vibration Testing of Buildings. Stroyizdat; 1972. (in Russian)
[8]Zolotkov AS. Seismic Stability of Monolithic Buildings. Kartya Moldovey; 2000. (in Russian)
[9]Zolotcov AS. Vibration tests on fragments of monolithic building until destruction. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012; 27(1): 14–21. doi: 10.5862/MCE.27.2 (in Russian)
[10]Tuleyev A, Omarov Z, Abakanov T, et al. Vibration test of a high-rise monolithic building. International Journal of GEOMATE. 2023; 25(109): 149–156. doi: 10.21660/2023.109.m2315
[11]Hadianfard MA, Jahangiri M, Shojaei S. The effects of non-structural components on the dynamic characteristics and vulnerability of concrete structures using ambient vibration tests and Nakamura’s criterion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2022; 162: 107492. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107492
[12]Yang Z, Jian M, Lin Y, et al. A study on the formula of fundamental period of high-rise shear wall structures based on ambient vibration testing. Structures. 2024; 64: 106622. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106622
[13]Kanbara S, Shaw R, Eguchi K, et al. Lessons from the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake: Need for digital transformation in disaster response. Progress in Disaster Science. 2025; 25: 100400. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100400
[14]Mkrtychev OV, Raiser VD. Reliability Theory in the Design of Building Structures. ASV Publishing House; 2016. (in Russian)
[15]Bolotin VV. Statistical Methods in Structural Mechanics. Holden-Day; 1969.
[16]Lapin V, Shokbarov Y, Aldakhov Y. The buildings’ reliability calculating method using a simple seismic impact model. Civil Engineering Journal. 2024; 10(8): 2734–2744. doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-08-019
[17]Aldakhov Y, Lapin V, Moldamuratov Z, et al. Statistical estimation of reliability values for large-panel buildings based on passportization results. Civil Engineering Journal. 2025; 11(5): 2066–2083. doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-05-019
[18]Hurtado JE, Barbat AH. Monte Carlo techniques in computational stochastic mechanics. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 1998; 5: 3–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02736747
[19]Hofer L, Toska K, Zanini MA, et al. The influence of the seismic hazard and structural fragility related uncertainties on the seismic reliability. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2026; 78: 1927–1934. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2025.12.245
[20]Shen J, Pan J, Ding G, et al. Seismic reliability analysis of frame structure subjected to sequential ground motions using probability density evolution method. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025; 112: 113667. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113667
[21]Brenner CE, Bucher C. A contribution to the SFE-based reliability assessment of nonlinear structures under dynamic loading. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 1995; 10(4): 265–273. doi: 10.1016/0266-8920(95)00021-6
[22]Sadykova AB, Silacheva NV, Stepanenko NP. Seismic micro zoning of the territory of Almaty on a new methodological basis. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences. 2021; 1(445): 127–134. doi: 10.32014/2021.2518-170X.18
[23]Kopnichev YF, Sokolova IN. Heterogeneities of the shear wave attenuation field in the lithosphere of East Tien Shan and their relationship with seismicity. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2012; 442: 292–295. doi: 10.1134/S1028334X12020249
[24]KazNIISA JSC. Code of Practice of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2.03-31-2020: Development of the Territory of Almaty Taking into Account Seismic Microzoning. Publishing Department of KazNIISA JSC; 2020. (in Russian)
[25]KazNIISA JSC. Code of Practice of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2.03-30-2017: Construction in Seismic Zones. Publishing Department of KazNIISA JSC; 2018. (in Russian)
[26]Mkrtychev OV, Yuriev RV. Modeling of Random Accelerograms and Nonlinear Calculation of Building Structures. Moscow State University of Civil Engineering; 2012. (in Russian)
[27]Vicente R, Ferreira T, Maio R. Seismic risk at the urban scale: Assessment, mapping and planning. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014; 18: 71–80. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00915-0
[28]Rashid MS, Zhang D, Moon SW, et al. Macro-seismic assessment for residential buildings constructed in the Soviet Union era in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Buildings. 2023; 13(4): 1053. doi: 10.3390/buildings13041053
[29]Grünthal G (editor). European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie; 1998.
[30]Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall; 1995.




