Vibration control of multi-degree-of-freedom structures using multiple tuned mass dampers and higher-order exceptional points

  • Mohammad Akram orcid

    Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
  • Umar Ishtiaq orcid

    Office of Research, Innovation and Commercialization, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54770, Pakistan; Software Development Department, Biruni University, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey; Research Center of Applied Mathematics, Khazar University, Baku AZ1096, Azerbaijan
  • Ioan-Lucian Popa

    Department of Computing, Mathematics and Electronics, “1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania; Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500091 Brasov, Romania
Article ID: 4685
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4685
Keywords: tuned mass damper; exceptional point; defective eigenvalue; Puiseux series; non-proportional damping; reduced-order model

Abstract

Tuned mass dampers are among the most widely used devices for suppressing resonant vibration in buildings and other flexible structures, yet their behaviour on a multi-degree-of-freedom host with non-proportional damping is still only partly understood. This paper analyses a structure controlled by several tuned mass dampers as a perturbation of an ideal defective system. It shows that the double eigenvalue underlying the classical tuning is an exceptional point. We determine the Jordan structure produced by any number of absorbers and prove that exceptional behaviour arises only in the presence of damping. Algebraic conditions for an exceptional point of arbitrary order are derived, together with their coalescence variety and codimension, which fix the design freedom that a higher-order coalescence demands. A Newton and Puiseux perturbation theory then yields the fractional law by which the coalescing eigenvalues split, with a leading coefficient read from the biorthogonal Jordan chains of the quadratic pencil, and quantifies the resulting sensitivity. On this basis we construct a structure-preserving reduced-order model with a pseudospectral error bound, a branch-aware learning surrogate that represents the coalescing spectrum through its elementary symmetric functions, and a differentiable design principle whose zero set is the coalescence variety. We further quantify how amplitude-dependent mounts, manufacturing scatter, and long-term stiffness loss displace the coalescence, each of them within the same fractional law, and we obtain the spectral resolution that a monitoring system must reach before the enhanced sensitivity can be used. The theory is validated on three-storey and ten-storey shear frames and on a three-dimensional finite element model of a six-storey steel building with coupled sway and twist, and an even-handed comparison with established absorber designs is reported. The classical single-damper tuning is recovered as a limiting case.

Published
2026-09-28
How to Cite
Akram, M., Ishtiaq, U., & Popa, I.-L. (2026). Vibration control of multi-degree-of-freedom structures using multiple tuned mass dampers and higher-order exceptional points. Sound & Vibration, 60(6). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4685
Issue
Vol. 60 No. 6 (2026): In Progress
Section
Article

Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Akram, Umar Ishtiaq, Ioan-Lucian Popa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Frahm H. Device for damping vibrations of bodies. U.S. Patent 989958, 18 April 1911.

[2]Ormondroyd J, Den Hartog JP. The Theory of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 1928; 49–50(2): 021007.

[3]Den Hartog JP. Mechanical Vibrations, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill; 1956.

[4]Warburton GB. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1982; 10(3): 381–401.

[5]Krenk S. Frequency Analysis of the Tuned Mass Damper. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 2005; 72(6): 936–942.

[6]Asami T, Nishihara O, Baz AM. Analytical Solutions to H∞and H2 Optimization of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers Attached to Damped Linear Systems. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 2002; 124(2): 284–295.

[7]Yenidogan C. Earthquake-Resilient Design of Seismically Isolated Buildings: A Review of Technology. Vibration. 2021; 4(3): 602–647.

[8]Patel D, Pandey G, Mourya VK, et al. Sustainable base isolation: a review of techniques, implementation, and extreme events. Sādhanā. 2024; 49(2): 173.

[9]Soong TT, Dargush GF. Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering. Wiley & Sons; 1997.

[10]Elias S, Matsagar V. Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers. Annual Reviews in Control. 2017; 44: 129–156.

[11]Dai H, Zhang X, Zheng Y, et al. Review and prospects of metamaterials used to control elastic waves and vibrations. Frontiers in Physics. 2022; 10: 1069454.

[12]Ren S, Chai Y, Yang X. Multistable locally resonant elastic metamaterial with tunable anisotropy. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 2025; 46(9): 1663–1678.

[13]Kang X, Huang Q, Wu Z, et al. A Review of the Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI) in Energy Harvesting and Vibration Control: Designs, Analysis and Applications. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 2024; 139(3): 2361–2398.

[14]Tran KT, Jin S, Deng L, et al. Semi-active inerters: a review of the literature. Frontiers in Materials. 2024; 11: 1347060.

[15]Das A, Banerjee A, Sahoo DR, et al. Inerter-based tuned mass dampers for response control of multi-degree-of-freedom structures subjected to wind and earthquake excitations. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 2026; 22(4): 624–637.

[16]Allani A, Bel Hadj Ali N. Assessing Vibration Control Performance of Optimized Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI) Configurations. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies. 2024; 12(S2): 1889–1906.

[17]Li H, Kang X, Wei J, et al. Performance Evaluation of Inertial Amplifier with Resonator Systems for Vibration Control of Buildings. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies. 2026; 14(4): 197.

[18]Shen C, Li M. Active vibration control of nonlinear flexible structures via reduction on spectral submanifolds. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2025; 113(10): 11069–11091.

[19]Gelb A, Vander Velde WE. Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design. McGraw-Hill; 1968.

[20]Worden K, Tomlinson GR. Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling. Institute of Physics Publishing; 2001.

[21]Den Hartog JP. Forced Vibrations With Combined Coulomb and Viscous Friction. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1931; 53(2): 107–115.

[22]Marino L, Cicirello A. Experimental investigation of a single-degree-of-freedom system with Coulomb friction. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2020; 99(3): 1781–1799.

[23]Rana R, Soong TT. Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures. 1998; 20(3): 193–204.

[24]Igusa T, Xu K. Vibration Control Using Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1994; 175(4): 491–503.

[25]Zuo L, Nayfeh SA. Optimization of the Individual Stiffness and Damping Parameters in Multiple-Tuned-Mass-Damper Systems. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 2005; 127(1): 77–83.

[26]Fujino Y, Abé M. Design formulas for tuned mass dampers based on A perturbation technique. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1993; 22(10): 833–854.

[27]Verdirame J, Nayfeh S. Design of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Dampers Based on Eigenvalue Perturbation. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 7–10 April 2003; Norfolk, VA, USA.

[28]Cao HQ, Tran NA. Multi-objective optimal design of double tuned mass dampers for structural vibration control. Archive of Applied Mechanics. 2023; 93(5): 2129–2144.

[29]Chan PT. Optimizing distribution of multiple tuned mass dampers for building structures with inverse element exchange method. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2025; 24(1): 187–199.

[30]Zakaria A, Nabawy AE, Abdelhaleem AMM. Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers for vibration control of a nonlinear beam. Scientific Reports. 2026; 16(1): 12691.

[31]Cetin H, Aydin E, Ozturk B. Multiple Tuned Mass Damper Design for the Mitigation of Cantilever Beam Response. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering. 2025; 11(3): 04025052.

[32]Akbari M, Falborski T, Klinkel S, et al. Performance assessment of a novel vertically interconnected tuned mass damper system with inertial coupling for vibration control in high-rise buildings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2026; 258: 114666.

[33]Akbari M, Seifi M, Falborski T, et al. Seismic performance enhancement of mid-rise buildings via multiple active friction-tuned mass dampers incorporating nonlinear soil-structure interaction. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2026; 26(5): 224.

[34]Ferretti M, Luongo A. General multi-DOF systems equipped with a tuned mass damper: Perturbation analysis and reduced models. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2026; 643: 119979.

[35]Ferretti M, Luongo A. Are tuned mass damper-controlled systems quasi-semi-simple or quasi-defective? Journal of Vibration and Control. 2026. doi: 10.1177/10775463261470876

[36]Luongo A. Eigensolutions of perturbed nearly defective matrices. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1995; 185(3): 377–395.

[37]Mayou A, Denoël V. Asymptotic analysis of multiple mode structures equipped with multiple tuned mass dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2022; 535: 117104.

[38]Kato T. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed. Springer; 1995.

[39]Seyranian AP, Mailybaev AA. Multiparameter Stability Theory with Mechanical Applications. World Scientific; 2003.

[40]Arnold VI. On matrices depending on parameters. Russian Mathematical Surveys. 1971; 26(2): 29–43.

[41]Lidskii VB. Perturbation theory of non-conjugate operators. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 1966; 6(1): 73–85.

[42]Moro J, Burke JV, Overton ML. On the Lidskii–Vishik–Lyusternik Perturbation Theory for Eigenvalues of Matrices with Arbitrary Jordan Structure. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. 1997; 18(4): 793–817.

[43]Gohberg I, Lancaster P, Rodman L. Matrix Polynomials. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2009. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719024

[44]Tisseur F, Meerbergen K. The Quadratic Eigenvalue Problem. SIAM Review. 2001; 43(2): 235–286.

[45]Heiss WD. The physics of exceptional points. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 2012; 45(44): 444016.

[46]Miri M-A, Alù A. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science. 2019; 363(6422): eaar7709.

[47]Wiersig J. Enhancing the Sensitivity of Frequency and Energy Splitting Detection by Using Exceptional Points: Application to Microcavity Sensors for Single-Particle Detection. Physical Review Letters. 2014; 112(20): 203901.

[48]Hodaei H, Hassan AU, Wittek S, et al. Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points. Nature. 2017; 548(7666): 187–191.

[49]Li A, Wei H, Cotrufo M, et al. Exceptional points and non-Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale. Nature Nanotechnology. 2023; 18(7): 706–720.

[50]Zhang X, Zhu Z, Hao Y, et al. Observation of higher-order exceptional points using frequency-dependent gain. Communications Physics. 2026; 9(1): 97.

[51]Shou Y, Wang D, Wang Y, et al. Resonant and scattering exceptional points in non-Hermitian metasurfaces. npj Nanophotonics. 2025; 2(1): 29.

[52]Langbein W. No exceptional precision of exceptional-point sensors. Physical Review A. 2018; 98(2): 023805.

[53]Lau HK, Clerk AA. Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing. Nature Communications. 2018; 9(1): 4320.

[54]Wiersig J. Review of exceptional point-based sensors. Photonics Research. 2020; 8(9): 1457.

[55]Farrar CR, Worden K. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2007; 365(1851): 303–315.

[56]Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, et al. A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2021; 147: 107077.

[57]Wagg DJ, Worden K, Barthorpe RJ, et al. Digital Twins: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions for Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering. 2020; 6(3): 030901.

[58]Trefethen LN, Embree M. Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators. Princeton University Press; 2005.

[59]Baumgartel H. Analytic Perturbation Theory for Matrices and Operators. Birkhauser; 1985.

[60]Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2019; 378: 686–707.

[61]Cuomo S, Di Cola VS, Giampaolo F, et al. Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics–Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What’s Next. Journal of Scientific Computing. 2022; 92(3): 88.

[62]Lu L, Jin P, Pang G, et al. Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2021; 3(3): 218–229.

[63]Kovachki N, Li Z, Liu B, et al. Neural operator: learning maps between function spaces with applications to PDEs. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2023; 24: 1–97.

[64]Peherstorfer B, Willcox K. Data-driven operator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model reduction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2016; 306: 196–215.

[65]Baydin AG, Pearlmutter BA, Radul AA, et al. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2018; 18: 1–43.

[66]Ostrowski AM. Solution of Equations in Euclidean and Banach Spaces. Academic Press; 1973.

[67]Owen AB. Scrambling Sobol’ and Niederreiter–Xing Points. Journal of Complexity. 1998; 14(4): 466–489.

[68]Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint. 2014; arXiv:1412.6980. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980

[69]Nagarajaiah S. Adaptive passive, semiactive, smart tuned mass dampers: identification and control using empirical mode decomposition, hilbert transform, and short-term fourier transform. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 2009; 16(7–8): 800–841.

[70]Weber F, Maślanka M. Frequency and damping adaptation of a TMD with controlled MR damper. Smart Materials and Structures. 2012; 21(5): 055011.

[71]Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures, 2nd ed. Klaus-Juergen Bathe; 2014.

[72]Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 5th ed. Pearson; 2017.