Integrated finite element and reduced-order modeling analysis of a real flat top tower crane system

  • Mustafa Tınkır orcid

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya 42090, Turkey

  • Ali Çoban orcid

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42250, Turkey; acoban@ktun.edu.tr

Article ID: 4531
Keywords: flat top tower crane; finite element analysis; reduced-order modeling; discrete parameter system; modal analysis

Abstract

This study presents the structural and dynamic analysis of a real 60/15 flat-top tower crane with a free-standing height of 48 m. Finite element analyses were performed to evaluate the stress distribution, deformation, and dynamic characteristics of the main structural components. Based on the finite element results, a 17-degree-of-freedom (17-DOF) reduced-order mathematical model was developed. The stiffness coefficients were obtained from the finite element deformations using Hooke's law, while the damping coefficients were determined analytically. An elastic multibody model of the crane was also developed in MATLAB/SimMechanics to validate the proposed reduced-order model. The finite element analyses showed that the maximum equivalent stress remained below the allowable stress limit (approximately 225 MPa), while the maximum displacement of the mast reached 183.94 mm under the design loading condition. Modal analysis indicated that the counter-jib had the lowest first natural frequency (0.64 Hz), making it the most flexible structural component of the crane. Under the same 2-t tip load, the maximum difference between the proposed 17-DOF model and the SimMechanics model was only 4.86% in the jib tip deflection. These results show that the proposed model can accurately represent the structural behavior of the crane while providing a computationally efficient reduced-order representation of the crane compared with detailed finite element modeling. The developed model provides a practical tool for structural analysis, vibration evaluation, design studies, and future control applications of real flat-top tower crane systems.

Published
2026-08-16
How to Cite
Tınkır, M., & Çoban, A. (2026). Integrated finite element and reduced-order modeling analysis of a real flat top tower crane system. Sound & Vibration, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4531
Section
Article

References

[1]Augustyn M, Barski M. Numerical and analytical determination of the critical wind speed causing the overturning of the top-slewing tower crane. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(9): 4683. doi: 10.3390/app15094683

[2]Chen W, Qin X, Yang Z, et al. Wind-induced tower crane vibration and safety evaluation. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. 2020; 39(2): 297–312. doi: 10.1177/1461348419847306

[3]EN 1991-1-4. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures–Part 1-4: General Actions–Wind Actions. 2010.

[4]Federation Europeenne de la Manutention. FEM 1.001: Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances, 3rd ed. Federation Europeenne de la Manutention; 1998.

[5]Gerdemeli I, Kurt S, Deliktaş O. Finite element analysis of the tower crane. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Research/Expert Conference on Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology; 11–18 September 2010; Mediterranean Cruise, Turkey. pp. 11–18.

[6]Gu YQ, Wang WF, Guo SD. Analysis on tower crane under wind load by ANSYS. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2012; 226–228: 35–38. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.226-228.35

[7]Qing L, Zeng YH. Finite element analysis on tower crane based on ANSYS. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2012; 190–191: 373–380. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.190-191.373

[8]Karpe A, Karpe S, Chawrai A, et al. Validation of use of FEM (ANSYS) for structural analysis of tower crane jib and static and dynamic analysis of tower crane jib using ANSYS. International Journal of Innovative Research in Applied Engineering. 2014; 1(4): 69–75.

[9]Zeng G, Chen K, Wang Y, et al. Stress and strain analysis and parameter optimization of pipe truss tower connection of super-large tower crane based on FEM. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1): 3670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54351-y

[10]Zhang Q, Mei B, Yang H, et al. Stress measurement and analysis of structural parameters of flat arm tower crane under different working conditions. Buildings. 2025; 15(7): 1137. doi: 10.3390/buildings15071137

[11]Huang GJ, He CZ, Wang XH. A modal analysis of giant shipbuilding tower crane. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013; 239–240: 473–477. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.239-240.473

[12]Lei JF, Chen XH, Huang L, et al. Modeling and modal analysis of the whole structure of PT7032 tower crane based on finite element method. Advanced Materials Research. 2013; 706–708: 1433–1436. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.1433

[13]Guo H, Chen K. Modal and fatigue characteristics analysis of key components of tower crane. Vibroengineering Procedia. 2024; 54: 72–77. doi: 10.21595/vp.2024.23826

[14]Trong DX, Toan LK, Ngoc HT, et al. Modal analysis of cracked tower crane with an experimental validation. Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology. 2020; 58(6): 776–788. doi: 10.15625/2525-2518/58/6/15298

[15]Jiang H, Li S. The wind-induced vibration response for tower crane based on virtual excitation method. Open Mechanical Engineering Journal. 2014; 8: 201–205.

[16]Jiang H, Li Y. Dynamic reliability analysis of tower crane with wind loading. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019; 677(5): 052031. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/677/5/052031

[17]Lu Y, Gao M, Liang T, et al. Wind-induced vibration assessment of tower cranes attached to high-rise buildings under construction. Automation in Construction. 2022; 135: 104132. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104132

[18]Oliveira CS, Correia PMB. Comparison of the seismic and wind analyses of two tower cranes. Journal of Vibroengineering. 2021; 23(4): 956–975. doi: 10.21595/jve.2021.21649

[19]Liu F, Yang J, Wang J, et al. Effect on tower crane structural vibration under the lifting-luffing coupling condition. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2023; 37(10): 4935–4947. doi: 10.1007/s12206-023-0702-4

[20]Rauscher F, Sawodny O. An elastic jib model for the slewing control of tower cranes. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2017; 50(1): 9796–9801. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.886

[21]Stölzner M, Kleeberger M, Moll M, et al. Investigation of the dynamic loads on tower cranes during slewing operations. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH); 8–10 July 2020; Online. pp. 59–67. doi: 10.5220/0009816300590067

[22]Yang Y, Zhang Z, Xu L, et al. Mechanical performance and failure mode research on the braced frame joint of tower cranes in high-rise building construction. Frontiers in Materials. 2022; 9: 824693. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2022.824693

[23]Yang ZJ, Ai ZD, An HW. Mechanics analysis of tower crane. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 580–583: 3034–3037. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.580-583.3034

[24]Gu YQ, Mao CF. The preliminary analysis on tower crane by earthquake effect. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013; 353–356: 1892–1895. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.353-356.1892

[25]Kenan H, Azeloğlu O. Design of scaled down model of a tower crane mast by using similitude theory. Engineering Structures. 2020; 220: 110985. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110985

[26]Zhu L, Wang Y. Static analysis and modal analysis of crane arms of tower cranes based on ANSYS. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Materials, and Automation Technology (MMEAT 2023); 9–11 June 2023; Dalian, China. doi: 10.1117/12.3007715

[27]Hric S, Tkac J, Matiskova D, et al. Preliminary analysis of tower crane as a type of truss structure. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2019; 299: 03003. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201929903003

[28]Hou C, Liu C, Li Z, et al. Tower crane systems modeling and adaptive robust sliding mode control design under unknown frictions and wind disturbances. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control. 2025; 47(4): 795–809. doi: 10.1177/01423312241260911

[29]Yu Z, Gu Z, Lan P, et al. Multibody system dynamic modeling and order reduction of tower crane. Journal of Dynamics and Control. 2024; 22(8): 58–65. doi: 10.6052/1672-6553-2024-023 (in Chinese)

[30]Yu Z, Li H. A novel flexible multibody system dynamic analysis platform of tower crane. Machines. 2025; 13(12): 1103. doi: 10.3390/machines13121103

[31]Liu P, Zhao C, Sun Y, et al. Impact of multiple operating parameter interactions on load swing of tower cranes. Machines. 2025; 13(2): 85. doi: 10.3390/machines13020085

[32]Chitaoui H, Megnounif A, Benadla Z. Optimal Placement of Vibration Control Systems in a Smart Civil Engineering Structure. Civil Engineering Journal. 2025; 11(8): 3495–3515. doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-08-022

[33]Abdelrheem AE, El-Helloty A, Ehab A. Integrated FEM, CFD, and BIM Approaches for Optimizing Pre-Stressed Concrete Wind Turbine Tower Design. Civil Engineering Journal. 2025; 11(2): 523–543. doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-02-08

[34]Chu TSC, Sorilla J, Chua AY. UAV-Based Structural Health Monitoring Using a Two-Stage CNN Model with Lighthouse Localization in GNSS-Denied Environments. HighTech and Innovation Journal. 2025; 6(2): 398–410. doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2025-06-02-03

[35]Çoban A. Structural Analysis and Control of Tower Crane System [Master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University; 2025.