LBM-IBM simulation of aeolian vibration of a stranded overhead conductor with resolved cross-sectional geometry
Abstract
The outer surface of overhead transmission conductors is formed by wound aluminium strands, exhibiting a corrugated geometric profile. However, aerodynamic analyses typically simplify this geometry to a smooth cylinder. How this simplification influences the fluid-structure coupled vortex-induced vibration response remains unclear. This paper addresses this research gap through comparative numerical simulations between a geometrically refined stranded conductor and an equivalent smooth cylinder with identical outer diameter. A two-dimensional lattice Boltzmann–immersed boundary method (LBM-IBM) computational framework was developed on a fixed Cartesian grid and coupled with a Newmark-β transverse oscillator. Reduced-velocity sweeps and supplementary high-resolution flow-field cases were conducted under fully matched structural and fluid parameters. Results show that the smooth cylinder exhibits a narrow classical lock-in region with rapid amplitude decay beyond the peak. In contrast, the stranded conductor sustains large-amplitude vibrations over a considerably wider velocity range, accompanied by a substantial increase in time-averaged drag. Vorticity and phase analyses indicate that strand grooves function as local flow separation promoters, altering the lift-velocity phase relationship and maintaining positive aerodynamic energy input beyond the desynchronization boundary of the smooth cylinder. The findings confirm that strand-scale surface features significantly broaden the lock-in range, a conclusion that merits incorporation into high-fidelity aerodynamic models to improve conductor response prediction accuracy.
Copyright (c) 2026 Xiaoyu Luo, Yunfeng Zou, Ming Nie, Ganyu Wang, Yongchun Liang, Zejia Yang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]International Electrotechnical Commission. Overhead Lines—Requirements and Tests for Aeolian Vibration Dampers. IEC 61897:2020. International Electrotechnical Commission; 2020.
[2]Liu J, Yan B, Mou Z, et al. Numerical study of aeolian vibration characteristics and fatigue life estimation of transmission conductors. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17(1): e0263163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263163
[3]Yang S, Chouinard L, Langlois S, et al. Evaluation of fatigue damage for undamped overhead conductors under aeolian vibration. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2025; 40(3): 1647–1655. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2025.3558649
[4]Babaei M, Asemi K. Stress analysis of functionally graded saturated porous rotating thick truncated cone. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines. 2022; 50(5): 1537–1564. doi: 10.1080/15397734.2020.1753536
[5]Kiarasi F, Babaei M, Asemi K, et al. Free vibration analysis of thick annular functionally graded plate integrated with piezo-magneto-electro-elastic layers in a hygrothermal environment. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(20): 10682. doi: 10.3390/app122010682
[6]Nazari H, Babaei M, Kiarasi F, et al. Geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of functionally graded material plate excited by a moving load applying first-order shear deformation theory via generalized differential quadrature method. SN Applied Sciences. 2021; 3(11): 847. doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04825-9
[7]Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Chirukam BN, et al. Free vibration analyses of stiffened functionally graded graphene-reinforced composite multilayer cylindrical panel. Mathematics. 2023; 11(17): 3662. doi: 10.3390/math11173662
[8]Shen X, Li T, Xu L, et al. Free vibration analysis of FG porous spherical cap reinforced by graphene platelet resting on Winkler foundation. Advances in Nano Research. 2024; 16(1): 11–26. doi: 10.12989/anr.2024.16.1.011
[9]Chan J, Havard D, Rawlins C, et al. EPRI Transmission Line Reference Book: Wind-Induced Conductor Motion, 2nd ed. Electric Power Research Institute; 2009. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/2268/102166
[10]Diana G. Modelling of Vibrations of Overhead Line Conductors: Assessment of the Technology. CIGRE Green Books; 2018.
[11]Diana G, Cigada A, Belloli M, et al. Stockbridge-type damper effectiveness evaluation. I. Comparison between tests on span and on the shaker. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2003; 18(4): 1462–1469. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2003.817797
[12]CIGRE. Overhead Conductor Safe Design Tension with Respect to Aeolian Vibrations. CIGRE; 2005.
[13]Zhong B, Cai M, Hu M, et al. Enhancing iced 8-bundled conductor galloping prediction for UHV transmission line infrastructure through high-fidelity aerodynamic modeling. Infrastructures. 2025; 10(8): 201. doi: 10.3390/infrastructures10080201
[14]Krüger T, Kusumaatmaja H, Kuzmin A, et al. The Lattice Boltzmann Method: Principles and Practice. Springer; 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44649-3
[15]Latt J, Malaspinas O, Kontaxakis D, et al. Palabos: Parallel lattice Boltzmann solver. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 2021; 81: 334–350. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.03.022
[16]Krause MJ, Kummerländer A, Avis SJ, et al. OpenLB—Open source lattice Boltzmann code. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 2021; 81: 258–288. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.04.033
[17]Ataei M, Salehipour H. XLB: A differentiable massively parallel lattice Boltzmann library in Python. Computer Physics Communications. 2024; 300: 109187. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109187
[18]Hou G, Wang J, Layton A. Numerical methods for fluid–structure interaction: A review. Communications in Computational Physics. 2012; 12(2): 337–377. doi: 10.4208/cicp.291210.290411s
[19]Sotiropoulos F, Yang X. Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid–structure interaction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2014; 65: 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.09.003
[20]Kim W, Choi H. Immersed boundary methods for fluid–structure interaction: A review. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2019; 75: 301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.01.010
[21]Li Z, Cao W, Le Touzé D. On the coupling of a direct-forcing immersed boundary method and the regularized lattice Boltzmann method for fluid–structure interaction. Computers & Fluids. 2019; 190: 470–484. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.06.030
[22]Griffith BE, Patankar NA. Immersed methods for fluid–structure interaction. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2020; 52: 421–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060228
[23]Wang L, Liu Z, Rajamuni M. Recent progress of lattice Boltzmann method and its applications in fluid–structure interaction. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2023; 237(11): 2461–2484. doi: 10.1177/09544062221077583
[24]Wu X, Chen F, Zhou S. Stationary and flow-induced vibration of two elliptic cylinders in tandem by immersed boundary-MRT lattice Boltzmann flux solver. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2019; 91: 102762. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102762
[25]Yan H, Zhang G, Wang S, et al. Simulation of vortex shedding around cylinders by immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann flux solver. Applied Ocean Research. 2021; 114: 102763. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102763
[26]Jiao H. Vortex-Induced Vibration of Circular Cylinders Using Multi-Block Immersed Boundary-Lattice Boltzmann Method [PhD Thesis]. University College London; 2021.
[27]Xu P, Zhou Q, Luo Z, et al. An efficient numerical framework for fluid–structure interaction based on the LBM-IBM method and its applications. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica. 2026; 44(3): 132–144. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0245 (in Chinese)
[28]Zhao M, Cheng L, An H, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of vortex-induced vibration of an elastically mounted rigid circular cylinder in steady current. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2014; 50: 292–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.05.016
[29]Bao Y, Huang C, Zhou D, et al. Two-degree-of-freedom flow-induced vibrations on isolated and tandem cylinders with varying natural frequency ratios. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2012; 35: 50–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.08.002
[30]Martini S, Morgut M, Pigazzini R. Numerical VIV analysis of a single elastically mounted cylinder: Comparison between 2D and 3D URANS simulations. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2021; 104: 103303. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103303
[31]Wang Z, Fan D, Triantafyllou MS. Illuminating the complex role of the added mass during vortex-induced vibration. Physics of Fluids. 2021; 33(8): 085120. doi: 10.1063/5.0059013
[32]Raza SA, Irawan YH, Chern MJ. Effect of grid size and initial conditions on vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder. Ocean Engineering. 2022; 263: 112332. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112332
[33]Jia L, Sang S, Shi X, et al. Investigation on numerical simulation of VIV of deep-sea flexible risers. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(14): 8096. doi: 10.3390/app13148096
[34]Jiang H, Ju X, Zhao M, et al. Large-eddy simulation of vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder at Reynolds number 10 000. Physics of Fluids. 2024; 36(8): 085113. doi: 10.1063/5.0219933
[35]Wang L, Liu Z, Jin BR, et al. Wall-modeled large eddy simulation in the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method. Physics of Fluids. 2024; 36(3): 035167. doi: 10.1063/5.0198252
[36]Yu Z, Wang E, Bao Y, et al. VIV of two rigidly coupled side-by-side cylinders at subcritical Re. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2024; 267: 108961. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.108961
[37]Williamson CHK, Govardhan R. A brief review of recent results in vortex-induced vibrations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2008; 96(6–7): 713–735. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.019
[38]Williamson CHK, Brown GL. A series in 1/√Re to represent the Strouhal–Reynolds number relationship of the cylinder wake. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 1998; 12: 1073–1085. doi: 10.1006/jfls.1998.0184
[39]White FM. Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2006.




