Modeling and simulation of hybrid electric propulsion systems for amphibious vehicle

  • Van-Tong Em Nguyen orcid

    Faculty of Energy Engineering and Transport, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (HCM-UTE), Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; College of Engineering and Technology, Nam Can Tho University (DNC), Can Tho City 94000, Vietnam

  • Van-Trang Nguyen orcid

    Faculty of Energy Engineering and Transport, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (HCM-UTE), Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

  • Tat-Hien Le orcid

    Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU‐HCM), Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

  • Cao-Thanh Nhi Ninh orcid

    Faculty of Energy Engineering and Transport, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (HCM-UTE), Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

  • Thai-Nguyen Vo orcid

    College of Engineering and Technology, Nam Can Tho University (DNC), Can Tho City 94000, Vietnam

Article ID: 4403
Keywords: amphibious vehicle; series hybrid electric propulsion; longitudinal dynamic modelling; environment transition phase; power distribution

Abstract

Amphibious vehicles operate across land and water, requiring stable environmental transitions. Although series hybrid electric propulsion systems (Series HEPS) offer flexible power distribution for these dual-environment demands, existing studies often limit dynamic analysis to individual environments. The transition phase, where buoyancy, hydrodynamic drag, and wheel loads vary simultaneously, lacks a unified mathematical framework. This study develops an integrated longitudinal dynamic model coupled with a Series HEPS, enabling continuous simulation across three phases: land, water, and transition. The land phase considers rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, and wheel traction, whereas the water phase determines hydrodynamic resistance via the Holtrop-Mennen method and a propeller thrust model. Notably, for the transition phase, a proposed geometric relationship links longitudinal displacement along the bank slope to submergence depth, determining real-time buoyancy variations and wheel load redistribution. Simulation scenarios evaluate velocity, acceleration, and traction requirements across all phases, analyzing the influence of bank slope angles and ground friction on climbing capability. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed HEPS configuration is highly reliable, achieving maximum speeds of 60 km/h on land and over 8 km/h in water. The system effectively satisfies the dynamic performance requirements, including velocity, acceleration, and gradeability, across the terrestrial, aquatic, and transitional phases. The simulation results indicate that the proposed HEPS configuration provides continuous tractive effort across the operating phases, achieving the required on-road design speed of 60 km/h, reaching approximately 8.7 km/h in calm-water operation, and attaining terminal transition velocities of approximately 7.2–9.5 km/h during the aquatic-to-terrestrial transition. This framework provides a useful analytical tool for the preliminary design and dynamic evaluation of hybrid amphibious vehicles.

Published
2026-07-26
How to Cite
Nguyen, V.-T. E., Nguyen, V.-T., Le, T.-H., Ninh, C.-T. N., & Vo, T.-N. (2026). Modeling and simulation of hybrid electric propulsion systems for amphibious vehicle. Sound & Vibration, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4403

References

[1]Zhang X, Huang J, Huang Y, et al. Intelligent amphibious ground-aerial vehicles: State of the art technology for future transportation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles. 2022; 8(1): 970–987.

[2]Policarpo H, Lourenço JP, Anastácio AM, et al. Conceptual design of an unmanned electrical amphibious vehicle for ocean and land surveillance. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2024; 15(7): 279.

[3]Pan D, Xu X, Liu B, et al. A review on drag reduction technology: Focusing on amphibious vehicles. Ocean Engineering. 2023; 280: 114618.

[4]Zou D, Jiao X, Zhou Y, et al. Design and multi-objective optimization of an electric inflatable pontoon amphibious vehicle. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2025; 16(2): 58.

[5]Luo H, Ding J, Jiang J, et al. Resistance characteristics and improvement of a pump-jet propelled wheeled amphibious vehicle. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(8): 1092.

[6]Liu B, Pan D, Xu X. Research on the resistance and maneuvering characteristics of an amphibious transport vehicle and the influence of stern hydrofoil. Ocean Engineering. 2024; 293: 116592.

[7]Zhang Q, Jia B, Zhu Z, et al. Extreme Attitude Prediction of Amphibious Vehicles Based on Improved Transformer Model and Extreme Loss Function. Journal of Marine Science and Application. 2026; 25(1): 228–238.

[8]Shang D, Zhang X, Liang F, et al. Optimization of Center of Gravity Position and Anti-Wave Plate Angle of Amphibious Unmanned Vehicle Based on Orthogonal Experimental Method. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 2024; 139(2): 2027–2041.

[9]Gan W, Zuo Z, Zhuang J, et al. Aerodynamic/Hydrodynamic Investigation of Water Cross-Over for a Bionic Unmanned Aquatic–Aerial Amphibious Vehicle. Biomimetics. 2024; 9(3): 181.

[10]Jiang Z, Ding J, Li Z. Study on the Impact of Tail Wing Profiles on the Resistance Characteristics of Amphibious Vehicles. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(5): 780.

[11]Jeong WJ, Nam S, Park JC, et al. Experimental and Numerical Study on Influence of Wheel Attachments on Resistance Performance of Amphibious Vessel for Marine Debris Collection. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(4): 570.

[12]Xia M, Zhu Q, Yin Q, et al. Hydrodynamic simulation and experiment of a self-adaptive amphibious robot driven by tracks and bionic fins. Biomimetics. 2024; 9(10): 580.

[13]Liu B, Xu X, Pan D, et al. Drag reduction design and research of high-speed amphibious vehicle’s deformable track wheels. Ships and Offshore Structures. 2023; 18(7): 970–979.

[14]Pan D, Liu B, Xu X, et al. Experimental and CFD investigation on resistance reduction of hydrofoils for amphibious vehicles. Ships and Offshore Structures. 2024; 19(11): 1938–1951.

[15]Shi Z, Tan X, Wang Y, et al. Experimental investigation of high speed cross-domain vehicles with hydrofoil. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(1): 152.

[16]Yamashita H, Arnold A, Carrica PM, et al. Coupled multibody dynamics and computational fluid dynamics approach for amphibious vehicles in the surf zone. Ocean Engineering. 2022; 257: 111607.

[17]Burciu Z, Kraskowski M, Gerigk M. Analysis of the process of water entry of an amphibious vehicle. Polish Maritime Research. 2012; 19(4): 5–14.

[18]Huang B, Yuan Z, Yu W, et al. Driving Force Control for Water-to-Land Transition of Distributed Drive Amphibious Vehicles. SAE International; 2025. doi: 10.4271/2025-01-5011

[19]Tison N. Amphibious Vehicle Water Egress Modeling and Simulation Using CFD and Wong’s Methodology. In: Proceedings of the Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium (GVSETS); 13–15 August 2019; Novi, MI, USA.

[20]Liu B, Xu X, Pan D. Research on launching, water exiting, and river crossing of an amphibious vehicle. Physics of Fluids. 2023; 35(11): 113328. doi: 10.1063/5.0174148

[21]Roh MI, Lee KY. Computational Ship Design. Springer; 2018.

[22]Gillespie T. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. SAE International; 2021.

[23]Larminie J, Lowry J. Electric Vehicle Technology Explained. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2012.

[24]Ekinci S. A practical approach for design of marine propellers with systematic propeller series. Brodogradnja: An International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering for Research and Development. 2011; 62(2): 123–129.

[25]Rajamani R. Vehicle Dynamics and Control. Springer; 2006.

[26]Jazar RN. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application. Springer Nature; 2025.