Comparative analysis of simulation explosive methods in coupling charge

  • Tao Yin orcid

    School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

  • Fengzhuang Zhang orcid

    School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

  • Huayong Guan orcid

    School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

  • Ziru Guo orcid

    School of Chemical and Blasting Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

  • Chuanbo Zhou orcid

    Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

  • Hongwei Li orcid

    School of Chemical and Blasting Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

Article ID: 4336
Keywords: coupling charge, equivalent amplified explosive, explosive simulation, blast load, vibration attenuation law

Abstract

The accuracy of numerical simulation for blasting behaviors is largely determined by explosive simulation methods. An equivalent amplified explosives method (method 2) for simulating explosives is proposed in this paper. A numerical model for large-diameter low-detonation-velocity explosives is developed to match the same total energy release in rock mass as small-diameter high-detonation-velocity explosives. Compared with existing equivalent methods that apply simplified blast vibration load curves to blast hole walls (method 3) and the plane of center line of blast holes (method 4), the proposed method can accurately characterize the detonation process of explosives and the thermodynamic properties of detonation products. The requirements and characteristics of four different explosive simulation methods are analyzed. Simulations of the blasting of open-pit iron mines were conducted via ANSYS/LS-DYNA, and the simulated vibration velocities obtained were compared with measured velocities. The results showed that field-measured vibration velocities were generally larger than numerical values from all four methods. Specifically, the fluid–structure coupling algorithm (method 1) required the most meshing work and is applicable to few blast holes and near-field analysis. Method 2 is suitable for simulating numerous blast holes and for studying and analyzing the middle and far regions of blast holes. Method 3 is applicable for simulating a few blast holes and for analyzing the middle and far regions of blast holes. Method 4 is also suitable for studying the middle and far regions of the blast holes. These results provide a reference for the numerical simulations of blasting processes under similar conditions.

Published
2026-08-15
How to Cite
Yin, T., Zhang, F., Guan, H., Guo, Z., Zhou, C., & Li, H. (2026). Comparative analysis of simulation explosive methods in coupling charge. Sound & Vibration, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4336
Section
Article

References

[1]Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. LSTC Co; 2007.

[2]Shin JH, Moon HG, Chae SE. Effect of blast-induced vibration on existing tunnels in soft rocks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2011; 26(1): 51–61.

[3]Swoboda G, Zenz G. Practical considerations of blast loading in tunneling using numerical modeling. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics; 11–15 April 1988; Innsbruck, Austria.

[4]Lu W, Yang J, Chen M, et al. An equivalent method for blasting vibration simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2011; 19(9): 2050–2062.

[5]Weng L, Huang L, Taheri A, et al. Rockburst characteristics and numerical simulation based on a strain energy density index: A case study of a roadway in Linglong gold mine, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2017; 69: 223–232.

[6]Lu W, Yang J, Yan P, et al. Dynamic response of rock mass induced by the transient release of in-situ stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2012; 53: 129–141.

[7]Wu X, Gong M, Wu H, et al. Vibration reduction technology and the mechanisms of surrounding rock damage from blasting in neighborhood tunnels with small clearance. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2023; 33(5): 625–637.

[8]Jiang X, Xue Y, Kong F, et al. Dynamic responses and damage mechanism of rock with discontinuity subjected to confining stresses and blasting loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2023; 172: 104404.

[9]Chen M, Ye Z, Lu W, et al. An improved method for calculating the peak explosion pressure on the borehole wall in decoupling charge blasting. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2020; 146: 103695.

[10]Chen S, Zhao J, Zhou Y. UDEC modeling of a field explosion test. Fragblast. 2000; 4(2): 149–163.

[11]Mobaraki B, Vaghefi M. Numerical study of the depth and cross-sectional shape of tunnel under surface explosion. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research. 2015; 47: 114–122.

[12]Hu Y, Lu W, Chen M, et al. Comparison of Blast-Induced Damage Between Presplit and Smooth Blasting of High Rock Slope. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering. 2014; 47(4): 1307–1320.

[13]Gou Y, Ye M, Yu Z, et al. Experimental and theoretical analysis of charge length on single-hole vibration amplitude from underground deep-hole blasting. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2024; 182: 105876.

[14]Huo X, Shi X, Qiu X, et al. A study on raise blasting and blast-induced vibrations in highly stressed rock masses. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2022; 123: 104407.

[15]Jiang X, Xue Y, Ren X, et al. Dynamic response characteristics and damage calculation method of fractured rock mass under blasting disturbance. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2024; 192: 105036.

[16]Jiang N, Zhou C, Lu S, et al. Propagation and prediction of blasting vibration on slope in an open pit during underground mining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2017; 70: 409–421.

[17]Lyu G, Zhou C, Jiang N. Experimental and Numerical Study on Tunnel Blasting Induced Damage Characteristics of Grouted Surrounding Rock in Fault Zones. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2023; 56(1): 603–617.

[18]Cao W, Li X, Tao M, et al. Vibrations induced by high initial stress release during underground excavations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2016; 53: 78–95.

[19]Lu Y, Jin C, Wang Q, et al. Numerical study on spatial distribution of blast-induced damage zone in open-pit slope. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2023; 163: 105328.

[20]Rehman JU, Park D, Ahn JK. Predicting Blast-Induced Damage and Dynamic Response of Drill-and-Blast Tunnel Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(14): 6152.

[21]Xu X, Chi LY, Chen YPW. An elastoplastic damage constitutive model for capturing dynamic enhancement effect of rock and concrete through equivalent stress history. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2023; 181: 104736.

[22]Guan X, Yang N, Zhang W, et al. Vibration response and failure modes analysis of the temporary support structure under blasting excavation of tunnels. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2022; 136: 106188.

[23]Huo Q, Liu G, Wang W, et al. Failure mode and damage assessment of underground reinforced concrete arched structure under side top explosion. Structures. 2024; 59: 105801.

[24]Gui YL, Zhao ZY, Jayasinghe LB, et al. Blast wave induced spatial variation of ground vibration considering field geological conditions. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2018; 101: 63–68.

[25]Henrych J. The Dynamics of Explosion and Its Use. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; 1979.

[26]Souers P, Haselman Jr L. Detonation Equation of State at LLNL, 1993. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL); 1994.

[27]Zhou M, Zhang YP, Cui JY, et al. Numerical Simulation on Offset of Seismic Wave Peaks and Valleys in Deep-hole Blasting. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition). 2022; 44(1): 10. (in Chinese)

[28]Kuhlemeyer RL, Lysmer J. Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 1973; 99(5): 421–427.