Study of the mechanical behavior under compression of a tetrachiral auxetic tubular structure

  • Ali Bejaoui orcid

    National School of Engineers of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1002, Tunisia; Laboratory of Mechanics, Production and Energetics, Higher National Engineering School of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunis 1008, Tunisia

  • Ltaief Lammari orcid

    Mechanical and Agro-Industrial Engineering Laboratory, Higher School of Engineering of Medjez El Bab, University of Jendouba, Medjez El Bab 9070, Tunisia

  • Fethi Abbassi orcid

    College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait

  • Ali Trabelsi orcid

    Laboratory of Mechanics, Production and Energetics, Higher National Engineering School of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunis 1008, Tunisia

  • Mohamed-Ali Rezgui orcid

    Laboratory of Mechanics, Production and Energetics, Higher National Engineering School of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunis 1008, Tunisia

Article ID: 4310
Keywords: auxetic tubular structure, tetrachiral lattice, effective Poisson's ratio, finite element modeling, axial compression, boundary conditions, additive manufacturing

Abstract

Additive manufacturing enables the fabrication of architected materials with geometries unattainable through conventional processes. Among these, auxetic metastructures, characterized by a negative Poisson's ratio, have attracted considerable interest owing to their unusual deformation mechanisms and superior energy absorption and dissipation. This study investigates the mechanical behavior of a tetrachiral tubular structure made of AA7075-T651 aluminum alloy under axial compression, focusing on the influence of boundary conditions at the part–machine interfaces. Finite element simulations accounted for frictional contact, geometric nonlinearity, and the rotational kinematics of tetrachiral cells. The results reveal that friction governs the onset and magnitude of the auxetic response. Under highly constrained contact (μ = 0.8), ligament rotation is suppressed, and the structure deforms conventionally, exhibiting a positive effective Poisson's ratio (ν ≈ +0.28), limited twisting (two turns), and a maximum compressive load of 3.877 kN. Reducing friction to μ = 0.2 with a fixed base promotes in-plane node rotation, activating the tetrachiral mechanism and yielding ν ≈ −0.25, four turns, and a higher load of 3.883 kN. The most pronounced auxetic response arises when both ends are free to slide under low friction, producing ν ≈ −0.32, five turns, and an 8.2% contraction of the outer diameter. Across the investigated configurations, the effective Poisson's ratio varies by 0.60. These findings demonstrate that the auxetic behavior of tetrachiral tubes is highly sensitive to frictional and kinematic constraints, which must be carefully controlled to ensure reproducible mechanical performance.

Published
2026-08-14
How to Cite
Bejaoui, A., Lammari, L., Abbassi, F., Trabelsi, A., & Rezgui, M.-A. (2026). Study of the mechanical behavior under compression of a tetrachiral auxetic tubular structure. Sound & Vibration, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4310
Section
Article

References

[1]Kumar R, Kumar M, Chohan JS, et al. Overview on metamaterial: History, types and applications. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022; 56: 3016–3024. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.423

[2]Ni X, Yves S, Krasnok A, et al. Topological metamaterials. Chemical Reviews. 2023; 123(12): 7585–7654. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00800

[3]Zheng X, Zhang X, Chen TT, et al. Deep learning in mechanical metamaterials: From prediction and generation to inverse design. Advanced Materials. 2023; 35(45): 2302530. doi: 10.1002/adma.202302530

[4]Bao Y, Wei Z, Jia Z, et al. Mechanical metamaterial design with the customized low-frequency bandgap and negative Poisson's ratio via topology optimization. Extreme Mechanics Letters. 2024; 67: 102124. doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2024.102124

[5]Bohara RP, Linforth S, Nguyen T, et al. Anti-blast and impact performances of auxetic structures: A review of structures, materials, methods, and fabrications. Engineering Structures. 2023; 276: 115377. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115377

[6]Mora S, Pugno NM, Misseroni D. 3D printed architected lattice structures by material jetting. Materials Today. 2022; 59: 107–132. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2022.05.008

[7]Rahimi-Lenji A, Heidari-Rarani M, Mirkhalaf M, et al. On the internal architecture of lightweight negative Poisson's ratio (auxetic) metastructures: A review. Materials & Design. 2025; 260: 115225. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.115225

[8]Benedetti M, du Plessis A, Ritchie RO, et al. Architected cellular materials: A review on their mechanical properties towards fatigue-tolerant design and fabrication. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2021; 144: 100606. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2021.100606

[9]Zadpoor AA. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia. 2019; 85: 41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.038

[10]Hu Y, Fan Y, Wu Y, et al. A piezoelectric damping support for the vibration suppression of rotors. In: Fu S (editor). 2023 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2023), Proceedings of the APISAT: Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology; 16–18 October 2023; Lingshui, China. Springer; 2024. pp. 1237–1256. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-3998-1_97

[11]Nazir A, Abate KM, Kumar A, et al. A state-of-the-art review on types, design, optimization, and additive manufacturing of cellular structures. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019; 104(9): 3489–3510. doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04085-3

[12]Dananjaya SAV, Chevali VS, Dear JP, et al. 3D printing of biodegradable polymers and their composites—Current state-of-the-art, properties, applications, and machine learning for potential future applications. Progress in Materials Science. 2024; 146: 101336. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101336

[13]Khan N, Riccio A. A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: Current trends and future directions. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2024; 149: 101021. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101021

[14]Xin X, Liu L, Liu Y, et al. 4D printing auxetic metamaterials with tunable, programmable, and reconfigurable mechanical properties. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020; 30(43): 2004226. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202004226

[15]Ding A, Tang F, Alsberg E. 4D printing: A comprehensive review of technologies, materials, stimuli, design, and emerging applications. Chemical Reviews. 2025; 125(7): 3663–3771. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00070

[16]Zhang X, Yin J, Ren X, et al. Pre-torsion tubular metamaterials: Multi-effect integration of compression-torsion and auxetic behaviors for advanced functional applications. Advanced Science. 2025; 12(42): e12564. doi: 10.1002/advs.202512564

[17]An R, Ge X, Wang M. Design and microscale fabrication of negative Poisson's ratio lattice structures based on multi-scale topology optimization. Machines. 2023; 11(5): 519. doi: 10.3390/machines11050519

[18]Wang P, Fu X, Li C, et al. Research on a broadband vibration energy acquisition method combining nonlinear softening and hardening. Sound & Vibration. 2025; 59(2): 1712. doi: 10.59400/sv1712

[19]Simpson J, Kazancı Z. Crushing investigation of crash boxes filled with honeycomb and re-entrant (auxetic) lattices. Thin-Walled Structures. 2020; 150: 106676. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106676

[20]Etemadi S, Hosseinabadi M, Gholikord M, et al. Dynamic performance of arc-shaped auxetic structures through split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Smart Materials and Structures. 2025; 34(8): 085022. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/adf928

[21]Jiang W, Ren X, Wang SL, et al. Manufacturing, characteristics and applications of auxetic foams: A state-of-the-art review. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2022; 235: 109733. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109733

[22]Luo HC, Ren X, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanical properties of foam-filled hexagonal and re-entrant honeycombs under uniaxial compression. Composite Structures. 2022; 280: 114922. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114922

[23]Li X, Peng W, Wu W, et al. Auxetic mechanical metamaterials: From soft to stiff. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing. 2023; 5(4): 042003. doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ace668

[24]Zhang Y, Jiang WZ, Jiang W, et al. Recent advances of auxetic metamaterials in smart materials and structural systems. Advanced Functional Materials. 2025; 35(23): 2421746. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202421746

[25]Ting TCT, Chen T. Poisson's ratio for anisotropic elastic materials can have no bounds. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. 2005; 58(1): 73–82. doi: 10.1093/qjmamj/hbh021

[26]Grédiac M, Sur F, Blaysat B. The grid method for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: A review and analysis. Strain. 2016; 52(3): 205–243. doi: 10.1111/str.12182

[27]Gurtin ME, Fried E, Anand L. The Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Continua. Cambridge University Press; 2010. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511762956

[28]Gao XL. A new Timoshenko beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Acta Mechanica. 2015; 226(2): 457–474. doi: 10.1007/s00707-014-1189-y

[29]Selvadurai APS. On Spencer's displacement function approach for problems in second-order elasticity theory. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids. 2023; 28(1): 56–92. doi: 10.1177/10812865221096771

[30]Lenihan D, Ronan W, O'Donoghue PE, et al. A review of the integrity of metallic vehicle armour to projectile attack. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2019; 233(1): 73–94. doi: 10.1177/1464420718759704

[31]Habte B. Matrix Structural Analysis and the Finite Element Methods Using Scilab and Octave: A Problem-Solving Approach. CRC Press; 2024. doi: 10.1201/9781003329350

[32]Mohamed AB, Znaidi A, Daghfas O, et al. Evolution of mechanical behavior of aluminium alloy Al 7075 during maturation time. International Journal of Technology. 2016; 7(6): 1077–1085. Available online: https://ijtech.eng.ui.ac.id/article/view/358

[33]Chow ZP, Gliszczyński A. Influence of boundary conditions on the residual compressive strength of impacted thin-walled GFRP channel section profiles. Composite Structures. 2025; 370: 119399. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119399