Possibility-based transfer-matrix optimization of a graded double-cavity micro-perforated partition with fuzzy parameters for broadband sound transmission loss

  • Yogeesh Nijalingappa orcid

    Department of Mathematics, Government First Grade College, Tumakuru 572102, India; Research Fellow, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Naeema Darwish Khamis Al Maashari orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Asokan Vasudevan orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Chethana N. S. orcid

    Department of Mathematics, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi 585367, India

  • Wenya Wu orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, Xingtai Vocational College of Applied Technology, Xingtai 054000, China

  • Sulieman Ibrahim Mohammad orcid

    Research Fellow, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia; Department of Business Administration, Business School, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan

  • Mohammad Faleh Ahmmad Hunitie orcid

    Department of Public Administration, School of Business, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan

Article ID: 4292
Keywords: fuzzy mathematics, micro-perforated panel, possibility theory, graded cavity, transfer matrix, sound transmission loss, robust acoustic design

Abstract

This study proposes a possibility-based transfer-matrix optimization and assessment framework for fuzzy geometric parameters in a graded double-cavity micro-perforated partition. The system consists of a front limp panel, a first air cavity, a micro-perforated panel, a second air cavity, and a back limp panel. The two cavities are graded over three equal parallel strips, so the local depths of the two cavities differ from strip to strip. Fuzzy numbers model each uncertain design quantity as a triangular fuzzy number and propagate through alpha-cuts. The acoustic model consists of explicit transfer matrices, an area-averaged transmission coefficient, and normal-incidence sound transmission loss. The specific novelty is the direct use of exact alpha-cut corner propagation inside the graded strip-wise transfer-matrix objective, where guaranteed band-average sound transmission loss, guaranteed low-band minimum, and fuzzy width are evaluated together rather than only after a deterministic design is selected. A fuzzy width penalty and guaranteed band-average transmission loss with guaranteed low-band minimum transmission loss are included in the objective function. This is analyzed with a detailed numerical study from 250 Hz to 2,000 Hz. The selected graded design realizes a guaranteed average sound transmission loss of 78.085 dB and a guaranteed low-band minimum of 41.323 dB, while the central design gives 81.425 dB and 43.406 dB, respectively. Compared with a uniform-cavity reference evaluated under the same fuzzy setting, the graded design improves the guaranteed low-band average and minimum while maintaining a comparable uncertainty width. This study focuses on mathematical formulation, tabulated numerical output, and an accessible interpretation of design rather than a long theoretical discussion.

Published
2026-07-21
How to Cite
Nijalingappa, Y., Khamis Al Maashari, N. D., Vasudevan, A., N. S., C., Wu , W., Ibrahim Mohammad, S., & Ahmmad Hunitie, M. F. (2026). Possibility-based transfer-matrix optimization of a graded double-cavity micro-perforated partition with fuzzy parameters for broadband sound transmission loss. Sound & Vibration, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4292
Section
Article

References

[1]Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8(3): 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

[2]Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1978; 1(1): 3–28. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5

[3]Dubois D, Prade H. Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science. 1978; 9(6): 613–626. doi: 10.1080/00207727808941724

[4]Hanss M. The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2002; 130(3): 277–289. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00045-3

[5]Hanss M. The Extended Transformation Method for the Simulation and Analysis of Fuzzy-Parameterized Models. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 2003; 11(06): 711–727. doi: 10.1142/S0218488503002491

[6]Moens D, Vandepitte D. Fuzzy Finite Element Method for Frequency Response Function Analysis of Uncertain Structures. AIAA Journal. 2002; 40(1): 126–136. doi: 10.2514/2.1621

[7]Jiang C, Babaei M. Machine learning-based estimation of sound transmission loss in single and double-layered rectangular functionally graded plates. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2025; 161: 112112. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112112

[8]Fang Z, Liu W, Asemi K. Machine learning estimation on functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced honeycomb sandwich shells: Sound transmission analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2026; 167: 113672. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.113672

[9]Cobo P, Simón F. Multiple-Layer Microperforated Panels as Sound Absorbers in Buildings: A Review. Buildings. 2019; 9(2): 53. doi: 10.3390/buildings9020053

[10]Kim HS, Ma PS, Kim SR, et al. A model for the sound absorption coefficient of multi-layered elastic micro-perforated plates. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2018; 430: 75–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.05.036

[11]Kim HS, Kim SR, Kim BK, et al. Sound transmission loss of multi-layered infinite micro-perforated plates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2020; 147(1): 508–515. doi: 10.1121/10.0000600

[12]Kim HS, Ma PS, Kim BK, et al. Sound transmission loss of multi-layered elastic micro-perforated plates in an impedance tube. Applied Acoustics. 2020; 166: 107348. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107348

[13]Putra A, Ismail AY. Normal Incidence of Sound Transmission Loss from Perforated Plates with Micro and Macro Size Holes. Advances in Acoustics and Vibration. 2014; 2014: 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2014/534569

[14]Zarastvand M, Ghassabi M, Talebitooti R. Prediction of acoustic wave transmission features of the multilayered plate constructions: A review. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2022; 24(1): 218–293. doi: 10.1177/1099636221993891

[15]Li X, Liu B, Chang D. An acoustic impedance structure consisting of perforated panel resonator and porous material for low-to-mid frequency sound absorption. Applied Acoustics. 2021; 180: 108069. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108069

[16]El Kharras B, Garoum M, Bybi A. Effect of Acoustic Enclosure on the Sound Transmission Loss of Multi-Layered Micro-Perforated Plates. Archives of Acoustics. 2024; 241–254. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2024.148781

[17]Fung ML, Tang SK, Leung M. Sound transmission across a rectangular duct section with a thin micro-perforated wall backed by a sidebranch cavity. Applied Acoustics. 2024; 219: 109920. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.109920

[18]Yang W, Li Y, Choy YS. Sound radiation control of an unbaffled long enclosure using wavy micro-perforated panel absorbers. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2024; 574: 118233. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2023.118233

[19]Qian Y, Gao Z, Zhang J, et al. Investigation on the band narrowing and shifting effects of micro-perforated panel absorbers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2024; 155(3): 1950–1968. doi: 10.1121/10.0025277

[20]Agarwalla DK, Mohanty AR. Low-Frequency Wideband Sound Absorption Properties of Composite Layer Micro-perforated Panel Absorber. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies. 2024; 12(4): 6251–6271. doi: 10.1007/s42417-023-01250-7

[21]Arjunan A, Baroutaji A, Robinson J, et al. Acoustic metamaterials for sound absorption and insulation in buildings. Building and Environment. 2024; 251: 111250. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111250

[22]Mohammadi M, Ishak MR, Sultan MTH, et al. A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing the Sound Absorption Properties of Micro-Perforated Panel Structures. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies. 2025; 13(5): 319. doi: 10.1007/s42417-025-01849-y

[23]Xie Y, Hou X, Wang L, et al. Sound absorption characteristics of micro-perforated panel-sound-absorbing sponge composite structure. Technical Acoustics. 2025; 44(5): 758–764. DOI: 10.16300/j.cnki.1000-3630.23121202 (in Chinese)

[24]Chen C, Wang C, Zhao Y, et al. An isogeometric modeling and vibro-acoustic characteristics analysis of a double panel-acoustic cavity coupling system with in-plane functionally graded materials. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 6554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90826-2

[25]Bayat MJ, Kalhori A, Asemi K, et al. Static and vibrational characteristics of bio-inspired helicoid laminated composite annular sector plates embedded on Winkler elastic foundation. Engineering Structures. 2025; 334: 120194. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120194

[26]Bayat MJ, Kalhori A, Babaei M, et al. Buckling Characteristics of Bio-Inspired Helicoidal Laminated Composite Spherical Shells Under External Normal and Torsional Loads Subjected to Elastic Support. Buildings. 2025; 15(17): 3165. doi: 10.3390/buildings15173165

[27]Mourelatos ZP, Zhou J. Reliability Estimation and Design with Insufficient Data Based on Possibility Theory. AIAA Journal. 2005; 43(8): 1696–1705. doi: 10.2514/1.12044

[28]Maa DY. Theory and Design of Microperforated Panel Sound-Absorbing Constructions. Scientia Sinica. 1975; 18(1): 55–71. Available online: https://www.sciengine.com/Math%20A0/doi/10.1360/ya1975-18-1-55

[29]Maa DY. Microperforated-Panel Wideband Absorbers. Noise Control Engineering Journal. 1987; 29(3): 77. doi: 10.3397/1.2827694

[30]Maa DY. Potential of microperforated panel absorber. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1998; 104(5): 2861–2866. doi: 10.1121/1.423870

[31]Lee DH, Kwon YP. Estimation of the absorption performance of multiple layer perforated panel systems by transfer matrix method. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2004; 278(4–5): 847–860. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.017

[32]Toyoda M, Takahashi D. Sound transmission through a microperforated-panel structure with subdivided air cavities. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 124(6): 3594–3603. doi: 10.1121/1.3001711

[33]Sakagami K, Matsutani K, Morimoto M. Sound absorption of a double-leaf micro-perforated panel with an air-back cavity and a rigid-back wall: Detailed analysis with a Helmholtz–Kirchhoff integral formulation. Applied Acoustics. 2010; 71(5): 411–417. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2009.11.014

[34]Sakagami K, Fukutani Y, Yairi M, et al. A theoretical study on the effect of a permeable membrane in the air cavity of a double-leaf microperforated panel space sound absorber. Applied Acoustics. 2014; 79: 104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.12.015