Coupling vibration analysis for aerial inspection robot landing on transmission line under wind disturbance

  • Xiaodong Zhang

    School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China;Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robot, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

  • Haiming Shen orcid

    School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China

  • Ahmad Bala Alhassan orcid

    School of Mechanical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

  • Haibo Xu

    School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robot, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Article ID: 4198
Keywords: landing gripper; wind disturbance model; HVTIR-line coupled vibrations; exponential nonlinear contact-force model; contact-force strategy

Abstract

When the high-voltage transmission line inspection robot (HVTIR) lands amid wind disturbances, line vibrations significantly affect system stability. Therefore, this paper proposes a contact-force control strategy for HVTIR landing based on varying wind speed conditions: a nonlinear contact-force model is preferred for vibration reduction under low wind speeds, while a linear contact-force model enhances stability under medium and high wind speeds. Using a composite wind field model, the vibration bending beam model of the transmission line and the mass-stiffness-damping coupling model of the robot under wind disturbance were developed. An experimental verification system was established using wireless acceleration sensors. Results showed that under a typical low wind speed of 2 m/s, the exponential nonlinear contact-force strategy controlled vibration at 0.64 m/s2, which was 90.1% more effective than direct loading. At a typical medium-high wind speed of 6 m/s, the experimental peak value using the linear contact-force strategy was reduced by 5.7% compared to the ideal peak value; the experimental RMS was reduced by 0.36%, and the linear contact-force strategy significantly reduced coupling vibrations. These experimental results demonstrate the reliability and applicability of the proposed control strategy, providing theoretical and technical support for the stable and rapid landing of the inspection robot.

Published
2026-04-15
How to Cite
Zhang, X., Shen, H., Alhassan, A. B., & Xu, H. (2026). Coupling vibration analysis for aerial inspection robot landing on transmission line under wind disturbance. Sound & Vibration, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4198

References

[1]Alhassan AB, Zhang X, Shen H, et al. Power transmission line inspection robots: A review, trends and challenges for future research. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2020; 118: 105862. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105862

[2]Wang Y, Qin X, Jia W, et al. Multiobjective Energy Consumption Optimization of a Flying–Walking Power Transmission Line Inspection Robot during Flight Missions Using Improved NSGA-II. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(4): 1637. doi: 10.3390/app14041637

[3]Chao C, Mei X, Wei Y, et al. A balanced walking-clamp mechanism for inspection robot of transmission line. Industrial Robot: The International Journal of Robotics Research and Application. 2023; 50(4): 673–685. doi: 10.1108/IR-09-2022-0226

[4]Luo Y, Yu X, Yang D, et al. A survey of intelligent transmission line inspection based on unmanned aerial vehicle. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2023; 56(1): 173–201. doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10189-2

[5]Zhang X, Shen H, Alhassan AB, et al. Coupling vibration analysis for inspection robot landing on high voltage transmission line. Sound & Vibration. 2025; 59(5). doi: 10.59400/sv3788

[6]Zhang X, Shen H, Alhassan AB, et al. Gripper vibration analysis of inspection robot during variable working flight of pre-landing on high-voltage transmission line. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2024; 38(3): 1411–1428. doi: 10.1007/s12206-024-0233-7

[7]Chermprayong P, Zhang K, Xiao F, et al. An Integrated Delta Manipulator for Aerial Repair: A New Aerial Robotic System. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2019; 26: 54–66.

[8]Suarez A, Real F, Vega VM, et al. Compliant Bimanual Aerial Manipulation: Standard and Long Reach Configurations. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 88844–88865. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993101

[9]Paul H, Miyazaki R, Ladig R, et al. TAMS: development of a multipurpose three-arm aerial manipulator system. Advanced Robotics. 2021; 35(1): 31–47. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2020.1845237

[10]Li L, Zhang T, Zhong H, et al. Autonomous Removing Foreign Objects for Power Transmission Line by Using a Vision-Guided Unmanned Aerial Manipulator. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2021; 103(2): 23. doi: 10.1007/s10846-021-01482-3

[11]Zhang Z, Chen Y, Wu Y, et al. Gliding grasping analysis and hybrid force/position control for unmanned aerial manipulator system. ISA Transactions. 2022; 126: 377–387. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.07.038

[12]Meng X, He Y, Han J. Hybrid Force/Motion Control and Implementation of an Aerial Manipulator towards Sustained Contact Operations. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 3–8 November 2019; Macau, China. pp. 3678–3683. doi: 10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967808

[13]Wang T, Umemoto K, Endo T, et al. Modeling and Control of a Quadrotor UAV Equipped With a Flexible Arm in Vertical Plane. IEEE Access. 2021; 9: 98476–98489. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3095536

[14]Khanmirza E, Daneshjou K, Ravandi AK. Underactuated Flexible Aerial Manipulators: a New Framework for Optimal Trajectory Planning Under Constraints Induced by Complex Dynamics. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2018; 92(3–4): 599–613. doi: 10.1007/s10846-017-0711-6

[15]Orozco Soto SM, Lippiello V. Increasing Horizontal Controlled Force Delivery Capabilities of Aerial Manipulators by Leveraging the Environment. Robotics. 2024; 13(10): 147. doi: 10.3390/robotics13100147

[16]Acosta JÁ, De Cos CR, Ollero A. Accurate control of Aerial Manipulators outdoors. A reliable and self-coordinated nonlinear approach. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2020; 99: 105731. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105731

[17]Ikeda T, Ohara K, Ichikawa A, et al. Aerial Manipulator Control Method Based on Generalized Jacobian. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics. 2021; 33(2): 231–241. doi: 10.20965/jrm.2021.p0231

[18]Lee D, Seo H, Jang I, et al. Aerial Manipulator Pushing a Movable Structure Using a DOB-Based Robust Controller. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2021; 6(2): 723–730. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3047779

[19]Nava G, Sable Q, Tognon M, et al. Direct Force Feedback Control and Online Multi-Task Optimization for Aerial Manipulators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2020; 5(2): 331–338. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2958473

[20]Fang Q, Mao P. Compliant Contact Force Control for Aerial Manipulator of Adaptive Neural Network-Based Robust Control. Sensors. 2024; 24(8): 2556. doi: 10.3390/s24082556

[21]Zhang G, He Y, Dai B, et al. Aerial Grasping of an Object in the Strong Wind: Robust Control of an Aerial Manipulator. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(11): 2230. doi: 10.3390/app9112230

[22]Liu Y-C, Huang C-Y. DDPG-Based Adaptive Robust Tracking Control for Aerial Manipulators With Decoupling Approach. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2022; 52(8): 8258–8271. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3049555

[23]Jiao R, Chou W, Rong Y, et al. Anti-Disturbance Control for Quadrotor UAV Manipulator Attitude System Based on Fuzzy Adaptive Saturation Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Observer. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(11): 3719. doi: 10.3390/app10113719

[24]Bodie K, Tognon M, Siegwart R. Dynamic End Effector Tracking With an Omnidirectional Parallel Aerial Manipulator. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2021; 6(4): 8165–8172. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3101864

[25]Malczyk G, Brunner M, Cuniato E, et al. Multi-directional Interaction Force Control with an Aerial Manipulator Under External Disturbances. Autonomous Robots. 2023; 47(8): 1325–1343. doi: 10.1007/s10514-023-10128-2

[26]Tang Y, Duan Z, Xu F, et al. Probabilistic Model of Random Equivalent Static Wind Loads on Transmission Line Cables Under Strong Winds. Engineering Mechanics. 2024; 41(1): 124–137.

[27]Desai YM, Yu P, Popplewell N, et al. Finite element modelling of transmission line galloping. Computers & Structures. 1995; 57(3): 407–420. doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00630-L

[28]Alhassan AB, Zhang X, Shen H, et al. Precise Motion Control of a Power Line Inspection Robot Using Hybrid Time Delay and State Feedback Control. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2022; 9: 746991. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.746991