Audio signal approximation and fuzzy logic-based acoustic noise-risk assessment using Fourier–Dirichlet analysis and hyperbolic series representations

  • Yogeesh Nijalingappa orcid

    Department of Mathematics, Government First Grade College, Tumkur 572102, India; Mathematics & Natural Sciences, Gulf University for Science & Technology, Hawalli 32093, Kuwait; Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Asokan Vasudevan orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Soon Eu Hui orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Zetty Pakir Mastan orcid

    Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Choo Wou Onn

    International Relations and Collaborations Centre, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Mohammed Almakki orcid

    School of Engineering, Architecture and Interior Design, Amity University Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 345019, United Arab Emirates

Article ID: 4180
Keywords: Fourier series; Dirichlet conditions; audio signal approximation; hyperbolic series; fuzzy logic; acoustic noise-risk assessment; Mamdani fuzzy inference; harmonic analysis

Abstract

This paper presents an acoustics-oriented study that combines classical Fourier–Dirichlet signal approximation with a fuzzy logic-based noise-risk interpretation layer. The harmonic-analysis part revisits Fourier series for periodic and quasi-periodic audio waveforms under classical Dirichlet conditions and restates these conditions in a form that is practically checkable on sampled audio segments; no new convergence theorem is claimed. A complementary hyperbolic-series representation is used as an illustrative analytical tool for discussing compact representations of selected waveform classes. The applied contribution of the paper is a Mamdani fuzzy inference system that converts uncertain acoustic measurements into an interpretable Noise-Risk Index using A-weighted equivalent sound level, daily exposure duration, and source–receiver distance. The fuzzy model uses triangular/trapezoidal memberships, an interpretable rule base, min–max inference, and centroid defuzzification. To show the practical usefulness in sound and vibration practice, one waveform-reconstruction example and a twelve-scenario acoustic-risk dataset with regard to traffic, workshop, generator room, and public address contexts are reported in the study. The resulting fuzzy system generates a range of risk scores from 22 to 92, lying within the safe, caution, high, and critical level categories and depicts smooth transitions as we approach decision boundaries where a crisp threshold can often be challenging to decode. This work thus establishes Fourier analysis as the underlying level for acoustic signals and fuzzy inference as a decision-support level in the context of uncertainty-based exposure assessment. The current coupling is linear instead of feature-driven: the Fourier-based signal description forms the basis for exposure descriptors, and the fuzzy system processes these descriptors given uncertainty.

Published
2026-07-24
How to Cite
Nijalingappa, Y., Vasudevan, A., Hui, S. E., Mastan, Z. P., Onn, C. W., & Almakki, M. (2026). Audio signal approximation and fuzzy logic-based acoustic noise-risk assessment using Fourier–Dirichlet analysis and hyperbolic series representations. Sound & Vibration, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4180

References

[1]Khan D, Burdzik R. Measurement and analysis of transport noise and vibration: A review of techniques, case studies, and future directions. Measurement. 2023; 220: 113354. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113354

[2]Alharbi F, Luo S, Zhang H, et al. A Brief Review of Acoustic and Vibration Signal-Based Fault Detection for Belt Conveyor Idlers Using Machine Learning Models. Sensors. 2023; 23(4): 1902. doi: 10.3390/s23041902

[3]Nawrocki W, Stryjski R, Kostrzewski M, et al. Application of the vibro-acoustic signal to evaluate wear in the spindle bearings of machining centres. In-service diagnostics in the automotive industry. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2023; 92: 165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.036

[4]Wang X, Mao D, Li X. Bearing fault diagnosis based on vibro-acoustic data fusion and 1D-CNN network. Measurement. 2021; 173: 108518. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108518

[5]Tran T, Pham NT, Lundgren J. A deep learning approach for detecting drill bit failures from a small sound dataset. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12(1): 9623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13237-7

[6]Batko W, Radziszewski L, Bąkowski A. A Scalar Measure of Acoustic Hazard Assessment. Archives of Acoustics. 2024; 299–306. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2024.148793

[7]Morillas JMB, González DM, Vílchez-Gómez R, et al. Estimation of the Occurrence and Significance of Noise Effects on Pedestrians Using Acoustic Variables Related to Sound Energy in Urban Environments. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(23): 11212. doi: 10.3390/app142311212

[8]Tsaligopoulos A, Aletta F, Maracchini G, et al. Rethinking environmental noise assessment through a noise footprint framework. Noise Mapping. 2025; 12(1): 20250019. doi: 10.1515/noise-2025-0019

[9]Torres-Cobo L, Alcázar-Espinoza J, Vinueza-Morales M, et al. Occupational noise in the university setting: dosimetric assessment and strategies for exposure reduction. Frontiers in Public Health. 2025; 13: 1581677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1581677

[10]Asensio C, Pavón I, De Arcas G. A methodological framework for urban noise exposure assessment exploiting citizen itineraries and environmental noise maps. Applied Acoustics. 2026; 242: 111114. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.111114

[11]Ranpise RB, Tandel BN. Urban road traffic noise monitoring, mapping, modelling, and mitigation: A thematic review. Noise Mapping. 2022; 9(1): 48–66. doi: 10.1515/noise-2022-0004

[12]Weidenfeld S, Sanok S, Fimmers R, et al. Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(9): 4647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094647

[13]Fernández LPS. Environmental noise indicators and acoustic indexes based on fuzzy modelling for urban spaces. Ecological Indicators. 2021; 126: 107631. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107631

[14]Fernandez-Prieto JA, Canada-Bago J, Birkel U. A Fuzzy Rule-Based System to Infer Subjective Noise Annoyance Using an Experimental Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network. Smart Cities. 2022; 5(4): 1574–1589. doi: 10.3390/smartcities5040080

[15]Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8(3): 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

[16]Mamdani EH, Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1975; 7(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2

[17]Ross TJ. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.

[18]Cox E. The Fuzzy Systems Handbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Building, Using, Maintaining Fuzzy Systems. AP Professional; 1994.

[19]Courant R, Hilbert D. Methods of Mathematical Physics. Wiley; 1989. doi: 10.1002/9783527617210

[20]Bracewell RN. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill; 2000.

[21]Luenberger DG. Optimization by Vector Space Methods. Wiley; 2015.

[22]Strang G. Introduction to Applied Mathematics. Wellesley-Cambridge Press; 1993.

[23]Folland GB. Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 1999.

[24]Rudin W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill; 2006.

[25]Goodman R, Wallach NR. Representations and Invariants of the Classical Groups. Cambridge University Press; 1998.

[26]Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2007.

[27]Rao SS. Vibration of Continuous Systems, 1st ed. Wiley; 2019. doi: 10.1002/9781119424284

[28]Yadav M, Tandel B. Work Efficiency Prediction of Persons Working in Traffic Noise Environment Using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Models. Archives of Acoustics. 2021; 677–683. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2021.139644

[29]Mahapatra TK, Satapathy S, Panda SK. Evaluation and prediction of impact of noise on a worker in noisy environment by using ANFIS model. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 2024; 15(3): 1172–1182. doi: 10.1007/s13198-023-02198-3

[30]International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1999:2013: Acoustics—Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. International Organization for Standardization; 2013. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/45103.html

[31]Sahu AK, Nayak SK, Mohanty CR, et al. Traffic Noise and its Impact on Wellness of the Residents in Sambalpur City – a Critical Analysis. Archives of Acoustics. 2021; 353–363. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2021.136588

[32]Cudjoe FA, Opoku DA, Ayisi-Boateng NK, et al. Health effects of occupational noise exposure on heavy-duty equipment operators and exposed workers in a mining firm in Ghana. PLOS One. 2025; 20(9): e0332600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332600

Most read articles by the same author(s)