Audio signal approximation and fuzzy logic-based acoustic noise-risk assessment using Fourier–Dirichlet analysis and hyperbolic series representations
Abstract
This paper presents an acoustics-oriented study that combines classical Fourier–Dirichlet signal approximation with a fuzzy logic-based noise-risk interpretation layer. The harmonic-analysis part revisits Fourier series for periodic and quasi-periodic audio waveforms under classical Dirichlet conditions and restates these conditions in a form that is practically checkable on sampled audio segments; no new convergence theorem is claimed. A complementary hyperbolic-series representation is used as an illustrative analytical tool for discussing compact representations of selected waveform classes. The applied contribution of the paper is a Mamdani fuzzy inference system that converts uncertain acoustic measurements into an interpretable Noise-Risk Index using A-weighted equivalent sound level, daily exposure duration, and source–receiver distance. The fuzzy model uses triangular/trapezoidal memberships, an interpretable rule base, min–max inference, and centroid defuzzification. To show the practical usefulness in sound and vibration practice, one waveform-reconstruction example and a twelve-scenario acoustic-risk dataset with regard to traffic, workshop, generator room, and public address contexts are reported in the study. The resulting fuzzy system generates a range of risk scores from 22 to 92, lying within the safe, caution, high, and critical level categories and depicts smooth transitions as we approach decision boundaries where a crisp threshold can often be challenging to decode. This work thus establishes Fourier analysis as the underlying level for acoustic signals and fuzzy inference as a decision-support level in the context of uncertainty-based exposure assessment. The current coupling is linear instead of feature-driven: the Fourier-based signal description forms the basis for exposure descriptors, and the fuzzy system processes these descriptors given uncertainty.
Copyright (c) 2026 Yogeesh Nijalingappa, Asokan Vasudevan, Soon Eu Hui, Zetty Pakir Mastan, Choo Wou Onn, Mohammed Almakki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Khan D, Burdzik R. Measurement and analysis of transport noise and vibration: A review of techniques, case studies, and future directions. Measurement. 2023; 220: 113354. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113354
[2]Alharbi F, Luo S, Zhang H, et al. A Brief Review of Acoustic and Vibration Signal-Based Fault Detection for Belt Conveyor Idlers Using Machine Learning Models. Sensors. 2023; 23(4): 1902. doi: 10.3390/s23041902
[3]Nawrocki W, Stryjski R, Kostrzewski M, et al. Application of the vibro-acoustic signal to evaluate wear in the spindle bearings of machining centres. In-service diagnostics in the automotive industry. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2023; 92: 165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.036
[4]Wang X, Mao D, Li X. Bearing fault diagnosis based on vibro-acoustic data fusion and 1D-CNN network. Measurement. 2021; 173: 108518. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108518
[5]Tran T, Pham NT, Lundgren J. A deep learning approach for detecting drill bit failures from a small sound dataset. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12(1): 9623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13237-7
[6]Batko W, Radziszewski L, Bąkowski A. A Scalar Measure of Acoustic Hazard Assessment. Archives of Acoustics. 2024; 299–306. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2024.148793
[7]Morillas JMB, González DM, Vílchez-Gómez R, et al. Estimation of the Occurrence and Significance of Noise Effects on Pedestrians Using Acoustic Variables Related to Sound Energy in Urban Environments. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(23): 11212. doi: 10.3390/app142311212
[8]Tsaligopoulos A, Aletta F, Maracchini G, et al. Rethinking environmental noise assessment through a noise footprint framework. Noise Mapping. 2025; 12(1): 20250019. doi: 10.1515/noise-2025-0019
[9]Torres-Cobo L, Alcázar-Espinoza J, Vinueza-Morales M, et al. Occupational noise in the university setting: dosimetric assessment and strategies for exposure reduction. Frontiers in Public Health. 2025; 13: 1581677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1581677
[10]Asensio C, Pavón I, De Arcas G. A methodological framework for urban noise exposure assessment exploiting citizen itineraries and environmental noise maps. Applied Acoustics. 2026; 242: 111114. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.111114
[11]Ranpise RB, Tandel BN. Urban road traffic noise monitoring, mapping, modelling, and mitigation: A thematic review. Noise Mapping. 2022; 9(1): 48–66. doi: 10.1515/noise-2022-0004
[12]Weidenfeld S, Sanok S, Fimmers R, et al. Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(9): 4647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094647
[13]Fernández LPS. Environmental noise indicators and acoustic indexes based on fuzzy modelling for urban spaces. Ecological Indicators. 2021; 126: 107631. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107631
[14]Fernandez-Prieto JA, Canada-Bago J, Birkel U. A Fuzzy Rule-Based System to Infer Subjective Noise Annoyance Using an Experimental Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network. Smart Cities. 2022; 5(4): 1574–1589. doi: 10.3390/smartcities5040080
[15]Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8(3): 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[16]Mamdani EH, Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1975; 7(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
[17]Ross TJ. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
[18]Cox E. The Fuzzy Systems Handbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Building, Using, Maintaining Fuzzy Systems. AP Professional; 1994.
[19]Courant R, Hilbert D. Methods of Mathematical Physics. Wiley; 1989. doi: 10.1002/9783527617210
[20]Bracewell RN. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill; 2000.
[21]Luenberger DG. Optimization by Vector Space Methods. Wiley; 2015.
[22]Strang G. Introduction to Applied Mathematics. Wellesley-Cambridge Press; 1993.
[23]Folland GB. Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
[24]Rudin W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill; 2006.
[25]Goodman R, Wallach NR. Representations and Invariants of the Classical Groups. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
[26]Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2007.
[27]Rao SS. Vibration of Continuous Systems, 1st ed. Wiley; 2019. doi: 10.1002/9781119424284
[28]Yadav M, Tandel B. Work Efficiency Prediction of Persons Working in Traffic Noise Environment Using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Models. Archives of Acoustics. 2021; 677–683. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2021.139644
[29]Mahapatra TK, Satapathy S, Panda SK. Evaluation and prediction of impact of noise on a worker in noisy environment by using ANFIS model. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 2024; 15(3): 1172–1182. doi: 10.1007/s13198-023-02198-3
[30]International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1999:2013: Acoustics—Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. International Organization for Standardization; 2013. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/45103.html
[31]Sahu AK, Nayak SK, Mohanty CR, et al. Traffic Noise and its Impact on Wellness of the Residents in Sambalpur City – a Critical Analysis. Archives of Acoustics. 2021; 353–363. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2021.136588
[32]Cudjoe FA, Opoku DA, Ayisi-Boateng NK, et al. Health effects of occupational noise exposure on heavy-duty equipment operators and exposed workers in a mining firm in Ghana. PLOS One. 2025; 20(9): e0332600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332600




