Study on influencing factors of ultrasonic testing for lead seal defects in high-voltage cables

Peng He
China Southern Power Grid Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China
Jian Cheng
China Southern Power Grid Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China
Fengyin Zhang
China Southern Power Grid Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China
Lianbing Wang
China Southern Power Grid Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China
Cen Qian
China Southern Power Grid Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China

Article ID: 4154

Keywords: cable accessories; lead seals; ultrasonic phased array; defect detection; influencing factors

Abstract

Lead seals are critical sealing and protective components of high-voltage cable terminations, and their structural integrity directly determines the safe and stable operation of urban power transmission systems. Conventional non-destructive testing methods face inherent limitations such as low penetration depth and susceptibility to heat-shrinkable protective layers, making ultrasonic phased array technology a promising alternative for lead-seal defect detection. However, imaging quality is often severely degraded by practical factors encountered in complex field inspection environments. This study systematically investigates the effects of coupling condition, surface roughness, and surface curvature on ultrasonic imaging performance for lead-seal defects. Three groups of controlled comparative experiments were conducted using artificially fabricated lead-seal specimens with predefined internal defects, varying surface roughness levels, and different curvature radii. A dedicated ultrasonic phased array testing platform equipped with a 5 MHz, 16-element probe was established to quantitatively evaluate imaging quality through metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and bottom-wave amplitude. The results show that the improved flexible film coupling device provides significantly better imaging quality than the conventional rigid wedge, with 28.5% higher SNR and 27.8% higher CNR. In addition, increased surface roughness enhances diffuse reflection and reduces echo coherence, while surface curvature introduces spatial phase deviations that weaken bottom-wave response and increase defect interpretation difficulty. These findings provide essential experimental evidence and practical guidance for optimizing field inspection protocols and improving the reliability of ultrasonic testing for high-voltage cable lead seals.

Published

2026-07-14

How to Cite

He, P., Cheng, J., Zhang, F., Wang, L., & Qian, C. (2026). Study on influencing factors of ultrasonic testing for lead seal defects in high-voltage cables. Sound & Vibration, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4154

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 60 No. 4 (2026)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Fang CH, Hu JZ, Tao YN, et al. Ultrasonic phased array flexible coupling detection of defects in high-voltage cable termination seals. High Voltage Technology. 2022; 48(1): 29–37. (in Chinese)

[2]Fang CH, Zhou G, Rao D, et al. Quantitative ultrasonic detection of sealing defects in high-voltage cable accessories. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation. 2024; 38(6): 125–134. (in Chinese)

[3]Cao JP, Wang SH, Ren GZ, et al. Experimental validation and application of eddy current flaw detection method for lead seals of high voltage cable accessories. High Voltage Technology. 2018; 44(11): 3720–3726. (in Chinese)

[4]Wu ZR, Wu JT, Li ZJ. Fault diagnosis method of cable terminal grounding system based on metal sheath current and voltage. Electrotechnology. 2025; (3): 138–141,145. (in Chinese)

[5]Fang CH, Zhou G, Shao B, et al. Ultrasonic image convolutional neural network identification of defects in high-voltage cable terminal seals. Applied Acoustics. 2025; 44(1): 80–87. (in Chinese)

[6]Zhang J, Drinkwater B, Wilcox P. Effect of roughness on imaging and sizing rough crack-like defects using ultrasonic arrays. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 2012; 59(5): 939–948. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2278

[7]McKee JG, Wilcox PD, Malkin RE. Effect of surface compensation for imaging through doubly-curved surfaces using a 2D phased array. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; 5–19 July 2018; Burlington, VT, USA. p. 100008. doi: 10.1063/1.5099836

[8]Rodrigues Filho JFM, Bélanger P. Probe Standoff Optimization Method for Phased Array Ultrasonic TFM Imaging of Curved Parts. Sensors. 2021; 21(19): 6665. doi: 10.3390/s21196665.

[9]Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD. Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review. NDT & E International. 2006; 39(7): 525–541. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.006

[10]Holmes C, Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD. Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation. NDT & E International. 2005; 38(8): 701–711. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002

[11]Mahaut S, Roy O, Beroni C, et al. Development of phased array techniques to improve characterization of defect located in a component of complex geometry. Ultrasonics. 2002; 40(1–8): 165–169. doi: 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00131-2

[12]Sun X, Drinkwater BW, Croxford AJ. Continuous monitoring with a permanently installed high-resolution ultrasonic phased array. Structural Health Monitoring. 2023; 22(5): 3451–3464. doi: 10.1177/14759217231152413.

[13]Lei X, Wirdelius H, Rosell A. Simulation-Based Investigation of a Probability of Detection (POD) Model Using Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) Technique. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation. 2022; 41(2): 40. doi: 10.1007/s10921-022-00873-2.

[14]Hunter AJ, Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD. Autofocusing ultrasonic imagery for non-destructive testing and evaluation of specimens with complicated geometries. NDT & E International. 2010; 43(2): 78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.09.001

[15]Huggett DJ, Dewan MW, Wahab MA, et al. Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing for Post-Weld and OnLine Detection of Friction Stir Welding Defects. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation. 2017; 28(4): 187–210. doi: 10.1080/09349847.2016.1157660

[16]Chatillon S, Cattiaux G, Serre M, et al. Ultrasonic non-destructive testing of pieces of complex geometry with a flexible phased array transducer. Ultrasonics. 2000; 38(1–8): 131–134. doi: 10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00181-X

[17]Schmerr LW. Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer; 2016.

[18]Nicolson E, Mohseni E, Lines D, Tant KMM, Pierce G, MacLeod CN. Towards an in-process ultrasonic phased array inspection method for narrow-gap welds. NDT & E International. 2024; 144: 103074. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103074.

[19]Yamada T, Ohara Y, Ulrich TJ, et al. High-resolution 3D ultrasonic imaging using high-frequency piezoelectric transmitter and ultra-multiple laser 2D scanning. NDT & E International. 2024; 146: 103178. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103178

[20]Prada C, Thomas JL, Fink M. The iterative time reversal process: Analysis of the convergence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1995; 97(1): 62–71. doi: 10.1121/1.412285

[21]Wilcox P, Lowe M, Cawley P. The effect of dispersion on long-range inspection using ultrasonic guided waves. NDT & E International. 2001; 34(1): 1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00024-4

[22]Lowe MJS, Cawley P, Kao JY, et al. The low frequency reflection characteristics of the fundamental antisymmetric Lamb wave a0 from a rectangular notch in a plate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2002; 112(6): 2612–2622. doi: 10.1121/1.1512702

[23]Rose JL. Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media. Cambridge University Press; 2014.

[24]Krautkrämer J, Krautkrämer H. Ultrasonic Testing of Materials. Springer-Verlag; 1990.

[25]Saini A, Lane CJL, Tu J, et al. 3D ultrasonic imaging of surface-breaking cracks using a linear array. Ultrasonics. 2022; 125: 106790. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106790

[26]Silk MG. Ultrasonic Transducers for Nondestructive Testing. Adam Hilger; 1984.

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Jun Yang

Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

ISSN

1541-0161 (Print)

2693-1443 (Online)

Publication Frequency

Bi-monthly

Indexing

Web of Science Coverage

Emerging Sources Citation Index (IF 4.2, Q1)

Elsevier Solutions

Scopus (2025 CiteScore 2.0);

Portico, etc.

About the Publisher

Academic Publishing insists on taking academic exchange and publication as the main line, carrying out comprehensive management based on science and technology, and fully exploring excellent international publishing resources. Within 5 years, it will form a strategic framework and scale with science (S), technology (T), medicine (M), education (E), and humanities and arts (H) as the main publishing fields. Academic Publishing is headquartered in Singapore and based in Malaysia, with the United States and China providing the main scientific and academic resources. At the same time, it has established long-term good cooperative relations with other publishing companies, scientific research communities, and academic organizations in more than a dozen countries and regions. Academic Publishing uses English and Chinese as its main publishing languages, mainly publishing books, journals, and conference papers in print and online. The vast majority of publications follow the international open access policy, providing stable and long-term quality and professional publications. With the joint efforts of the expert team and our professional editorial team, our publications will gradually be indexed by international databases in stages to provide convenient and professional retrieval for various scholars. At the same time, manuscripts we accept will be subject to the peer review principle, and cutting-edge and innovative research articles will be preferentially accepted for peer reference and discussion. All kinds of our publications are welcome for peer to contribute, access, and download.

more

Member of ASC

Volume Arrangement

Featured Articles

New scaling of critical damping and reduced frequency for mechanically excited systems

This paper introduces a universal framework for understanding the vibration responses of systems subjected to harmonic excitation. By examining a simplified cylinder-spring-damper model, the study refurbishes traditional scaling methods for the excitation frequency ratio and critical damping ratio. The findings indicate that in damped systems, the maximum amplitude of vibration does not align with the natural frequency. This observation leads to the introduction of a new scaling method for reduced frequency. This new approach aligns resonance peaks at the new reduced velocity of 1.0 across different damping ratios, providing a consistent characterization of vibration behavior. A new critical damping ratio of 0.707 is identified for an excited system as opposed to the traditional damping ratio of 1.0 for an unexcited system. Key properties such as maximum amplitude, phase lag, bandwidth, and quality factor are analyzed, demonstrating that the proposed reduced frequency and critical damping ratio effectively capture the dynamics of both damped and undamped excited systems. The findings offer significant insights for practical applications in engineering and various scientific fields.

Ultrasonic wave velocity as a universal metric for defect detection in timber structures: A case study on Japanese cedar wood (Cryptomeria japonica)

This study makes significant contributions to the field of ultrasonic testing (UT) by offering a novel approach to the identification of artificially introduced defects within Japanese cedar wood (Cryptomeria japonica). The findings are of particular relevance for the heritage conservation and construction sectors, where non-invasive defect detection is paramount. The study establishes a robust framework for assessing the structural integrity of timber by correlating ultrasonic wave velocity reductions with defect size and distribution. Big-sized defects led to more substantial decreases in wave velocity. The study establishes a robust framework for assessing the structural integrity of historical timber by correlating ultrasonic wave velocity reductions with defect size and distribution. This framework has the potential to be applicable to diverse wood species and defect types.

Vehicle structural road noise prediction based on an improved Long Short-Term Memory method

The control of vehicle interior noise has become a critical metric for assessing noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) in vehicles. During the initial phases of vehicle development, accurately predicting the impact of road noise on interior noise is essential for reducing noise levels and expediting the product development cycle. In recent years, data-driven methods based on machine learning have gained significant attention due to their robust capability in navigating complex data mapping relationships. Notably, surrogate models have demonstrated exceptional performance in this domain. Numerous researchers have integrated diverse intelligent algorithms into the study of vehicle noise, leveraging advantages such as the elimination of precise modeling requirements, extensive solution space exploration, continuous learning from data, and robust algorithmic versatility. However, in NVH engineering applications, data-driven models face inherent limitations, particularly in interpretability and stability. To address these issues, this paper introduces an improved Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network that combines knowledge and data. Inspired by the physical information neural network concept, this approach incorporates values calculated through empirical formulas into the neural network as constraints. Comparative assessments with traditional LSTM networks highlight the advantages of this deep learning model. By integrating empirical formulas constraints, the model not only enhances interpretability but also achieves robust generalization with fewer data samples. The proposed method is validated on a specific vehicle model, showing significant improvements in prediction accuracy and efficiency.